Dexmedetomidine prolongs spinal anaesthesia induced by levobupivacaine 0.5% in guinea-pigs

Effect of vasoconstriction by dexmedetomidine in the mandible of rat

Background

In recent years, dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been proposed as a useful vasoconstrictor for local anesthesia because it is less effective in circulation than clonidine of antihypertensive drugs. In addition, DEX is expected to act as a vasoconstrictor during local anesthesia. However, histomorphometric studies demonstrating that DEX exerts vasoconstrictive effects are lacking. This study aimed to clarify whether DEX exerts a histomorphologically vasoconstrictive effect on blood vessels in the mandible of rats.

Methods

A total of 12 male Wistar rats were used. General anesthesia was induced and maintained using sevoflurane. Normal saline (0.2 ml) was injected on the left side of the jaw (DEX (-) effect site) and 0.2 ml normal saline containing 12.5 µg/ml DEX was injected on the right side of the jaw (DEX (+) effect site). The puncture point was located on the mesial side of the first molar, 1 mm away from the gingival sulcus. Following decalcification, the specimens were paraffinized and sagittally sliced into 20 µm-thick sections, followed by staining with anti-α smooth muscle actin antibody. The intravascular lumen area was measured in the oral mucosa, periodontal ligament, mandibular bone above the root apex, mandibular bone below the root apex, and dental pulp. The unpaired t-test was used for statistical analysis, and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared to the DEX (-) effect site, the intravascular lumen area in the oral mucosa and periodontal ligament of the DEX (+) effect site was significantly decreased. No significant difference was observed in the intravascular lumen area between the DEX (-) and DEX (-) effect sites in the mandibular bone above and below the root apex and dental pulp.

Conclusion

A direct vasoconstrictive effect of DEX was not observed in the intravascular lumen of the mandibular bone above and below the root apex and dental pulp; however, it was observed in the oral mucosa and periodontal ligament.

A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars

Introduction

Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist. It is conventionally used as a sedative in the intensive care unit. However, recently, the application of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to a local anesthetic agent has been studied. The present study intends to evaluate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine with 2% plain lignocaine with 2% lignocaine and 1:200000 adrenaline.

Materials and Methods

A total of 80 patients who required surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar extraction were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using a computer-generated table. Patients in the study group received 2% plain lignocaine with 1 mcg/ml dexmedetomidine. Patients in the control group received 2% lignocaine with 1:200000 adrenaline. The parameters evaluated were onset and duration of action, pulse rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and blood loss.

Results

Onset of action was faster and the duration of action was longer when dexmedetomidine was used with lignocaine as a local anesthetic agent. The vital parameters in both the groups were stable. Bleeding at the surgical site was less in the dexmedetomidine group.

Conclusion

The study concluded that the combination of dexmedetomidine with lignocaine enhances the local anesthetic potency of lignocaine when injected for nerve blocks.

Nanotechnology for Pain Management: Current and Future Therapeutic Interventions

Pain is one of the most common medical conditions and affects more Americans than diabetes, heart disease, and cancer combined. Current pain treatments mainly rely on opioid analgesics and remain unsatisfactory. The life-threatening side effects and addictive properties of opioids demand new therapeutic approaches. Nanomedicine may be able to address these challenges as it allows for sensitive and targeted treatments without some of the burdens associated with current clinical pain therapies. This review discusses the physiology of pain, the current landscape of pain treatment, novel targets for pain treatment, and recent and ongoing efforts to effectively treat pain using nanotechnology-based approaches. We highl ight advances in nanoparticle-based drug delivery to reduce side effects, gene therapy to tackle the source of pain, and nanomaterials-based scavenging to proactively mediate pain signaling.

