Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Antiresorptive Agents in Benign and Malignant Diseases: A Critical Review Organized by the ECTS

Medication related osteonecrosis (MRONJ) in the management of CTIBL in breast and prostate cancer patients. Joint report by SIPMO AND SIOMMMS

Background

Low-doses of bone modifying agents (LD-BMAs) compared to those used to treat bone metastases are used in breast or prostate cancer patients on adjuvant endocrine therapy to prevent Cancer Treatment Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL). Their use is associated with an increased risk of developing Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ). However, there is not clarity about strategies aimed to minimize the MRONJ risk in cancer patients at different conditions as low- vs high-doses of BMA. This joint report from the Italian Societies of Oral Pathology and Medicine (SIPMO) and of Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism and Skeletal Diseases (SIOMMMS) aims to define the dental management of breast and prostate cancer patients with CTIBL under LD-BMAs, to reduce their risk to develop MRONJ.

Methods

This interdisciplinary SIPMO-SIOMMMS Expert Italian Panel reviewed the available international scientific literature and developed a set of recommendations to implement strategies of MRONJ prevention in breast (BC) and prostate cancer (PC) patients undertaking LD-BMAs to prevent CTIBL.

Results

The Expert Panel, after addressing some introductive topics (i.e., CTIBL and its management, pharmacology and pharmacodynamics of BMAs, definition and diagnosis of MRONJ), developed a joint report on the following five issues: a) prevention and dental management in cancer patients candidates to LD-BMAs, or under LD-BMAs; b) prophylactic drug holiday; c) MRONJ treatment; d) LD-BMAs therapeutic drug holiday; and e) restart of LD-BMA treatment after successful healing of MRONJ.Finally, ten key questions with answers were prepared and placed at the end of the document.

Conclusions

Despite obvious weaknesses of the available international literature, the Expert Panel recognized the need to tailor separate MRONJ preventive approach for breast and prostate cancer patients on adjuvant endocrine therapy who begin low-dose BMA therapy to prevent CTIBL and provided this practical guidance for bone specialists and oral healthcare providers. In view of a MRONJ risk for BC and PC patients receiving low-dose BMAs, which approximates that of patients with osteoporosis and other non-malignant diseases undergoing similar treatment schedules, the SIPMO-SIOMMMS Expert Panel recognizes the need for less stringent preventive strategies than those already developed for BC or PC patients with bone metastases taking HD-BMAs.

Current and emerging bone resorption inhibitors for the treatment of osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a metabolic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and strength, and increased risk for fragility fractures. It is a major health issue in aging populations, due to fracture-associated increased disability and mortality. Antiresorptive treatments are first line choices in most of the cases.

AREAS COVERED

Bone homeostasis is complicated, and multiple factors can compromise skeletal health. Bone turnover is a continuous process regulated by the coupled activities of bone cells that preserves skeletal strength and integrity. Imbalance between bone resorption and formation leads to bone loss and increased susceptibility to fractures. Antiresorptives prevent bone loss and reduce fracture risk, by targeting osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast function and survival. Their major drawback is the coupling of osteoclast and osteoblast activity, due to which any reduction in bone resorption is followed by suppression of bone formation.

EXPERT OPINION

During the last couple of decades significant progress has been made in understanding of the genetic and molecular basis of osteoporosis. Critical pathways and key molecules that mediate regulation of bone resorption have been identified. These factors may underpin novel therapeutic avenues for osteoporosis, but their potential for translation into clinical applications is yet to be tested.

Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Importance

Osteoporotic fractures are associated with psychological distress, subsequent fractures, loss of independence, reduced ability to perform activities of daily living, and death.

Objective

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures in adults 40 years or older with no known diagnosis of osteoporosis or history of fragility fracture.

Population

Adults 40 years or older without known osteoporosis or history of fragility fractures.

Evidence Assessment

The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years or older has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years at increased risk has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient and the balance of benefits and harms for screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men cannot be determined.

Recommendation

The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years or older. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years who are at increased risk for an osteoporotic fracture as estimated by clinical risk assessment. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men. (I statement).

Synthetic nanoparticles functionalized with cell membrane-mimicking, bone-targeting, and ROS-controlled release agents for osteoporosis treatment

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a common degenerative disease, with suboptimal clinical outcomes. The targets of current therapeutic agents are both nonspecific and diverse. We synthesized a novel nanoparticle (NP), ALN@BMSCM@PLGA-TK-PEG-SS31. After intravenous injection, the NP evaded immune phagocytosis, targeted bone tissue, and efficiently downregulated bone reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. The core PLGA-TK-PEG-SS31 NP was ∼100 nm in diameter. The TK chemical bond breaks on exposure to ROS, releasing the novel mitochondrion-targeting peptide SS31. Outer bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell membranes (BMSCMs) were used to coat the NP with surface proteins to ensure membrane functionality. The circulation time was prolonged and immune phagocytosis was evaded. Embedding the DSPE-PEG-ALN lipid within the cell membrane enhanced the bone-targeting ability of the NP. Our results suggest that ALN@BMSCM@PLGA-TK-PEG-SS31 exerted dual effects on bone tissue in vitro, significantly inhibiting RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in the presence of H2O2 and promoting osteogenic differentiation in BMSCs. In a mouse model of ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis, ALN@BMSCM@PLGA-TK-PEG-SS31 significantly ameliorated oxidative stress and increased bone mass with no notable systemic side effects. These results suggest that ALN@BMSCM@PLGA-TK-PEG-SS31 is a promising treatment for osteoporosis.

Efficacy and safety of osteoporosis treatment in older adults. Approach for the secondary prevention of fractures in older populations. A proposal by SEFRAOS

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and deterioration of the microarchitecture, resulting in bone fragility and risk of fractures. As the life expectancy of the population increases, fragility fractures are expected to become more common. Indeed, the incidence rate for major fracture (hip, vertebra, pelvis, etc.) is highest among the population of adults aged 80 and over. Despite this, in Spain, three out of four patients who have experienced a fragility fracture do not receive drug treatment for the secondary prevention of new fractures. Therefore, it is crucial to raise awareness among healthcare professionals of the need to assess imminent fracture risk in older patients who have already sustained a fragility fracture and to initiate a rapid, appropriate, effective, and safe secondary fracture prevention strategy. The various clinical guidelines on secondary prevention of fragility fractures published to date do not reflect the heterogeneity of older adults. The aim of this paper is to provide a brief description of the available scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis in older adults and to submit a position paper proposed by the Spanish Society of Osteoporotic Fractures (SEFRAOS), which places greater emphasis on the specifics of the approach to and treatment of older adults who have sustained a fragility fracture.

