The natural history of untreated hyperprolactinemia: a prospective analysis

Current evaluation of amenorrhea: a committee opinion

The purpose of this American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee Opinion is to provide clinicians with principles and strategies for the diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with primary or secondary amenorrhea. This revised document replaces the Practice Committee Document titled "Current evaluation of amenorrhea," last published in 2008 (Fertil Steril 2008;90:S219-25).

How often should we perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the follow-up of pituitary adenoma?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the examination of choice for diagnosing and monitoring pituitary adenoma (also known as pituitary neuroendocrine tumor or PitNET), whether treated or not. However, repeating the examination too often (and sometimes unnecessarily) is costly, and worrying data on tissue accumulation (brain, bone, etc.) of gadolinium atoms dissociated from their carrier molecule (chelator) have led European authorities to ban contrast agents based on linear chelators of gadolinium, which are particularly susceptible to rapid dissociation, in favor of chemically more stable macrocyclic chelators. It is therefore important to determine the optimal frequency for pituitary MRI monitoring in order to safely assess the natural history or therapeutic response of pituitary adenomas. The aim of this article is to summarize the most recent data on optimal follow-up intervals depending on the type, size and location of the pituitary tumor and the clinical situation in general, in order to generate monitoring algorithms to guide clinicians.

Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement

This Consensus Statement from an international, multidisciplinary workshop sponsored by the Pituitary Society offers evidence-based graded consensus recommendations and key summary points for clinical practice on the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Epidemiology and pathogenesis, clinical presentation of disordered pituitary hormone secretion, assessment of hyperprolactinaemia and biochemical evaluation, optimal use of imaging strategies and disease-related complications are addressed. In-depth discussions present the latest evidence on treatment of prolactinoma, including efficacy, adverse effects and options for withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy, as well as indications for surgery, preoperative medical therapy and radiation therapy. Management of prolactinoma in special situations is discussed, including cystic lesions, mixed growth hormone-secreting and prolactin-secreting adenomas and giant and aggressive prolactinomas. Furthermore, considerations for pregnancy and fertility are outlined, as well as management of prolactinomas in children and adolescents, patients with an underlying psychiatric disorder, postmenopausal women, transgender individuals and patients with chronic kidney disease. The workshop concluded that, although treatment resistance is rare, there is a need for additional therapeutic options to address clinical challenges in treating these patients and a need to facilitate international registries to enable risk stratification and optimization of therapeutic strategies.

Giant prolactinomas, a detailed analysis of 196 adult cases

PURPOSE

Giant prolactinomas are a rare entity, representing approximately 5% of all prolactinomas. A systematic review of 196 adult cases was performed. A comparison of the clinical, biochemical and radiological characteristics, management and therapeutic outcomes in men versus women is made.

METHODS

A structured search was conducted using the term 'giant prolactinoma'. Following inclusion criteria were used: diameter ≥ 40 mm, prolactin levels > 1000 ng/ml and no concomitant GH/ ACTH secretion.

RESULTS

196 cases were included [age: 38 (28-50) years, F/M ratio: 1/3.6]. Median tumor diameter was 53 (43-69) mm. Pituitary deficiency was present in 91% of cases, with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism being the most frequent. Most common presenting symptoms were visual impairment (73%) and headache (50%) in men and amenorrhea (58%) in women. 82% of cases were treated with a dopamine agonist (DA) as first-line treatment which led to normoprolactinemia, tumor shrinkage and visual improvement in 51%, 88% and 85% of cases, respectively. Surgery was performed in 29% of cases and all showed tumor remnant and persistent hyperprolactinemia. Women had a lower prolactin level and a smaller tumor diameter at diagnosis but pituitary deficiencies were more frequent and outcome was worse.

CONCLUSION

Giant prolactinomas are rare and have a male predominance. Visual impairment is the most frequent presenting symptom in men and amenorrhea in women. The gender-related difference in tumor size and level of prolactin was confirmed in this analysis where men had a larger diameter and a higher baseline prolactin level. DAs are the treatment of choice, irrespective of tumor size and presence of visual impairment. As only half of the cases achieved normoprolactinemia we do not, in contrast to previous literature, state giant prolactinomas to be exquisitely sensitive to DAs. Patient characteristics associated with persistent hyperprolactinemia after treatment with a DA were female gender, higher baseline prolactin and larger tumor size . This analysis did show TSH- and ACTH-deficiency to be more frequent after surgery which was not seen for LH/FSH deficiency.

Approach to the Patient With Prolactinoma

Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary tumor histotype, with microprolactinomas being prevalent in women and macroprolactinomas in men. Hyperprolactinemia is among the most common causes of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in both sexes, prompting medical advice for hypogonadism (infertility, oligo-amenorrhea, impotence, osteoporosis/osteopenia) in both sexes, and for signs and symptoms of mass effects (hypopituitarism, visual loss, optic chiasm compression, cranial nerve deficits, headaches) predominantly in men. Diagnostic workup involves a single prolactin measurement and pituitary imaging, but some laboratory artifacts (ie, the "hook effect" and macroprolactin) can complicate or delay the diagnosis. The treatment of choice for prolactinomas is represented by dopamine agonists, mainly cabergoline, which are able to induce disease control, restore fertility in both sexes, and definitively cure one-third of patients, thus permitting treatment discontinuation. Pregnancy and menopause may promote spontaneous prolactin decline and anticipate cabergoline discontinuation in women. Surgery and/or radiotherapy are indicated in case of resistance to cabergoline not overcome by the increase in drug dose up to the maximally tolerated or the patient's personal choice of surgery. The evidence of resistance to cabergoline in invasive and proliferative tumors may indicate biological aggressiveness, thus requiring alternative therapeutic approaches mainly based on temozolomide use as monotherapy or combined with radiotherapy. In uncontrolled patients, new medical approaches (alternative hormonal treatments, cytotoxic drugs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, mTOR/Akt inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or immunotherapy) may be offered but the experience collected to date is still very scant. This article reviews different facets of prolactinomas and discusses approaches to the condition in more common clinical situations.