Inhibition of Fast Nerve Conduction Produced by Analgesics and Analgesic Adjuvants-Possible Involvement in Pain Alleviation

Nociceptive information is transmitted from the periphery to the cerebral cortex mainly by action potential (AP) conduction in nerve fibers and chemical transmission at synapses. Although this nociceptive transmission is largely inhibited at synapses by analgesics and their adjuvants, it is possible that the antinociceptive drugs inhibit nerve AP conduction, contributing to their antinociceptive effects. Many of the drugs are reported to inhibit the nerve conduction of AP and voltage-gated Na⁺ and K⁺ channels involved in its production. Compound action potential (CAP) is a useful measure to know whether drugs act on nerve AP conduction. Clinically-used analgesics and analgesic adjuvants (opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ₂-adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and local anesthetics) were found to inhibit fast-conducting CAPs recorded from the frog sciatic nerve by using the air-gap method. Similar actions were produced by antinociceptive plant-derived chemicals. Their inhibitory actions depended on the concentrations and chemical structures of the drugs. This review article will mention the inhibitory actions of the antinociceptive compounds on CAPs in frog and mammalian peripheral (particularly, sciatic) nerves and on voltage-gated Na⁺ and K⁺ channels involved in AP production. Nerve AP conduction inhibition produced by analgesics and analgesic adjuvants is suggested to contribute to at least a part of their antinociceptive effects.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on porcine pulmonary artery vascular smooth muscle

Background

The α₂-receptor agonist dexmedetomidine (Dex) has been shown to produce sedative and analgesic effects not only with systemic administration but also when administered in the extradural space and around peripheral nerves. The effects and mechanism of action of Dex on pulmonary arteries, however, have not been determined. This study therefore aimed to investigate the effect of Dex on pulmonary arterial vascular smooth muscle by evaluating changes in isometric contraction tension. We then attempted to determine the effects of Dex on depolarization stimulation and receptor stimulation.

Methods

Endothelium-denuded porcine pulmonary arteries were sliced into 2- to 3-mm rings. We then exposed them to certain substances at various concentrations under different conditions of baseline stimulation (with KCl, adrenaline, caffeine, or histamine) and to α₂-receptor stimulants or antagonists, or α₁-receptor antagonists (imidazoline, yohimbine, rauwolscine, prazosin), and different conditions of Ca²⁺ depletion of the intracellular reservoir or extracellular stores. We measured the changes in isometric contraction tension with each addition or change in conditions.

Results

Dex enhanced the contraction induced by high-concentration KCl stimulation. Dex-induced enhancement of contraction induced by high-concentration KCl was completely suppressed by yohimbine and rauwolscine, which are α₂-receptor antagonists, but not by prazosin. Dex, imidazoline, yohimbine, and rauwolscine reduced the increases in contraction tension induced by the receptor stimulant adrenaline. Dex suppressed the adrenaline-induced increases in contraction tension after depletion of the Ca²⁺ reservoir. In the absence of extracellular Ca²⁺, Dex suppressed the adrenaline- and histamine-induced increases in contraction tension but did not affect caffeine-induced increases.

Conclusions

Dex-enhanced, high-concentration KCl-induced contraction was mediated by α₂-receptors. Adrenaline-induced contraction was suppressed by the α₂-receptor stimulant Dex and α₂-receptor antagonists yohimbine and rauwolscine, suggesting that the effect of Dex on adrenaline-induced contraction is attributable to its α₂-receptor-blocking action. Dex inhibited receptor-activated Ca²⁺ channels and phosphatidylinositol-1,4,5-triphosphate-induced Ca²⁺ release but not Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release.