A Retrospective Audit of Osteoporosis Management Following Fragility Fractures in a Hospital Setting

Background Fragility fractures, often caused by osteoporosis, are a major public health concern among the growing population of the United Kingdom (UK). In addition to being a major source of illness and mortality, the rising incidence of osteoporosis places a heavy strain on healthcare systems if it is not adequately managed. In order to lower the risk of additional fractures, current guidelines place a strong emphasis on the timely evaluation and treatment of fragility fractures. Methods This retrospective audit was carried out in Warrington Hospital, UK, to examine the management of fragility fractures in patients aged 65 years and above across two cycles (January to March 2022 and April to May 2023, respectively). All data was obtained from electronic medical records, and management was assessed, including treatment with bisphosphonates, vitamin D, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans and further referrals for metabolic bone clinics. Results The first cycle included 144 inpatients and showed significant under-utilization with only 16% receiving bisphosphonates treatment (23 inpatient prescriptions), low referrals for DEXA scan and metabolic bone clinics. Assessment and supplementation of vitamin D was also suboptimal. The second cycle of the audit reviewed 165 patients and showed minor improvement in bisphosphonates prescription, although post-discharge rates were low with around 80% of patients (104 of 131, as 34 patients were prescribed while inpatient) not receiving medications. The DEXA scans and metabolic bone clinic referrals also remained inadequate in the second cycle. Conclusions This audit highlighted the significant gap in the management of fragility fractures and persistent deficiencies in spite of robust guidelines and interventions set by various bodies. The implementation of treatment guidelines for osteoporotic patients at hospital level can help in timely initiation of antiresorptive therapy, DEXA scans and utilisation of metabolic bone clinics to optimise outcomes and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. There is a need for further research and education to improve this adherence to set guidelines and improve outcomes.

Mechanisms Underlying Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

OBJECTIVE

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare but debilitating disease characterized by a progressive necrosis of jaw bones in patients who have received anti-resorptive or anti-angiogenic therapies. Unfortunately, we still have no validated preventive or pharmaceutical interventions to help these patients, primarily due to our limited understanding of MRONJ pathogenesis. Here, we offer an extensive review of recent studies relevant to MRONJ pathogenesis. We present a hypothesis regarding the coupling of bone resorption and angiogenesis that relies on osteoblast-derived, matrix-bound vascular endothelial growth factors to explain why ONJ is associated with both anti-resorptive and anti-angiogenic agents.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted by searching databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, to retrieve relevant reports.

RESULTS

Reduced bone resorption leads to reduced angiogenesis, and vice versa, creating a vicious cycle that ultimately results in ischemic necrosis of the jaw. Additionally, we suggest that reduced angiogenesis, induced by anti-resorptive or anti-angiogenic agents, aggravates bacterial infection-induced bone necrosis, explaining why the jaw bone is particularly susceptible to necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Our novel hypothesis will facilitate the advancement of future research and the development of more targeted approaches to managing MRONJ.

A study of peri-implant tissue clinical parameters in patients starting anti-osteoporosis medication after existing implant function: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Recently, rare cases of medication-related peri-implant osteonecrosis of the jaw (PI-MRONJ) have been reported. In patients with functional implants who begin using anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs) after implantation, PI-MRONJ is unpredictable and poses a significant threat to the patient. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of AOMs on peri-implant tissues and to examine risk factors for peri-implantitis, a presumed trigger for PI-MRONJ.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of patients who underwent implant maintenance treatment between January 2016 and February 2024. Patients were divided into AOM users (AOM group) and controls (control group). Clinical parameters were statistically evaluated, including implant probing depth (iPPD), implant bleeding on probing (iBoP), marginal bone resorption (MBL), and mandibular cortical index (MCI) measured at baseline and at the last visit. Risk factors were examined by multivariate analysis for adjusted odds ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients (35 male, 59 female) with 270 implants were recruited. The AOM group had 93 implants (24 patients). Comparison of clinical parameters showed significantly greater changes in iBoP (p = 0.000768) and MBL (p = 0.000863) scores over time in the AOM group than in the control group. Risk factors for peri-implantitis were a history of moderate or severe periodontal disease (OR: 15.8, 95% CI 3.6-69.3, p = 0.000256) and MCI class 3 (OR: 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-7.8, p = 0.00534).

CONCLUSIONS

In implant treatment of AOM users, special attention should be paid to local inflammation, which is presumed to be the cause of PI-MRONJ.

Synergistic effect between denosumab and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)? A retrospective study of 268 patients with ICI and bone metastases

Background

Bone metastasis is a significant concern in advanced solid tumors, contributing to diminished patient survival and quality of life due to skeletal-related events (SREs). Denosumab (DMAB), a monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), is used to prevent SREs in such cases. The RANK/RANKL axis, crucial in immunological processes, has garnered attention, especially with the expanding use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in modern oncology.

Objective

Our study aims to explore the potential synergistic antitumor effects of combining immunotherapy with denosumab, as suggested by anecdotal evidence, small cohort studies, and preclinical research.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis using the IMMUCARE database, encompassing patients receiving ICI treatment since 2014 and diagnosed with bone metastases. We examined overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and switch of treatment line based on denosumab usage. Patients were stratified into groups: without denosumab, ICI followed by denosumab, and denosumab followed by ICI. Survival curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

Results

Among the 268 patients with bone metastases, 154 received treatment with ICI alone, while 114 received ICI in combination with denosumab at some point during their oncological history. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between patients receiving ICI monotherapy and those receiving ICI with denosumab (p = 0.29 and p = 0.79, respectively). However, upon analyzing patients who received denosumab following ICI initiation (17 patients), a notable difference emerged. The group receiving ICI followed by denosumab exhibited a significant advantage compared to those without denosumab (154 patients) or those receiving denosumab before ICI initiation (72 patients) (p = 0.022).

Conclusion

This retrospective investigation supports the notion of potential benefits associated with sequential administration of ICI and denosumab, although statistical significance was not achieved. Future studies, including prospective trials or updated retrospective analyses, focusing on cancers treated with first-line immunotherapy, could provide further insights into this therapeutic approach.