Pituitary Adenomas: Classification, Clinical Evaluation and Management

Pituitary adenomas are one of the most common brain tumors. They represent approximately 18% of all intracranial, and around 95% of sellar neoplasms. In recent years, our understanding of the pathophysiology and the behavior of these lesions has led to better control and higher curative rates. The treatment decision is largely dependent on type of the adenoma, clinical presentation, and the size of the lesion. In addition, incidental pituitary lesions add uncertainty in the decision-making process, especially for pituitary adenomas that can be medically managed. When surgery is indicated, the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach is the technique of choice, but open standard craniotomy approaches can also be the option in selected cases. The following chapter will review the classification, clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic work-up, selection of surgical approach, and treatment complications in pituitary adenomas.

Surgery as a first-line option for prolactinomas

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of prolactinomas with dopamine agonists has been the established first-line treatment option for many years, with surgery reserved for refractory cases or medication intolerance. This approach may not be the best option in many cases.

AREAS COVERED

Review of the epidemiology, biology, and treatment options available for prolactinomas, including best available data on outcomes, costs, and morbidities for each therapy. These data are then used to propose a 'surgery-first' treatment approach for a subset of prolactinomas as an alternative to primary medical management.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on the available data, there is a strong rationale that transsphenoidal surgery should be considered a first-line treatment option for both micro- and macro-prolactinomas that do not demonstrate high grade cavernous sinus invasion on MRI imaging, with dopamine agonists administered as a secondary therapy for tumors not in remission following surgery, and for giant tumors. This 'surgery-first' approach assumes the availability of skilled and experienced pituitary surgeons to ensure optimal outcomes. This approach should result in high cure rates and reduced DA requirements for patients not cured from initial surgery. Further, it will reduce medical costs over a patient's lifetime and the chronic morbidities associated with protracted dopamine agonist usage.

Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME) and International Chapter of Clinical Endocrinology (ICCE). Position statement for clinical practice: prolactin-secreting tumors

Prolactinomas are the most frequent pituitary adenomas. Prolactinoma may occur in different clinical settings and always require an individually tailored approach. This is the reason why a panel of Italian neuroendocrine experts was charged with the task to provide indications for the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that can be easily applied in different contexts. The document provides 15 recommendations for diagnosis and 54 recommendations for treatment, issued according to the GRADE system. The level of agreement among panel members was formally evaluated by RAND-UCLA methodology. In the last century, prolactinomas represented the paradigm of pituitary tumors for which the development of highly effective drugs obtained the best results, allowing to avoid neurosurgery in most cases. The impressive improvement of neurosurgical endoscopic techniques allows a far better definition of the tumoral tissue during surgery and the remission of endocrine symptoms in many patients with pituitary tumors. Consequently, this refinement of neurosurgery is changing the therapeutic strategy in prolactinomas, allowing the definitive cure of some patients with permanent discontinuation of medical therapy.

Management of prolactinomas in children and adolescents; which factors define the response to treatment?

PURPOSE

Prevalence, presentation and clinical outcome of prolactinomas vary in children and adults. In this study, we evaluated the clinical features and outcome of children and adolescents with prolactinoma to identify the differences from that of adults, and thus to establish the management strategies for this age group.

METHODS

Patients with prolactinoma diagnosed before 18 years of age from a single center in the last 20-years were included. Clinical and laboratory data, radiological findings and treatment outcome were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (23 female; 82.1%) with prolactinoma were included. Median age at diagnosis was 15.2 years (12.6-17.7 years) in girls, 12.9 years (12.0-16.7 years) in boys. First line treatment was cabergoline in 82% of patients and normal prolactin level was achieved with maximum dose of 2 mg/week in 78%. Surgery was required in 28% of patients. Adenomas < 13.5 mm responded conventional doses of CAB. Adenomas > 30 mm were drug resistant or required surgery. Adenomas between 13.5 mm and 30 mm with invasion/extension were more likely to have drug resistance. CAB had to be continued following surgery in all patients. One macroprolactinoma had an increase in size which was accompanied with increasing prolactin level.

CONCLUSIONS

All microprolactinomas responded well to DA treatment. However, all adenomas larger than 30 mm was resistant to CAB or required surgery. Probability of drug resistance and requirement of second line therapy were higher in adenomas between 13.5 mm and 30 mm with invasion/extension. Doses over 2 mg/week of CAB in drug-resistant patients may not provide additional benefit. The frequency of follow-up MRI could be determined based on prolactin levels and emergence of new neurological symptoms.

A scoping review to understand the indications, effectiveness, and limitations of cabergoline in radiological and biochemical remission of prolactinomas

Cabergoline has long been used in the medical management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. However, there is contradicting and inadequate evidence on the efficacy of cabergoline in achieving radiological and biochemical remission in prolactinoma. This article presents scoping review of evidence in cabergoline achieving radiological and biochemical remission in cases of prolactinoma. We have used a recommended scoping review methodology to map and summarize existing research evidence and identify knowledge gaps. The review process was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews). The selection of studies was based on the criteria defined. Essential information such as reference details, study characteristics, topics of interest, main findings, and the study author's conclusion are presented in text and tables. With the study selection process, eight publications were finally included-one systematic review and meta-analysis, one RCT, and six primary studies. Cabergoline is effective in achieving biochemical and radiological remission in cases of prolactinoma. We identified several knowledge gaps with the scoping review and directions for future studies. Future studies, including randomized studies, will help address challenging questions associated with the management of prolactinoma.

