Response to Letter to the Editor: "Surgery as a Viable Alternative First-Line Treatment for Prolactinoma Patients. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"

Surgical Management of Giant Prolactinomas: A Descriptive Study

Introduction

Giant prolactinoma (GP) is a rare pituitary lactotropic cell tumor larger than 4 cm in its widest dimension, and is less likely than a smaller prolactinoma to achieve prolactin normalization on dopamine agonist (DA) monotherapy. There is a paucity of data on the circumstances and outcomes of second-line management of GP with surgery. Herein, our institution's experience with the surgical management of GPs is described.

Methods

A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent surgery for giant prolactinoma from 2003 to 2018. A chart review was conducted for demographic data, clinical features, laboratory and radiographic findings, operative and pathology reports, perioperative management, and clinical outcomes in follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results

Of 79 prolactinoma cases, 8 patients had GP with a median age of 38 years (range 20-53), 75% (6/8) were male, with a median largest tumor dimension of 6 cm (range 4.6-7.7), and a median prolactin level of 2,500 μg/L (range 100->13,000). Six patients had transsphenoidal surgery for dopamine agonist (DA) resistance or intolerance. Two patients had a craniotomy for a missed diagnosis; one was due to the hook effect. No tumor resections were complete by either surgical approach; all had persistent hyperprolactinemia requiring postoperative DA therapy, and two patients had an additional craniotomy procedure for further tumor debulking. There was no recovery of pituitary axes and postoperative deficits were common. Remission as defined by prolactin normalization occurred in 63% (5/8) at a median time of 36 months (range 14-63 months) on DA therapy after surgery with a follow-up of 3-13 years.

Conclusions

GPs infrequently require surgical resection, which is generally incomplete and requires adjuvant therapy. Given the rarity of surgery for GPs, multi-institutional or registry studies would yield clearer guidance on optimal management.

Implementation of functional imaging using 11C-methionine PET-CT co-registered with MRI for advanced surgical planning and decision making in prolactinoma surgery

PURPOSE

To report the first experience of our multidisciplinary team with functional imaging using ¹¹C-methionine positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹¹C-methionine PET-CT) co-registered with MRI (Met-PET/MRI^CR) in clinical decision making and surgical planning of patients with difficult to treat prolactinoma.

METHODS

In eighteen patients with prolactinoma, referred to our tertiary referral centre because of intolerance or resistance for dopamine agonists (DA), Met-PET/MRI^CR was used to aid decision-making regarding therapy.

RESULTS

Met-PET/MRI^CR was positive in 94% of the patients. MRI and Met-PET/MRI^CR findings were completely concordant in five patients, partially concordant in nine patients, and non-concordant in four patients. In five patients Met-PET/MRI^CR identified lesion(s) that were retrospectively also visible on MRI. Met-PET/MRI^CR was false negative in one patient, with a cystic adenoma on conventional MRI. Thirteen patients underwent transsphenoidal surgery, with nine achieving full biochemical remission, two clinical improvement and near normalized prolactin levels, and one patient clinical improvement with significant tumour reduction. Hence, nearly all patients (94%) were considered to have a positive outcome. Permanent complication rate was low. Three patients continued DA, two patients have a wait and scan policy.

CONCLUSION

Met-PET/MRI^CR can provide additional information to guide multidisciplinary preoperative and intraoperative decision making in selected cases of prolactinoma. This approach resulted in a high remission rate with a low rate of complications in our expert centre.

Are dopamine agonists still the first-choice treatment for prolactinoma in the era of endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

For prolactinoma patients, dopamine agonists (DAs) are indicated as the first-line treatment and surgery is an adjunctive choice. However, with the development of surgical technique and equipment, the effect of surgery has improved. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of surgery versus DAs in patients with different types of prolactinomas.

Methods

A systematic search of literature using Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trial databases was conducted until July 12, 2019. Prolactinoma patients treated with DAs (bromocriptine or cabergoline) or surgery (microscopic or endoscopic surgery) were included. Outcomes included the biochemical cure rate, recurrence rate, prolactin level, improvement rates of symptoms, and incidence rates of complications. A random-effects model was used to pool the extracted data. Qualitative comparisons were conducted instead of quantitative comparison.