Study of the in vitro metabolic profile of a new α2-adrenergic agonist in rat and human liver microsomes by using liquid chromatography-multiple-stage mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance

A potent synthetic α₂-adrenergic agonist called PT-31, (3-(2-chloro-6-fluorobenzyl)-imidazolidine-2,4-dione), was recently detected as a potential drug to be used as an adjuvant drug to treat chronic pain. The excellent pharmacological property of PT-31 highlights the importance in elucidating its metabolism, which could provide valuable information about its metabolite profile for further pharmacokinetics studies and additionally to estimate the impact of its metabolites on the efficacy, safety and elimination of PT-31. In this work, the study of the in vitro metabolism of PT-31 was initially carried out by using a liquid chromatography coupled to ion trap multiple-stage mass spectrometer (LC-IT-MSⁿ) and a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (LC-QTrap). The production of at least three unknown oxidative metabolites was observed. Structural identification of the unknown metabolites was carried out by combination of LC-MS experiments, including selected reaction monitoring (SRM) and multi-stage full scan experiments. Further analysis of ¹H-NMR led to the structural confirmation of the major metabolite. The results indicated that PT-31 was metabolized by a hydroxylation reaction in the imidazolidine-2,4-dione ring in rat and human liver microsomes, producing the metabolite 3-(2-chloro-6-fluorobenzyl)-5-hydroxyimidazolidine-2,4-dione in rat liver microsomes. A carbon hydroxylation onto the benzyl ring, produced two other minor metabolites of the PT-31 in rat liver microsomes.

Dexmedetomidine as an Additive to Local Anesthesia: A Step to Development in Dentistry

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine added to lidocaine against epinephrine added to lidocaine on local anesthetic potency and to look for future prospects of dexmedetomidine as an additive to local anesthesia in dentistry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 25 healthy volunteers in whom extraction of all first premolars was scheduled as part of their orthodontic treatment plan. In this split-mouth, double-blind, crossover, randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized into 2 groups: Group 1 received injection lidocaine plus dexmedetomidine, and group 2 was administered lidocaine plus epinephrine. Patients were assessed for the onset of action of anesthesia, duration of analgesia, pain perception, and vital signs.

RESULTS

The mean values (±standard deviations) for the onset of anesthetic action in groups 1 and 2 were 113 ± 24.9 and 141 ± 34.8 seconds, respectively, for the mandible. For the maxilla, the mean values were 113 ± 24.9 seconds for group 1 and 165 ± 43.8 seconds for group 2. The duration of anesthesia was longer in group 1 (lidocaine plus dexmedetomidine), in which the requirement for the first analgesic on request was seen after a longer time interval, when compared with group 2 (lidocaine plus epinephrine). Pain perception elicited statistically significant results with less perception of pain in group 1 (lidocaine plus dexmedetomidine). The vital parameters remained stable, and the results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed that the addition of dexmedetomidine to lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular nerve blocks significantly prolonged the block duration and shortened the onset of action, as well as improved postoperative analgesia in terms of the need for fewer analgesics in the postoperative period. Furthermore, the vital parameters remained stable and no complications were encountered. The findings were supportive of the use of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to local anesthetics in dental procedures.

Effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an additive to low-dose bupivacaine in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate

Background and Aims:

In patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), it is vital to restrict the level of block to T₁₀dermatome during spinal anaesthesia. Low-dose bupivacaine causes minimum haemodynamic alterations, but may provide insufficient surgical anaesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, a selective α₂-adrenoreceptor agonist, is a potent anti-nociceptive agent when given intrathecally. The aim of this study was to compare the adjuvant effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine with low-dose bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia versus a higher dose of bupivacaine in patients undergoing TURP.

Methods:

The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomised trial that included sixty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I–III scheduled for TURP. They were allocated into two groups: Group I receiving only hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally and Group II receiving dexmedetomidine with low dose bupivacaine. The time to regression of two dermatomes from the peak sensory block level was the primary outcome of the study.

Results:

With comparable baseline and demographic attributes, both groups had similar peak sensory block levels (T₉). Patients in Group II had quicker onset with the time to reach T₁₀being faster (10.72 ± 3.50 vs. 12.72 ± 3.90 min, P = 0.041), longer duration of motor block (200 ± 18.23 vs. 190 ± 10.15 min, P = 0.011) and increased time to first analgesic requirement (300 ± 25.30 vs. 220 ± 15.12 min, P = 0.0001).