Prolactinomas

Hyperprolactinemia, defined by a level of serum prolactin above the standard upper limit of normal range, is a common finding in clinical practice and prolactinomas are the main pathological cause. Prolactinomas lead to signs and symptoms of hormone oversecretion, such as galactorrhea and hypogonadism, as well as symptoms of mass effect, including visual impairment, headaches and intracranial hypertension. Diagnosis involves prolactin measurement and sellar imaging, but several pitfalls are involved in this evaluation, which may difficult the proper management. Treatment is medical in the majority of cases, consisting of dopamine agonists, which present high response rates, with a very favorable safety profile. Major adverse effects that should be monitored consist of cardiac valvulopathy and impulse control disorders. Other treatment options include surgery and radiotherapy. Temozolomide may be used for aggressive or malignant carcinomas. Finally, pregnancy outcomes are similar to general population even when dopamine agonist treatment is maintained.

Prolactin ordering patterns in psychiatric inpatients and the impact this has on patient management

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines stipulate that baseline prolactin be ordered prior to commencing antipsychotic treatment to facilitate investigation of any subsequent hyperprolactinaemic symptoms. The aim was to observe when and why prolactin levels are ordered for psychiatry inpatients commencing or continuing antipsychotics and how this alters clinical management.

METHODS

Psychiatry inpatients admitted to the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, in 2018 with the diagnoses of psychosis, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder or bipolar affective disorder were retrospectively analysed. Results and clinical history data were collected in patients in whom prolactin was ordered during or within 12 months of the relevant admission.

RESULTS

Of 592 patients admitted during this period, 90 had prolactin ordered. Eight (8.9%) of the 90 tests were for hyperprolactinaemic symptoms, while the remainder were routine blood work. The results altered clinical management in 10 of the 90 (11.1%) patients. Of these 10, 8 were symptomatic. In the six patients with first episode psychosis, only one had prolactin ordered prior to antipsychotic commencement.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to guideline recommendations of baseline prolactin testing was poor. When established on antipsychotics, measuring prolactin rarely changed management in asymptomatic patients; however, it did in those with hyperprolactinaemic symptoms. Measuring prolactin in asymptomatic patients on antipsychotics appears unhelpful.

True hyperprolactinemia in men without visible pituitary adenoma

PURPOSE

Men with mild to moderate hyperprolactinemia rarely present with normal pituitary on MRI with no visible adenoma, a condition entitled also "idiopathic hyperprolactinemia" or "non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia". We have characterized a cohort of hyperprolactinemic men with normal pituitary imaging.

DESIGN

We have identified 13 men with true hyperprolactinemia and normal pituitary MRI. Baseline clinical and hormonal characteristics and response to medical treatment were retrospectively retrieved from medical records.

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 51 ± 16 years (range, 20-77); mean serum prolactin level at presentation was 91 ng/ml (range, 28-264), eight men presented with low baseline testosterone. Initial complaints leading to diagnosis included sexual dysfunction in ten men and gynecomastia in five. All patients were treated with cabergoline, except for one who was given bromocriptine; none required pituitary surgery. All patients normalized prolactin and testosterone with subsequent clinical improvement reported by most men. Currently, after a mean follow-up of 72 months, ten patients continue treatment with caborgoline (median weekly dose, 0.25 mg), whereas three men discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Men with symptomatic hyperprolactinemia may rarely present with normal pituitary imaging. Medical treatment can lead to hormonal improvement with clinical benefit.

Do nothing but observe microprolactinomas: when and how to replace sex hormones?

Hyperprolactinemia is associated with suppression of the hypothalamic- pituitary-gonadal axis and consequent hypogonadism, manifesting loss of libido, infertility and osteoporosis long-term in both male and female patients, with associated menstrual irregularities, amenorrhea and galactorrhea in women and erectile dysfunction in men. The primary goals of therapy in patients harboring prolactinoma are control of tumor size and normalization of serum PRL, with restoration of gonadal and sexual function and fertility. Clinical manifestations of hypogonadism have variable consequences depending on the age and sex of the patient and desire for fertility. Careful consideration of clinical consequences of hyperprolactinemia in relation to age and sex should help guide therapeutic decision making. Another important consideration in attaining our treatment goals in patients harboring microprolactinomas, is the observation that greater than 90% of microprolactinomas do not enlarge, when followed for 10 years. Treatment options for the management of microprolactinomas include observation alone, with monitoring of serum prolactin levels every 6-12 months, vs initiation of dopamine agonist therapy vs gonadal steroid hormone replacement (using the oral contraceptive or other combination estrogen and progesterone replacement regimens in females or testosterone replacement therapy in males). In the present review, current data related to clinical consequences of microprolactinomas and treatment outcomes at different stages in the lifespan are reviewed, with a suggested algorithm as to whether to treat or not, and an appropriate therapeutic regimen to institute.

Expression patterns of ERα66 and its novel variant isoform ERα36 in lactotroph pituitary adenomas and associations with clinicopathological characteristics

PURPOSE

The regulatory effects of estradiol on pituitary homeostasis have been well documented. However, the expression patterns of ERα66 and ERα36 and their correlations with the clinical course of postoperative prolactinoma tumors remain unclear.

METHODS

The expression of ERα36, ERα66, Ki67, p53, and CD31 were determined by immunohistochemistry in 62 prolactinoma patients. Snap-frozen tumors and normal pituitaries were also examined by western blotting for estrogen receptor detection.

