Surgical results of thyroid nodules according to a management guideline based on the BRAF(V600E) mutation status

Biomarkers in Thyroid Cancer: Emerging Opportunities from Non-Coding RNAs and Mitochondrial Space

Thyroid cancer diagnosis primarily relies on imaging techniques and cytological analyses. In cases where the diagnosis is uncertain, the quantification of molecular markers has been incorporated after cytological examination. This approach helps physicians to make surgical decisions, estimate cancer aggressiveness, and monitor the response to treatments. Despite the availability of commercial molecular tests, their widespread use has been hindered in our experience due to cost constraints and variability between them. Thus, numerous groups are currently evaluating new molecular markers that ultimately will lead to improved diagnostic certainty, as well as better classification of prognosis and recurrence. In this review, we start reviewing the current preoperative testing methodologies, followed by a comprehensive review of emerging molecular markers. We focus on micro RNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and mitochondrial (mt) signatures, including mtDNA genes and circulating cell-free mtDNA. We envision that a robust set of molecular markers will complement the national and international clinical guides for proper assessment of the disease.

InTERTwined: how TERT promoter mutations impact BRAFV600E-driven thyroid cancers

Thyroid cancers are often initiated by the acquisition of a BRAFV600E mutation. BRAFV600E-driven thyroid tumors display a wide range of behaviors, from the slow-growing papillary carcinomas to the highly aggressive anaplastic. Mutations in the promoter of TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase) gene were discovered a decade ago and identified as prevalent events in thyroid cancers. Multiple studies showed that TERT promoter mutations, particularly when co-occurring with BRAFV600E, are markers of poor prognosis across thyroid cancer subtypes, and can be implemented for routine clinical stratification. Mechanistically, TERT promoter mutations reactivate telomerase expression via the differential recruitment of transcriptional complexes. Re-expression of TERT impacts tumor biology, plausibly via both the well-known function of telomerase maintaining telomeres and by affecting other cancer-relevant processes.

Next-Generation Sequencing Enhances the Diagnosis Efficiency in Thyroid Nodules

BACKGROUND

Though fine-needle aspiration (FNA) improved the diagnostic methods of thyroid nodules, there are still parts of nodules that cannot be determined according to cytology. In the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology, there are two uncertain cytology results. Thanks to the development of next-generation sequencing technology, it is possible to gain the genetic background of pathological tissue efficiently. Therefore, a combination of the cytology and genetic background may enhance the accuracy of diagnosis in thyroid nodules.

METHODS

DNA from 73 FNA samples of thyroid nodules belonging to different cytology types was extracted and exome sequencing was performed by the ThyroLead panel. Test for BRAF mutation was also performed by ARMS-qPCR. Information including age, sex, preoperative cytology, BRAF mutation status tested by ARMS-qPCR, and surgical pathology was collected in electronic medical record system.

RESULTS

A total of 71 single nucleotide variants, three fusion gene, and two microsatellite instability-high status were detected in 73 FNA samples. BRAF V600E mutation is the most common mutation in these malignant thyroid nodules. After combining the cytology and genetic background detected by next-generation sequencing, the diagnosis sensitivity was increased from 0.582 (95% CI: 0.441-0.711) to 0.855 (95% CI: 0.728-0.930) (P < 0.001) in our group, while the specificity, 1,000 (95% CI: 0.732-1.000) compared to 0.857 (95% CI: 0.562-0.975) (P = 0.25), did not get affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Next-generation sequencing in thyroid nodules can enhance the preoperative diagnosis sensitivity by fine-needle aspiration alone. It can also provide genetic background for direction of medication. It is possible for clinicians to combine cytology with genetic alterations for a more precise diagnosis strategy of thyroid nodules.

Impact of Molecular Testing on the Management of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Among Western and Asian Countries: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Molecular testing has a potential to improve the management of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules considered for surgery. This study examined the influence of molecular tests on the treatment of indeterminate nodules, particularly the differences between Western and Asian countries. Electronic databases including PubMed and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles from 2010 to March 2019. We computed meta-analysis of proportion and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) utilizing the random-effect model. We used independent samples t test to compare the resection rate (RR), rate of malignancy (ROM), rate of preoperative molecular testing (RMT), and rate of positive test (RP) between subgroups. We included a total of 34 studies with 7976 indeterminate nodules. The multigene panel testing methods were exclusively used in the USA. Compared with the non-molecular era, molecular testing was associated with a significantly increased ROM (47.9% versus 32.1%; p = 0.001). The ROM of indeterminate nodules in Asian institutes was significantly higher than that in Western countries (75.3% versus 36.6%; p < 0.001, respectively). Institutes employing single-gene tests achieved a higher ROM (59.8% versus 37.9%; p = 0.013). Molecular testing is a promising method to tailor the clinical management for indeterminate thyroid FNA. Certain differences in routine thyroid cytopathology practice among the West and the East are still present. The combination of molecular testing and active surveillance enhances the accuracy of case selection for surgery in Asian countries.

Outcome of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: A six-year institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is one of six diagnostic categories of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC). The goal of our study is to assess the outcome of cases classified as AUS/FLUS at our institution.

METHODS

AUS/FLUS cases were identified by computer searching of the thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases performed between 2010 and 2016. Outcomes were categorized as: follow-up surgery, repeat FNA or no follow-up available. Demographics, ultrasound findings and FNA diagnostic criteria were reviewed for AUS/FLUS cases with follow-up surgical pathology diagnosis.

RESULTS

Our AUS/FLUS thyroid FNA rate was 6% (117 out of 1984 FNAs). Only 15% of the AUS/FLUS cases had repeat FNA, while 41% underwent surgery. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for cases with follow-up surgery was 17%. When considering all AUS/FLUS cases, the ROM was 7%. Statistically, benign neoplasms were more likely to be single lesions on ultrasound comparing to malignant neoplasms, and to exhibit architectural atypia as opposed to non-neoplastic lesions on FNA. The malignancy rates among patients that directly went to surgical resection (17%) and patients having repeat FNA after the first AUS/FLUS diagnosis followed by surgery (29%) was not significantly different. However, repeat FNA was able to reclassify the majority of cases into more definitive categories.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of the thyroid FNAs diagnosed as AUS/FLUS in our institution meets the benchmark statistics for AUS/FLUS rate and ROM. This study constitutes a valuable quality assurance measure and serves as a baseline for subsequent quality improvement.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of a 7-panel mutation testing in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology: the SWEETMAC study

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01880203) was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of a 7-panel mutation testing in the aspirates of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology (IC).

METHODS

Eligible patients had a thyroid nodule ≥15 mm with IC (Bethesda III-V) for which surgery had been recommended. Detection of BRAF and RAS mutations was performed using pyrosequencing and RET/PTC and PAX8/PPARγ rearrangements using Real-Time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

Among 131 nodules with IC, 21 (16%) were malignant including 20 differentiated cancers and one thyroid lymphoma. Molecular abnormalities were identified in 15 nodules with IC corresponding to 10 malignant and 5 benign tumours. BRAF mutation was detected in 4 nodules all corresponding to classic PTC, and PAX8/PPARγ rearrangement in 2 HCC. In contrast, RAS mutation was identified in eight nodules, of which four were malignant, and one RET/PTC3 rearrangement in a follicular adenoma. This data resulted in an accuracy of 88%, sensitivity of 48%, specificity of 95%, positive-predictive value of 67%, and negative-predictive value of 91%. After a 56 month's follow-up, the proportion of excellent response was similar in patients with molecular alterations (67%) and those without (60%).

