Investigation of the Mechanism of Therapeutic Protein-Drug Interaction Between Methotrexate and Golimumab, an Anti-TNFα Monoclonal Antibody

Therapeutic Protein Drug Interactions: A White Paper From the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development

Typically, therapeutic proteins (TPs) have a low risk for eliciting meaningful drug interactions (DIs). However, there are select instances where TP drug interactions (TP-DIs) of clinical concern can occur. This white paper discusses the various types of TP-DIs involving mechanisms such as changes in disease state, target-mediated drug disposition, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), or antidrug antibodies formation. The nature of TP drug interaction being investigated should determine whether the examination is conducted as a standalone TP-DI study in healthy participants, in patients, or assessed via population pharmacokinetic analysis. DIs involving antibody-drug conjugates are discussed briefly, but the primary focus here will be DIs involving cytokine modulation. Cytokine modulation can occur directly by certain TPs, or indirectly due to moderate to severe inflammation, infection, or injury. Disease states that have been shown to result in indirect disease-DIs that are clinically meaningful have been listed (i.e., typically a twofold change in the systemic exposure of a coadministered sensitive cytochrome P450 substrate drug). Type of disease and severity of inflammation should be the primary drivers for risk assessment for disease-DIs. While more clinical inflammatory marker data needs to be collected, the use of two or more clinical inflammatory markers (such as C-reactive protein, albumin, or interleukin 6) may help broadly categorize whether the predicted magnitude of inflammatory disease-DI risk is negligible, weak, or moderate to strong. Based on current knowledge, clinical DI studies are not necessary for all TPs, and should no longer be conducted in certain disease patient populations such as psoriasis, which do not have sufficient systemic inflammation to cause a meaningful indirect disease-DI.

Delanzomib, a Novel Proteasome Inhibitor, Combined With Adalimumab Drastically Ameliorates Collagen-Induced Arthritis in Rats by Improving and Prolonging the Anti-TNF-α Effect of Adalimumab

Delanzomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor initially developed for treating multiple myeloma. It was found to inhibit the expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). This study aimed to investigate the ameliorating effect of delanzomib on collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) and to explore the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics (PK) interactions between delanzomib and adalimumab. Rats with CIA were randomly assigned to receive the treatment with delanzomib, adalimumab, delanzomib combined with adalimumab, or placebo. Visual inspection and biochemical examinations including TNF-α, interleukin 6, and C-reactive protein were performed to assess arthritis severity during the treatment. The adalimumab concentration in rats was determined to evaluate the PK interaction between delanzomib and adalimumab. Also, the levels of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) and FcRn mRNA were measured to explore the role of FcRn in the PK interaction between delanzomib and adalimumab. As a result, delanzomib combined with adalimumab exhibited stronger anti-arthritis activity than a single drug because both drugs synergistically reduced TNF-α level in vivo. Delanzomib also decreased adalimumab elimination in rats by increasing the level of FcRn. The slower elimination of adalimumab in rats further prolonged the anti-TNF-α effect of adalimumab. Moreover, FcRn level was increased by delanzomib via suppressing FcRn degradation rather than promoting FcRn production. In conclusion, delanzomib combined with adalimumab may be a potential therapeutic approach for treating rheumatoid arthritis. The initial finding that the PK interaction occurred between delanzomib and adalimumab may have clinical relevance for patients who simultaneously take proteasome inhibitors and anti-TNF-α therapeutic proteins.

A minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to characterize colon TNF suppression and treatment effects of an anti-TNF monoclonal antibody in a mouse inflammatory bowel disease model

Biotherapeutic drugs against tumor necrosis factor (TNF) are effective treatments for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here, we evaluated CNTO 5048, an antimurine TNF surrogate monoclonal antibody (mAb), in a CD45RB^high adoptive T cell transfer mouse colitis model, which allows examination of the early immunological events associated with gut inflammation and the therapeutic effects. The study was designed to quantitatively understand the effects of IBD on CNTO 5048 disposition, the ability of CNTO 5048 to neutralize pathogenic TNF at the colon under disease conditions, and the impact of dosing regimen on CNTO 5048 treatment effect. CNTO 5048 and TNF concentrations in both mice serum and colon homogenate were also measured. Free TNF concentrations in colon, but not in serum, were shown to correlate well with the colon pharmacodynamic readout, such as the summed histopathology score and neutrophil score. A minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model was developed to characterize CNTO 5048 PK and disposition, as well as colon soluble TNF target engagement (TE). The mPBPK/TE model reasonably captured the observed data and provided a quantitative understanding of an anti-TNF mAb on its colon TNF suppression and therapeutic effect in a physiologically relevant IBD animal model. These results also provided insights into the potential benefits of using induction doses for the treatment of IBD patients.