RESULTS

A broad expression of ERα36 was identified in normal pituitaries. The median scores of ERα36 and ERα66 expression were 8 and 6 in normal pituitaries and 4 and 0 in tumors, respectively. Four phenotypes of ERα36 and ERα66 expression were explored in tumors with regard to sex, invasiveness, dopamine resistance, and recurrence. Low ERα36 expression was associated with tumor invasion and increased Ki67. Low ERα66 expression was associated with tumor invasion, dopamine-agonist resistance, and enhanced tumor size. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that low ERα36 expression is an independent risk factor for invasiveness. The significant inverse association of ERα66 with invasiveness, dopamine resistance, and tumor size remained significant after adjustment for sex as a potential confounder. After controlling for sex, the low ERα66/low ERα36 phenotype was 6.24 times more prevalent in invasive tumors than in noninvasive tumors. Although the decreasing trend of CD31 expression from surrounding nontumoral lactotroph adenomas to tumors was similar to that of the estrogen receptors, a significant correlation was not observed here.

CONCLUSION

The decreasing trends of ERα36 and ERα66 expression from normal pituitaries to tumors are associated with aggressive clinical behavior.

Prolactinomas and menopause: any changes in management?

PURPOSE

Treatment goals in prolactinomas are to correct hypogonadism, restore fertility and control tumor mass in case of macroadenomas. According to current guidelines, medical treatment of asymptomatic postmenopausal women is not indicated. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature pertaining to biological behavior of prolactinomas during menopause, likelihood of successful dopamine agonist withdrawal during this period and possible prolactin-mediated increased morbidity that could modify current management.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search including papers published until July 2019 was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases.

RESULTS

Women with prolactinomas entering menopause have a higher chance of prolactin normalization of treatment compared with women in their reproductive years. Although most prolactin secreting adenomas diagnosed during menopause are large, they respond well to dopamine agonist treatment. Data directly linking hyperprolactinemia with an increased risk of cancer and cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity are inconsistent. There is no data indicating that correction of hyperprolactinemia improves clinical outcomes in asymptomatic patients bearing microadenomas.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that justifies changing current recommendations to withhold medical treatment of microprolactinomas in asymptomatic post-menopausal women. Macroprolactinoma patients should be treated according to standard clinical practice.

Dopamine agonists in prolactinomas: when to withdraw?

Dopamine agonists (DAs) are well recognized as the first-line therapy for prolactinomas due to their efficacy in achieving tumoral shrinkage and normoprolactinemia. However, it remains to be established the best timing to withdraw DAs and in which patients this should be attempted. Studies in the 1980s, mainly using bromocriptine, started to defy the concept that DAs should be regarded as a lifelong therapy considering that sustained normoprolactinemia was attained in a small subset of patients after drug withdrawal. The introduction of the more effective agent cabergoline led to an increase in the percentages of remission. The most recent meta-analysis on the topic stated than remission rates after withdrawal can range from 15% in macroprolactinoma patients treated with bromocriptine to 41% in those with microprolactinomas previously treated with cabergoline. When more stringent criteria were applied before attempting withdrawal, sustained remission ensued in more than 50% of the individuals. Treatment duration for more than 24 months, the achievement of normoprolactinemia, marked reduction (≥ 50%) in tumoral size and DAs tapering till a low maintenance dose (e.g. cabergoline 0.5 mg/week) have been the most consistently identified predictors of success. In addition, a growing amount of evidence suggests that the post-pregnancy/breastfeeding period and menopause are reasonable timings to re-access the need for continuing DAs therapy. Considering that the achievement of sustained normoprolactinemia is still far from being universal after the withdrawal, even in highly selected cohorts, future larger prospective studies should continue to address this issue.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas; a review of the evidence

PURPOSE

This review aimed to evaluate data on the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas.

METHODS

Recent literature about prolactinoma behavior and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas is reviewed.

RESULTS

A review of evidence regarding prolactinoma pituitary MRI follow-up; techniques and sequences, recent data on possible gadolinium retention, the role and a review of T2-weighted images in the identification of prolactinomas and frequently encountered clinical scenarios, as well as MRI correlation with prolactin secretion, tumor growth and prediction of response to medical therapy are presented.

CONCLUSION

The underlying decision to perform serial imaging in prolactinoma patients should be individualized on a case-by-case basis. Future studies should focus on alternative imaging methods and/or contract agents.

Prolactin, prolactin disorders, and dopamine agonists during pregnancy

Pituitary disorders, and especially prolactinomas, are not common among pregnant women, though they tend to occur during a woman's years of fertility. The majority of prolactinoma patients present with infertility and menstruation dysfunction; however, prolactinomas are associated with potentially significant morbidity if they remain unrecognized and untreated. Herein, we survey the role of prolactin and prolactinomas in pregnancy while also outlining the therapeutic approach to prolactinoma during pregnancy. The current literature on the impact of dopamine agonists during pregnancy is also reviewed.

The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of Prolactinomas: The old and the new

Prevalence and incidence of prolactinomas are approximately 50 per 100,000 and 3-5 new cases/100,000/year. The pathophysiological mechanism of hyperprolactinemia-induced gonadotropic failure involves kisspeptin neurons. Prolactinomas in males are larger, more invasive and less sensitive to dopamine agonists (DAs). Macroprolactin, responsible for pseudohyperprolactinemia is a frequent pitfall of prolactin assay. DAs still represent the primary therapy for most prolactinomas, but neurosurgery has regained interest, due to progress in surgical techniques and a high success rate in microprolactinoma, as well as to some underestimated side effects of long-term DA treatment, such as impulse control disorders or impaired quality of life. Recent data show that the suspected effects of DAs on cardiac valves in patients with prolactinomas are reassuring. Finally, temozolomide has emerged as a valuable treatment for rare cases of aggressive and malignant prolactinomas that do not respond to all other conventional treatments.