CONCLUSIONS

By increasing the overall risk of cancer from 16 to 67% in mutated nodules and by diminishing it to 9% in wild-type, this study confirms the relevance of the 7-panel mutation testing in the diagnostic of nodules with IC. Genetic testing, however, did not predict outcome in the cancer patient subgroup.

The diversities in thyroid cytopathology practices among Asian countries using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology

Background

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) has been adopted and widely used among Asian countries. This study aims to investigate the application of TBSRTC in thyroid cytology practice among Asian countries.

Methods

We searched electronic databases including PubMed and Web of Science from 2010 to 2019. Meta-analysis of proportion and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effect model. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to search for heterogeneity origins.

Results

We included 42 Asian studies with 84.953 fine-needle aspirations. Among six categories, benign was the most commonly diagnosed category. The resection rate (RR) and risk of malignancy (ROM) were highest in malignant and SM categories, and lowest among benign nodules. Thyroid cytology practice in Asia was characterized by a low RR and high ROM in patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules. There was a significant amount of heterogeneities of TBSRTC outputs (frequency, resection rate, and malignancy risk) among Asian countries. Meta-regression showed that the sources of heterogeneity might stem from the differences in study origin and the application of molecular testing. We highlighted the usefulness of preoperative molecular testing to select patients for surgery.

Conclusions

Our study provided insight regarding thyroid cytology practice among Asian countries. Active surveillance is commonly used in Asian practice resulting in a low RR and high ROM for indeterminate nodules. There are still variations in general thyroid cytology practice in Asia. Future guidelines and consensus regarding the application of TBSRTC in thyroid cytology practice among Asian countries are required.

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: Asian vs. non-Asian practice, and the Singapore experience

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has paved the way for comparisons of the practice of thyroid cytology in many different regions. However, there have been comparatively few studies documenting differences between Asian and non-Asian practice. Here, we aim to compare a few key parameters between the two regions, focusing on the indeterminate category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS). We compared its incidence, resection rates (RRs), risk of malignancy (ROM), rate of repeat fine needle aspiration (rFNA), ROMs of cytomorphologic subcategories of nuclear atypia (AUS-N) vs. architectural atypia (AUS-A), and, finally, the incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) vs. follicular neoplasms (FNs) in resected AUS/FLUS cases in Asian and non-Asian regions. Where possible, these metrics were compared with the Singapore experience from a tertiary referral institution. While the incidence of AUS/FLUS was similar in both regions, we found geographical differences in the RRs and ROMs, which may reflect a higher collective threshold for surgery in Asian countries. However, both cohorts showed higher ROMs in the AUS-N subcategory as compared to the AUS-A subcategory, supporting the subclassification of the AUS/FLUS based on the presence of nuclear atypia. We also observed a higher incidence of AUS-N coupled with a higher incidence of PTC in resected AUS/FLUS nodules in Asian cohorts, while AUS-A and follicular-patterned neoplasms featured more prominently in the non-Asian cohorts. These incidences may account for the starkly different molecular approaches that we noted-in Asian (chiefly Korean and Chinese) centers, BRAF mutational analysis was favored, while gene panels and gene expression classifiers were more frequently applied in non-Asian centers (chiefly in the United States of America). Overall, the data from Singapore appears more closely aligned to non-Asian trends, despite its geographical location in Southeast Asia and its predominantly Asian population. We conclude that there is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes of the AUS/FLUS categories between and within regions, which is only partially explained by regional variations, and may also reflect different regional diagnostic and management practices. This highlights the importance of understanding the local context in the interpretation of indeterminate Bethesda categories, rather than adopting a "one-size fits all" approach.

Molecular markers for the classification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of indeterminate lesions of the thyroid is a challenge in cytopathology practice. Indeed, up to 30% of cases lack the morphological features needed to provide definitive classification. Molecular tests have been developed to assist in the diagnosis of these indeterminate cases. The first studies dealing with the preoperative molecular evaluation of FNA samples focused on the analysis of BRAF^V600E or on the combined evaluation of two or three genetic alterations. The sensitivity of molecular testing was then improved through the introduction of gene panels, which became available for clinical use in the late 2000s. Two different categories of molecular tests have been developed, the 'rule-out' methods, which aim to reduce the avoidable treatment of benign nodules, and the 'rule-in' tests that have the purpose to optimize surgical management. The genetic evaluation of indeterminate thyroid nodules is predicted to improve patient care, particularly if molecular tests are used appropriately and with the awareness of their advantages and weaknesses. The main disadvantage of these tests is the cost, which makes them rarely used in Europe. To overcome this limitation, customized panels have been set up, which are able to detect the most frequent genetic alterations of thyroid cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present review, the most recent available versions of commercial molecular tests and of custom, non-commercial panels are described. Their characteristics and accuracy in the differential diagnosis of indeterminate nodules, namely Bethesda classes III (Atypical follicular lesion of undetermined significance, AUS/FLUS) and IV (Suspicious for follicular neoplasm, FN/SFN) are fully analyzed and discussed.

Testing for BRAF (V600E) Mutation in Thyroid Nodules with Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Read as Suspicious for Malignancy (Bethesda V, Thy4, TIR4): a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

In patients with thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) report of suspicious for malignancy (SFM), both lobectomy and thyroidectomy might be considered. BRAF mutation analysis could guide towards accurate surgical therapy. The primary outcome was the reliability of BRAF (V600E) in detecting malignancy in nodules with FNA reading of SFM. The secondary outcome was to analyze its positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) considering the surgical histology as gold standard. A literature search of online databases was performed in June 2019. BRAF prevalence among thyroid nodules with FNA read as SFM according to the most popular classification systems (i.e., Bethesda V, Thy4, TIR4 category) was searched. The random-effects model was used. Three hundred sixty original articles were identified and 34 were finally included in the study. There were 1428 thyroid nodules with FNA read as SFM and 1287 (90.1%) lesions underwent surgery with a cancer rate 89.6%. The pooled prevalence of BRAF (V600E) mutation among all nodules with SFM cytology was 47% (95% CI = 40 to 54, I2 = 85.5%). Pooled PPV and NPV of BRAF testing were 99% (95% CI, 97-99) and 24% (95% CI, 16-32), respectively. BRAF (V600E) mutation was found in about one in two nodules with thyroid FNA read as SFM, its PPV to detect cancers was excellent, and its NPV was very poor. The routine BRAF testing in FNA read as SFM cannot be recommended. BRAF (V600E) test may be useful to extend surgical approach in selected cases with further suspicious clinical/ultrasound features.

