A coated tube assay for the detection of blocking thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies

Comparison of two different TSH-receptor antibody assays: A clinical practice study

Background

Graves' disease (GD) is caused by the production of TSH-receptor (TSHR) stimulating auto-antibodies. Over the years various TSHR-antibody (TRAb) detection assays have been developed. Most clinical laboratories use competitive TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII) assays, which measure the total amount of stimulating and blocking auto-antibodies. Selective detection of TSHR stimulating auto-antibodies (TSI) was previously only possible with functional cell-based bioassays. However, more recently an automated bridge-based binding assay to more specifically measure TSI has become available. The aim of our study was to compare the third-generation automated competitive immunoassay (TBII) with the automated bridge immunoassay (TSI) in clinical practice in an academic thyroid expert center.

Methods

A retrospective study in 356 patients with Graves' disease, Graves orbitopathy (GO), and other (thyroid) disease treated in an academic thyroid center was performed. All samples were analyzed for TBII and TSI. For both assays, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PVV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated using different cut-offs for negativity.

Results

Using the provided cut-off, the overall sensitivity appeared similar between TBII and TSI, but TSI showed higher overall specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic odds ratio. Using two or three times the cut-off for negativity resulted in a decrease in sensitivity, but an increase in specificity and PPV, which was most pronounced for the TBII-assay. Analysis in a subgroup of newly diagnosed treatment naïve GD/GO patients also revealed overall favorable results for the TSI-assay. Increasing the cut-off for negativity resulted in increased specificity for both assays, with similar results using two or three times the cut-off. Most patients with concordant positive results for TBII and TSI suffered from GD or GD + GO (n = 110, 95.6 %), while patients negative for both TBII and TSI mostly suffered from other (thyroid) disease (n = 143, 77.3 %). From patients with positive TBII but negative TSI only 42.1 % had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 57.9 % (n = 22) had other (thyroid) disease. In contrast, 88.9 % of patients with positive TSI but negative TBII had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 11.1 % (n = 2) had other (thyroid) disease.

Conclusion

In our academic thyroid center, the diagnostic performance of the TSI-assay outperformed the TBII-assay. Using a higher cut-off value for negativity can be helpful in assessing clinical relevance.

Thyrotropin Receptor Blocking Antibodies

Autoantibodies (Ab) against the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) are frequently found in autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). Autoantibodies to the TSHR (anti-TSHR-Ab) may mimic or block the action of TSH or be functionally neutral. Measurement of anti-TSHR-Ab can be done either via competitive-binding immunoassays or with functional cell-based bioassays. Antibody-binding assays do not assess anti-TSHR-Ab functionality, but rather measure the concentration of total anti-TSHR binding activity. In contrast, functional cell-based bioassays indicate whether anti-TSHR-Ab have stimulatory or blocking activity. Historically bioassays for anti-TSHR-Ab were research tools and were used to study the pathophysiology of Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. In the past, bioassays for anti-TSHR-Abs were laborious and time-consuming and varied widely in performance from laboratory to laboratory. Recent advances in the development of cell-based assays, including the application of molecular engineering, have led to significant improvements that have enabled bioassays to be employed routinely in clinical laboratories. The prevalence and functional significance of TSHR blocking autoantibodies (TBAb) in autoimmune hypothyroidism has been less well investigated compared to TSHR stimulating Ab. There is an increasing body of data, however, that demonstrate the clinical utility and relevance of TBAb, and thus the importance of TBAb bioassays, in the diagnosis and management of patients with AITD. In the present review, we summarize the different methods used to measure TBAb, and discuss their prevalence and clinical relevance.

Similarities and differences in interactions of thyroid stimulating and blocking autoantibodies with the TSH receptor

Binding of a new thyroid-stimulating human monoclonal autoantibody (MAb) K1-18 to the TSH receptor (TSHR) leucine-rich domain (LRD) was predicted using charge-charge interaction mapping based on unique complementarities between the TSHR in interactions with the thyroid-stimulating human MAb M22 or the thyroid-blocking human MAb K1-70. The interactions of K1-18 with the TSHR LRD were compared with the interactions in the crystal structures of the M22-TSHR LRD and K1-70-TSHR LRD complexes. Furthermore, the predicted position of K1-18 on the TSHR was validated by the effects of TSHR mutations on the stimulating activity of K1-18. A similar approach was adopted for predicting binding of a mouse thyroid-blocking MAb RSR-B2 to the TSHR. K1-18 is predicted to bind to the TSHR LRD in a similar way as TSH and M22. The binding analysis suggests that K1-18 light chain (LC) mimics binding of the TSH-α chain and the heavy chain (HC) mimics binding of the TSH-β chain. By contrast, M22 HC mimics the interactions of TSH-α while M22 LC mimics TSH-β in interactions with the TSHR. The observed interactions in the M22-TSHR LRD and K1-70-TSHR LRD complexes (crystal structures) with TSH-TSHR LRD (comparative model) and K1-18-TSHR LRD (predictive binding) suggest that K1-18 and M22 interactions with the receptor may reflect interaction of thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies in general. Furthermore, K1-70 and RSR-B2 interactions with the TSHR LRD may reflect binding of TSHR-blocking autoantibodies in general. Interactions involving the C-terminal part of the TSHR LRD may be important for receptor activation by autoantibodies.

