Radiofrequency Ablation of Unifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma With BRAF V600E Mutation

Comparative outcomes of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation vs. microwave ablation for patients with T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) in a large cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 1111 patients with solitary T1N0M0 PTC treated with RFA (n = 894) or MWA (n = 215) by experienced physicians. A propensity score matching was used to compare disease progression, including lymph node metastases (LNM), recurrent tumors and persistent tumors, recurrence-free survival (RFS), volume reduction ratio (VRR), and complications between the RFA and MWA groups. The subgroup outcomes of T1a and T1b tumors treated with RFA and MWA were also compared.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up period of 41.7 ± 12.6 months, the overall incidence rates of disease progression, LNM, recurrent tumors, and persistent tumors were 2.1%, 0.7%, 1.2%, and 0.2%, respectively. Eight patients (0.7%) experienced transient voice change and recovered within 3 months. After 1:1 matching, there were no significant differences in disease progression (3.3% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.793), LNM (1.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000), recurrent tumor (1.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000), persistent tumors (0.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.317), RFS rates (96.7% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.821), VRR (99.3 ± 3.0% vs. 98.3 ± 8.5%, p = 0.865), tumor disappearance rate (87.9% vs. 81.4%, p = 0.061) and complications (1.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000) between the RFA and MWA groups. For T1a and T1b tumors, clinical outcomes were comparable between RFA and MWA.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA and MWA did not show significant differences in clinical outcomes for T1N0M0 PTC. The choice between RFA and MWA could depend on physician expertise and resources of local center resources. A qualified and experienced physician with extensive knowledge of the modalities is recommended when thermal ablation is performed.

KEY POINTS

Question With radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) used worldwide for T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), is one of them superior to the others? Findings There were no significant differences in disease progression, recurrence-free survival, volume reduction ratio, tumor disappearance, or complications between techniques for solitary T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Clinical relevance The choice between RFA and MWA could depend on physician expertise and resources of the local center resources. A qualified and experienced physician with extensive knowledge of the modalities is recommended when thermal ablation is performed.

Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: the devil is in the details

Thermal ablation (TA) has harvested favorable outcomes in treating low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). Preoperative assessment, intraoperative procedures and postoperative follow-up are all closely linked with the success and safety of TA on PTMC. However, many details in these aspects have not been systematically reviewed. This review firstly described the influence of preoperative assessment, especially for the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), as well as the molecular testing on the selection of TA for PTMC. Besides, we also summarized the experiences in treating special PTMC cases by TA, like multifocal lesions, PTMC located in the isthmus or adjacent to the dorsal capsule. At last, we discussed the follow-up strategies, the influence of the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level on the prognosis of PTMCs, and the management for recurrent cases. In conclusion, the procedures during the entire perioperative period should be standardized to improve the outcomes of TA in treating PTMC patients.