Ozone infiltration as an adjunctive treatment to piezoelectric surgery in the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: case series of 29 patients

PURPOSE

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws has been reported to be associated with bisphosphonate and RANKL inhibitor medications. This prospective clinical study aimed to assess the outcomes of pre-operative ozone infiltration therapy in patients with established MRONJ.

METHODS

The treatment protocol for ozone applications were designed as 20 applications ozone infiltration therapy followed by surgical interventions of necrotic tissue debridement using piezoelectric surgery instruments. The evaluation of the results based on the clinical and radiologic specifications considering the necrotic lesion reduction and healing. The study included 31 lesions in 29 patients. The mean follow-up was 23.6 months.

RESULTS

25 lesions out of 31 healed totally without any remissions. The outcomes were not affected by any variables such as gender, age, type of pharmacological treatment, lesion location, and MRONJ staging. The statistically significant results were found among the clinical condition of the patients (p = 0.01) and administration route of medications (p = 0.004). Healing was significantly less in patients that received intra-vascular administrations. Clinical conditions of the patients were divided as osteoporosis, oncologic, and arthritis. Significantly better results were obtained in osteoporosis patients. 38% of the population experienced spontaneous sequestration with signs of improvements and the surgical interventions were canceled. According to the results, total healing of MRONJ lesions was seen in 79% patients (81% lesions).

CONCLUSION

Ozone therapy and debridement with Piezoelectric surgery can be considered as a safe and beneficial adjunctive treatment alternative for osteonecrosis lesions in cases of established MRONJ.

Romosozumab versus parathyroid hormone receptor agonists: which osteoanabolic to choose and when?

Osteoanabolic agents are used as a first line treatment in patients at high fracture risk. The PTH receptor 1 (PTH1R) agonists teriparatide (TPTD) and abaloparatide (ABL) increase bone formation, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone strength by activating PTH receptors on osteoblasts. Romosozumab (ROMO), a humanized monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, dramatically but transiently stimulates bone formation and persistently reduces bone resorption. Osteoanabolic agents increase BMD and bone strength while being more effective than antiresorptives in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women. However, direct comparisons of the antifracture benefits of osteoanabolic therapies are limited. In a direct comparison of TPTD and ABL, the latter resulted in greater BMD increases at the hip. While no differences in vertebral or non-vertebral fracture risk were observed between the two drugs, ABL led to a greater reduction of major osteoporotic fractures. Adverse event profiles were similar between the two agents except for hypercalcemia, which occurred more often with TPTD. No direct comparisons of fracture risk reduction between ROMO and the PTH1R agonists exist. Individual studies have shown greater increases in BMD and bone strength with ROMO compared with TPTD in treatment-naive women and in women previously treated with bisphosphonates. Some safety aspects, such as a history of tumor precluding the use of PTH1R agonists, and a history of major cardiovascular events precluding the use of ROMO, should also be considered when choosing between these agents. Finally, convenience of administration, reimbursement by national health systems and length of clinical experience may influence patient choice.

Smart osteoclasts targeted nanomedicine based on amorphous CaCO3 for effective osteoporosis reversal

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is characterized by an imbalance in bone homeostasis, resulting in the excessive dissolution of bone minerals due to the acidified microenvironment mediated by overactive osteoclasts. Oroxylin A (ORO), a natural flavonoid, has shown potential in reversing osteoporosis by inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The limited water solubility and lack of targeting specificity hinder the effective accumulation of Oroxylin A within the pathological environment of osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Osteoclasts' microenvironment-responsive nanoparticles are prepared by incorporating Oroxylin A with amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) and coated with glutamic acid hexapeptide-modified phospholipids, aiming at reinforcing the drug delivery efficiency as well as therapeutic effect. The obtained smart nanoparticles, coined as OAPLG, could instantly neutralize acid and release Oroxylin A in the extracellular microenvironment of osteoclasts. The combination of Oroxylin A and ACC synergistically inhibits osteoclast formation and activity, leading to a significant reversal of systemic bone loss in the ovariectomized mice model.

CONCLUSION

The work highlights an intelligent nanoplatform based on ACC for spatiotemporally controlled release of lipophilic drugs, and illustrates prominent therapeutic promise against osteoporosis.

A novel proteomic signature of osteoclast differentiation unveils the deubiquitinase UCHL1 as a necessary osteoclastogenic driver

Bone destruction, a major source of morbidity, is mediated by heightened differentiation and activity of osteoclasts (OC), highly specialized multinucleated myeloid cells endowed with unique bone-resorptive capacity. The molecular mechanisms regulating OC differentiation in the bone marrow are still partly elusive. Here, we aimed to identify new regulatory circuits and actionable targets by comprehensive proteomic characterization of OCgenesis from mouse bone marrow monocytes, adopting two parallel unbiased comparative proteomic approaches. This work disclosed an unanticipated protein signature of OCgenesis, with most gene products currently unannotated in bone-related functions, revealing broad structural and functional cellular reorganization and divergence from macrophagic immune activity. Moreover, we identified the deubiquitinase UCHL1 as the most upregulated cytosolic protein in differentiating OCs. Functional studies proved it essential, as UCHL1 genetic and pharmacologic inhibition potently suppressed OCgenesis. Furthermore, proteomics and mechanistic dissection showed that UCHL1 supports OC differentiation by restricting the anti-OCgenic activity of NRF2, the transcriptional activator of the canonical antioxidant response, through redox-independent stabilization of the NRF2 inhibitor, KEAP1. Besides offering a valuable experimental framework to dissect OC differentiation, our study discloses the essential role of UCHL1, exerted through KEAP1-dependent containment of NRF2 anti-OCgenic activity, yielding a novel potential actionable pathway against bone loss.

Could MRONJ Be Related to Osimertinib Monotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients after Denosumab Suspension?

BACKGROUND

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws is the most frequent complication in patients treated or in therapy with antiresorptive/antiangiogenetic drugs. The list of medications possibly related to MRONJ onset is constantly growing; we aimed to report on a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Osimertinib) as possibly responsible for bilateral maxillary necrosis onset in the herein-described case.