Osteoporosis associated with neutralizing autoantibodies against osteoprotegerin

Autoantibodies against osteoprotegerin, which block the inhibitory effect of osteoprotegerin on signaling by the receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB (RANK), were identified in a man with celiac disease who presented with severe osteoporosis and high bone turnover. The osteoporosis did not respond to the treatment of his celiac disease but was completely reversed by bisphosphonate therapy. Autoantibodies against osteoprotegerin were detected in three additional patients with celiac disease. Such autoantibodies may be associated with the development of high-turnover osteoporosis, but whether autoantibodies against osteoprotegerin commonly contribute to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis in patients with celiac disease remains to be determined.

Clinical value of M22-based assays for TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb) in the follow-up of antithyroid drug treated Graves' disease: comparison with the second generation human TRAb assay

BACKGROUND

We compared the clinical performances of two new M22-based assays for TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb) with those of the human TRAb assay (hTRAK) in Graves' disease patients at the end of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sera were obtained from 128 Graves' patients treated for 18 months with antithyroid drugs. Sixty-six remained in remission and sixty-two had relapse of hyperthyroidism in a 3-year follow-up after discontinuing treatment. TRAbs were measured using two M22-based methods (electrochemiluminescence using the Cobas or ELISA using the Medizym TRAb clone) and with the hTRAK.

RESULTS

At T18, the results were significantly higher by the Cobas assay (median: 2.7 IU/L, range: 1.1-18.5 IU/L) or lower by ELISA (median: 0.56 IU/L, range: 0.22-14.8 IU/L) than those obtained for the hTRAK (median: 1.5 IU/L, range: 0.9-9.8 IU/L). The use of cut-off limits at 1.9 IU/L, 3.2 IU/L and 0.94 IU/L gave similar and higher prevalences of TRAb-positive patients in the group of relapse as compared to the remission group. However, some patients remained misclassified in each remission or relapse group.

CONCLUSIONS

The M22-based TRAb assays did not improve the predictive value of relapse obtained with the hTRAK measured at the end of treatment. High inter-method variability requires assay harmonization for correct interpretation of results.

Induction of stimulating thyrotropin receptor antibodies after radioiodine therapy for toxic multinodular goitre and Graves' disease measured with a novel bioassay

BACKGROUND

Radioactive iodine therapy (RaI) in toxic multinodular goitre (TMNG) has been associated with the occurrence of Graves'-like hyperthyroidism. It has been postulated that pre-existing autoimmunity may contribute to this phenomenon.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether RaI induces thyrotropin receptor stimulating antibodies (TSAbs) in the short term in TMNG and whether pre-existing autoimmunity is relevant.

PATIENTS

Thirty-one patients with relapsing Graves' disease and 17 patients with TMNG, all eligible for RaI.

METHODS

Before and 6 weeks after RaI, sera were collected and analysed for the presence of thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Abs) and thyrotropin receptor binding antibodies (TBIIs). TSAbs were analysed with a novel high-sensitive luciferase-based bioassay based on the JP-26-26 cell line, which constitutively expresses the TSH receptor.

RESULTS

In Graves' disease, RaI did not induce or increase the levels and proportion of patients with measurable levels of any of the antibodies measured, despite a significant increase in Tg. In contrast, in TMNG, RaI induced TBIIs in three TMNG patients, which was accompanied by measurable TSAbs on one occasion.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude from the present study that induction of TBIIs and TSAbs may occur shortly after RaI in TMNG and that pre-existing autoimmunity may not be a requirement for the induction of TBIIs, as evidenced by the lack of effect of RaI on TBIIs in Graves' disease.

A bioluminescence assay for thyrotropin receptor antibodies predicts serum thyroid hormone levels in patients with de novo Graves' disease

BACKGROUND

TSH receptor antibodies (TBII) in Graves' disease (GD) may be TSH receptor stimulating (TSAb) and blocking (TBAb) antibodies. In commercially available assays however, only total TBII titres can be measured, without discriminating between TSAb and TBAb.

OBJECTIVE

To design a TBII bioassay to detect of TSAb and to correlate TSAb activity with severity of hyperthyroidism in de novo GD patients.

PATIENTS

Thirty-five patients with de novo GD and 27 controls.

METHODS

The JP-26-26 cell line, which constitutively expresses the TSH receptor (TSHR), was stably transfected with a cyclic adenosine monophosphate responsive element--luciferase construct. The clone B1 exhibited a near linear increase in luminescence from 0.2 mU/l to 50 mU/l bovine TSH and was used as a TBII bioassay. TBII, free T4 and TSH were measured in the sera of all patients and controls.

RESULTS

In the sera of 35 GD patients, TBII titres did not correlate with serum free T4 concentrations. In contrast, a strong and highly significant correlation was found between TSHR stimulating activity (luminescence) as measured with the TBII bioassay and serum free T4 levels (R = 0.80, P < 0.001). Interestingly, the luminescence/TBII ratio had a wide range at low TBII titres, whereas high TBII titres were associated with a low degree of TSHR activation. The TBII bioassay also detected TBAb in GD patients who spontaneously developed hypothyroidism.

CONCLUSIONS

The B1-TBII-bioassay as developed in our laboratory has a high sensitivity for the detection of TSAb in GD and predicts the severity of hyperthyroidism in untreated GD patients. In addition, we found that high TBII titres are associated with weak TSHR activation.