Investigation of dry powder inhaler (DPI) resistance and aerosol dispersion timing on emitted aerosol aerodynamic particle sizing by multistage cascade impactor when sampled volume is reduced from compendial value of 4 L

The history, current state and perspectives of aerosol therapy

Nebulization is a very effective method of drug administration. This technique has been popular since ancient times when inhalation of plants rich in tropane alkaloids with spasmolytic and analgesic effects was widely used. Undoubtedly, the invention of anasthesia in the 19th century had an influence on the development of this technique. It resulted in the search for devices that facilitated anasthesia such as pulveriser or hydronium. From the second half of the 21st century, when the first DPI and MDI inhalers were launched, the constant development of aerosol therapy has been noticed. This is due to the fact that nebulization, compared with other means of medicinal substance application (such as oral and intravenous routes of administration), is safer and it exhibits a positive dose/efficacy ratio connected to the reduction of the dose. It enables drugs administration through the lung and possesses very fast onset action. Therefore, various drugs prescribed in respiratory diseases (such as corticosteroids, β-agonists, anticholinergics) are present on the market in a form of an aerosol.

Lung Function Can Predict the Expected Inspiratory Airflow Rate through Dry Powder Inhalers in Asthmatic Adolescents

Several factors affect drug delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Some are related to patient’s physiological characteristics, while others depend on DPIs’ technical aspects. The patient’s inspiratory airflow rate (IAR) affects the pressure drop and the turbulence needed to disaggregate the powder inside a DPI. The present study investigated whether lung function limitations occurring in asthmatic adolescents affect their IAR when inhaling through a DPI simulator. Eighteen consecutive adolescents with asthma were recruited, and IAR was randomly assessed at low-, mid-, and high-resistance regimens. A multiple logistic model was developed to evaluate the association of patients’ lung function characteristics and devices’ resistance with the probability to achieve the expected IAR (E-IAR). The mean value of E-IAR achieved seemed to be sex- and age-independent. Low- and high-resistance regimens were less likely to consent the E-IAR level (odds ratio [OR] = 0.035 and OR = 0.004, respectively). Only the basal residual volume and the inspiratory resistance, but not the Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1), seemed to affect the extent of IAR in asthmatic adolescents (OR = 1.131 and OR = 0.290, respectively). The results suggest that the assessment of current lung function is crucial for choosing the proper DPI for asthmatic adolescents.

The contribution of patients' lung function to the inspiratory airflow rate achievable through a DPIs' simulator reproducing different intrinsic resistance rates

Background

The performance of DPIs depends on several physiological (patient-dependent) and technological (device-dependent) factors. The inspiratory airflow rate is the only active force generated and operating in the system for inducing the required pressure drop and eliciting the resistance-induced turbulence needed to disaggregate the powder through the device. The present study aimed to investigate in the most prevalent respiratory disorders whether and at what extent the inspiratory airflow rate achievable when inhaling through a DPIs’ simulator reproducing different intrinsic resistance regimens (low, mid, and high resistance) is affected by peculiar changes in lung function and/or can be predicted by any specific lung function parameter.

Methods

The inspiratory airflow rate was assessed in randomized order by the In-Check DIAL G16 at low, mid, and high resistance regimens in a sample of consecutive subjects at recruitment. Independent predictors of the probability to achieve the expected inhalation airflow rate were investigated by means of a multivariate logistic regression model, specific to the disease.

Results

A total of 114 subjects were recruited (asthmatics n=30; COPD n=50, restrictive patients n=16, and normal subjects n=18). The mean values of the expected inspiratory airflow rate achieved proved significantly different within the groups (p<0.0001), independently of sex and age. In asthmatics and in COPD patients, the mid-resistance regimen proved highly associated with the highest mean values of airflow rates obtained. Low- and high-resistance regimens were significantly less likely to consent to achieve the expected level of inspiratory airflow rate (OR<1 in all comparisons). Restrictive patients performed the lowest airflow rates at the low-resistance regimen (p<0.01). Unlike FEV¹, RV in asthmatics (OR=1.008); RV and I_Raw in COPD (OR=0.587 and OR=0.901, respectively), and FIF and TLC in restrictive patients (OR=1.041, and OR=0.962, respectively) proved the only sensitive predictors of the inspiratory airflow rate achievable at the different resistive regimens.

Conclusions

The intrinsic resistive regimen of DPIs can play a critical role. The patients’ lung function profile also affects the extent of their inhalation airflow rate. Some specific lung function parameters (such as: FIF; RV; I_Raw; TLC, but not FEV₁) may be regarded as specific predictors in real-life. In order to optimize the DPI choice, further to the device’s technology, also the current patients’ lung function should be properly investigated and carefully assessed.

Inhalable dry powders of rifampicin highlighting potential and drawbacks in formulation development for experimental tuberculosis aerosol therapy

Introduction: Recently, tuberculosis was reported as the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent. Standard therapy includes administration of four first-line antibiotics, i.e. rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide over a period of at least 26 weeks, which in case of rifampicin oftentimes is accompanied by unwanted side effects and variable bioavailability that compromise a positive therapeutic outcome. As the main site of infection is the lungs, it is desirable to develop a therapeutic formulation to be administered via the pulmonary route.Areas covered: This work presents a literature review on studies investigating inhalable dry powder formulations including rifampicin in the context of an experimental tuberculosis therapy, with a special focus on aerosol performance.Expert opinion: It was found that formulation approaches involving different strategies and functional excipients are under investigation but as of now, no formulation has managed to leap into commercial clinical testing. Reasons for this might not primarily be associated with a lack of suitable candidates, but amongst others a lack of suitable in vitro models to assess the efficacy, therapeutic benefit, and cost-effectiveness of the candidate formulations.

Determination of Passive Dry Powder Inhaler Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution by Multi-Stage Cascade Impactor: International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation & Science (IPAC-RS) Recommendations to Support Both Product Quality Control and Clinical Programs

The multi-stage cascade impactor (CI) is the mainstay method for the determination of the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled products (OIPs). CIs are designed to operate at a constant flow rate throughout the measurement process. However, it is necessary to mimic an inhalation maneuver to disperse the powder into an aerosol when testing passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), which constitute a significant portion of available products in this inhaler class. Methods in the pharmacopeial compendia intended for product quality assurance initiate sampling by applying a vacuum to the measurement apparatus using a timer-operated solenoid valve located downstream of the CI, resulting in a period when the flow rate through the impactor rapidly increases from zero towards the target flow rate. This article provides recommendations for achieving consistent APSD measurements, including selection of the CI, pre-separator, and flow control equipment, as well as reviewing considerations that relate to the shape of the flow rate-sampling time profile. Evidence from comparisons of different DPIs delivering the same active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is indicative that the compendial method for APSD measurement is insensitive as a predictor of pharmacokinetic outcomes. Although inappropriate for product quality testing, guidance is therefore provided towards adopting a more clinically realistic methodology, including the use of an anatomically appropriate inlet and mimicking patient inhalation at the DPI while operating the CI at constant flow rate. Many of these recommendations are applicable to the testing of other OIP classes.