METHODS

In June 2023, an oncologic patient with two different maxillary bone exposures was referred to our attention. His medical history revealed a two-year Denosumab regimen along with Osimertinib, the latter not suspended before teeth extractions. The clinicians performed a sequestrum removal and bone debridement after three cycles of antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

Histologic examinations confirmed the clinical diagnosis of MRONJ excluding a metastatic occurrence, while complete mucosal healing was achieved after 15 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient suspended Denosumab for more than six months before teeth extraction for MRONJ prevention; hence, failure to discontinue Osimertinib led us to consider it a possible etiological factor. From a literature analysis, only one case has already been published reporting a possible Osimertinib-related occurrence of MRONJ in lung cancer patients. Our case is a further report that could be intended as an alert both for oncologists and dentists to share decisions about the oral management of such patients together, also informing them about this possible risk. Also, this report could trigger in the scientific community the necessity to evaluate further guidelines for similar doubtful cases in which the drug interaction, the mono-suspension, and the possible removable prosthesis-related additional trauma should be considered causes or con-causes.

Τhe story of sclerostin inhibition: the past, the present, and the future

Sclerostin inhibits osteoblast activity by hampering activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway and simultaneously stimulates osteoclastogenesis through upregulation of the receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL). Thus, antibodies against sclerostin (Scl-Abs), besides promoting bone formation, suppress bone resorption and dissociate bone formation from resorption. This dual action results in remarkable increases of bone mineral density which are of a greater magnitude compared to the other antiosteoporotic treatments and are accompanied by decreases of fracture risk at all skeletal sites. The anabolic effect subsides after the first few months of treatment and a predominantly antiresorptive effect remains after this period, limiting its use to 12 months. Furthermore, these effects are largely reversible upon discontinuation; therefore, subsequent treatment with antiresorptives is indicated to maintain or further increase the bone gains achieved. Romosozumab is currently the only Scl-Ab approved for the treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis. Indications for use in other populations, such as males, premenopausal women, and patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, are pending. Additionally, the efficacy of Scl-Abs in other bone diseases, such as osteogenesis imperfecta, hypophosphatasia, X-linked hypophosphatemia, and bone loss associated with malignancies, is under thorough investigation. Cardiovascular safety concerns currently exclude patients at high cardiovascular risk from this treatment.

[Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with the use of bone-modifying agents]

The relevance of the study is associated with the widespread use of osteomodifying agents in patients with bone metastases and osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates and other osteo-modifying agents are widely used in oncology and prevention of age-related changes in the human bone system. The use, therapeutic effects and complications of therapy with osteo modifying agents are being investigated all over the world. However, the etiology and pathogenesis of drug-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws (MONCH) have not been fully studied, in this regard, the study of risk factors and mechanisms of its development remains relevant. New data on the etiology and pathogenesis of drug-induced osteonecrosis are presented. The literature review is carried out on the electronic resource PubMed.

Nocebo-associated treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs. A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-arm dropouts in randomized-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Nocebo is a concept of therapeutics referring to unpleasant symptoms attributed by a patient to a drug, due to negative anticipation. Patients receiving oral anti-osteoporotic drugs in randomized controlled trials (RCT) can experience adverse events leading to dropout, implying that nocebo contributes to treatment discontinuation for these drugs. In this study we aim to investigate the nocebo effect of subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs with a higher compliance rate than orally administered drugs.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for double-blind trials investigating subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs for osteoporosis (namely, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab) published up to May 2023.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Dropouts due to reported adverse events in the placebo arms ("nocebo dropouts").

RESULTS

Data from 17 trials were extracted. Among 10,529 placebo-treated patients the pooled nocebo-dropout percentage was 3 % for denosumab (average: 0.03; 95 % CI: 0.01-0.05), 1 % for romosozumab (average: 0.01; 95 % CI: 0.00-0.03) and 6 % for teriparatide and abaloparatide (average: 0.06; 95 % CI: 0.05-0.07). Nocebo-dropouts were significantly higher in men than women (6 % vs. 3 %, respectively, p = 0.012), in older (mean age >68 years) than in younger patients (5 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.017) and in those with more severe osteoporosis (based on the percentage of participants with prior fragility-related fractures in the study cohort) compared with patients with no prior fracture history (4 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Nocebo responses may contribute to treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs in clinical practice. Higher nocebo-related dropout rates in the higher-risk RCT population (older patients, males, those with prior fractures) show that nocebo mechanisms have the potential to hinder therapeutic efforts to specific populations who would benefit most. Prospero registration number CRD42020212843.

Is withdrawal of antiresorptive agents necessary before and after tooth extraction? A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The need for prevention and management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has increased with the growing number of patients using antiresorptive agents. The scope of this systematic review (SR) was to determine whether the withdrawal of antiresorptive agents is necessary for tooth extractions in patients receiving each of the antiresorptive medications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The searches were performed using the MEDLINE databases. We selected SRs, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective non-randomized clinical (observational) studies, and case reports/case series in this order of preference.

RESULTS

We included one SR, one RCT, five observational studies, and three case reports. Meta-analyses were not conducted because the RCT had an extremely small sample size and the observational studies had different definitions of intervention and comparison that could not be integrated across studies. In this SR, no studies showed a benefit (i.e., a reduction in the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw) of short-term withdrawal of antiresorptive agents for tooth extraction. Additionally, no studies examined the harm (i.e., an increase in femoral and vertebral fractures and skeletal-related events during bone metastasis) of withdrawal for tooth extraction.

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to determine whether withdrawal before and after tooth extraction is necessary with a high certainty of evidence. Future systematic reviews including RCTs with larger samples are expected to provide such evidence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This systematic review provides evidence-based information for multidisciplinary collaborations related to patients receiving antiresorptive agents.

Zoledronate and osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporosis: incidence and risk factors. Analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance Database

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) have been characterized with the use of oral bisphosphonates in osteoporosis and zoledronate in oncology. Uncertainties remain, though, with the occurrence of BRONJ related to the use of zoledronate in osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to estimate the incidence and characterize the risk factors of zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis as compared with oral bisphosphonates in real life setting.

METHODS

Cases of BRONJ associated with zoledronate, alendronate or risedronate were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database up to 2020. The incidence of BRONJ was estimated as their respective numbers related to cases of BRONJ in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis, over the same period, according to the Medic'AM database.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2020, BRONJ incidence with zoledronate was 9.6/100,000 patient-year (PY), significantly higher than with alendronate (5.1/100,000 PY, P<0.001), and risedronate (2.0/100,000 PY, P<0.001). The number of patients treated with bisphosphonates has steadily decreased by 44.5% over 10 years. Meanwhile, the incidence of BRONJ decreased (5.8/100,000 PY in 2011; 1.5/100,000 in 2020), although a rebound was observed in 2018, including 47.6% of BRONJ following denosumab. Apart from classical risk factors, recent dental cares stood out in more than 40% of BRONJ, and zoledronate had a shorter exposure time than oral bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, our data confirm that zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis is scarce, seeming slightly more common compared with oral bisphosphonates. We also raise awareness of dental care guidelines and greater vigilance when using bisphosphonates in patients with previous exposure to denosumab.

