Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Pasireotide in Patients With Acromegaly: 14 Years of Single-Center Real-World Experience

Insights from an Italian Delphi panel: exploring resistance to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands and guiding second-line medical therapies in acromegaly management

PURPOSE

First-line medical therapy for acromegaly management includes first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs), but resistance limits their use. Despite international guidelines, the choice of second-line therapy is debated.

METHODS

We aim to discuss resistance to fgSRLs, identify second-line therapy determinants and assess glycemia's impact to provide valuable insights for acromegaly management in clinical practice. A group of Italian endocrinologists expert in the pituitary field participated in a two-round Delphi panel between July and September 2023. The Delphi questionnaire encompassed a total of 75 statements categorized into three sections: resistance to fgSRLs therapy and predictors of response; determinants for the selection of second-line therapy; the role of glycemia in the therapeutic management. The statements were rated on a 6-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine (79%) statements reached a consensus. IGF-1 levels resulted central for evaluating resistance to fgSRLs, that should be defined considering also symptomatic clinical response, degree of tumor shrinkage and complications, using clinician- and patient-reported outcome tools available. Factors to be evaluated for the choice of second-line medical therapy are hyperglycemia-that should be managed as in non-acromegalic patients-tumor remnant, resistant headache and compliance. Costs do not represent a main determinant in the choice of second-line medical treatment.

CONCLUSION

The experts agreed on a holistic management approach to acromegaly. It is therefore necessary to choose currently available highly effective second-line medical treatment (pegvisomant and pasireotide) based on the characteristics of the patients.

Long-term pasireotide-LAR treatment in the personalized therapy of patients with complex acromegaly: a collection of clinical experiences

Pasireotide-LAR is recommended as a second-line treatment for patients with acromegaly. Although the effects of pasireotide-LAR have been well characterized in clinical studies, real-practice evidence is scant, especially in the long term and within the individualization of therapy in patients with comorbidities. To provide additional insight on the individualized approach to acromegaly management, six clinical cases of complex acromegaly treated with pasireotide-LAR for more than 5 years were reported. Pasireotide-LAR allowed the normalization of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) values in all patients and reduced tumour residue volume where present. A good safety profile and long-term tolerability were also reported.

Long-term pasireotide therapy in acromegaly: extensive real-life experience of a referral center

PURPOSE

Pasireotide is a novel therapeutic option for patients with acromegaly resistant to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands. To date, real-life data are still scant, therefore, the aim of the current study is to evaluate the impact of long-term pasireotide therapy on disease control, pituitary tumor size, gluco-insulinemic and lipid profile in a real-life setting.

METHODS

Retrospective study of data prospectively collected, evaluating hormonal, tumoral, and metabolic data of 28 patients with acromegaly administered with pasireotide in a pituitary tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

Within the first 12 months of treatment, 70.4% of patients achieved normal IGF-I levels, which was maintained at 36-month evaluation in these responders patients. Patients who started with pasireotide 60 mg monthly exhibited significantly lower IGF-I levels after 36 months (p = 0.05) as compared to patients administered first with pasireotide 20 or 40 mg monthly. The maximal tumoral diameter was significantly decreased after 12 months of pasireotide (p < 0.001) and a further reduction was registered throughout the following months, with 41.2% of patients achieving a significant reduction (> 25% of baseline measurement) after 36 months of treatment. Fasting glucose significantly increased during the first 6 months (p < 0.001) with a gradual rise in diabetes prevalence during the following months, resulting diabetes prevalence after 36 months of pasireotide significantly increased compared to baseline (p = 0.003), although with glycated hemoglobin levels within the normal range. Diabetes was managed using oral glucose-lowering drugs or glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists, with no patient requiring insulin therapy. Pasireotide improved lipid profile, mainly during the first 12 months of treatment, by increasing HDL and decreasing triglycerides levels.

CONCLUSION

Pasireotide is effective and safe in the long-term. Hyperglycemia is a common event and is manageable even without insulin treatment.

