A Case of Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism With Homolateral Suppression

Adrenal venous sampling with adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effect of adrenal venous sampling with adrenocorticotropic hormone with that without adrenocorticotropic hormone in subjects with primary aldosteronism.

METHODS

A systematic literature search up to May 2020 was performed and 17 studies were detected with 1878 subjects who had adrenal venous sampling operations. They reported relationships between with and without adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation during adrenal venous sampling in subjects with primary aldosteronism. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using the dichotomous method with a random- or fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

Adrenal venous sampling operations with adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation had statistically significant lower incorrect lateralisation (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.75, P < .001); lower unsuccessful cannulations in both adrenal veins (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.58, P < .001); lower unsuccessful cannulations of left adrenal vein (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.06-0.17, P < .001) and lower unsuccessful cannulations of right adrenal vein (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.54, P < .001) compared with without adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation in subjects with primary aldosteronism.

CONCLUSIONS

Adrenal venous sampling operations with adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation had significantly lower incorrect lateralisation, unsuccessful cannulations in both adrenal veins, unsuccessful cannulations of the left adrenal vein and unsuccessful cannulations of the right adrenal vein compared with adrenal venous sampling operations without adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation in subjects with primary aldosteronism. Larger prospective studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

Bilateral Aldosterone Suppression in Patients With Right Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism and Review of the Literature

Introduction

Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) identifies unilateral primary aldosteronism but may occasionally show paradoxically low aldosterone–cortisol ratios bilaterally. Postulated reasons include venous anomalies, fluctuating aldosterone secretion, or superselective cannulation. We report our findings in patients who underwent repeat AVS and reviewed the current literature.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing AVS in an experienced high-volume tertiary center over a 5-year period.

Results

From 2015 to 2019, 61 patients underwent sequential cosyntropin-stimulated AVS and all had bilateral successful cannulation (100%). Four of 61 (6.6%) patients had bilaterally low aldosterone–cortisol ratios. Three patients underwent repeat AVS, with all 3 cases demonstrating right-sided lateralization and cure of disease postadrenalectomy. Right-sided disease was also more common in other reports. This may be due to inadvertent superselective cannulation of the short right adrenal vein, resulting in sampling of the adjacent normal gland. Cortisol results cannot detect this problem. In 1 patient, computed tomography venography excluded any accessory right adrenal veins. In another patient, repeat bilateral simultaneous unstimulated AVS was done, and measurements of metanephrines aided in accurately identifying right-sided lateralization.

Conclusion

In addition to technical difficulties in cannulating the right adrenal vein, we also have to avoid performing superselective cannulation inadvertently. In cases of inconclusive AVS, repeat sampling may identify patients with potentially curable unilateral primary aldosteronism. The role of corticotropin stimulation and metanephrines measurements during repeat AVS requires further study.

Adrenal venous sampling with or without adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation: A meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) with or without adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation is the test of choice to identify patients with a surgically curable subtype of primary aldosteronism (PA). Whether AVS with ACTH stimulation is more effective than AVS without ACTH stimulation remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of AVS with ACTH stimulation and AVS without ACTH stimulation in patients with PA.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles. All cohort studies comparing the 2 techniques (AVS with ACTH stimulation and AVS without ACTH stimulation in patient with PA) were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, and they were analyzed. AVS with ACTH stimulation did not significantly reduce the number of incorrect lateralization more than AVS without ACTH stimulation in patients with PA [OR: 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36, 1.59; P=0.47]. AVS with ACTH stimulation significantly reduced the number of unsuccessful cannulations of both adrenal veins more than AVS without ACTH stimulation in patients with PA (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.40; P<0.00001). For subgroup analyses, it also significantly reduced the number of unsuccessful cannulations of left adrenal vein and right adrenal vein (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.33; P<0.00001 and OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.71; P=0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSION

AVS with ACTH stimulation can significantly reduce the number of unsuccessful cannulations, without significantly reducing the number of incorrect lateralization. Further studies are still needed to verify these findings.