Gonadal Tissue Cryopreservation for a Girl With Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

Analysis of genetic and clinical characteristics of androgen insensitivity syndrome: a cohort study including 12 families

CONTEXT

Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) manifests itself as variable symptoms of under-virilization in patients with 46,XY disorders caused by androgen receptor (AR) gene variants. This large-sample study aimed to correlate the genotypes and phenotypes to the fertility of individuals.

METHODS

This was a cohort study that analyzed the genetic and clinical characteristics of patients with AIS from a single center in China.

RESULTS

The 117 patients were divided into 53 with complete AIS (CAIS) and 64 with partial AIS (PAIS). At their first visit, the median age was 1.83 years (0.92-4.17), and the external masculinization score was 3.0 (2.0-6.0). At the last follow-up, 92% (49/53) of patients with CAIS maintained their female gender, and 94% (60/64) of patients with PAIS were raised as males. No gender anxiety was observed in this study. Eighty-eight AR variants were identified, with 31 (35%) being unreported. Moreover, 24% (21/88) occurred more than once. The variants that appeared most frequently were located at amino acid 841, including p.R841H (n = 5) and p.R841C (n = 2). Variants p.N706S, p.R856H, and p.A871V were each observed 4 times. In terms of inheritance, 83% of patients with parental verification inherited variants from their mothers. We also observed that the variants from 1 case were inherited from his maternal grandfather who had hypospadias.

CONCLUSION

Most children with PAIS were raised as males. The abundance of maternally inheritable variants and the presence of case of preserved fertility indicate the fertility potential in patients with AIS. Hence, we recommend a careful evaluation of gonadectomy when fertility preservation is being considered.

Adolescent Fertility Preservation: Where Do We Stand Now

Adolescence is a period of flux for many body systems. While fertility potential typically increases after menarche, there are diseases where the opposite occurs and fertility preservation options need to be considered early. In cases of cancer, options vary by pubertal status and can include ovarian tissue cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, sperm cryopreservation, and testicular tissue cryopreservation. Much remains to be learned about fertility and preservation options in those with differences in sexual development (DSDs); however, depending on the form of DSD, fertility preservation may not be necessary. Similarly, traditional fertility counseling in children with galactosemia may need to be changed, as data suggest that fertility rates attributed to other causes of premature ovarian insufficiency may not be as applicable to this disease. Adolescents with Turner's syndrome are at high risk for premature ovarian failure; therefore, it is important to consider options as early as possible since ovarian reserves are depleted quickly. On the other hand, transgender and gender diverse adolescents may even be able to undergo fertility preservation after starting hormone therapy. In all cases, there are additional ethical components including technical/surgical risks in childhood, offering experimental therapies without creating false hope and evaluating children's consent and assent capabilities that must be considered.

The ethics of offering fertility preservation to pediatric patients: A case-based discussion of barriers for clinicians to consider

Decisions about fertility preservation can be difficult in general but the recent application of preservation techniques to pediatric patients has ushered in a host of new ethical considerations. Fertility preservation (FP) may be considered for all patients who are at risk for infertility due to their medical diagnosis or treatment, including those undergoing gonadotoxic chemotherapy, those with differences of sex development (DSD) undergoing gonadectomy,^1-3 and transgender patients undergoing gender affirming surgery. The focus of this paper is to review the ethical issues involved in offering FP to pediatric oncology patients and, to a lesser extent, the new ethical issues that apply to patients with DSD. Some of the techniques and approach to counseling will also apply to transgender individuals, although that is beyond the scope of this work. We aim to discuss several barriers to offering FP and to advise how to counsel families in the setting of rapid changes in this field. Families should be educated about:Specific guidance for clinicians regarding some of these points was recently published in an American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Report,¹ and we will illustrate the use of these guidelines in four case presentations.

Disorders of sex development and female reproductive capacity: A literature review

Disorders of sex development (DSD) are a wide-ranging group of complex conditions that influence chromosomal, gonadal, and phenotypic sex. The prevalence of DSD is very low, but affected patients deserve individualized management to improve psychological, sexual, and reproductive outcomes. This review aims to clarify the fertility potential of DSD patients who can be reared as females and their chance of becoming pregnant, especially using assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Due to the effects of DSD on internal and external genital organs, these conditions result in varying degrees of fertility potential. Fertility rate depends on the phenotype and is inversely related to the severity of the disorder. Reproductive endocrinologists and infertility specialists must be considered active partners of the interdisciplinary treatment team. With current advances in ART, pregnancy is more achievable in patients who were considered infertile at first glance. Due to the complexity of the medical management in DSD patients, more studies should be conducted to conclusively suggest the best choice for improving their fertility potential.Abbreviations: AIS: Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome; AMH: Anti-Müllerian Hormone; ART: Assisted Reproductive Technology; ASRM: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; CAH: Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia; CAIS: Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome; DHT: Dihydrotestosterone; DSD: Disorders of Sexual Development; FSH: Follicle Stimulating Hormone; GD: Gonadal Dysgenesis; ICSI: Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection; IUGR: Intrauterine Growth Restriction; IVF: In Vitro Fertilization; IVF-ET: IVF and Embryo Transfer; LH: Luteinizing Hormone; MGD: Mixed Gonadal Dysgenesis; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; MRKH: Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser; US: Ultrasonography; HSG: Hysterosalpingography; PAIS: Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome; PGD: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis; POR: P450 Oxidoreductase; PROM: Premature Rupture of Membranes; TS: Turner Syndrome; 17β-HSD III: 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase III; 21-OHD: 21-hydroxylase deficiency; 5α-RD-2: 5α-reductase-2.

Gonadal Tissue Cryopreservation for Children with Differences of Sex Development

INTRODUCTION

Infertility is common for individuals with differences of sex development (DSD) and is a significant concern to these individuals. Fertility potential in many DSD conditions is poorly understood. Gonadal tissue cryopreservation (GTC) for fertility preservation (FP) is offered to children with cancer undergoing gonadotoxic therapy. Our team sought to expand the field of FP by offering and evaluating the success of GTC for individuals with DSD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

GTC was offered to patients with DSD undergoing prophylactic gonadectomy, after extensive multidisciplinary counseling. For those who elected to attempt GTC, data were retrospectively abstracted, including: DSD diagnosis, age at gonadectomy, indication for gonadectomy, pathology results, and final decision about long-term gonadal tissue storage.

RESULTS

Ten patients were enrolled to attempt GTC, with a mean age of 11.5 years (range 1-18). Five of the 10 patients had germ cells (GCs) present. Diagnoses (age at gonadectomy) for patients with GCs included ovotesticular DSD (13 months), mixed gonadal dysgenesis (17 months), partial gonadal dysgenesis (3 years), partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (11 years), and mixed gonadal dysgenesis (12 years). Four of the 5 subjects with GCs elected for GTC. One opted against GTC, citing immature gametes that did not match gender identity.

CONCLUSION

GTC at the time of gonadectomy for patients with DSD is feasible. In many patients, GCs are present. While questions remain about the timing of gonadectomy, quality of GCs, and future success for use of the tissue based on technological advancement, GTC represents a novel approach to experimental FP for individuals with DSD.