1
|
Fabbri-Scallet H, Werner R, Guaragna MS, de Andrade JGR, Maciel-Guerra AT, Hornig NC, Hiort O, Guerra-Júnior G, de Mello MP. Can Non-Coding NR5A1 Gene Variants Explain Phenotypes of Disorders of Sex Development? Sex Dev 2023; 16:252-260. [PMID: 35764069 DOI: 10.1159/000524956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION NR5A1 is an essential transcription factor that regulates several target genes involved in reproduction and endocrine function. Pathogenic variants in this gene are responsible for a wide spectrum of disorders/differences of sex development (DSD). METHODS The molecular study involved Sanger sequencing, in vitro assays, and whole exome sequencing (WES). RESULTS Four variants were identified within the NR5A1 non-coding region in 3 patients with 46,XY DSD. In vitro analyses showed that promoter activity was affected in all cases. WES revealed variants in SRA1, WWOX, and WDR11 genes. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Evaluation of clinical and phenotypic significance of variants located in a non-coding region of a gene can be complex, and little is known regarding their association with DSD. Nevertheless, based on the important region for interaction with cofactors essential to promote appropriated sex development and on our in vitro results, it is feasible to say that an impact on gene expression can be expected and that this may be correlated with the DSD pathophysiology presented in our patients. Considering the number of cases that remain elusive after screening for the well-known DSD related genes, we emphasize the importance of a careful molecular analysis of NR5A1 non-coding region which is commonly neglected and might explain some idiopathic DSD cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Fabbri-Scallet
- Center for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering - CBMEG, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.,Interdisciplinary Group for the Study of Sex Determination and Differentiation - GIEDDS, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ralf Werner
- Division of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.,Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Mara S Guaragna
- Center for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering - CBMEG, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.,Interdisciplinary Group for the Study of Sex Determination and Differentiation - GIEDDS, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Juliana G R de Andrade
- Interdisciplinary Group for the Study of Sex Determination and Differentiation - GIEDDS, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Andrea T Maciel-Guerra
- Interdisciplinary Group for the Study of Sex Determination and Differentiation - GIEDDS, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nadine C Hornig
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Olaf Hiort
- Division of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Gil Guerra-Júnior
- Interdisciplinary Group for the Study of Sex Determination and Differentiation - GIEDDS, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Maricilda P de Mello
- Center for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering - CBMEG, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.,Interdisciplinary Group for the Study of Sex Determination and Differentiation - GIEDDS, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moree SE, Maneix L, Iakova P, Stossi F, Sahin E, Catic A. Imaging-Based Screening of Deubiquitinating Proteases Identifies Otubain-1 as a Stabilizer of c-MYC. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:806. [PMID: 35159073 PMCID: PMC8833929 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway precisely controls the turnover of transcription factors in the nucleus, playing an important role in maintaining appropriate quantities of these regulatory proteins. The transcription factor c-MYC is essential for normal development and is a critical cancer driver. Despite being highly expressed in several tissues and malignancies, the c-MYC protein is also continuously targeted by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, which can either facilitate or inhibit c-MYC degradation. Deubiquitinating proteases can remove ubiquitin chains from target proteins and rescue them from proteasomal digestion. This study sought to determine novel elements of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway that regulate c-MYC levels. We performed an overexpression screen with 41 human proteases to identify which deubiquitinases stabilize c-MYC. We discovered that the highly expressed Otubain-1 (OTUB1) protease increases c-MYC protein levels. Confirming its role in enhancing c-MYC activity, we found that elevated OTUB1 correlates with inferior clinical outcomes in the c-MYC-dependent cancer multiple myeloma, and overexpression of OTUB1 accelerates the growth of myeloma cells. In summary, our study identifies OTUB1 as a novel amplifier of the proto-oncogene c-MYC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon E. Moree
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.E.M.); (L.M.); (P.I.); (F.S.)
- Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Laure Maneix
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.E.M.); (L.M.); (P.I.); (F.S.)
- Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Polina Iakova
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.E.M.); (L.M.); (P.I.); (F.S.)
- Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Fabio Stossi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.E.M.); (L.M.); (P.I.); (F.S.)
- Gulf Coast Consortia, Center for Advanced Microscopy and Image Informatics, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ergun Sahin
- Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Andre Catic
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.E.M.); (L.M.); (P.I.); (F.S.)
- Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clark BJ, Prough RA, Klinge CM. Mechanisms of Action of Dehydroepiandrosterone. VITAMINS AND HORMONES 2018; 108:29-73. [PMID: 30029731 DOI: 10.1016/bs.vh.2018.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Dehydroepiandrosterone (3β-hydroxy-5-androsten-17-one, DHEA) and its sulfated metabolite DHEA-S are the most abundant steroids in circulation and decline with age. Rodent studies have shown that DHEA has a wide variety of effects on liver, kidney, adipose, reproductive tissues, and central nervous system/neuronal function. The mechanisms by which DHEA and DHEA-S impart their physiological effects may be direct actions on plasma membrane receptors, including a DHEA-specific, G-protein-coupled receptor in endothelial cells; various neuroreceptors, e.g., aminobutyric-acid-type A, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA), and sigma-1 (S1R) receptors; by binding steroid receptors: androgen and estrogen receptors (ARs, ERα, or ERβ); or by their metabolism to more potent sex steroid hormones, e.g., testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and estradiol, which bind with higher affinity to ARs and ERs. DHEA inhibits voltage-gated T-type calcium channels. DHEA activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARα) and CAR by a mechanism apparently involving PP2A, a protein phosphatase dephosphorylating PPARα and CAR to activate their transcriptional activity. We review our recent study showing DHEA activated GPER1 (G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1) in HepG2 cells to stimulate miR-21 transcription. This chapter reviews some of the physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of DHEA and DHEA-S activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara J Clark
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Center for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Russell A Prough
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Center for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Carolyn M Klinge
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Center for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schiller CE, Johnson SL, Abate AC, Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DR. Reproductive Steroid Regulation of Mood and Behavior. Compr Physiol 2016; 6:1135-60. [PMID: 27347888 PMCID: PMC6309888 DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c150014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In this article, we examine evidence supporting the role of reproductive steroids in the regulation of mood and behavior in women and the nature of that role. In the first half of the article, we review evidence for the following: (i) the reproductive system is designed to regulate behavior; (ii) from the subcellular to cellular to circuit to behavior, reproductive steroids are powerful neuroregulators; (iii) affective disorders are disorders of behavioral state; and (iv) reproductive steroids affect virtually every system implicated in the pathophysiology of depression. In the second half of the article, we discuss the diagnosis of the three reproductive endocrine-related mood disorders (premenstrual dysphoric disorder, postpartum depression, and perimenopausal depression) and present evidence supporting the relevance of reproductive steroids to these conditions. Existing evidence suggests that changes in reproductive steroid levels during specific reproductive states (i.e., the premenstrual phase of the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, parturition, and the menopause transition) trigger affective dysregulation in susceptible women, thus suggesting the etiopathogenic relevance of these hormonal changes in reproductive mood disorders. Understanding the source of individual susceptibility is critical to both preventing the onset of illness and developing novel, individualized treatments for reproductive-related affective dysregulation. © 2016 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 6:1135-1160, 2016e.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crystal Edler Schiller
- Psychiatry Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah L. Johnson
- Psychiatry Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anna C. Abate
- Psychiatry Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter J. Schmidt
- Section on Behavioral Endocrinology, National Institute of Mental Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - David R. Rubinow
- Psychiatry Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Charoensawan V, Martinho C, Wigge PA. "Hit-and-run": Transcription factors get caught in the act. Bioessays 2015; 37:748-54. [PMID: 26010075 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201400186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