Results

DAs were better than surgery in terms of the biochemical cure rate (0.78 versus 0.66), but surgery had a much lower recurrence rate (0.19 versus 0.57). Full advantages were not demonstrated in improvement rates of symptoms and incidence rates of complications with both treatment options. In microprolactinoma patients, the biochemical cure rate of endoscopic surgery was equal to the average cure rate of DAs (0.86 versus 0.86) and it surpassed the biochemical cure rate of bromocriptine (0.86 versus 0.76). In macroprolactinoma patients, endoscopic surgery was slightly higher than bromocriptine (0.66 versus 0.64) in terms of the biochemical cure rate.

Conclusion

For patients with clear indications or contraindications for surgery, choosing surgery or DAs accordingly is unequivocal. However, for patients with clinical equipoise, such as surgery, especially endoscopic surgery, in microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma patients, we suggest that neurosurgeons and endocrinologists conduct high-quality clinical trials to address the clinical equipoise quantitatively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41016-022-00277-1.

Surgical outcomes of medically failed prolactinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In Prolactinomas, surgery or radiation are reserved for DA failure due to tumor resistance, intolerance to medication-induced side-effects, or patient preference. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the currently available literature regarding the effectiveness of surgery to treat prolactinomas in patients who have failed DA therapy.

METHOD

A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for studies that reported outcomes of medically resistant and intolerant prolactinoma treated surgically.

RESULTS

10 articles (Total N = 816, Surgery N = 657) met the inclusion criteria. 38% of patients who underwent surgery following DA failure achieved remission without need for further treatment (p < 0.001, I² = 67.09%) with a median follow-up of 49.2 +/- 40 months. 62% achieved remission with multimodal treatment (p < 0.001, I² = 93.28%) with a median follow-up of 53 +/- 39.8 months. 16% of cases demonstrated recurrence after early remission (p = 0.02, I² = 62.91%) with recurrence occurring on average at 27 +/- 9 months. Overall, 46% of patients required reinstitution of postoperative DA therapy at last follow up (p < 0.001, I² = 82.57%). Subgroup analysis of macroprolactinoma and microprolactinoma has demonstrated that there is no statistical significance in achieving long-term remission with surgery stand-alone in macroprolactinoma group (p = 0.49) although 43% of patients were able to achieve remission with multimodal therapy at last follow-up in the same group (p < 0.001, I² = 86.34%).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed 38% of operated patients achieved remission, while 62% achieved remission when additional modes of therapy were implemented. Therefore, although surgery has not been initial therapeutic choice for prolactinoma, it plays a significant role in medically failed prolactinoma care.

Prolactinomas: Prognostic Factors of Early Remission After Transsphenoidal Surgery

Background and Objective: Most patients with prolactinomas receive pharmacological treatment only, resulting in limited research on the predictors of successful prolactinoma surgery. In this study, we analyzed whether early postoperative serum prolactin concentrations and selected tumor characteristics could predict early, hormonal remission after removal of prolactinomas. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 48 consecutive patients with prolactinomas who underwent transsphenoidal resection performed by the same surgeon. Early remission, defined as a lack of hyperprolactinemia symptoms and normalization of serum prolactin concentration, was ascertained in all patients at 3 months. We evaluated the invasiveness of prolactinomas on the Knosp grading scale and measured serum prolactin concentrations on the first postoperative day. Routine immunohistochemical analysis, evaluation for plurihormonality, and assessment of the Ki-67 proliferation index (<3 or ≥3% of positive nuclei) were performed in all tumor samples. Results: Of 48 patients, 38 (79%) achieved early biochemical remission at 3 months. Patients in early remission at 3 months had lower serum prolactin concentrations on the first postoperative day than patients with recurrent or persistent hyperprolactinemia (p < 0.001). Using univariate logistic regression, larger maximum tumor diameter (p = 0.014), higher Knosp grade (p < 0.001), and plurihormonality predicted remission at 3 months (p = 0.021). However, using multivariate stepwise logistic regression, only the Knosp grade remained significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Radiological assessment of prolactinoma invasiveness (Knosp grades) and early postoperative serum prolactin concentrations are important predictors of early remission following transsphenoidal prolactinoma resection.