Predictors of biochemical response to somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly

Although predictors of response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs), and to a lesser extent to pasireotide, have been studied in acromegaly for many years, their use is still not recommended in clinical guidelines. Is there insufficient evidence to use them? Numerous biomarkers including various clinical, functional, radiological and molecular markers have been identified. The first ones are applicable pre-surgery, while the molecular predictors are utilized for patients not cured after surgery. In this regard, factors predicting a good response to fg-SRLs are specifically: low basal GH, a low GH nadir in the acute octreotide test, T2 MRI hypointensity, a densely granulated pattern, high immunohistochemistry staining for somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), and E-cadherin. However, there is still a lack of consensus regarding which of these biomarkers is more useful or how to integrate them into clinical practice. With classical statistical methods, it is complex to define reliable and generalizable cut-off values for a single biomarker. The potential solution to the limitations of traditional methods involves combining systems biology with artificial intelligence, which is currently providing answers to such long-standing questions that may eventually be finally included into the clinical guidelines and make personalized medicine a reality. The aim of this review is to describe the current knowledge of the main fg-SRLs and pasireotide response predictors, discuss their current usefulness, and point to future directions in the research of this field.

Successful medical management of a pituitary macroadenoma with features of resistant acromegaly and hyperprolactinemia using pasireotide

BACKGROUND

The somatostatin analog, pasireotide, is used for the treatment of acromegaly after the failure of surgery and/or first-line medical treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 48-year-old male reported that during a workup for obesity in his home country, hyperprolactinemia was diagnosed and a 3.5 × 3.5 cm pituitary macroadenoma was identified on pituitary MRI. He received cabergoline for 6 months; then he was lost to follow-up. He presented at our Endocrine clinic 2 years later for treatment of obesity (BMI 49.5 kg/m2). Biochemical workup revealed that in addition to hyperprolactinemia (7,237 [normal: 85-323 mIU/L), he had acromegaly, evident by elevated insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level (450 [normal: 88-210 µg/L]), and a positive growth hormone suppression test, secondary hypothyroidism, and secondary hypogonadism. Pituitary MRI showed that the adenoma encased parts of the left and right internal carotid arteries and encroached on the optic chiasm. Surgical excision was therefore not feasible. He was treated with cabergoline and later, long-acting release (LAR) octreotide. Prolactin levels were reduced with cabergoline, but IGF-1 levels did not respond to octreotide, and it was discontinued. The patient abandoned radiotherapy after two sessions. He was started on LAR pasireotide 40 mg every 4 weeks and continued on cabergoline 0.5 mg per week. His biochemical response was dramatic, with a near normalization of IGF-1 levels in 3 months. After 6 months from starting pasireotide, we increased cabergoline dose from 0.5 mg/week to 3 mg/week. Three months later, IGF-1 level was normalized. The patient developed type 2 diabetes as a side effect of pasireotide; however, this was well-controlled with medications.

CONCLUSIONS

The case suggests that pasireotide can provide marked biochemical improvement in acromegaly after the failure of both cabergoline monotherapy and cabergoline plus octreotide. This further confirms a potentially efficacious treatment regimen in treatment-resistant acromegaly with hyperprolactinemia.

Pasireotide effects on biochemical control and glycometabolic profile in acromegaly patients switched from combination therapies or unconventional dosages of somatostatin analogs

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of pasireotide (PAS) therapy on hormonal and glycometabolic outcome in patients with acromegaly previously treated with combination medical therapies or unconventional dosages of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs).

METHODS

Retrospective study carried out in two referral centers for pituitary diseases. Twenty-one acromegalic patients were switched to PAS (12 had biochemical control, 9 were uncontrolled). Data were collected after 3- and 6-months PAS treatment, and at the last available visit (median 35 months).

RESULTS

After switching to PAS therapy, a significant reduction in IGF-1 values was observed [median 39%; 0.79 xULN (IQR 0.5-1.01) vs 1.29 xULN (IQR 1.06-1.83); p = 0.009]. IGF-1 reduction was statistically significant in the 9 patients previously uncontrolled (61%, p = 0.016), and in the 12 controlled subjects (33%, p = 0.037). At last follow-up, the number of patients reaching an acceptable biochemical control (IGF-1 < 1.3 xULN) raised from 57 to 90% (p = 0.032). Mean HbA1c levels increased from 5.7% (5.5-5.9) to 6.0% (5.9-7) (p = 0.002), and the percentage of diabetic patients raised from 14% (3/21) to 67% (14/21) (p = 0.004). At the last evaluation HbA1c was ≥ 7.0% in 5 patients (24%). Antidiabetic drugs were initiated in 9 new patients, and in 7 out of 9 metformin alone was effective. Younger age and male sex were predictors for the maintenance of glucose homeostasis.