Sequential management of postmenopausal health and osteoporosis: An update

Increased life expectancy means that women are now in a hypoestrogenic state for approximately one-third of their lives. Overall health and specifically bone health during this period evolves in accordance with aging and successive exposure to various risk factors. In this review, we provide a summary of the approaches to the sequential management of osteoporosis within an integrative model of care to offer physicians a useful tool to facilitate therapeutic decision-making. Current evidence suggests that pharmacologic agents should be selected based on the risk of fractures, which does not always correlate with age. Due to their effect on bone turnover and on other hormone-regulated phenomena, such as hot flushes or breast cancer risk, we position hormone therapy and selective estrogen receptor modulators as an early postmenopause intervention for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. When the use of these agents is not possible, compelling evidence supports antiresorptive agents as first-line treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in many clinical scenarios, with digestive conditions, kidney function, readiness for compliance, or patient preferences playing a role in choosing between bisphosphonates or denosumab during this period. For patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture, the "anabolic first" approach reduces that risk. The effect on bone health with these bone-forming agents or with denosumab should be consolidated with the subsequent use of antiresorptive agents. Regardless of the strategy, follow-up and treatment should be maintained indefinitely to help prevent fractures.

Long-term and sequential treatment for osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder that causes impairment of bone structure and strength, leading to a progressively increased risk of fragility fractures. The global prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing in the ageing population. Owing to the chronic character of osteoporosis, years or even decades of preventive measures or therapy are required. The long-term use of bone-specific pharmacological treatment options, including antiresorptive and/or osteoanabolic approaches, has raised concerns around adverse effects or potential rebound phenomena after treatment discontinuation. Imaging options, risk scores and the assessment of bone turnover during initiation and monitoring of such therapies could help to inform individualized treatment strategies. Combination therapies are currently used less often than 'sequential' treatments. However, all patients with osteoporosis, including those with secondary and rare causes of osteoporosis, as well as specific patient populations (for example, young adults, men and pregnant women) require new approaches for long-term therapy and disease monitoring. New pathophysiological aspects of bone metabolism might therefore help to inform and revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Using sequential pharmacotherapy for the treatment of osteoporosis: an update of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis, which is characterized by compromised bone density and heightened susceptibility to fractures, is a substantial public health concern, especially among the aging population. Underdiagnosis, undertreatment, and therapy non-adherence contribute to its impact. Anabolic and dual-action agents like teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab have emerged as effective treatments, allowing rapid gains in bone mineral density (BMD) and reducing fracture risk. However, administering treatments in the correct order is paramount, with an 'anabolic first' approach gaining traction for patients at high risk of fractures. This strategy involves starting anabolic therapies, followed by antiresorptive agents as maintenance therapy. It is important to note that the effectiveness of anabolic agents differs between treatment-naive and previously treated patients: tailored treatment approaches are therefore necessary. This comprehensive strategy adheres to clinical guidelines, emphasizing individualized care, early intervention, and patient-centered management to mitigate the burden of osteoporosis and enhance patients' quality of life.

AREA COVERED

The aim of this review is to summarize recent evidence on the sequential treatment of osteoporosis and to provide recommendations on the best treatment strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

Effective treatments, such as anabolic agents, are key in high-risk patients, who require an 'anabolic first' approach. Sequential therapy, specifically tailored to a patient's history, can help to optimize prevention and management of fractures.

Anti-resorptive therapy in the osteometabolic patient affected by periodontitis. A joint position paper of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT) and the Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology (SIdP)

This joint report from the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT) and the Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology (SIdP) aims for a consensus around the scientific rationale and clinical strategy for the management of osteoporotic patients affected by periodontitis who are undergoing anti-resorptive (AR) therapy to manage the risk of the occurrence of a medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ). Osteoporosis and periodontitis are chronic diseases with a high prevalence in aging patients, and they share some of the same pathogenetic mechanisms based upon inflammation. Available evidence shows the relationship among osteoporosis, AR agents, periodontitis and implant therapy in relation to the incidence of MRONJ. Uncontrolled periodontitis may lead to tooth loss and to the need to replace teeth with dental implants. Tooth extraction and surgical dental procedures are recognized as the main risk factors for developing MRONJ in individuals taking AR therapy for osteometabolic conditions. Although the incidence of MRONJ in osteometabolic patients taking AR therapy may be as low as 0.9%, the increasing prevalence of osteoporosis and the high prevalence of periodontitis suggest that this potential complication should not be overlooked. Good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines are proposed that aim at a more integrated approach (prescriber, dentist, periodontist and dental hygienist) in the management of periodontitis patients undergoing AR therapy for osteometabolic disorders to reduce the risk of MRONJ. Dental professional and prescribers should educate patients regarding the potential risk associated with the long-term use of AR therapy and oral health behavior.

Outcomes of a Pharmacological Protocol with Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol for the Management of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ): A Randomized Study on 202 Osteoporosis Patients

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a challenging situation in clinics. Previous studies have shown that pentoxifylline combined with tocopherol proved to be beneficial in patients with osteoradionecrosis, due to their antioxidant and antifibrotic properties. The aim of this randomized study was to evaluate the effect of pentoxifylline and tocopherol in patients that had developed MRONJ after tooth extractions. The study population consisted of 202 Stage I MRONJ female patients with an average age of 66.4 ± 8.3 years, who were divided into two groups. The test group (n = 108) received a pharmacological protocol with pentoxifylline and tocopherol (2 months pre-operatively and 6 months post-operatively). The control group (n = 94) had sequestrectomy operations without any pharmacological preparation. The main outcomes were clinical healing of the mucosa after 1 month, and clinical and radiographic healing of the bone lesion at 6 months. In the test group all patients had mucosal healing and there was only one relapse within 6 months. In the control group, in 17% of the patients the mucosa did not heal, 71% of the patients relapsed within two months, and 7% developed infectious complications (such as abscess or phlegmon). After 6 months, the control group patients with persisting issues were prescribed pentoxifylline and tocopherol, as in the test group. At a subsequent follow-up, all those patients healed completely. Patients were monitored for a period of 7.8 ± 0.3 years, during which no relapse or additional problems were reported. As a conclusion, pentoxifylline and tocopherol protocol seems to be beneficial in the management of MRONJ patients.