Impact of the Italian Society of Anatomic Pathology and Diagnostic Cytology Classification of Thyroid Nodules in the Treatment of Indeterminate Follicular Lesions: Five-Year Results at a Single Center

PURPOSE

Aim of the study was to assess the impact of the Italian Society of Anatomic Pathology and Diagnostic Cytology (SIAPEC) classification of 2014, on the treatment of indeterminate thyroid lesions (TIR3).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing thyroid surgery for TIR3 lesions between 2013 and 2018, at the General Surgery Department of Trieste University Hospital. According to the SIAPEC classification, patients were divided into TIR3A and TIR3B groups. All patients treated before 2014 underwent surgical treatment, and surgical specimens were retrospectively classified after revision of fine-needle aspiration cytology. Starting 2014, TIR3A patients were treated only when symptomatic (i.e., coexistent bilateral thyroid goiter or growing TIR3A nodules), whereas TIR3B patients always received surgical treatment. Hemithyroidectomy (HT) was the procedure of choice. Total thyroidectomy (TT) was performed in case of concurrent bilateral goiter, autoimmune thyroid disease, and/or presence of BRAF and/or RAS mutation. Lastly, we analyzed the malignancy rate in the two groups.

RESULTS

29 TIR3A and 90 TIR3B patients were included in the study. HT was performed in 10 TIR3A patients and 37 TIR3B patients, respectively, with need for reoperation in 4 TIR3B (10.8%) patients due to histological findings of follicular thyroid carcinoma >1  cm. The malignancy rates were 17.2% in TIR3A and 31.1% in TIR3B, (p = 0.16). Predictability of malignancy was almost 89% in BRAF mutation and just 47% in RAS mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

The new SIAPEC classification in association with biomolecular markers has improved diagnostic accuracy, patient selection, and clinical management of TIR3 lesions.

BRAF mutation analysis by ARMS-PCR refines thyroid nodule management

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules leads to nearly 25% indeterminate nodules, while BRAF^V600E mutation helps to predicting papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). However, the clinical validity and utility of the BRAF^V600E mutation detected using preoperative FNA samples in a large cohort were rarely reported.

AIM

To explore the clinical significance of the BRAF^V600E mutation on preoperative diagnosis and decision-making in a large FNA cohort in China.

DESIGN

This was a prospective study of BRAF^V600E mutation analysis using an amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) in FNA samples.

PATIENTS

The study involved 2640 samples from 2307 patients undergoing FNA procedures in a Chinese medical centre.

RESULTS

A high mutation rate of 86.7% was found in the PTC population. For indeterminate thyroid nodules, the malignant rate of BRAF^V600E+ and BRAF^V600E- was 87.8% and 39.5% in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) III, and 88.2% and 31.8% in the BSRTC IV, respectively. A cost-effective diagnostic model combining both BSRTC grading and BRAF^V600E mutation status showed the highest sensitivity of 82.9% and specificity of 85.4%. Central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) was independent of the BRAF mutation status and accounted for 34.2% of the patients with PTC. C_T values of BRAF^V600E of patients with PTMC were significantly lower in young patients and patients with CLNM.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined analysis of cytological results and BRAF^V600E mutation is highly recommended in BRAF^V600E high-prevalence regions, including China. Prophylactic central neck dissection should be performed in selected patients without regard to the BRAF mutation status.

Molecular Variants and Their Risks for Malignancy in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Background: Gene panels are routinely used to assess predisposition to hereditary cancers by simultaneously testing multiple susceptibility genes and/or variants. More recently, genetic panels have been implemented as part of solid tumor malignancy testing assessing somatic alterations. One example is targeted variant panels for thyroid nodules that are not conclusively malignant or benign upon fine-needle aspiration (FNA). We systematically reviewed published studies from 2009 to 2018 that contained genetic data from preoperative FNA specimens on cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) that subsequently underwent surgical resection. Pooled prevalence estimates per gene and variant, along with their respective positive predictive values (PPVs) for malignancy, were calculated. Summary: Our systematic search identified 540 studies that were supplemented by 18 studies from bibliographies or personal files. Sixty-one studies met all inclusion criteria and included >4600 ITNs. Overall, 26% of nodules contained at least 1 variant or fusion. However, half of them did not include details on the specific gene, variant, and/or complete fusion pair reported for inclusion toward PPV calculations. The PPVs of genomic alterations reported at least 10 times were limited to BRAF^V600E (98%, 95% confidence interval [CI 96-99%]), PAX8/PPARG (55% [CI 34-78%]), HRAS^Q61R (45% [CI 22-72%]), BRAF^K601E (42% [CI 19-68%]), and NRAS^Q61R (38% [CI 23-55%]). Excluding BRAF^V600E, the pooled PPV for all other specified variants and fusions was 47%. Multiple variants within the same nodule were identified in ∼1% of ITN and carried a cumulative PPV of 77%. Conclusions: The chance that a genomic alteration predicts malignancy depends on the individual variant or fusion detected. Only five alterations were reported at least 10 times; BRAF^V600E had a PPV of 98%, while the remaining four had individual PPVs ranging from 38% to 55%. The small sample size of most variants and fusion pairs found among ITNs, however, limits confidence in their individual PPV point estimates. Better specific reporting of genomic alterations with cytological category, histological subtype, and cancer staging would facilitate better understanding of cancer prediction, and the independent contribution of the genomic profile to prognosis.

BRAFV600E mutation analysis in fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false-positive and false-negative results

Background

The accurate evaluation of BRAF^V600E mutation in preoperative fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens is important for making management decisions in thyroid nodules (TNs). The aim of this study was to assess the false‐positive and false‐negative BRAF^V600E mutations in thyroid FNAC specimens and their influence on diagnosis of TN.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 292 nodules in 269 patients who underwent BRAF^V600E mutation analysis using amplification refractory mutation system‐quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (ARMS‐qPCR) both in FNAC specimens and formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue samples after surgery. The false‐positive and false‐negative mutations for BRAF^V600E analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FNAC specimens were recorded, with reference to the results of BRAF^V600E mutation analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FFPE tissue sample. Diagnostic performances of FNAC, BRAF^V600E mutation analysis in FNAC specimens, BRAF^V600E mutation analysis in FFPE tissue sample, and the combination of FNAC and BRAF^V600E mutation analysis for predicting thyroid malignancy were assessed.

Results

The false‐positive and false‐negative mutations for BRAF^V600E analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FNAC specimens were 10.1% (19/189) and 7.1% (7/98), respectively. FNAC combined with preoperative BRAF^V600E mutation analysis significantly increased the diagnostic sensitivity from 75.7% to 92.3%, and accuracy from 78.7% to 90.6% in comparison with FNAC alone (both P < .001). No significant differences were found between the combination of FNAC and BRAF^V600E mutation analysis in FNAC specimens and the combination of FNAC and BRAF^V600E mutation analysis in FFPE tissue sample (sensitivity: 92.3% vs 91.9%; accuracy: 90.6% vs 91.3%; both P > .05).

Conclusions

FNAC combined with preoperative BRAF^V600E mutation analysis can significantly increase the diagnostic performance in comparison with FNAC alone. False‐positive and false‐negative BRAF^V600E mutation results are found in preoperative FNAC specimens, whereas it does not affect the overall auxiliary diagnosis of TNs.

Comparison of droplet digital PCR and direct Sanger sequencing for the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma

Background

The BRAF^V600E mutation status is a useful diagnostic and prognostic marker for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Although it is a commonly used method, Sanger sequencing has several limitations in detecting the BRAF^V600E mutation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) as an alternative method for the detection of the BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC patients.