A key challenge for understanding transcriptional regulation is being able to measure transcription factor (TF)-DNA binding events with sufficient spatial and temporal resolution; that is, when and where TFs occupy their cognate sites. A recent study by Para et al. has highlighted the dynamics underlying the activation of gene expression by a master regulator TF. This study provides concrete evidence for a long-standing hypothesis in biology, the "hit-and-run" mechanism, which was first proposed decades ago. That is, gene expression is dynamically controlled by a TF that transiently binds and activates a target gene, which might stay in a transcriptionally active state after the initial binding event has ended. Importantly, the experimental procedure introduced, TARGET, provides a useful way for identifying multiple target genes transiently bound by their regulators, which can be used in conjunction with other well-established methods to improve our understanding of transcriptional regulatory dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varodom Charoensawan
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Integrative Computational BioScience (ICBS) Center, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
| | - Claudia Martinho
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip A Wigge
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walsh CA, Qin L, Tien JCY, Young LS, Xu J. The function of steroid receptor coactivator-1 in normal tissues and cancer. Int J Biol Sci 2012; 8:470-85. [PMID: 22419892 PMCID: PMC3303173 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.4125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2012] [Accepted: 02/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
In 1995, the steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) was identified as the first authentic steroid receptor coactivator. Since then, the SRC proteins have remained at the epicenter of coregulator biology, molecular endocrinology and endocrine-related cancer. Cumulative works on SRC-1 have shown that it is primarily a nuclear receptor coregulator and functions to construct highly specific enzymatic protein complexes which can execute efficient and successful transcriptional activation of designated target genes. The versatile nature of SRC-1 enables it to respond to steroid dependent and steroid independent stimulation, allowing it to bind across many families of transcription factors to orchestrate and regulate complex physiological reactions. This review highlights the multiple functions of SRC-1 in the development and maintenance of normal tissue functions as well as its major role in mediating hormone receptor responsiveness. Insights from genetically manipulated mouse models and clinical data suggest SRC-1 is significantly overexpressed in many cancers, in particular, cancers of the reproductive tissues. SRC-1 has been associated with cellular proliferation and tumor growth but its major tumorigenic contributions are promotion and execution of breast cancer metastasis and mediation of resistance to endocrine therapies. The ability of SRC-1 to coordinate multiple signaling pathways makes it an important player in tumor cells' escape of targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire A Walsh
- Endocrine Oncology Research Group, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hartmaier RJ, Richter AS, Gillihan RM, Sallit JZ, McGuire SE, Wang J, Lee AV, Osborne CK, O'Malley BW, Brown PH, Xu J, Skaar TC, Philips S, Rae JM, Azzouz F, Li L, Hayden J, Henry NL, Nguyen AT, Stearns V, Hayes DF, Flockhart DA, Oesterreich S. A SNP in steroid receptor coactivator-1 disrupts a GSK3β phosphorylation site and is associated with altered tamoxifen response in bone. Mol Endocrinol 2011; 26:220-7. [PMID: 22174377 DOI: 10.1210/me.2011-1032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The coregulator steroid receptor coactivator (SRC)-1 increases transcriptional activity of the estrogen receptor (ER) in a number of tissues including bone. Mice deficient in SRC-1 are osteopenic and display skeletal resistance to estrogen treatment. SRC-1 is also known to modulate effects of selective ER modulators like tamoxifen. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in SRC-1 may impact estrogen and/or tamoxifen action. Because the only nonsynonymous SNP in SRC-1 (rs1804645; P1272S) is located in an activation domain, it was examined for effects on estrogen and tamoxifen action. SRC-1 P1272S showed a decreased ability to coactivate ER compared with wild-type SRC-1 in multiple cell lines. Paradoxically, SRC-1 P1272S had an increased protein half-life. The Pro to Ser change disrupts a putative glycogen synthase 3 (GSK3)β phosphorylation site that was confirmed by in vitro kinase assays. Finally, knockdown of GSK3β increased SRC-1 protein levels, mimicking the loss of phosphorylation at P1272S. These findings are similar to the GSK3β-mediated phospho-ubiquitin clock previously described for the related coregulator SRC-3. To assess the potential clinical significance of this SNP, we examined whether there was an association between SRC-1 P1272S and selective ER modulators response in bone. SRC-1 P1272S was associated with a decrease in hip and lumbar bone mineral density in women receiving tamoxifen treatment, supporting our in vitro findings for decreased ER coactivation. In summary, we have identified a functional genetic variant of SRC-1 with decreased activity, resulting, at least in part, from the loss of a GSK3β phosphorylation site, which was also associated with decreased bone mineral density in tamoxifen-treated women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Hartmaier
