Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced desensitization may account for the decrease in pituitary responsiveness after the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge

A regulator of G protein signaling, RGS3, inhibits gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion

BACKGROUND

Luteinizing hormone secreted by the anterior pituitary gland regulates gonadal function. Luteinizing hormone secretion is regulated both by alterations in gonadotrope responsiveness to hypothalamic gonadotropin releasing hormone and by alterations in gonadotropin releasing hormone secretion. The mechanisms that determine gonadotrope responsiveness are unknown but may involve regulators of G protein signaling (RGSs). These proteins act by antagonizing or abbreviating interaction of Galpha proteins with effectors such as phospholipase Cbeta. Previously, we reported that gonadotropin releasing hormone-stimulated second messenger inositol trisphosphate production was inhibited when RGS3 and gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor cDNAs were co-transfected into the COS cell line. Here, we present evidence for RGS3 inhibition of gonadotropin releasing hormone-induced luteinizing hormone secretion from cultured rat pituitary cells.

RESULTS

A truncated version of RGS3 (RGS3T = RGS3 314-519) inhibited gonadotropin releasing hormone-stimulated inositol trisphosphate production more potently than did RSG3 in gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor-bearing COS cells. An RSG3/glutathione-S-transferase fusion protein bound more 35S-Gqalpha than any other member of the G protein family tested. Adenoviral-mediated RGS3 gene transfer in pituitary gonadotropes inhibited gonadotropin releasing hormone-stimulated luteinizing hormone secretion in a dose-related fashion. Adeno-RGS3 also inhibited gonadotropin releasing hormone stimulated 3H-inositol phosphate accumulation, consistent with a molecular site of action at the Gqalpha protein.

CONCLUSIONS

RGS3 inhibits gonadotropin releasing hormone-stimulated second messenger production (inositol trisphosphate) as well as luteinizing hormone secretion from rat pituitary gonadotropes apparently by binding and suppressing the transduction properties of Gqalpha protein function. A version of RGS3 that is amino-terminally truncated is even more potent than intact RGS3 at inhibiting gonadotropin releasing hormone-stimulated inositol trisphosphate production.

High efficiency method for gene transfer in normal pituitary gonadotropes: adenoviral-mediated expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 suppresses luteinizing hormone secretion

The level of LH secretion is determined by both alterations in gonadotrope responsiveness and alterations in GnRH secretion. The molecular mechanisms underlying gonadotrope responsiveness are unknown, but may include G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). Typically, GRKs phosphorylate the intracellular regions of seven-transmembrane receptors permitting beta-arrestin to bind, which prevents receptor activation of its G protein. Previously, we reported that heterologous expression of GRK2, -3, and -6 in GnRH receptor-expressing COS cells by complementary DNA transfection suppressed GnRH-stimulated inositol trisphosphate production, and that coexpression of GRK2 and beta-arrestin-2 was more inhibitory than either expressed alone. Here, we have investigated the effect of GRK2 on GnRH-stimulated LH secretion using adenovirus-mediated gene transfer in normal pituitary gonadotropes. Pituitary cells were infected with adeno-GRK2 or adeno-beta-galactosidase constructs at a multiplicity of infection of 60 (number of viral particles per cell). Seventy-two hours later, GRK2 expression was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and GnRH-stimulated LH secretion (10(-7) M GnRH-A for 90 min) was assayed by RIA. Adeno-beta-galactosidase infected 96-99% of the cells based on X-Gal staining. Uninfected and adeno-beta-galactosidase-infected cells exhibited endogenous GRK immunoreactivity of about 0.5 (OD405), and LH secretion of 14.8-17.7 ng/ml. Adeno-GRK2-infected cells showed a GRK2 immunoreactivity of about 2.5 (OD405) and LH secretion of 2.5 ng/ml. Therefore, adeno-GRK2 infection resulted in a 5-fold increase in the GRK2 OD405 value, which was accompanied by an 80-85% decrease in GnRH-stimulated LH secretion. GnRH-stimulated inositol trisphosphate production by gonadotropes also was inhibited, suggesting a site of action for GRK2 at phospholipase Cbeta or earlier in the signal transduction pathway. The significance of these findings is 2-fold: 1) adenoviral-mediated gene transfer permits investigation of the regulatory role of gene products in the cell of interest, the gonadotrope, rather than in heterologous cell systems; and 2) additional, stronger evidence is provided that supports a role for GRKs in setting the responsiveness of GnRH receptor signaling.

Modulation of gonadotropin levels by peptides acting at the anterior pituitary gland

There are several lines of evidence that point to peptides participating in the regulation of LH and/or FSH levels by action at the pituitary. This evidence includes altered secretion of gonadotropins from the anterior pituitary cells or tissue in vitro when exposed to the peptide. Additionally, modification of GnRH-stimulated LH/FSH secretion has been observed. Furthermore, there is potential for a separately modulated interaction with the primed response. Another potential of action is by interaction among non-GnRH peptides on gonadotropin-regulating processes, although there are no good data available on this aspect. Other observations, consistent with a pituitary role for the peptides in modulation of LH, include detection of the peptides in portal blood, detection of high-affinity receptors or receptor mRNA in the pituitary, and detection of intrapituitary peptide or peptide mRNA in the pituitary. The modulation by steroids of both concentrations and type of activities provides a further level of physiological refinement. There is, however, some confusion regarding the involvement of these peptides in gonadotropin control. The reasons can be seen by considering aspects of investigations. There are experimental variations such as 1) species studied, e.g., NPY has been reported to have an effect on LH secretion from rat cells (168) but not on sheep anterior pituitary tissue (64), and substance P inhibits GnRH-stimulated release from rat cells (182) but potentiates the response in prepubertal porcine cells (92); 2) the steroidal conditions under which the study is performed, e.g., NPY has opposite effects in certain endocrine environments, augmenting GnRH-stimulated LH release in proestrus-like conditions (168), and inhibiting in metestrus-like environment (66); 3) the type of cell preparation, e.g., responsiveness to substance P might depend on whether cells in overnight culture were in separated or clustered state (91); 4) the time course considered, e.g., oxytocin that might induce marked LH release from pituitary cells after a longer length of incubation than GnRH requires (68); 5) length of exposure to peptide, e.g., endothelin that augmented or inhibited GnRH-stimulated LH release (50); 6) In addition, it is possible that the traditional endpoint selected in such studies, namely, observation of gonadotropin secretion, is not necessarily the most important for these peptides (56, 81, 117). Unfortunately, at this stage a definitive answer to the question "What do the peptides actually do?" cannot be provided and we remain tantalized by the glimpses of potential roles. Perhaps in a few years an updated review will be able to include a more complete answer. It is necessary for the full understanding of LH control that not only the properties of the peptides in isolation be characterized but also their interactions.