Methods

Samples from a total of 120 patients with PTC and 30 patients with benign nodular thyroid disease who underwent thyroid surgery were collected. The BRAF^V600E mutation status of the PTC patients was tested by Sanger sequencing and ddPCR.

Results

The BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in 67 samples (44.67%) by Sanger sequencing and 92 samples (61.33%) by ddPCR. The detection of the mutation by the two methods was inconsistent in twenty‐five samples (16.67%). The sensitivity and specificity of the ddPCR method were 100% and 69.88%, respectively, and the positive predictive and negative predictive values were 72.83% and 100%, respectively. The concordance rate between the two methods in detecting the BRAF^V600E mutation was 83.33%. Neither Sanger sequencing nor ddPCR detected BRAF^V600E in 30 patients with benign nodular thyroid disease. The 92 samples with the BRAF^V600E mutation were detected by ddPCR at a fractional abundance from 0.28% to 45.40% as follows: ≥10% (59 samples, 64.13%), 5%‐10% (8 samples, 8.70%), and ≤5% (25 samples, 27.17%). The BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in all 59 samples at a fractional abundance ≥10% and in four samples at a fractional abundance from 5% to 10%, and no BRAF^V600E mutation was detected at a fractional abundance ≤5% by Sanger sequencing.

Conclusions

ddPCR was a reliable, highly sensitive alternative method for the detection of the BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC patients.

Value of BRAF V600E in High-Risk Thyroid Nodules with Benign Cytology Results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Limitations of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration include nondiagnostic, indeterminate cytology and false-negative results. The BRAF V600E mutation is a specific biomarker for papillary thyroid carcinoma. This study aimed to investigate the additional diagnostic role of the BRAF V600E mutation in high-risk thyroid nodules with benign cytology results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 787 high-risk nodules in 720 patients underwent ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration. A subsequent BRAF V600E mutation test was performed on thyroid nodules with benign cytology. Final pathology confirmed thyroid nodules with benign cytology that were positive for the BRAF V600E mutation. Ultrasound was performed on thyroid nodules with benign cytology results that were negative for the BRAF V600E mutation. Fine-needle aspiration was repeated on thyroid nodules with enlarged size or changed ultrasound features.

RESULTS

Among the 787 nodules, 292 thyroid nodules had benign cytology results with 256 nodules negative for the BRAF V600E mutation and 36 nodules positive for the BRAF V600E mutation. Thirty-one nodules positive for the BRAF V600E mutation were confirmed malignant, and 5 nodules were confirmed benign by pathology. Fine-needle aspiration was repeated on 11 enlarged thyroid nodules with benign cytology findings that were negative for the BRAF V600E mutation. The results of repeat fine-needle aspiration were 4 benign nodules, 2 follicular neoplasms or suspected follicular neoplasms, 3 suspected malignancies, and 2 malignant nodules. Among the 36 thyroid nodules positive for the BRAF V600E mutation, 25 (69.4%) had ≥2 suspicious ultrasound features and 11 (30.6%) nodules had 1 suspicious ultrasound feature.

CONCLUSIONS

The BRAF V600E mutation test can detect papillary thyroid carcinomas that might be missed by fine-needle aspiration. We recommend that fine-needle aspiration be routinely accompanied by the BRAF V600E mutation test in high-risk thyroid nodules with ≥2 suspicious ultrasound features.

Presurgical Screening of Fine Needle Aspirates from Thyroid Nodules for BRAF Mutations: A Prospective Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in thyroid fine needle aspirates (FNA) is an important adjunct to cytology, particularly among FNA placed in the "indeterminate category." However, such a prospective evaluation of FNA obtained from patients with thyroid nodules has been lacking from India.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

FNA from 277 patients were prospectively evaluated for BRAF mutations by Sanger's sequencing. A subset of 30 samples was also analyzed by pyrosequencing using the PyroMark BRAF mutation kit.

RESULTS

Overall, 27.2% of FNA samples were positive for mutations including 19 (35.8%) of the 53 histologically confirmed papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), 2 of the 25 follicular variants of PTC, and 1 anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Only 1 (2.7%) of the 37 samples in the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of unknown significance category was BRAF positive. The sensitivity of cytology improved marginally from 67.1% to 68.3% when evaluated with BRAF. Further, a comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics of BRAF positive and negative PTCs showed a significant association (P = 0.05) between lymph node metastasis and BRAF positivity.

CONCLUSION

BRAF positivity was lower than that reported from East Asia with the test being useful in confirming malignancies among the suspicious of malignancy and malignant categories.

Molecular testing in the diagnosis of differentiated thyroid carcinomas

Different genetic mutations and other molecular alterations in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) can be detected in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules, and can be used successfully to ameliorate cancer diagnosis and management of patients with thyroid nodules. The greatest experience has been obtained with the diagnostic use of BRAF mutation that is strongly specific for malignancy when detected using well-validated techniques. The strongest diagnostic result can be obtained testing FNA samples for a panel of mutations that typically involve TERT, BRAF, PAX8/PPARγ, RAS, and RET/PTC. Finding any of these mutations in a thyroid nodule provides strong indication for malignancy and helps to refine clinical management for a significant proportion of patients with indeterminate cytology. The use of molecular markers, as TERT, BRAF, PAX8/PPARγ, RAS, and RET/PTC, may be considered for patients with indeterminate FNA cytology (FNAC) to help guide management. In patients with indeterminate TIR3 FNA, the combination of precise molecular marker expression analysis with molecular mutations evaluations could ameliorate significantly the accuracy of cancer diagnosis. However other prospective studies are needed to identify more accurate molecular markers. Finally, the knowledge of these molecular pathways has permitted the development of new targeted therapies for aggressive TC.

Diagnostic value of BRAFV600E mutation analysis in fine needle aspiration for evaluation of thyroid nodules

Objectives Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is routinely used in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. However, it has several pitfalls, as has been noted in nondiagnostic and indeterminate cases. This study aims to investigate the value of BRAF V600E mutation co-testing in FNA cytology. Method A total of 310 patients underwent BRAF V600E mutation co-testing in FNA cytology on thyroid nodules between June 2013 and June 2014. Of the 310 patients, 69 patients who had undergone a surgery for thyroid nodules were included in this study. The presence of the BRAF V600E mutation was determined by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction amplification of exon 15 of the BRAF gene. Results Of 69 cases, 33 (47.8%) were BRAF V600E mutation positive. The BRAF V600E mutation was not significantly associated with high-risk features such as tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and pathological stage. The respective diagnostic performance of FNA ( P = 0.02), BRAF V600E mutation ( P = 0.03), and ultrasonographic ( P = 0.00) findings was statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of FNA was 64.9%, 83.3%, and 94.8%. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of BRAF V600E mutation was 56.1%, 91.7%, and 96.9% and the US features was 91.2%, 91.7%, and 98.1% respectively. However, sensitivity of FNA with BRAF V600E mutation (77.2%) was lower than FNA with US (92.9%) and combination all together (92.9%). Conclusion In this study, we found that US features were the most useful in preoperative differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules. BRAF V600E mutation co-testing in FNA cytology was also useful for diagnosis of thyroid tumors.