Preserving bone in cancers of the elderly: A necessity

The occurrence of bone fractures is frequent in the elderly population, and in cancer patients, especially with bone metastases. The growing incidence of cancer associated with an aging population implies important health challenges, including bone health. Decisions on cancer care in older adults have to take into account older adults' specificities. Screening tools as G8 or VES 13 and evaluating tools as comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) do not include bone-related items. Bone risk assessment is indicated according to identification of geriatric syndromes such as falls, history, and the oncology treatment plan. Some cancer treatments disrupt bone turnover and decrease bone mineral density. This is mainly caused by hypogonadism, induced by hormonal treatments and some chemotherapies. Treatments can also cause direct (i.e., chemotherapy, radiotherapy or glucocorticoids) or indirect toxicity through electrolyte disorders (i.e., some chemotherapies or tyrosine kinase inhibitors) on bone turnover. Bone risk prevention is multidisciplinary. Certain interventions proposed in the CGA aim to improve bone health and reduce the risk of falling. It is also based on the drug management of osteoporosis, and the prevention of complications from bone metastases. Management of fractures, related or not to bone metastases relates to the concept of orthogeriatrics. It is also based on the benefit-risk ratio of the operation, access to minimally invasive techniques, prehabilitation or rehabilitation, but also the prognosis related to cancer and geriatric syndromes. Bone health is essential in older cancer patient's care. Bone risk assessment should be part of CGA in routine use and specific decision-making tools should be developed. Bone event management must be integrated throughout the patient's care pathway and oncogeriatrics multidisciplinarity should include rheumatological expertise.

Comparison of Different Antibiotic Regimes for Preventive Tooth Extractions in Patients with Antiresorptive Intake-A Retrospective Cohort Study

In the present study, the impacts on success rates between three different antibiotic regimes in patients receiving preventive tooth extraction during/after antiresorptive treatment were compared. For the retrospective analysis, we enrolled patients who had undergone tooth extraction from 2009 to 2019 according to the specified preventive conditions under antiresorptive therapy. Three antibiotic regimens were distinguished: (Group 1) intravenous for 7 days, (Group 2) oral for 14 days, and (Group 3) oral for 7 days of application. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw at 12 weeks after surgery. A total of 760 patients and 1143 extraction regions were evaluated (Group 1 n = 719; Group 2 n = 126; Group 3 n = 298). The primary endpoint showed no significant difference in the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw between the groups studied (Group 1 n = 50/669 (7%); Group 2 n = 9/117 (7%); Group 3 n = 17/281 (6%); p = 0.746). Overall, the success rate was 93% after intervention when preventive measures were followed. With the same success rate, a reduced, oral administration of antibiotics seems to be sufficient regarding the possible spectrum of side effects, the development of resistance and the health economic point of view.

Incidence and trend of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw from 2016 to 2020 in Kure, Japan

We investigated the incidence/trend of osteonecrosis of the jaw by antiresorptive agent dose over a 5-year period in Kure city, Japan. The incidence was 24 times higher among osteoporosis patients with low-dose agents and 421 times higher among cancer patients with high-dose agents than in the population without agents.

PURPOSE

We launched the registry system of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) cases in 2015 to investigate the trend in ONJ incidence. The purpose of our study was to estimate the ONJ incidence among patients with antiresorptive agent use by dosage and people without antiresorptive agent use in Kure and its trend from 2016 to 2020.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2021, 98 eligible ONJ patients were enrolled. Medication-related ONJ (MRONJ) was diagnosed based on the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons criteria. The annual number of those with and without antiresorptive agents was obtained from the claims database. Antiresorptive agents used for cancer and osteoporosis patients were defined as high- and low-dose medications, respectively.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of high-dose MRONJ was 2305.8 per 100,000 and that of low-dose MRONJ was 132.5 per 100,000, while the ONJ incidence among people without antiresorptive agents was 5.1 per 100,000. The incidence ratio was 23.6 (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.3-41.8) among osteoporosis patients who used low-dose antiresorptive agents and 420.6 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 220.8-801.4) among cancer patients who used high-dose agents compared with people who did not use these agents. MRONJ incidence increased from 2016 to 2020, but the incidence of high-dose MRONJ decreased, although this was nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the incidence and trend of ONJ by antiresorptive agent dose over a 5-year period in Kure after launching the multiprofession study. This collaborative study for the early detection and prevention of ONJ will continue.

Risk Factors for Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw-A Binomial Analysis of Data of Cancer Patients from Craiova and Constanta Treated with Zoledronic Acid

MRONJ (Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw) is a condition observed in a subset of cancer patients who have undergone treatment with zoledronic acid in order to either prevent or treat bone metastases. The primary aim of this research was to establish the importance of risk factors in the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer patients receiving zoledronic acid therapy for bone metastases. The present study is an observational retrospective investigation conducted at two university centers, namely, Craiova and Constanța, and included cancer patients treated with zoledronic acid. The medical records of the patients were obtained over a four-year timeframe spanning from June 2018 to June 2022. The data analysis was carried out between January 2021 and October 2022. Patients were treated for cancer, bone metastases, and MRONJ according to the international guidelines. The research investigated a cohort of 174 cancer patients (109 females and 65 males) aged between 22 and 84 years (with a mean age 64.65 ± 10.72 years) seeking treatment at oncology clinics situated in Craiova and Constanța. The study conducted a binomial logistic regression to analyze ten predictor variables, namely, gender, age, smoking status, treatment duration, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, and hypertension (HT). The results of the analysis revealed that only five of the ten predictor variables were statistically significant for MRONJ occurrence: duration of treatment (p < 0.005), chemotherapy (p = 0.007), and hypertension (p = 0.002) as risk factors, and endocrine therapy (p = 0.001) and obesity (p = 0.024) as protective factors.