Conclusion:

Intrathecal dexmedetomidine with low-dose bupivacaine provides faster onset, prolonged sensory and motor block and reduced rescue analgesic requirement in patients undergoing TURP.

Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine with Midazolam in Prolonging Spinal Anaesthesia with Ropivacaine

INTRODUCTION

Midazolam and dexmedetomidine both being sedatives, but the latter with additional analgesic properties is expected to prolong the duration of sensory and motor block obtained with spinal anaesthesia.

AIM

To compare intravenous dexmedetomidine with midazolam and placebo with respect to sensory and motor block duration, analgesia, and sedation in patients undergoing lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries with intrathecal ropivacaine anaesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single blind placebo controlled trial, 60 patients, classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status I-II, were randomized into three groups (n=20 per group). All patients were administered ropivacaine (15 mg) for spinal anaesthesia. Intravenous dexmedetomidine was administered in Group D (1 μg/kg loading dose over 10 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion (0.5 μg/kg/hr), intravenous midazolam was administered in Group M (0.05 mg/kg) loading dose, followed by a continuous infusion (0.02 mg/kg/hr) and normal saline was infused in Group C. Intraoperative haemodynamic changes, onset, level and duration of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, level of sedation, postoperative analgesia and side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

Heart rate was seen to fall significantly in Group D patients for the first 15 minutes. Measurements of mean blood pressure revealed significant decrease in Group D after 40 minutes, whereas the fall in Group C occurred after 15 minutes. Duration of sensory block was significantly longer in Group D patients (208±19.358 mins) as compared to Group M and C where the duration was (177±15.252 mins) and (177±17.800 mins) respectively. Higher levels of sedation were achieved in Group D and M where sedation score was 3 (fully asleep but arousable), 90% cases in Group D and 100% cases in Group M. The time at which first analgesic was given to patients (VAS score 4) was (271.50±21.831) in Group D and (202±25.047) in M and (218.50±38.013) in Group C. Dexmedetomidine significantly prolongs duration of analgesia providing pain relief in intraoperative and postoperative period. Injection of diclofenac sodium 75 mg intramuscular was used as rescue analgesic. The VAS score reached a value of 4 earlier in the midazolam and saline group than dexmedetomidine group.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous dexmedetomidine prolonged spinal anaesthesia, though midazolam did not. It also provided sedation and additional analgesia. Therefore, dexmedetomidine is appropriate during spinal anaesthesia, although heart rate needs to be monitored cautiously.

The newer aspect of dexmedetomidine use in dentistry: As an additive to local anesthesia, initial experience, and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Despite the availability of a wide variety of pharmacological agents in the field of anesthesia, there has always been a continuous search for newer local anesthetic agents with improved efficacy, potency, and better handling properties. Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist, is an emerging agent for provision of additive local anesthetic effect if used with conventional local anesthetics, which can be implicated in dentistry for performing many minor oral surgical procedures. The present paper reports a pilot study comparing clinical efficacy and potency of this newer emerging drug in combination with lignocaine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients undergoing orthodontic extraction for correction of malocclusion and other dentofacial deformities requiring orthodontic treatment were locally infiltrated with 2% lignocaine plus dexmedetomidine 1μ/ml and 2% lignocaine plus adrenaline in 1:200,000 dilution at two different appointments. The onset of action, duration of action, and pain threshold were assessed.

RESULTS

Onset of action was found to be faster with longer duration of action with the newer drug dexmedetomidine and lignocaine combination when compared with combination of lignocaine and adrenaline.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that the combination of dexmedetomidine with lignocaine enhances the local anesthetic potency of lignocaine without significant systemic effects when locally injected into oral mucosa.