Diagnostic Utility of Molecular and Imaging Biomarkers in Cytological Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Indeterminate thyroid cytology (Bethesda III and IV) corresponds to follicular-patterned benign and malignant lesions, which are particularly difficult to differentiate on cytology alone. As ~25% of these nodules harbor malignancy, diagnostic hemithyroidectomy is still custom. However, advanced preoperative diagnostics are rapidly evolving.This review provides an overview of additional molecular and imaging diagnostics for indeterminate thyroid nodules in a preoperative clinical setting, including considerations regarding cost-effectiveness, availability, and feasibility of combining techniques. Addressed diagnostics include gene mutation analysis, microRNA, immunocytochemistry, ultrasonography, elastosonography, computed tomography, sestamibi scintigraphy, [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.The best rule-out tests for malignancy were the Afirma® gene expression classifier and FDG-PET. The most accurate rule-in test was sole BRAF mutation analysis. No diagnostic had both near-perfect sensitivity and specificity, and estimated cost-effectiveness. Molecular techniques are rapidly advancing. However, given the currently available techniques, a multimodality stepwise approach likely offers the most accurate diagnosis, sequentially applying one sensitive rule-out test and one specific rule-in test. Geographical variations in cytology (e.g., Hürthle cell neoplasms) and tumor genetics strongly influence local test performance and clinical utility. Multidisciplinary collaboration and implementation studies can aid the local decision for one or more eligible diagnostics.

Thyroid Cancer: Risk-Stratified Management and Individualized Therapy

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) with the two subtypes, papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), is the most frequent subtype of thyroid cancer; more rare subtypes are medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). The incidence of DTC has increased rapidly in recent years due to the more frequent use of imaging methods such as ultrasound of the neck and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules. After total thyroidectomy and radioiodine treatment, DTC remains an indolent and curable disease in most patients, whereas the cure rate in MTC is lower and depends on early diagnosis. Most ATCs are incurable. In recent years, there has been great progress in identifying genetic changes in thyroid cancer, and genetic testing of FNA samples or blood samples provides useful information for clinical decision making. Tumor staging, either postoperatively or by imaging, and measuring the tumor markers thyroglobulin for DTC and calcitonin for MTC, allow for dynamic risk-adapted stratification for follow-up procedures. In advanced metastatic thyroid cancer, molecular targeted therapy using tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors, including sorafenib, lenvantinib, vandetanib, and cabozantinib, helps control tumor progression and prolongs progression-free survival. Using a dynamic risk-stratified approach to manage thyroid cancer, the outcomes for most thyroid cancer patients are excellent compared with those for other cancers. The major challenge in the future is to identify high-risk patients and to treat and monitor them appropriately. Clin Cancer Res; 22(20); 5012-21. ©2016 AACR SEE ALL ARTICLES IN THIS CCR FOCUS SECTION, "ENDOCRINE CANCERS REVISING PARADIGMS".

Triage of the indeterminate thyroid aspirate: What are the options for the practicing cytopathologist?

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) plays a key role in the early evaluation of patients with thyroid nodules; however, from 15% to 30% of FNA specimens are cytologically indeterminate. Molecular testing has proven useful when applied to indeterminate thyroid FNAs, and its use has been endorsed in the American Thyroid Association guidelines. In addition to the noncommercial ("in-house") application of v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), rat sarcoma (RAS), rearranged in transformation/papillary thyroid carcinoma (RET/PTC), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ/paired box gene 8 (PPARγ/PAX8) testing, there are currently 3 commercially available molecular panels that vary in their relative reported performances, strengths, and limitations. Here, we discuss the role of molecular testing for indeterminate thyroid aspirates, taking into consideration the recent reclassification of the encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) as "noninvasive follicular neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP)." Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125(6 suppl):477-85. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Cost-effectiveness of Gene Expression Classifier Testing of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Utilizing a Real Cohort Comparator

Objective

To predict the cost-effectiveness of implementing routine gene expression classifier testing for thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytology, by utilizing a real cohort of patients as a comparator.

Study Design

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a retrospective cohort compared with a simulated cohort.

Setting

Tertiary academic medical center.

Subjects and Methods

We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration from 2010 to 2014 at a tertiary academic medical center. All patients with Bethesda class III or IV cytopathology had the details of their management catalogued over the subsequent 2 years of care. These patients were assigned to the standard-of-care arm of the study. We compared the third-party payer costs of care and the proportion of patients who underwent surgery with a simulated cohort who underwent gene expression classifier testing after an initial indeterminate fine-needle aspiration (molecular test arm).

Results

The cost of managing 1 nodule over 2 years was $2399 higher (range, $397-$4399) for the molecular test group than the standard of care group. The molecular test group had a 13.1% decrease (base parameters; range, 0.73%-45.09%) in the number of patients undergoing surgery.

Conclusion

When applied to a real cohort of patients, routine gene expression classifier is predicted to reduce the number of patients undergoing surgery but will increase cost of care. Cost-effectiveness is heavily dependent on prevalence of malignancy and gene expression classifier specificity.

Comparative analysis of diagnostic performance, feasibility and cost of different test-methods for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology

Since it is impossible to recognize malignancy at fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in indeterminate thyroid nodules, surgery is recommended for all of them. However, cancer rate at final histology is <30%. Many different test-methods have been proposed to increase diagnostic accuracy in such lesions, including Galectin-3-ICC (GAL-3-ICC), BRAF mutation analysis (BRAF), Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) alone and GEC+BRAF, mutation/fusion (M/F) panel, alone, M/F panel+miRNA GEC, and M/F panel by next generation sequencing (NGS), FDG-PET/CT, MIBI-Scan and TSHR mRNA blood assay.We performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses to compare their features, feasibility, diagnostic performance and cost. GEC, GEC+BRAF, M/F panel+miRNA GEC and M/F panel by NGS were the best in ruling-out malignancy (sensitivity = 90%, 89%, 89% and 90% respectively). BRAF and M/F panel alone and by NGS were the best in ruling-in malignancy (specificity = 100%, 93% and 93%). The M/F by NGS showed the highest accuracy (92%) and BRAF the highest diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (247). GAL-3-ICC performed well as rule-out (sensitivity = 83%) and rule-in test (specificity = 85%), with good accuracy (84%) and high DOR (27) and is one of the cheapest (113 USD) and easiest one to be performed in different clinical settings.In conclusion, the more accurate molecular-based test-methods are still expensive and restricted to few, highly specialized and centralized laboratories. GAL-3-ICC, although limited by some false negatives, represents the most suitable screening test-method to be applied on a large-scale basis in the diagnostic algorithm of indeterminate thyroid lesions.

Thyroid nodules classified as atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance deserve further research: Analysis of 305 surgically confirmed nodules

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to determine the malignancy risk for nodules categorised as atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) and to investigate the predictors of malignancy.

METHODS

All nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS on fine needle aspiration (FNAs) performed between January 2011 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, ultrasonographic features, follow-up data and the final pathological results were recorded. After further exclusion, only nodules that underwent surgical excision were included in the final analysis. The malignancy rate and the range of malignancy rates were calculated. Clinical and ultrasound features were examined to determine the predictors of malignancy.