Clinical and Histopathological Aspects of MRONJ in Cancer Patients

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a major complication of bisphosphonate treatment in cancer patients, and its etiology is not completely clarified. The study's goal is to find connections between the clinical and histopathological characteristics of osteonecrosis and bisphosphonates in a cohort of cancer patients who had osteonecrosis treated surgically. The retrospective study includes 51 patients of both sexes, aged 46 to 85 years, who underwent surgical treatment for MRONJ in two oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics (Craiova and Constanța). Demographic, clinical, and imaging data from the records of patients with osteonecrosis were analyzed. The surgical treatment removed the necrotic bone, and the harvested fragments were analyzed from a histopathological perspective. The histopathological examination data were evaluated and statistically processed to look for viable bone, granulation tissue, bacterial colonies, and inflammatory infiltrate. In the study groups, MRONJ was found particularly in the posterior regions of the mandible. Tooth extraction, but also periapical or periodontal infections, represented the trigger factors in most of the cases. The surgical therapy consisted of sequestrectomy or bone resection, and the histopathological examination of the fragments revealed osteonecrosis-specific features, such as the lack of bone cells, the development of an inflammatory infiltrate, and the existence of bacterial colonies. MRONJ in cancer patients receiving zoledronic acid is a severe complication that significantly lowers quality of life. Since these patients are not usually monitored by the dentist, they are identified in advanced stages of MRONJ. For these patients, thorough dental monitoring could reduce the incidence of osteonecrosis and its related complications.

Location and Gender Differences in Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Patients Treated with Antiresorptive and Antineoplastic Drugs Undergoing Dentoalveolar Surgical, Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

In the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and more generally of neoplastic and metabolic pathologies affecting bone tissues, antiresorption drugs such as bisphosphonates and monoclonal antibody are used. Bisphosphonates have been linked to cases of osteonecrosis of the jaws since 2003 by Marx, with more and more evidence over the next two decades; together with bisphosphonate drugs, cases relating to the use of monoclonal drugs have been subsequently added. Among the main independent risk factors, we have extraction procedures in oral surgery that can affect both the mandible and the maxilla and the anterior or posterior sectors. The incidence of MRONJ treated with oral bisphosphonates ranges from 0.5% to 3% according to studies; this incidence would appear to be higher in patients treated with antiresorptive agents with neoplastic diseases. Many pathologies including those in which antiresorptive drugs are used show differences in prevalence in relation to sex; similarly, there could be differences in the incidence of cases of osteonecrosis based on gender in patients undergoing dentoalveolar surgery. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and trial sequential analysis was to identify and quantify whether there is a proportionally greater risk of MRONJ in male or female subjects and whether there is evidence of greater involvement of osteonecrosis at several extraction sites, differentiating them into mandibular or maxilla and in the anterior or posterior sector. The revision protocol followed the indications of the Cochrane Handbook, and were recorded in Prospero, while the drafting of the manuscript was based on PRISMA. The results of the systematic review, after the study identification and selection process, included a total of 24 studies. The results of the meta-analysis reports: odds ratio (random effects model): 1.476 (0.684, 3.184) between male and female; odds ratio (random effects model): 1.390 (0.801, 2.412) between mandible and maxillary, and an odds ratio value of 0.730 (0.250, 2.137) between the anterior and posterior extraction sites. In conclusion, we can see that there was a trend in the onset of MRONJ as a complication of dentoalveolar surgical procedures, which proportionally mostly involved the male sex and the posterior mandibular sectors, however, this trend must be further confirmed by additional studies.

Association between Hyperglycemia and Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ)

BACKGROUND

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a type of jawbone necrosis caused by the use of drugs for some types of cancer and osteoporosis. The current study aimed to evaluate the associations between hyperglycemia and the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

METHODS

Our research group investigated data collected between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020. A total of 260 patients were selected from the Inpatient Care Unit, Department of Oromaxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, Semmelweis University. Fasting glucose data were used and included in the study.

RESULTS

Approximately 40% of the necrosis group and 21% of the control group presented with hyperglycemia. There was a significant association between hyperglycemia and MRONJ (p < 0.05, p = 0.003). Vascular anomaly and immune dysfunction caused by hyperglycemia can lead to necrosis after tooth extraction. Necrosis is more common in the mandible (75.0%) and in the case of parenteral antiresorptive treatment (intravenous Zoledronate and subcutaneous Denosumab). Hyperglycemia is a more relevant risk factor than bad oral habits (26.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemia is a complication of abnormal glucose levels, a possible risk factor for necrosis development. Hence, uncontrolled or poorly regulated plasma glucose levels can significantly increase the risk of jawbone necrosis after invasive dental or oral surgical interventions.

MRONJ in breast cancer patients under bone modifying agents for cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL): a multi-hospital-based case series

BACKGROUND

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is the most common adverse event experienced by patients affected by breast cancer (BC) patients, without bone metastases. Bone modifying agents (BMAs) therapy is prescribed for the prevention of CTIBL, but it exposes patients to the risk of MRONJ.

METHODS

This multicentre hospital-based retrospective study included consecutive non-metastatic BC patients affected by MRONJ related to exposure to low-dose BMAs for CTIBL prevention. Patients' data were retrospectively collected from the clinical charts of seven recruiting Italian centres.

RESULTS

MRONJ lesions were found in fifteen females (mean age 67.5 years), mainly in the mandible (73.3%). The mean duration of BMAs therapy at MRONJ presentation was 34.9 months. The more frequent BMAs was denosumab (53.3%). Ten patients (66.7%) showed the following local risk factors associated to MRONJ development: periodontal disease (PD) in three cases (20%) and the remaining six (40%) have undergone PD-related tooth extractions. One patient presented an implant presence-triggered MRONJ (6.7%). In five patients (33.3%) no local risk factors were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first case series that investigated BC patients under BMAs for CTIBL prevention suffering from MRONJ. These patients seem to have similar probabilities of developing MRONJ as osteo-metabolic ones. Breast cancer patients under BMAs for CTIBL prevention need a regular prevention program for MRONJ, since they may develop bone metastases and be treated with higher doses of BMAs, potentially leading to a high-risk of MRONJ.

Novel formulations of oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis

Oral bisphosphonates are a key intervention in the treatment of osteoporosis and in reducing the risk of fragility fractures. Their use is supported by over 3 decades of evidence; however, patient adherence to oral bisphosphonates remains poor in part due to complex dosing instructions and adverse events, including upper gastrointestinal symptoms. This problem has led to the development of novel oral bisphosphonate formulations. Buffered, effervescent alendronate is dissolved in water and so seeks to reduce upper gastro-intestinal adverse events, and gastro-resistant risedronate aims to reduce the complexity of dosing procedure (e.g. fasting prior to consumption) whilst still maintaining the efficacy of fracture risk reduction. Clinical trials and real-world data have been employed to demonstrate some benefits in terms of reduced upper gastro-intestinal adverse events, adherence, persistence and health economic outcomes. This report describes the result of an ESCEO (European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis) expert working group, which explores where oral bisphosphonates sit in current clinical practice guidelines, review their risk-benefit profile and the consequences of poor adherence before exploring novel oral bisphosphonate formulations and their potential clinical and health economic impact. Further research is required but there are signs that these novel, oral bisphosphonate formulations may lead to improved tolerance of oral bisphosphonates and thus, improved adherence and fracture outcomes.