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ivanova MM, Luken KH, Zimmer AS, Lenzo FL, Smith RJ, Arteel MW, Kollenberg TJ, Mattingly KA, Klinge CM. Tamoxifen increases nuclear respiratory factor 1 transcription by activating estrogen receptor beta and AP-1 recruitment to adjacent promoter binding sites. FASEB J 2011; 25:1402-16. [PMID: 21233487 DOI: 10.1096/fj.10-169029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about endogenous estrogen receptor β (ERβ) gene targets in human breast cancer. We reported that estradiol (E(2)) induces nuclear respiratory factor-1 (NRF-1) transcription through ERα in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Here we report that 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), with an EC(50) of ~1.7 nM, increases NRF-1 expression by recruiting ERβ, cJun, cFos, CBP, and RNA polymerase II to and dismissing NCoR from the NRF1 promoter. Promoter deletion and transient transfection studies showed that the estrogen response element (ERE) is essential and that an adjacent AP-1 site contributes to maximal 4-OHT-induced NRF-1 transcription. siRNA knockdown of ERβ revealed that ERβ inhibits basal NRF-1 expression and is required for 4-OHT-induced NRF-1 transcription. An AP-1 inhibitor blocked 4-OHT-induced NRF-1 expression. The 4-OHT-induced increase in NRF-1 resulted in increased transcription of NRF-1 target CAPNS1 but not CYC1, CYC2, or TFAM despite increased NRF-1 coactivator PGC-1α protein. The absence of TFAM induction corresponds to a lack of Akt-dependent phosphorylation of NRF-1 with 4-OHT treatment. Overexpression of NRF-1 inhibited 4-OHT-induced apoptosis and siRNA knockdown of NRF-1 increased apoptosis, indicating an antiapoptotic role for NRF-1. Overall, NRF-1 expression and activity is regulated by 4-OHT via endogenous ERβ in MCF-7 cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita M Ivanova
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bulynko YA, O'Malley BW. Nuclear receptor coactivators: structural and functional biochemistry. Biochemistry 2010; 50:313-28. [PMID: 21141906 DOI: 10.1021/bi101762x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Transcription of eukaryotic cell is a multistep process tightly controlled by concerted action of macromolecules. Nuclear receptors are ligand-activated sequence-specific transcription factors that bind DNA and activate (or repress) transcription of specific sets of nuclear target genes. Successful activation of transcription by nuclear receptors and most other transcription factors requires "coregulators" of transcription. Coregulators make up a diverse family of proteins that physically interact with and modulate the activity of transcription factors and other components of the gene expression machinery via multiple biochemical mechanisms. The coregulators include coactivators that accomplish reactions required for activation of transcription and corepressors that suppress transcription. This review summarizes our current knowledge of nuclear receptor coactivators with an emphasis on their biochemical mechanisms of action and means of regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaroslava A Bulynko
- Molecular and Cellular Biology, BCM130 Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rando G, Horner D, Biserni A, Ramachandran B, Caruso D, Ciana P, Komm B, Maggi A. An innovative method to classify SERMs based on the dynamics of estrogen receptor transcriptional activity in living animals. Mol Endocrinol 2010; 24:735-44. [PMID: 20197311 DOI: 10.1210/me.2009-0514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Using a mouse model engineered to measure estrogen receptor (ER) transcriptional activity in living organisms, we investigated the effect of long-term (21 d) hormone replacement on ER signaling by whole-body in vivo imaging. Estrogens and selective ER modulators were administered daily at doses equivalent to those used in humans as calculated by the allometric approach. As controls, ER activity was measured also in cycling and ovariectomized mice. The study demonstrated that ER-dependent transcriptional activity oscillated in time, and the frequency and amplitude of the transcription pulses was strictly associated with the target tissue and the estrogenic compound administered. Our results indicate that the spatiotemporal activity of selective ER modulators is predictive of their structure, demonstrating that the analysis of the effect of estrogenic compounds on a single surrogate marker of ER transcriptional activity is sufficient to classify families of compounds structurally and functionally related. For more than one century, the measure of drug structure-activity relationships has been based on mathematical equations describing the interaction of the drug with its biological receptor. The understanding of the multiplicity of biological responses induced by the drug-receptor interaction demonstrated the limits of current approach and the necessity to develop novel concepts for the quantitative analysis of drug action. Here, a systematic study of spatiotemporal effects is proposed as a measure of drug efficacy for the classification of pharmacologically active compounds. The application of this methodology is expected to simplify the identification of families of molecules functionally correlated and to speed up the process of drug discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpaolo Rando
- Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Center of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|