Impact of immunogenicity on clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of biologic agents used for treatment of inflammatory arthritis in children compared to adults

The treatment of inflammatory arthritis has been revolutionised by the introduction of biologic treatments. Many biologic agents are currently licensed for use in both paediatric and adult patients with inflammatory arthritis and contribute to improved disease outcomes compared with the pre-biologic era. However, immunogenicity to biologic agents, characterised by an immune reaction leading to the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), can negatively impact the therapeutic efficacy of biologic drugs and induce side effects to treatment. This review explores for the first time the impact of immunogenicity against all licensed biologic treatments currently used in inflammatory arthritis across age, and will examine any significant differences between ADA prevalence, titres and timing of development, as well as ADA impact on therapeutic drug levels, clinical efficacy and side effects between paediatric and adult patients. In addition, we will investigate factors associated with differences in immunogenicity across biologic agents used in inflammatory arthritis, and their potential therapeutic implications.

Head-to-Head Comparison of Etanercept vs. Adalimumab in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Crossover Clinical Trial

Background: Anti-tumor necrosis factor biological agents had been proved to have a dramatic effect in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of crossover effects of adalimumab vs. etanercept in AS patients.

Methods: A randomized, open-label crossover study was done in patients with active AS. Patients were randomized into two sequence groups, etanercept first (treatment arm) vs. adalimumab first (control arm) 8 weeks and then switched over for another 8 weeks. The primary endpoints were the difference of the Bath AS activity index and AS disease activity score (ASDAS)crp at week 16. Secondary endpoints were ASDASesr, ASAS20, and ASAS40 response rates and the proportion of patients achieving ASDAS inactive disease and low disease activity at weeks 8 and 16. Patient global assessment and preference was grading on a numerical scale.

Results: A total of 21 patients were screened, and 19 of them were randomly allocated into the treatment arm (n = 9) and control arm (n = 9). At baseline, age, sex, Bath AS activity index, and ASDAS of both arms were comparable (p > 0.05). Both arms showed dramatic improvement, whereas no significance was observed between the changes of ASDAScrp (0.90 ± 1.39 vs. 1.24 ± 1.40 at week 8, p = 0.612; 1.02 ± 1.22 vs. 1.26 ± 1.44 at week 16, p = 0.707, respectively). ASAS20 and ASAS40 response rates were also comparable at week 8 (33 vs. 44%, p = 1.000; 22 vs. 22%, p = 1.000) and week 16 (22 vs. 22%, p = 1.000; 22 vs. 22%, p = 1.000), respectively. Both arms were well-tolerated without a serious adverse event. Adalimumab was relatively more favorable by patients in both arms, with a total mean grading score of 0.4 (−5–5, p = 0.218).

Conclusion: Etanercept and adalimumab can both dramatically improve disease activity in 16 weeks. Crossover administration of etanercept and adalimumab revealed comparable efficacy and safety.

Trial Registration: The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board with the register CS08019 from Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (CSMUH), Taichung, Taiwan and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System: NCT02489760.

Increased Induction Infliximab Clearance Predicts Early Antidrug Antibody Detection