Pituitary Disease in Pregnancy: Special Aspects of Diagnosis and Treatment?

The diagnosis and treatment of pituitary disease in pregnancy represents a special clinical challenge. Not least because there is very little data on the treatment of pregnant patients with pituitary disorders. A selective search of the literature was carried out with the aim of compiling evidence about the diagnosis and treatment of pituitary disease in pregnancy. The search covered the databases PubMed/MEDLINE including PubMed Central and also used the Livivo (ZB MED) search engine. Recent studies were evaluated for recommendations about the care of pregnant patients with hormone-inactive and hormone-active pituitary adenomas (prolactinoma, acromegaly and Cushing's disease), pituitary insufficiency, pituitary apoplexy and hypophysitis. The most well-established forms of treatment are for prolactinoma, due to the incidence of this disease and its impact on fertility. When pregnancy has been confirmed, prolactinoma treatment with dopamine agonists should be paused. Although microprolactinomas rarely increase significantly in size after the administration of dopamine agonists is discontinued, symptomatic tumor growth of macroprolactinomas can occur. In such cases, treatment with dopamine agonists can be resumed. If the primary tumor is large and the risk that it will continue to grow is high, it may be necessary to continue medical treatment from the start of pregnancy. If one of the partners has a pituitary disorder, it is often still possible for many couples to achieve their wish of having children if they receive medical support to plan and the pregnancy is carefully monitored. Given the complexity of pituitary disease, pregnant patients with pituitary disorders should be cared for and treated by a multidisciplinary team in centers specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of pituitary disease.

Calcified Prolactinoma of the Pituitary Gland: Illustrative Case Reports Highlighting Medical versus Surgical Intervention

The presence of calcification is uncommon in pituitary adenomas, and often lends support to other diagnoses including craniopharyngioma. The majority of calcified pituitary adenomas are prolactin-secreting tumors. We report two patients with calcified macroprolactinomas, one that was treated medically with a biochemical response and partial tumor response, and one that was treated successfully via an endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. Suspected calcified prolactinomas can be initially managed medically as per standard treatment for typical prolactinomas; however, the presence of diffuse calcification may hinder tumor shrinkage. Tumors that are refractory to medical treatment can be safely managed with surgery.

Dopamine Agonists: From the 1970s to Today

The discovery of dopamine inhibitory effects on prolactin secretion has led to an era of successful dopaminergic therapy for prolactinomas. Herein we provide an overview of the evolution of dopamine agonists and their use in patients with PRL-secreting pituitary tumors, starting from the 1970s up to today, highlighting that normalization of PRL levels, restoration of eugonadism, and reduction of tumor mass can be achieved in the majority of patients by treatment with dopamine agonists.

The importance of the electrophysiological tests in the early diagnosis of ganglion cells and/or optic nerve dysfunction coexisting with pituitary adenoma: an overview

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Based on the available literature, it is suggested, in the clinical evaluation of the chiasmal tumors, that the following electrophysiological tests: visual evoked potentials to pattern-reversal stimulation, multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs), and pattern electroretinogram (PERG) play an important role in the diagnosis of the optic nerve and retinal dysfunction in the course of pituitary tumors.

RESULTS

Macroadenomas and also microadenomas may cause dysfunction of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons, even in the absence of changes in the routine ophthalmological examination, retinal sensitivity in standard automated perimetry, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in optical coherent tomography. The most frequently observed changes in electrophysiological tests were as follows: in PVEPs-the crossed/uncrossed asymmetry distribution, altered waveform, increase in P100-wave peak time, and/or reduction in amplitude; in mfVEPs-the peak time prolongation and/or amplitude reduction in C1-wave; in PERG-the reduction in N95-wave amplitude and decreased N95:P50 amplitude ratio. Hemifield PVEPs were more often abnormal than full-field PVEPs. Multi-channel recording is recommended for the assessment of the anterior visual pathway. The use of mfVEP offers the possibility to register localized disturbances of the optic nerve and ganglion cells. Additionally, an amplitude of N95-wave reduction in PERG correlated with a lack of postoperative visual acuity recovery. The postoperative improvement in the visual field was found to be associated with a normal N95:P50 amplitude ratio. The RGCs dysfunction manifested by decrease in PhNR/b-wave amplitude ratio was associated with the worse visual fields outcome. A review of the literature summarizing the electrophysiological testing in the pituitary adenoma is discussed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with pituitary tumor, detection of the early dysfunction of the visual pathway may lead to modification of the medical treatment regimen and reduce the incidence of irreversible optic nerve damage.

Different Effects of Atorvastatin on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Young Women With and Without Hyperprolactinemia

Long-term prolactin excess is often accompanied by numerous metabolic complications. No previous study has compared the effect of statin therapy on circulating levels of cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with elevated and normal prolactin levels. The study population consisted of 3 age-, weight-, and lipid-matched groups of young women: 19 women with untreated hyperprolactinemia (group A), 20 normoprolactinemic women receiving bromocriptine treatment (because of previous hyperprolactinemia) (group B), and 20 untreated women with prolactin levels within the reference range (group C). Because of elevated total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, all women were then treated with atorvastatin (40 mg daily). Apart from measuring plasma lipids, glucose homeostasis markers, and hormone levels at the beginning of the study and 12 weeks later, we measured circulating levels of uric acid, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, homocysteine, and fibrinogen. Despite similar baseline levels of plasma lipids, levels of uric acid, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, homocysteine, and fibrinogen as well as the degree of insulin resistance were higher in group A than in the remaining 2 groups. Atorvastatin reduced total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in all study groups. However, only in normoprolactinemic women (groups B and C) did atorvastatin reduce circulating levels of nonlipid cardiometabolic risk factors, whereas only in group A did the drug slightly impair insulin sensitivity. The results of the study suggest that cardiometabolic effects of atorvastatin depend on the prolactin status of patients.