CONCLUSION

PAS monotherapy can be effective in acromegalic patients previously treated with combination medical therapies or unconventional dosages of fg-SRLs. Glucose imbalance can be managed in the vast majority of cases by use of lifestyle interventions and metformin.

Management of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia in patients with acromegaly: An experts' consensus statement

Pasireotide is a somatostatin analogue for the treatment of acromegaly, a chronic condition caused by excess growth hormone. Despite the therapeutic benefits of pasireotide as a second-line treatment for inadequately controlled acromegaly, a major concern is its hyperglycemic side-effect. Here, we provide guidance on how to select appropriate patients with acromegaly for treatment with pasireotide. We summarize baseline characteristics of patients at high risk for pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia and recommend a monitoring strategy based on the risk profile. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels (SMBG), measurements of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and regular HbA1c measurements are the foundation of our proposed monitoring approach. The pathophysiology of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia involves decreased secretion of the incretin hormones GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) and GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1). Our expert recommendations address the specific pathophysiology of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia by recommending the incretin-based therapeutics dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in all appropriate patients as an alternative to first-line monotherapy with metformin. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of adequate control of acromegaly, excellent diabetes education, nutrition and lifestyle guidance and advise to consult expert diabetologists in case of uncertainty in the management of patients with hyperglycemia under pasireotide.

Efficacy of pasireotide LAR for acromegaly: a prolonged real-world monocentric study

Background

Acromegaly is caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1). Medical therapy plays a role as a treatment option for persistent disease after non-curative surgery or as a first-line therapy when surgery is not feasible. Pasireotide-LAR (Pas-LAR) is recommended for patients with acromegaly as second-line treatment.

Aim

To evaluate the patients characteristics predictive of an adequate response to Pas-LAR and the long-term efficacy and safety of the Pas-LAR treatment.

Methods

Data from 19 patients with active acromegaly, who were and resistant or intolerant to first-line medical therapy and were switched to pas-LAR have been retrospectively collected. We compared the baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients who were found to respond to Pas-LAR therapy (responders, n=14) with those of patients who did not respond (non-responders, n=5). We then evaluated the Pas-LAR efficacy and safety during long-term follow-up in responders.

Results

IGF1 normalization occurred in 71.4% of responders after one injection. IGF1 levels, [median(interquartile range) of the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) fold increase] were higher in non-responders compared to responders within the initial month of therapy [1.40(1.30-2.34) vs 0.70(0.55-1.25), respectively, p=0.009] and after three [1.77(1.74-2.29) vs 0.94(0.82-1.13), respectively, p=0.029] and six months [1.68(1.33-1.72) vs 1.00(0.65 -1.28), respectively, p=0.002]. Out of 6 patients with symptomatic headache (all in responder group), 5 and 1 reported the resolution and improvement of headache, respectively, already after the first injection. Median HbA1c levels tended to increase from baseline to 6 months both in responder (36 mMol/Mol to 42 mMol/Mol) and non-responder patients (45 mMol/Mol to 48 mMol/Mol). During long term follow up, in the responder group 2 new patients developed diabetes. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 6 out of 7 evaluated responders, with no cases of size increase during the long-term follow-up.

Conclusion

Pas-LAR is effective and safe and the early identification of responders is possible just after the first administration.

Biomarkers of response to treatment in acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Medical treatment of acromegaly is based in a `trial and error` approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are prescribed as first-line medical therapy to the vast majority of patients, despite lack of disease control in approximately 60% of patients. However, other drugs used in acromegaly treatment are available (cabergoline, pasireotide and pegvisomant).

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we review and discuss the biomarkers of response to medical treatment in acromegaly.

EXPERT OPINION

Biomarkers for fg-SRL that can already be applied in clinical practice are: gender, age, pretreatment GH and IGF-I levels, cytokeratin granulation pattern, and the expression of somatostatin receptor type 2. Using biomarkers of response could guide treatment towards precision medicine with greater efficacy and lower costs.