Treatment of patients with biologics such as infliximab may trigger development of antidrug antibodies, which are associated with faster drug clearance, reduced treatment efficacy, and increased risk of infusion‐related reactions. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of baseline infliximab clearance and early antidrug antibody formation. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models for infliximab were developed using 21 178 observations from 859 patients from the PLANETRA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01217086) and PLANETAS (NCT01220518) studies in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, respectively, to address the specified aims. Infliximab pharmacokinetics were well described by a 2‐compartment model with linear mean estimated baseline clearance of 0.26 L/day. Alongside increased body weight, serum C‐reactive protein, and antidrug antibody concentrations and decreased serum albumin, elevated serum glucose levels predicted higher clearance. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, baseline infliximab clearance and body weight were the only identified predictors of early antidrug antibody detection. The odds ratio for antidrug antibody detection for each 0.1 L/day increase in baseline infliximab clearance was 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.50–2.12); for each 10‐kg increase in body weight, this was 1.19 (1.06–1.33). Here we describe increased serum glucose levels as a novel independent predictor of baseline infliximab clearance. Estimates of baseline infliximab clearance should be incorporated to guide dosing modifications and/or antidrug antibody prophylaxis in clinical practice.

Exposure-Response Relationship of Certolizumab Pegol and Achievement of Low Disease Activity and Remission in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs are often prescribed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Although this treatment has been shown to be effective in many patients, up to 40% of patients do not achieve disease control. Drug concentration in plasma may be a factor affecting the observed variability in therapeutic response. In this study, we aimed to identify the plasma concentrations of the anti-TNF certolizumab pegol (CZP), associated with improvement in disease activity in patients with RA. Data were pooled from three randomized, controlled clinical trials with a combined total of 1,935 patients analyzed. Clinical outcomes of low disease activity (LDA) and remission were defined as Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28(CRP)) ≤ 2.7 and < 2.3, respectively. Quartile analysis results indicated that there may be an exposure-response relationship between CZP concentration and LDA/remission outcomes at weeks 12 and 24; the association was strongest for LDA (P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that CZP concentrations ≥ 28.0 μg/ml at week 12, and ≥ 17.6 μg/ml at week 24, were associated with a greater likelihood of achieving LDA/remission outcomes. Although confirmatory studies are warranted to define the optimal CZP therapeutic range at weeks 12 and 24, these data indicate that CZP concentrations may be associated with improvement of disease activity.

Characterization of concurrent target suppression by JNJ-61178104, a bispecific antibody against human tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-17A

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-17A are pleiotropic cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). JNJ-61178104 is a novel human anti-TNF and anti-IL-17A monovalent, bispecific antibody that binds to both human TNF and human IL-17A with high affinities and blocks the binding of TNF and IL-17A to their receptors in vitro. JNJ-61178104 also potently neutralizes TNF and IL-17A-mediated downstream effects in multiple cell-based assays. In vivo, treatment with JNJ-61178104 resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of cellular influx in a human IL-17A/TNF-induced murine lung neutrophilia model and the inhibitory effects of JNJ-61178104 were more potent than the treatment with bivalent parental anti-TNF or anti-IL-17A antibodies. JNJ-61178104 was shown to engage its targets, TNF and IL-17A, in systemic circulation measured as drug/target complex formation in normal cynomolgus monkeys (cyno). Surprisingly, quantitative target engagement assessment suggested lower apparent in vivo target-binding affinities for JNJ-61178104 compared to its bivalent parental antibodies, despite their similar in vitro target-binding affinities. The target engagement profiles of JNJ-61178104 in humans were in general agreement with the predicted profiles based on cyno data, suggesting similar differences in the apparent in vivo target-binding affinities. These findings show that in vivo target engagement of monovalent bispecific antibody does not necessarily recapitulate that of the molar-equivalent dose of its bivalent parental antibody. Our results also offer valuable insights into the understanding of the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and target engagement of other bispecific biologics against dimeric and/or trimeric soluble targets in vivo.

Clinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment Strategy for a Low Risk Monoclonal Antibody

This article provides a theoretical case-study risk assessment report for a low-risk monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutic. In terms of risk, there are considerations around risks to safety, but also risks regarding effects on pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy. Much of the discussion in this document is around the risk of immunogenicity incidence. A higher incidence of immunogenicity would necessitate a detailed review of the PK, efficacy and safety in anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive and ADA negative subjects, in order to evaluate potential effects. The publication is intended to provide a framework of some the current thought processes around assessing immunogenicity risk and for building strategies to mitigate those risks. For this example, we have created a hypothetical antibody, ABC-123, targeting a membrane protein on antigen presenting cells, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This hypothetical antibody therapeutic is provided as an example for the purposes of risk assessment for a low risk molecule, although any application of similar approach would be case by case.