Prolactinoma through the female life cycle

Prolactinomas are the most common secretory pituitary adenoma. They typically occur in women in the 3rd-6th decade of life and rarely in the pediatric population or after menopause. Most women present with irregular menses and/or infertility. Dopamine (DA) agonists, used in their treatment, are safe during pregnancy, but in most cases are discontinued at conception with close monitoring for signs or symptoms of tumor growth. Breastfeeding is safe postpartum, provided there was no significant growth during pregnancy. Some women will experience normalization of prolactin levels postpartum. Menopause may also decrease prolactin levels and even those with macroprolactinomas may consider discontinuing their DA agonist with close follow-up. Prolactinomas may be associated with decreased quality of life scores in women, and play a role in bone health and cardiovascular risk factors. This review discusses the current literature and clinical understanding of prolactinomas throughout the entirety of the female life cycle.

Hyperprolactinaemia in male infertility: Clinical case scenarios

Objective

To explore the evaluation, treatment and impact of hyperprolactinaemia on male infertility and testicular function, as hyperprolactinaemia is commonly detected during the evaluation of infertile men.

Methods

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify all studies exploring hyperprolactinaemia in male infertility.

Results

Elevated levels of serum prolactin have a detrimental effect on male reproduction through inhibition of the pulsatile release of gonadotrophins from the anterior pituitary gland, and a direct effect on spermatogenesis. Treatment of confirmed hyperprolactinaemia with dopamine agonists leads to significant improvements in both semen parameters and hormone levels.

Conclusion

Hyperprolactinaemia, both directly and indirectly, has a negative effect on sperm production, and its detection and management in men seeking fertility is mandatory.

Management of prolactinomas: a survey of physicians from the Middle East and North Africa

BACKGROUND

Prolactinomas are the commonest functional tumors of the pituitary gland. There are still controversies regarding medical therapy in specific clinical situations. Patients may be managed by different specialists in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and no data exist on patterns of clinical management.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to prolactinomas among relevant professionals from the MENA region.

METHODS

An online survey of a large sample of physicians was conducted. The questionnaire covered various aspects of diagnosis and treatment of prolactinomas. 468 respondents were included; 36 % were endocrinologists; 49 % worked in public facilities and 81 % graduated more than 10 years. 40 and 30 % would have seen 1-5 and more than 5 suspected or confirmed prolactinomas over a 6 months period, respectively.

RESULTS

Regarding the diagnosis, 30 % of the respondents considered that prolactin levels <100 ng/ml exclude the presence of a prolactinoma. 21 % of respondents considered prolactin levels >250 ng/ml compatible with macroprolactinomas only, whereas others accepted this to be compatible also with microprolactinomas, macroprolactinaemia and drug-induced hyperprolactinemia (50, 42 and 36 % respectively). 71 % of respondents favored the screening for macroprolactin in asymptomatic individuals with hyperprolactinemia. Regarding the treatment, 84 % of respondents would treat microprolactinomas even in the absence of symptoms whereas 72 % of the respondents would treat microprolactinomas only if symptoms exist. 60 and 49 % of the respondents chose cabergoline as the drug of choice to treat macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas respectively. Similar proportions had no preference of either cabergoline or bromocriptine as the best treatment for macroprolactinoma (27 %) and microprolactinomas (32 %). 46 and 75 % of respondents favored treatment withdrawal 2-3 years after prolactin normalization in patients with macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas, respectively whereas 10 % of respondents withdraw treatment after menopause in either case. 94 % of respondents considered medical therapy as the primary treatment for microprolactinomas. In case of pregnancy, 49 % considered bromocriptine as the drug of choice for women who wish to become pregnant. 65 and 38 % of respondents advocated discontinuation of treatment with dopamine agonists in patients with microprolactinomas and macroprolactinomas, respectively. Finally, 48 % would allow breast-feeding without restriction, 28 % would restrict it to patients with microprolactinomas and 25 % would not recommend it for women with prolactinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study of the clinical management of prolactinomas in the MENA region. Some of the practices are not in line with the latest Endocrine and Pituitary Societies guidelines. These warrant further discussions of contemporary guidelines in regional forums.

Pituitary tumors in MEN1: do not be misled by borderline elevated prolactin levels

PURPOSE

The objective of this case report is to demonstrate that the simple expedient of measuring periodic prolactin levels in patients with MEN1 who have modest hyperprolactinemia and normal pituitary MRI scans is insufficient to monitor for the development of pituitary adenomas.

METHODS

Review of relevant literature and chart review.

RESULTS

A 25 year old man with known MEN1 manifested by hyperparathyroidism and a gastrin-producing neuroendocrine tumor was found to have a prolactin [PRL] level of 20.0 ng/mL [1.6-16 ng/mL] but a normal pituitary MRI scan. The impression then was that he had prolactinoma too small to be visualized on the MRI. Over the next 3.5 years his PRL levels remained in this mildly elevated range but he then presented with severe headaches and visual field defects. An MRI showed a 3.1 × 1.7 × 1.9 cm pituitary adenoma with compression of the optic chiasm and invasion of the left cavernous sinus. Surgery revealed a gonadotroph adenoma and he subsequently required gamma knife radiotherapy for residual tumor. Postoperative PRL levels were normal.

CONCLUSIONS

Small, intrasellar microadenomas may be associated with elevated PRL levels due to possible direct hormone production [prolactinoma] or possibly to interference with portal vessel blood flow. In monitoring hyperprolactinemic MEN1 patients for the development of pituitary adenomas, measurement of PRL levels is insufficient and periodic MRI scans are necessary at a more frequent interval than every 3-5 years. This may also pertain to patients with "idiopathic" hyperprolactinemia.