RESULTS

During the study period, FNA was performed on 9938 nodules, and 1019 (10.2%) nodules were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. After further exclusion, 976 nodules were evaluated. After the initial diagnosis of AUS/FLUS, 139 (14.2%) patients underwent surgery, 518 (53.1%) had repeated FNAs. A total of 305 (31%) had undergone surgical excision at different time points. For surgically confirmed nodules, the malignancy rate after the initial FNA was 34.5% (the lower and upper thresholds for the malignancy rate were 19.3% and 66.3%, respectively), and 37.9% after the repeated FNA. No ultrasound feature was determined as a predictor, whereas age (>55 years) was a predictor for malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall malignancy rate for nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS and the malignancy rate for nodules that underwent repeated FNA after AUS/FLUS were higher than the expected malignancy rates of the National Cancer Institute. It is, therefore, suggested that the current recommendations should be reconsidered.

The Use of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in Korea: A Nationwide Multicenter Survey by the Korean Society of Endocrine Pathologists

Background

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) has standardized the reporting of thyroid cytology specimens. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the nationwide usage of TBSRTC and assess the malignancy rates in each category of TBSRTC in Korea.

Methods

Questionnaire surveys were used for data collection on the fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules at 74 institutes in 2012. The incidences and follow-up malignancy rates of each category diagnosed from January to December, 2011, in each institute were also collected and analyzed.

Results

Sixty out of 74 institutes answering the surveys reported the results of thyroid FNA in accordance with TBSRTC. The average malignancy rates for resected cases in 15 institutes were as follows: nondiagnostic, 45.6%; benign, 16.5%; atypical of undetermined significance, 68.8%; suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN), 30.2%; suspicious for malignancy, 97.5%; malignancy, 99.7%.

Conclusions

More than 80% of Korean institutes were using TBSRTC as of 2012. All malignancy rates other than the SFN and malignancy categories were higher than those reported by other countries. Therefore, the guidelines for treating patients with thyroid nodules in Korea should be revisited based on the malignancy rates reported in this study.

BRAFV600E mutation as a predictor of thyroid malignancy in indeterminate nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Thyroid nodules are usually diagnosed using fine-needle aspiration (FNA). The sensitivity limitations of FNA result in 10-30% of nodules being classified as "indeterminate". The BRAF^V600E mutation is associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the BRAF^V600E mutation in indeterminate nodules.

METHOD

PUBMED and EMBASE were searched for studies testing for the BRAF^V600E involving indeterminate nodules (Thy3a, Thy3f, Thy4) and containing information on final surgical histopathology. Thirty two studies involving 3150 indeterminate nodules were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity and specificity for BRAF^V600E for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.32-0.48) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 205.4 (95% CI: 40.1-1052). With a Fagan plot, the post-test probability of thyroid cancer, given a negative mutation was 6%, but this rose to 92% with a positive result. On subgroup analysis, for Thy3a nodules, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for thyroid malignancy was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.13-0.34) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). For Thy3f nodules, the pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.03-0.20) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.05-1.00) respectively. For Thy4 nodules, the corresponding sensitivity and specificity was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.5-0.64) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high specificity for thyroid cancer, BRAF^V600E mutation has a low overall sensitivity and therefore has a limited diagnostic value as a single screening test.

Current status and diagnostic values of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in a papillary thyroid carcinoma-prevalent area

BACKGROUND

Most studies validating the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) have been conducted in Western countries. We explored the current status of TBSRTC in an area where most thyroid malignancies are papillary carcinomas.

METHODS

Fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) of thyroid nodules performed in 2013 were retrospectively analyzed and the results were compared to final pathology on resection.

RESULTS

Of 1947 FNAs, 1925 (98.9%) were reported using TBSRTC. Among 381 resected lesions, 27.3% of nondiagnostic, 19.6% of benign, 56.0% of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), 33.3% of follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN), 97.7% of suspicious for malignancy, and 100.0% of malignant lesions were malignant on pathology. The sensitivity and specificity of FNA using TBSRTC were 96.7% and 84.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TBSRTC works well in an area in which papillary thyroid cancer is prevalent; however, it may underestimate malignancy rates in AUS/FLUS, benign, and nondiagnostic categories. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 269-274, 2017.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for thyroid malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically appraise and summarize the available evidence about the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (USFNA) for thyroid malignancy, and to explore the integration of these estimates with the probability of thyroid malignancy before USFNA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of multiple databases from each database's inception to August 2014 was performed. Eligible studies included those that evaluated patients with thyroid nodules who underwent USFNA and subsequent evaluation by histopathology or long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 32 studies at moderate risk of bias evaluating the USFNA diagnostic characteristics for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy. Results were imprecise and inconsistent across trials. The pooled likelihood ratio (LR) of thyroid malignancy for a benign USFNA result was 0.09 (95 % CI 0.06, 0.14; I (2) = 33 %), whereas the pooled LR for a malignant result was 197 (95 % CI, 68, 569; I (2) = 77 %). In the case of a suspicious for follicular neoplasm result, the pooled LR for malignancy was 0.6 (95 % CI, 0.4, 1.0; I (2) = 84 %) and 8.3 (95 % CI, 3.6, 19.2; I (2) = 89) for a result of suspicious for malignancy.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of USFNA warrants only limited confidence due to risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. However, some USFNA results (benign, malignant) are likely very helpful, by significantly changing the pre-test probability of thyroid cancer.

Atypia of undetermined significance on thyroid fine needle aspiration - risk factors for malignancy

OBJECTIVES

This study is designed to determine the clinical predictors of malignancy in the atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) category resulted from thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-two patients who underwent thyroid surgery from January 2010 to December 2013, following a diagnosis of AUS from preoperative thyroid FNA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We investigated the age, gender, maximum size and site of the nodules, ultrasonographic findings, cytological features, BRAF gene mutation, surgical method, number of AUS on repeated FNA and final pathologic results.

RESULTS

Forty-one of sixty-two patients underwent total thyroidectomy and the rest had lobectomy. The final pathologic results were 41 malignancies and 21 benign diseases. Nodules less than 1.5 cm, ultrasonographic findings suggestive of malignancy were risk factors for malignancy on univariated analysis (P < 0.001). Multivariated analysis showed that nodules less than 1.5 cm, ultrasonographic findings suggestive of malignancy and more than 2 results of atypia from repeated FNAs were significant risk factors for malignancy (P < 0.001). A BRAF gene mutation analysis was performed in 38 patients, and 13 patients had the mutation. All patients with the BRAF gene mutation had been diagnosed with papillary thyroid cancer (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend close observation or diagnostic surgery in patients with nodules <1.5 cm and with two or more malignant ultrasound feature and a BRAF mutation, or with two or more AUS findings on repeated FNAs.

Relevance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in the primary tumor and metastases of papillary thyroid carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Multifocality of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is common. BRAF and NRAS mutations are the most frequent genetic alterations in PTC. The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution and relevance of BRAF^T1799A and NRAS mutations in PTC.

METHODS

BRAF^T1799A and NRAS mutations were evaluated in 195 intrathyroid or metastatic foci from 29 patients with multifocal PTC.

RESULTS

BRAF^T1799A mutation was positive in 46.7% of the 59 intrathyroid and 136 metastatic foci (91/195 foci). Heterogeneous BRAF pattern was observed in 51.7% patients (15/29 patients). Irrespective of BRAF status at diagnosis (thyroid or nodes), all patients with recurrent PTC presented BRAF-mutated metastases during follow-up. All foci were negative for NRAS mutations.

