Effects of hypothalmic implants of GH on anterior pituitary weight and GH concentration

Increased GH Secretion and Body Growth in Mice Carrying Ablation of IGF-1 Receptor in GH-releasing Hormone Cells

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is controlled by short and long negative feedback loops. In this regard, both GH (short-loop feedback) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1; long-loop feedback) can target somatotropic cells of the pituitary gland and neuroendocrine hypothalamic neurons to regulate the GH/IGF-1 axis. GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-expressing neurons play a fundamental role in stimulating pituitary GH secretion. However, it is currently unknown whether IGF-1 action on GHRH-expressing cells is required for the control of the GH/IGF-1/growth axis. In the present study, we investigated the phenotype of male and female mice carrying ablation of IGF-1 receptor (IGF1R) exclusively in GHRH cells. After weaning, both male and female GHRHΔIGF1R mice exhibited increases in body weight, lean body mass, linear growth, and length of long bones (tibia, femur, humerus, and radius). In contrast, the percentage of body fat was similar between control and GHRHΔIGF1R mice. The higher body growth of GHRHΔIGF1R mice can be explained by increases in mean GH levels, GH pulse amplitude, and pulse frequency, calculated from 36 blood samples collected from each animal at 10-minute intervals. GHRHΔIGF1R mice also showed increased hypothalamic Ghrh mRNA levels, pituitary Gh mRNA expression, hepatic Igf1 expression, and serum IGF-1 levels compared with control animals. Furthermore, GHRHΔIGF1R mice displayed significant alterations in the sexually dimorphic hepatic gene expression profile, with a prevailing feminization in most genes analyzed. In conclusion, our findings indicate that GHRH neurons represent a key and necessary site for the long-loop negative feedback that controls the GH/IGF-1 axis and body growth.

Basal secretion of growth hormone in sheep is not influenced by GH feedback

Autoregulation of GH secretion in sheep was examined by intravenous and intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of human and bovine GH. Intravenous administration of hGH at either 2 mg or 10 mg per sheep failed to alter radioimmunoassayable plasma ovine GH concentrations or plasma somatostatin. Human GH also failed to alter plasma oGH when given at a dose of 50 micrograms i.c.v. Bovine GH (at 50 micrograms or 500 micrograms) i.c.v. did not affect basal plasma oGH or somatostatin, nor did pretreatment with 50 micrograms bGH significantly alter GH response to clonidine stimulation, although the change in plasma GH with stimulation was only half that of controls. These data do not support a major autoregulatory effect on GH secretion in the sheep.

Growth factors and the anterior pituitary

Normal growth and secretion in the pituitary gland are dependent upon the co-ordinated action of a large number of extracellular growth factors, neuropeptides and peripheral hormones acting on their respective cellular receptors and via complex intracellular signalling pathways. The pituitary and hypothalamus are exposed to a large number of growth factors, several of which have well-documented effects on secretory function and may act as physiological modulators of pituitary hormone synthesis and release. IGF-I, for example, almost certainly acts as a feedback regulator of GH secretion. Despite well-documented mitogenic effects in other tissues, little is known about the role of these growth factors in normal pituitary cell turnover, compensatory hyperplasia or adenoma formation. There is now good evidence, however, that at least some of the hypothalamic releasing peptides are mitogenic for their respective pituitary cell subpopulations. The aetiology of pituitary tumours remains poorly understood but some appear to develop as a result of somatic mutation. Such mutations could enhance growth by causing altered expression of growth factors or their receptors, or constitutive activation of proteins involved in the intracellular mitogenic signal. Abnormalities have been documented at each of these levels in human pituitary tumours. The identification of an activating point mutation in the alpha subunit of Gs, the stimulatory regulatory peptide of adenylyl cyclase, in a proportion of somatotroph adenomas represents a major advance in our understanding of pituitary tumour pathogenesis. This and other findings may ultimately lead to new therapeutic approaches to the management of pituitary disease.

Hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) participates in the negative feedback regulation of growth hormone secretion

Effects of growth hormone (GH) excess on immunoreactive hypothalamic GH-releasing factor (GRF) and somatostatin (SRIF) were studied in rats. Hypothalamic GRF content significantly reduced after 7-day daily treatment with 160 micrograms of rat GH or after inoculation of GH-secreting rat pituitary tumors, MtT-F4 for 9 or 13 days and GH3 for 3 months. Basal and 59 mM K+-evoked release of GRF from incubated hypothalami diminished, more than the content, by 43-51% in MtT-F4 tumor- or by 67-83% in GH3 tumor-bearing rats. In contrast, there was a small but significant increase in content or release of SRIF in rats harboring the GH3 or MtT-F4 tumor, respectively. These results indicate the existence of a negative feedback loop via hypothalamic GRF as well as SRIF in control of GH secretion.

Exogenous growth hormone inhibits growth hormone-releasing factor-induced growth hormone secretion in normal men

Previous studies from this laboratory and by others in rats, monkeys, and humans support the concept that growth hormone (GH) can regulate its own secretion through an autofeedback mechanism. With the availability of human growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF), the possible existence of such a mechanism was reexplored by examining the effect of exogenous GH on the GH response induced by GRF-44-NH2 in six normal men (mean age, 32.4 yr). In all subjects the plasma GH response evoked by GRF-44-NH2 (1 microgram/kg i.v. bolus) was studied before and after 5 d of placebo (1 ml normal saline i.m. every 12 h), and then before and 12 h after 5 d of biosynthetic methionyl human GH (5 U i.m. every 12 h). The GH response to GRF (maximal increment over time 0 value) was significantly inhibited after GH treatment (0-1.3 vs. 2.3-11.2 ng/ml before treatment, P = 0.05), but was not significantly affected by placebo. This impaired pituitary response to GRF persisted for at least 24 h following exogenous GH treatment in two subjects who underwent further study. Serum somatomedin-C concentrations were significantly increased after 5 d of GH treatment (2.66-5.00 vs. 0.92-1.91 U/ml before treatment, P = less than 0.01). The impaired pituitary response to GRF may be mediated indirectly through somatomedin, somatostatin, by a direct effect of GH on the pituitary somatotropes, or by all of these mechanisms. These data suggest that after GH treatment, the blunted GH response to synthetic GRF is not solely a consequence of the inhibition of hypothalamic GRF secretion.

Stimulation by growth hormone of somatostatin release from the rat hypothalamus in vitro

Growth hormone (GH) has been shown to cause a dose-dependent increase in the release of immunoreactive somatostatin from the rat hypothalamus in vitro, thus providing further evidence that GH may be involved in a "short loop" feedback, controlling its own secretion via hypothalamic somatostatin release.