Clinical Management of Antipsychotic-Induced Hyperprolactinemia

PURPOSE

This article describes the physiology and mechanisms of prolactin and the assessment and clinical management strategies of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperprolactinemia is a disorder of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis which can be caused by several mechanisms. Typical antipsychotic agents are more likely to cause hyperprolactinemia than atypical antipsychotic agents, with the exception of amisulpride, paliperidone, and risperidone.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Switching from prolactin-elevating to prolactin-sparing agents is recommended. Providing adjunctive treatment and prescribing substitutive hormones are alternatives. Education and lifestyle modification should be a major health promotion strategy. Taking patients' history and conducting physical examinations should be done during follow-up.

Is a stable or decreasing prolactin level in a patient with prolactinoma a surrogate marker for lack of tumor growth?

The optimal interval for follow-up imaging of patients with prolactinomas is unclear. We wish to determine the likelihood of tumor enlargement in patients with prolactinomas who have a stable or reduced prolactin (PRL) level over time, whether or not they are treated with a dopamine agonist (DA). We identified 80 patients with prolactinomas (34 men, 46 women) who had at least two paired sets of serum PRL levels and pituitary MRIs, 3 or more months apart. Patients with hyperprolactinemia due to drug or stalk effects were excluded. The median (range) age was 45 (25-77) years. Sixty-three patients (78.8%) were treated with DA. PRL levels (ng/mL) at the initial and latest sets were 114 (0.3-15,732) and 16 (0.3-1,204), respectively. In patients with identifiable tumors, the maximum tumor diameters (mm) at the initial and latest MRI studies were 12.5 (2-60) and 12.5 (2-39) respectively, with an interval of 2.9 (0.3-9.7) years. Sixty percent of patients (n = 48) had a macroadenoma. Forty-two (52.5%) patients had either disappearance of the tumor (n = 22) or reduction (n = 20) in tumor size. In the remainder, tumor size was stable in 35 but increased in 3 patients. One of these patients, observed off therapy had a concomitant rise in PRL level. The other 2 had evidence of pituitary hemorrhage with no PRL increase. Tumor growth in prolactinoma patients with a stable or decreasing PRL level, regardless of size, is a rare event. Repetitive pituitary imaging in these patients may not be warranted.

Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome with precocious puberty, growth hormone deficiency and hyperprolactinemia

Cardio-facio-cutaneous (CFC) syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by craniofacial dysmorphia, ectodermal abnormalities, cardiac malformations, as well as growth and developmental delay. Although some endocrine abnormalities have been reported in this syndrome, very little is known about CFC syndrome-related endocrine disorders. A 7.5-year-old boy was admitted to our endocrinology clinic with the complaint of short stature. He had a height of 103 cm [-4 standard deviation (SD)], a weight of 16 kg (<3(th) percentile, -1.7 SD), a facial appearance typical for the CFC syndrome, optic nerve hypoplasia and pulmonary stenosis. Genetic investigation revealed a heterozygous mutation in exon 3 of the MEK1 gene, c.389A>G (p. Y130C). During his long-term follow-up, the patient developed a variety of endocrine disorders including precocious puberty, growth hormone deficiency and hyperprolactinemia.

Hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma

Prolactinomas are the most frequent pituitary adenomas. In patients with prolactinomas the primary cause of hyperprolactinemia is excessive and autonomic production of prolactin by lactotroph cells. In other conditions, except in case of macroprolactinemia, hyperprolactinemia is secondary to circumstances that stimulate secretion of prolactin by intrinsically normal lactotroph cells, or, rarely, that are the result of decreased clearance of prolactin. In general, cabergoline is the preferred treatment for micro- and macroprolactinomas, because it is more effective with respect to normalization of prolactin levels and reduction of prolactinoma size and because it has fewer side-effects compared to bromocriptine. Recently, it has been suggested that a standardized, individualized, stepwise, dose-escalating regimen of cabergoline may normalize prolactin levels and reduce prolactinoma size in patients who were otherwise considered to be dopamine agonist resistant. In general, the cardiac adverse effects of dopamine agonists reported in Parkinson's disease are not of clinical concern in the treatment of prolactinomas, which are treated with much lower doses. Nonetheless, there is uncertainty with respect to the dose and duration of cabergoline treatment, which requires echocardiographic follow-up. Although withdrawal of dopamine agonists may be considered in patients with prolactinomas well controlled by dopamine agonists, especially in postmenopausal women, recurrence of signs and symptoms may occur in a considerable portion of patients.

Drug-induced hypo- and hyperprolactinemia: mechanisms, clinical and therapeutic consequences

INTRODUCTION

The altered profiles of prolactin secretion in the anterior hypophysis, generated by pathological, pharmacological or toxicological causes, have special consequences on multiple functions in both genders.

AREAS COVERED

This selective review presents the main mechanisms controlling prolactin secretion, focusing on the interplay of various neurotransmitters or xenobiotics, but also on the role of psychic or posttraumatic stress. A detailed analysis of several pharmacotherapeutic groups with hyperprolactinemic effects emphasize on the relevance of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic mechanisms and the clinical significance of the long term administration.

EXPERT OPINION

Accurate monitoring and evaluation of the hyperprolactinemia induced by xenobiotics is strongly recommended. The typical antipsychotics and some of the atypical agents (amisulpride, risperidone, paliperidone), as well as some antidepressants, antihypertensives and prokinetics, are the most important groups inducing hyperprolactinemia. The hyperprolactinemic effects are correlated with their affinity for dopamine D2 receptors, their blood-brain barrier penetration and, implicitly, the requested dose for adequate occupancy of cerebral D2 receptors. Consequently, integration of available pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data supports the idea of therapeutic switch to non-hyperprolactinemic agents (especially aripiprazole) or their association, for an optimal management of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Possible alternative strategies for counteracting the xenobiotics-induced hyperprolactinemia are also mentioned.

[Clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of prolactinoma and hyperprolactinemia]

OBJECTIVE

To provide practical and up to date recommendations for evaluation, differential diagnosis, and treatment of prolactinoma and hyperprolactinemia in various clinical settings.

PARTICIPANTS

Members of the Neuroendocrinology Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology.

METHODS

Recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system (GRADE) to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. A systematic search was made in Medline (Pubmed) for each subject, and authors' considerations were added in areas where the literature provided scarce evidence. Finally, recommendations were jointly discussed by the Working Group.

CONCLUSIONS

The document provides evidence-based practical and updated recommendations for diagnosis and management of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma, including drug-induced hyperprolactinemia, treatment options for prolactinoma (drugs, surgery, and radiotherapy), prolactinoma in pregnancy, adverse effects of dopaminergic agents, and drug-resistant and malignant prolactinomas.

Unusual clinical presentations of giant prolactinomas

Giant prolactinomas are rare pituitary tumors which have scarcely been reported in the literature. We describe three men with unusual presenting features of prolactin-secreting giant pituitary adenomas: prolonged and increasingly disturbing intolerance to light and noise; strange behavior and mood disturbances; and rhinorrhea followed by a finding of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Treatment with dopamine agonist alleviated all symptoms, with concomitant suppression of plasma prolactin levels and a significant reduction in tumor mass. These cases emphasize the importance of considering unusual symptoms in the differential diagnosis of giant prolactinomas and the effectiveness of medical treatment.

Hyperprolactinemia and infertility

Prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors are a common cause of amenorrhea and infertility in premenopausal women. The goals of therapy are to normalize prolactin, restore gonadal function and fertility, and reduce tumor size, and dopamine agonists are the preferred therapy. Clinically significant tumor enlargement during pregnancy is uncommon and dependent on tumor size and prepregnancy treatment.

Medical treatment of prolactinomas

Prolactinomas, the most prevalent type of neuroendocrine disease, account for approximately 40% of all pituitary adenomas. The most important clinical problems associated with prolactinomas are hypogonadism, infertility and hyposexuality. In patients with macroprolactinomas, mass effects, including visual field defects, headaches and neurological disturbances, can also occur. The objectives of therapy are normalization of prolactin levels, to restore eugonadism, and reduction of tumor mass, both of which can be achieved in the majority of patients by treatment with dopamine agonists. Given their association with minimal morbidity, these drugs currently represent the mainstay of treatment for prolactinomas. Novel data indicate that these agents can be successfully withdrawn in a subset of patients after normalization of prolactin levels and tumor disappearance, which suggests the possibility that medical therapy may not be required throughout life. Nevertheless, multimodal therapy that involves surgery, radiotherapy or both may be necessary in some cases, such as patients who are resistant to the effects of dopamine agonists or for those with atypical prolactinomas. This Review reports on efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in patients with prolactinomas.

Treatment for prolactinomas and hyperprolactinaemia: a lifetime approach

BACKGROUND

Prolactinomas are the most common hormone-secreting pituitary tumours and are amenable to medical therapy with dopamine agonists. Indication for treatment will most commonly result from hypogonadism, infertility or symptoms related to tumour size. Thus, both diagnosis and treatment will essentially depend on the patients' stage of life, namely prepubertal, reproductive or postreproductive stage. This review will focus on a lifespan-dependent diagnosis and treatment for prolactinoma and hyperprolactinaemia.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science and EMBASE were searched electronically. No restriction was made with respect to language. Relevant current articles will be included in this review.

RESULTS

Prevalence of prolactinomas and clinical symptoms are age group-specific, and treatment of first choice is dopamine agonists over the whole lifespan. Open questions in the treatment for hyperprolactinaemia include optimal choice and duration of pharmacological treatment. In addition, concerns have been raised on the safety of dopamine agonists since a reported association of valvular heart disease with dopaminergic treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical presentation and consequences of hyperprolactinaemia and prolactinoma will differ in the specific stages of reproductive life and require an adequate lifetime-dependent diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Management of prolactinomas in Brazil: an electronic survey

Dopamine agonists are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas. However, there are still controversies concerning dose, treatment duration and criteria for drug withdrawal in different clinical situations. The aim of this study was to assess diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to prolactinomas among members of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM). SBEM members answered a questionnaire sent by e-mail that included 18 questions related to controversial issues about the management of prolactinomas. Among SBEM members, 721 (approximately 24% of total) answered the questionnaire. Concerning the diagnosis, 38% of the respondents stated that prolactin levels < 100 ng/ml would exclude the presence of a prolactinoma. Most of them favored the screening for macroprolactin in asymptomatic individuals instead of a routine screening (74% vs. 26%). Regarding the treatment, 70% of the respondents chose cabergoline as the drug of choice to treat macroprolactinomas whereas similar proportions advised cabergoline or bromocriptine as the best treatment for microprolactinomas (52% vs. 48%). Only 20% and 34% of respondents favored treatment withdrawal 2-3 years after prolactin normalization in patients with macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas, respectively. In case of pregnancy, only 58 and 70% of respondents advocated discontinuation of treatment with dopamine agonists in patients with macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas, respectively. Finally, only 36% would allow breast-feeding without restriction, 44% would restrict it to patients with microprolactinomas and 20% would not recommend it for women with prolactinomas There are several points of disagreement among SBEM members regarding the management of prolactinomas.