Real-world study of antiresorptive-related osteonecrosis of jaw based on the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system database

Objective: This study aims to explore the risk signals of osteonecrosis of the jaw induced by antiresorptive drugs and provide references for the clinical safety application. Method: According to the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), from January 2004 to September 2021, we chose "Osteonecrosis of the jaw (10064658)" and "Exposed bone in jaw (10071014)" as preferred terms, "antiresorptive drugs" as the target drugs, and primary suspect drug as the drug role code in the dataset. We evaluated the association between drugs and adverse events by using reporting odds ratio (ROR) based on disproportionality analysis. We took the High-Level Terms (HLT) of MedDRA® as the classification level of indications to calculate ROR to compare the signal difference of ONJ in different indications. In addition, patients with antiresorptive-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw and the time of onset of the condition following different antiresorptive medications were collected for the study. Results: The FAERS contained 18,421 reports relating to jaw osteonecrosis from January 2004 to September 2021. A total of eight antiresorptive agents were included in the analysis. From high to low, the ROR of ONJ induced by antiresorptive agents (regardless of indication) is pamidronate (ROR = 494.8), zoledronic acid (ROR = 431.9), denosumab (ROR = 194.8), alendronate (ROR = 151.2), risedronate (ROR = 140.2), etidronic acid (ROR = 64.5), ibandronate (ROR = 40.8), and romosozumab (ROR = 6.4). HLT ROR values for "metabolic bone disorders" were the lowest for each drug, while HLT ROR values were high for "tumor-related indications," including breast and nipple neoplasms malignant, plasma cell myelomas, and prostatic neoplasms malignant. The onset time for osteonecrosis of the jaw as median (Q1, Q3), osteoporosis-related indications, and the onset time for ONJ were 730 (368, 1268), 489.5 (236.3, 909.8), 722.5 (314, 1055), 761 (368, 1720), and 153 (50, 346) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, ibandronate, risedronate, and romosozumab, respectively. Cancer-related indications: the onset time for ONJ were 680.5 (255.3, 1283), 488 (245, 851), and 696.5 (347, 1087) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, and pamidronate, respectively. Conclusion: When antiresorptive drugs are used for metastasis, they have the largest risk signal, followed by malignancy, and the smallest is osteoporosis. The onset time of ONJ may not be related to the indications. The onset time of ONJ for BPs was about 2 years, denosumab about 1.3 years, and romosozumab less than 1 year, which may be related to sequential treatment. When used according to the instructions, the risk of ONJ caused by denosumab was higher than that of zoledronic acid, regardless of the indication. Based on these findings, researchers will continue to monitor and identify risk factors.

Osteoporosis and Fragility Fractures: currently available pharmacological options and future directions

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture. The average lifetime risk of a 50-year-old woman to suffer a fracture of the spine, hip, proximal humerus, or distal forearm has been estimated at close to 50%. In general, pharmacological treatment is recommended in patients who suffered a fragility fracture because their risk of suffering a subsequent fracture is increased dramatically. Therefore, many guidelines recommend pharmacological treatment in patients without a prevalent fracture if their fracture probability is comparable to or higher than that of a person of the same age with a prevalent fracture. The present review aims to highlight currently available pharmacological treatment options and their antifracture efficacy including safety aspects. Drug classes discussed comprise bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, parathyroid hormone peptides and derivatives, humanized monoclonal antibodies, and estrogens and gestagens and their combinations. Furthermore, a brief glimpse is provided into a potentially promising treatment option that involves mesenchymal stem cells.

Novel Soy Peptide CBP: Stimulation of Osteoblast Differentiation via TβRI-p38-MAPK-Depending RUNX2 Activation

DEDEQIPSHPPR, the calcium-binding peptide (CBP) identified in soy yogurt, was proven to be a potential cofactor in osteoporosis prevention in our previous study, but the mechanism was unknown. In this study, the activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OCN), the regulation of RUNX2, and the expression of TβRI were investigated to elucidate the underlying mechanism. The results show that CBP upregulated ALP activity and OCN concentration and increased the expression of RUNX2 and the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway. Similarly, the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in osteoblasts also increased upon CBP treatment. Moreover, the CBP-induced enhancement of ALP activity and phosphorylation levels in the p38 pathway was inhibited by treatment with a p38 inhibitor (SB203538) and TβRI inhibitor (SB431542), respectively, suggesting that p38 and TβRI were involved in the osteogenic action. Based on the signaling pathways, the intracellular calcium concentration was significantly elevated by CBP, which was correlated with the increased behavioral functions and the relative fluorescence intensity of the bone mass. These findings suggest that CBP stimulates osteoblast differentiation and bone mineralization through the activation of RUNX2 via mechanisms related to the TβRI-p38-MAPK signaling pathways, further highlighting CBP's important potential for treating osteoporosis.

Approach to the management of β thalassemia major associated osteoporosis - A long-standing relationship revisited

Adults with β- thalassemia major (β-TM) develop low BMD and fragility fractures at a higher incidence and at a younger age compared to the general population. The disease itself, including direct effects of anemia and iron overload toxicity on bone turnover, genetic susceptibility, thalassemia-related endocrinopathies and acquittance of suboptimal peak bone mass contribute to low bone mass and increased bone fragility frequently encountered among these patients. Current management of osteoporosis requires long-term treatment that can be provided by agents that reduce the risk of all osteoporotic fractures by modulating bone metabolism with different mechanisms of action. These include inhibitors of bone remodeling (e.g., bisphosphonates, denosumab) and stimulators of bone formation (e.g., PTHR1 agonists and sclerostin antibodies). Considering the unique characteristics of osteoporosis associated with β-TM and the clinical importance of balancing the risk/benefit of treatment in the long-term, appropriate use of these therapeutic approaches is essential for patient care. In this review we outline current literature on the use of anti-osteoporotic drugs in β-TM patients with osteoporosis focusing on data on the efficacy, safety, and duration of treatment. In addition, we propose a long-term management plan for β-TM -associated osteoporosis aiming at the optimal patient care for this special population.