CONCLUSION

BRAF but not NRAS mutations were heterogeneously distributed among primary tumor, nodal sites, and recurrent disease. The BRAF status of metastases generated during the follow-up can differ from the status of foci at diagnosis. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1772-1779, 2016.

Diagnostic value of BRAF (V600E)-mutation analysis in fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a reliable method for preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules; however, about 10%–40% nodules are classified as indeterminate. The BRAF^V600E mutation is the most promising marker for thyroid FNA. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the diagnostic value of BRAF^V600E analysis in thyroid FNA, especially the indeterminate cases. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid, Elsevier, and the Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies prior to June 2015, and a total of 88 studies were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. Compared with FNA cytology, the synergism of BRAF^V600E testing increased the diagnostic sensitivity from 81.4% to 87.4% and decreased the false-negative rate from 8% to 5.2%. In the indeterminate group, the mutation rate of BRAF^V600E was 23% and varied in different subcategories (43.2% in suspicious for malignant cells [SMC], 13.77% in atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance [AUS/FLUS], and 4.43% in follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm [FN/SFN]). The sensitivity of BRAF^V600E analysis was higher in SMC than that in AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN cases (59.4% vs 40.1% vs 19.5% respectively), while specificity was opposite (86.1% vs 99.5% vs 99.7% respectively). The areas under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve also confirmed the diagnostic value of BRAF^V600E testing in SMC and AUS/FLUS rather than FN/SFN cases. Therefore, BRAF^V600E analysis can improve the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid FNA, especially indeterminate cases classified as SMC, and select malignancy to guide the extent of surgery.

Initial clinical experience with BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis of core-needle biopsy specimens from thyroid nodules

OBJECTIVE

The accurate diagnosis of thyroid nodules is important for making management decisions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of core-needle biopsy with BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis (CNB + BRAF(V600E) ) and to compare the clinical usefulness of CNB + BRAF(V600E) and fine-needle aspiration with BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis (FNA + BRAF(V600E) ) in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

The results of BRAF(V600E) mutation analyses of 820 nodules from 820 patients (153 men, 667 women; mean age, 51·1 years), who underwent CNB + BRAF(V600E) (n = 256) or FNA + BRAF(V600E) (n = 564) between January 2011 and March 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. The feasibility of CNB + BRAF(V600E) was assessed by comparing its rate of detection of BRAF(V600E) mutations and positive predictive value with those of FNA + BRAF(V600E) . The clinical usefulness of CNB + BRAF(V600E) was determined by comparing rates of inconclusive results, the additional value of BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis, diagnostic surgery and diagnostic performance with those of FNA + BRAF(V600E) .

RESULTS

CNB + BRAF(V600E) and FNA + BRAF(V600E) had similar rates of BRAF(V600E) mutation detection (66·3% vs 64·4%, P = 0·883) and positive predictive value (100·0% vs 96·6%, P = 0·135). CNB + BRAF(V600E) had a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy rate (95·7% vs 85·9%, P < 0·001), and significantly lower rates of inconclusive results (8·2% vs 51·8%, P < 0·001), and diagnostic surgery (8·9% vs 22·3%, P = 0·006), than FNA + BRAF(V600E) .

CONCLUSIONS

The greater diagnostic performance of CNB + BRAF(V600E) and its lower rate of inconclusive results than FNA + BRAF(V600E) suggest that CNB + BRAF(V600E) can reduce rates of preventable diagnostic surgery.

The Implementation of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology Improves Malignancy Detection Despite Lower Rate of Thyroidectomy in Indeterminate Nodules

BACKGROUND

The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) was developed in 2009 to standardize the terminology for interpreting fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens.

METHODS

A historical prospective case series design was employed. The study group included patients with a thyroid nodule classified as TBSRTC AUS/FLUS (B3) or FN/SFN (B4) in 2011-2012 in a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. Rates of surgery and malignancy detection were compared to our pre-TBSRTC (1999-2000) study.

RESULTS

Of 3927 nodules aspirated, 575 (14.6%) were categorized as B3/B4. Complete data were available for 322. Thyroidectomy was performed in 123 (38.2%) cases: 66/250 (26.4%) B3 and 57/72 (79.2%) B4. Differentiated thyroid cancer was found in 66 (53.7%) patients: 30/66 (45.5%) B3 and 36/57 (63.2%) B4 (p=0.075). Operated patients were younger than the non-operated (B3: 52.4±16 vs. 59.7±13 years, p=0.009; B4: 51.7±15 vs. 60.5±14 years, p=0.042), and operated B3 nodules were larger than the non-operated (27.2 vs. 22.2 mm, p=0.014). Additional FNA was done in 160 patients (49.7%): 137/250 (54.8%) B3 and 23/72 (31.9%) B4 (p=0.002). The additional B3 nodules aspirations yielded a diagnosis of B2 in 84 patients (61.3%), B3 in 48 (35%), and B4 in 5 (3.6%). Of the 23 repeated B4 aspirations, B2 was reported in 5 (21.7%), B3 in 12 (52.2%), B4 in 4 (17.4%), and B6 in 2 (8.7%). The number of aspirated nodules was twice that reported in 1999-2000. The rate of indeterminate nodules increased from 6 to 14.6%, the surgery rate decreased from 52.3 to 38.2%, and the accuracy of malignancy diagnosis increased from 25.9 to 53.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of TBSRTC significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for indeterminate thyroid nodules, leading to higher rates of malignancy detection despite lower rates of thyroidectomies.

Clinical impact of BRAF mutation on the diagnosis and prognosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The possible role of BRAF(V) (600E) mutation in the diagnosis and prognosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains controversial. A systematic review to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic role of BRAF(V) (600E) mutation in patients with PTC is urgently needed.

METHODS

A systematic review of relevant literatures was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL. The incremental accuracy (IA) of fine needle aspiration biopsy plus BRAF(V) (600E) mutation analysis over fine needle aspiration biopsy alone, and the statistical data about the association of BRAF(V) (600E) mutation and the prognosis of PTC (risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data, standard mean differences for continuous data and hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival (DFS) were pooled. Subgroup analysis was performed to explain the heterogeneities.

RESULTS

A total of 67 studies were included. The pooled IA was 2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0·5-4%). The pooled RR for gender, multifocality, lymph node metastasis, extrathyroidal invasion and pathological stage was 1·11 (95% CI: 0·98-1·25), 1·17 (95% CI: 1·09-1·24), 1·36 (95% CI: 1·20-1·53), 1·60 (95% CI: 1·41-1·82), and 1·49 (95% CI: 1·33-1·68), respectively. The pooled standard mean differences for age and tumour size were 0·14 (95% CI: 0·04-0·23) and 0·21 (95% CI: 0·1-0·32), respectively. The pooled HR for DFS was 1·96 (95% CI: 1·62-2·37). Subgroup analysis showed that these statistical results were affected by the geographical background of patients, study design and detection methods.

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF(V) (600E) mutation analysis can not only be used in the diagnosis of PTC, but can also predict its prognosis.

