Quantitative Assessment of Pulmonary Targeting of Inhaled Corticosteroids Using Ex Vivo Receptor Binding Studies

Pharmacology Versus Convenience: A Benefit/Risk Analysis of Regular Maintenance Versus Infrequent or As-Needed Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Mild Asthma

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the bronchoprotective and benefit/risk profiles of various inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dosing regimens in mild asthma.

METHODS

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was developed and validated describing the relationship between ICS dose and time-course for airway bronchoprotection, [provocative concentration of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) causing ≥ 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (AMP PC20)], for fluticasone furoate (FF), fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD). For regular ICS maintenance therapy (100% and 50% adherence) and infrequent or as-needed use (dosing 3-4 times per week), treatment effectiveness was expressed as percent time during 28 days when bronchoprotection exceeded either the threshold for a treatment-related bronchoprotective effect (AMP PC20 ≥ 0.25 doubling dose) or the threshold for a clinically significant bronchoprotective effect (AMP PC20 ≥ 1.0 doubling dose). This value was divided by the total ICS dose administered expressed in prednisolone equivalents to give a therapeutic index (TI).

RESULTS

The model-predicted time course of ICS-induced bronchoprotection with regular daily maintenance dosing and 100% adherence showed that all ICS at the highest recommended doses for mild asthma exceeded the threshold for clinically significant bronchoprotective effect for all or most of the 28-day dosing period, mean (90% CI); 100% (96.1-100), 99.9% (8.0-100) and 100% (58.2-100) with TI values of 16.9, 6.6 and 5.4 for FF 100 µg OD, FP 200 µg BID and BUD 200 µg BID, respectively. For simulated poor adherence (50%) to regular daily maintenance therapy, corresponding mean (90% CI) values were; 75.7% (39.4-89.1), 52.3% (0.7-69.2) and 51.3% (28.6-58.3) with TI values of 25.7, 6.9 and 5.6. For simulated infrequent/as needed use the corresponding values were; 77.0% (37.6-87.0), 25.5% (0.0-38.0) and 26.2% (14.3-31.5) with TI values of 26.1, 6.7 and 5.7. For all regimen/scenarios, FF had the most sustained efficacy and favourable TI followed by FP and BUD.

CONCLUSIONS

At doses recommended for mild asthma, all ICS regimens provide sustained bronchoprotective efficacy when dosed regularly with high adherence. With poor adherence or use 3-4 times per week (infrequent/as needed), longer-acting ICS molecules will more likely provide sustained protection and a better TI versus shorter duration of action molecules (FF > FP ≥ BUD). These data highlight the benefits of using ICS as regular daily maintenance dosing in mild asthma and the potential risks of under-treatment with ICS (which may occur with ICS/formoterol as-needed approach in mild persistent asthma) associated with reduced levels of bronchoprotection.

Semi-mechanistic PK/PD model to assess pulmonary targeting of beclomethasone dipropionate and its active metabolite

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to describe the pulmonary targeting of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and its active metabolite beclomethasone 17-monopropionate (BMP) in rats using a semi-mechanistic PK/PD model.

METHODS

Rat plasma and tissue concentrations of BDP and BMP, and tissue receptor occupancies of BMP after systemic and pulmonary delivery of BDP and BMP were integrated in a newly developed semi-mechanistic PK/PD model.

RESULTS

After IV administration of BDP, 95.4% of BDP was converted to BMP, while after pulmonary delivery of BDP, 46.6% of deposited BDP was absorbed as BMP. The developed semi-mechanistic PK model described plasma and tissue concentrations of BDP and BMP as well as receptor occupancies sufficiently well. The model incorporated dissolution, metabolic activation, and drug absorption processes to describe the local fate of BDP and BMP after systemic and pulmonary delivery. Dissolution rate constants of BDP and BMP were estimated to be 0.47/h and 2.01/h, respectively, and the permeabilities in central lung were estimated to be 15.0 and 2.9 × 10⁶ cm/s for BDP and BMP, respectively. The EC₅₀ of the binding of BMP to to the receptor was estimated to be 0.0017 ng/ml. Overall, receptor occupancies in the lung were more pronounced than those in the systemic circulation after pulmonary delivery of BDP or BMP. Simulations using the developed semi-mechanistic PK/PD model demonstrated that a slow dissolution rate and low permeability can improve pulmonary targeting.

CONCLUSIONS

A semi-mechanistic model was developed to describe the fate of an inhaled glucocorticoid pro-drug and its active metabolite in lung and the systemic circulation, both after pulmonary and systemic administration , thereby facilitating the understanding of the complex interplay between drug, prodrug and pharmacodynamic properties for quantifying the degree pulmonary targeting.

Combined in Vitro-in Silico Approach to Predict Deposition and Pharmacokinetics of Budesonide Dry Powder Inhalers

PURPOSE

A combined in vitro - in silico methodology was designed to estimate pharmacokinetics of budesonide delivered via dry powder inhaler.

METHODS

Particle size distributions from three budesonide DPIs, measured with a Next Generation Impactor and Alberta Idealized Throat, were input into a lung deposition model to predict regional deposition. Subsequent systemic exposure was estimated using a pharmacokinetic model that incorporated Nernst-Brunner dissolution in the conducting airways to predict the net influence of dissolution, mucociliary clearance, and absorption.

RESULTS

DPIs demonstrated significant in vitro differences in deposition, resulting in large differences in simulated regional deposition in the central conducting airways and the alveolar region. Similar but low deposition in the small conducting airways was observed with each DPI. Pharmacokinetic predictions showed good agreement with in vivo data from the literature. Peak systemic concentration was tied primarily to the alveolar dose, while the area under the curve was more dependent on the total lung dose. Tracheobronchial deposition was poorly correlated with pharmacokinetic data.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of realistic in vitro experiments, lung deposition modeling, and pharmacokinetic modeling was shown to provide reasonable estimation of in vivo systemic exposure from DPIs. Such combined approaches are useful in the development of orally inhaled drug products.