DNA degradation in liquid-based cytology and its comparison with conventional smear

BACKGROUND

In fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules, LBC is adopted in most of the hospitals and clinics in Korea for its convenience. BRAF mutation test has been introduced as an important ancillary test, but its applicability has not been completely proven with LBC samples.

METHODS

Five aspirates from thyroidectomy specimens were simultaneously processed into LBC and CS slides, in which BRAF mutation tests were performed using three primer sets with PCR products of 72, 164, and 226 base pairs (bp) at 6, 9, and 12 months after processing. In addition, BRAF mutation tests were performed in nine clinical samples that had been prepared by LBC or CS and stored for 3-5 years after processing.

RESULTS

At 9 months after processing, LBC failed to provide DNA of sufficient quality for PCR, whereas CS succeeded with primers for amplifying a 226 bp fragment. Furthermore, CS had successful amplification of DNA despite a delay of more than 1 year. The failure of DNA amplification in LBC was overcome by using primers to amplify shorter PCR products, suggesting that DNA degradation occurred in LBC. However, false positive or negative results were observed in primers for amplifying shorter size. The kind of preservative solutions used in LBC did not affect test results.

CONCLUSION

LBC may have disadvantages in long-term DNA preservation because of its accelerated DNA degradation compared with alcohol-fixed CS. Using primers to amplify shorter size fragments might be helpful in mitigating loss of signal due to DNA degradation in LBC.

2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND

Thyroid nodules are a common clinical problem, and differentiated thyroid cancer is becoming increasingly prevalent. Since the American Thyroid Association's (ATA's) guidelines for the management of these disorders were revised in 2009, significant scientific advances have occurred in the field. The aim of these guidelines is to inform clinicians, patients, researchers, and health policy makers on published evidence relating to the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer.

METHODS

The specific clinical questions addressed in these guidelines were based on prior versions of the guidelines, stakeholder input, and input of task force members. Task force panel members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database searching, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Published English language articles on adults were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians Guideline Grading System was used for critical appraisal of evidence and grading strength of recommendations for therapeutic interventions. We developed a similarly formatted system to appraise the quality of such studies and resultant recommendations. The guideline panel had complete editorial independence from the ATA. Competing interests of guideline task force members were regularly updated, managed, and communicated to the ATA and task force members.

RESULTS

The revised guidelines for the management of thyroid nodules include recommendations regarding initial evaluation, clinical and ultrasound criteria for fine-needle aspiration biopsy, interpretation of fine-needle aspiration biopsy results, use of molecular markers, and management of benign thyroid nodules. Recommendations regarding the initial management of thyroid cancer include those relating to screening for thyroid cancer, staging and risk assessment, surgical management, radioiodine remnant ablation and therapy, and thyrotropin suppression therapy using levothyroxine. Recommendations related to long-term management of differentiated thyroid cancer include those related to surveillance for recurrent disease using imaging and serum thyroglobulin, thyroid hormone therapy, management of recurrent and metastatic disease, consideration for clinical trials and targeted therapy, as well as directions for future research.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed evidence-based recommendations to inform clinical decision-making in the management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. They represent, in our opinion, contemporary optimal care for patients with these disorders.

The management of thyroid nodules and cancer in the molecular era

The incidence of thyroid cancer is increasing worldwide. Current standards in the diagnosis and management of thyroid cancer are limited by the uncertainty of fine-needle aspiration samples that are indeterminate in nature. Molecular markers have the potential to improve the accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration and to aid the physician in giving a more accurate diagnosis and prognosis. This paper summarizes the various molecular markers currently available.

Impact of the Multi-Gene ThyroSeq Next-Generation Sequencing Assay on Cancer Diagnosis in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Cytology

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a common approach to evaluate thyroid nodules. It offers definitive diagnosis of a benign or malignant nodule in the majority of cases. However, 10-25% of nodules yield one of three indeterminate cytologic diagnoses, leading to suboptimal management of these patients. Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is a common indeterminate diagnosis, with the cancer risk ranging from 6% to 48%. This study assessed whether a multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay can offer significant improvement in diagnosis in AUS/FLUS nodules.

METHODS

From May 2014 to March 2015, 465 consecutive FNA samples with the cytologic diagnosis of AUS/FLUS underwent prospective molecular testing using the ThyroSeq v2.1 panel. The panel included 14 genes analyzed for point mutations and 42 types of gene fusions occurring in thyroid cancer. In addition, eight genes were assessed for expression in order to evaluate the cell composition of FNA samples. Ninety-eight (21%) of these nodules had definitive surgical (n = 96) or nonsurgical (n = 2) follow-up and were used to determine the assay performance.

RESULTS

Among 465 AUS/FLUS nodules, three were found to be composed of parathyroid cells and 462 of thyroid follicular cells. Of the latter, 31 (6.7%) were positive for mutations. The most frequently mutated genes were NRAS and HRAS, and overall point mutations in seven different genes and five types of gene fusions were identified in these nodules. Among 98 nodules with known outcome, histologic analysis revealed 22 (22.5%) cancers. ThyroSeq v2.1 was able to classify 20/22 cancers correctly, showing a sensitivity of 90.9% [confidence interval (CI) 78.8-100], specificity of 92.1% [CI 86.0-98.2], positive predictive value of 76.9% [CI 60.7-93.1], and negative predictive value of 97.2% [CI 78.8-100], with an overall accuracy of 91.8% [CI 86.4-97.3].

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study demonstrate that the ThyroSeq v2.1 multi-gene NGS panel of molecular markers provides both high sensitivity and high specificity for cancer detection in thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology, which should allow improved management for these patients.

Evaluation of the Clinical Usefulness of BRAFV600E Mutation Analysis of Core-Needle Biopsy Specimens in Thyroid Nodules with Previous Atypia of Undetermined Significance or Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance Results

BACKGROUND

The accurate diagnosis of thyroid nodules is important for making management decisions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis with core-needle biopsy (CNB+BRAF(V600E)) in thyroid nodules with previous atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesions of undetermined significance (FLUS) results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2011 to December 2012, 590 CNB+BRAF(V600E) mutation analyses were performed. We analyzed 200 nodules from 200 patients with previous AUS/FLUS results (22 men, 178 women; mean age, 48.6 years). The clinical usefulness of CNB+BRAF(V600E) was assessed by comparing the rates of conclusive results, the additional value of BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis, diagnostic performances, and therapeutic/diagnostic surgery results with those of CNB alone. For the subgroup analysis, the study patients were divided into those with nodules with previous AUS results and those with previous FLUS results.

RESULTS

All CNB+BRAF(V600E) procedures were well-tolerated. CNB+BRAF(V600E) did not show significantly better diagnostic performance than CNB alone in thyroid nodules with previous AUS/FLUS results. However, the conclusive result rate of CNB+BRAF(V600E) was improved in thyroid nodules with previous AUS/FLUS results (76.5% vs. 73.0%, p=0.016), especially with previous AUS results (81.1% vs. 76.4%, p=0.031). Of the 56 previous AUS result thyroid nodules with surgical management, BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis led to therapeutic surgery in 5.4% by decreasing unnecessary diagnostic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, CNB+BRAF(V600E) did not show significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than CNB alone. Although CNB+BRAF(V600E) may add additional value in nodules with previous AUS results, routinely adding BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis to CNB is not recommended.