Neurotoxicity of intrathecal injections of dexmedetomidine into the rat spinal dorsal horn

To investigate the neurotoxicity of intrathecal injections of dexmedetomidine, Sprague-Dawley rats were intrathecally injected with dexmedetomidine at doses of 0.75, 1.50 and 3.00 μg/kg into the spinal dorsal horn. We found that c-Fos expression in the rat spinal dorsal horn peaked at 7 hours following the 3.00 μg/kg dexmedetomidine injection, while the levels of c-Fos expression following 0.75 and 1.50 μg/kg dexmedetomidine were similar to those in the spinal dorsal horn of normal rats. At 48 hours following administration, the level of c-Fos expression was similar to normal levels. In addition, the intrathecal injections of dexmedetomidine increased paw withdrawal mechanical thresholds and prolonged thermal tail flick latencies. These results indicate that dexmedetomidine has pronounced antinociceptive effects. However, dexmedetomidine appears to have neurotoxic effects in the spinal cord because it increased c-Fos expression in the spinal dorsal horn within 7 hours following administration.

The effects of 2 µg and 4 µg doses of dexmedetomidine in combination with intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine on spinal anesthesia and its postoperative analgesic characteristics

OBJECTIVE

To compare the postoperative analgesic characteristics and side effects of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine in combination with hyperbaric bupivacaine, and to evaluate the effects of these combinations on spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

After obtaining approval from the local ethics committee, 60 male patients who were undergoing inguinal surgery and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I were included in the study. The present study was conducted in 2003 in a military hospital with a capacity of 100 beds. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups of 20 patients: group 1, 0.5 mL saline added to 3 mL (15 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine; and groups 2 and 3, 2 µg dexmedetomidine and 4 µg dexmedetomidine added to 3 mL (15 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine, respectively. Medications were administered by intrathecal injection in a total volume of 3.5 mL. The postoperative analgesic characteristics, effects on spinal anesthesia and side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were similar among the groups. The mean (±SD) time to onset of pain was 220.75±112.7 min in group 1, 371.5±223.5 min in group 2 and 1042.50±366.78 min in group 3. Time to first pain sensation in group 3 was significantly longer than that in groups 1 and 2 (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Two different doses of dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenoceptor agonist with analgesic effects, resulted in an increased duration of analgesia and efficacy, decreased postoperative analgesic use and was associated with no notable adverse effects.

Anti-nociceptive, analgesic and pathohistological effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine in rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study investigates analgesic and nociceptive effects of adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine neuraxial anesthesia through Tail-flick (TF) and Hot-plate (HP) tests and the pathohistological changes on spinal nerves and nerve roots through light microscopy.

METHODS

Forty anesthetized, male Sprague-Dawley rats were intrathecally catheterized. Basal values of TF and HP tests were measured before and after catheterization. Thirty-six successfully catheterized rats were assigned to four groups. Group B received 10 μg bupivacaine, Group BD3 received 10 μg bupivacaine + 3 μg dexmedetomidine, Group BD10 received 10 μg bupivacaine + 10 μg dexmedetomidine and Control group received 10 μL volume of artificial cerebrospinal fluid. TF and HP tests were performed between the 5(th) and 300(th) minutes of drug administration. Twenty-four hours after administration of drugs, rats were sacrificed and spinal cord and nerve roots were removed for pathological investigation.

RESULTS

Baseline values of the TF and HP tests were not statistically different among the groups (6.8 ± 0.15 s). TF and HP latencies in the Control group did not change significantly during the study. TF and HP test results showed that adding 3 and 10 μg dexmedetomidine caused a dose- dependent increase in duration and amplitude of analgesic and nociceptive effect of bupivacaine (TF: 37.52 ± 1.08%, 57.86 ± 1.16% respectively, HP: 44.24 ± 1.15%, 68.43 ± 1.24% respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no apparent pathohistological changes at least 24 hours after the intrathecal administration of a single dose of dexmedetomidine 3 μg and 10 μg. Dexmedetomidine added to bupivacaine for spinal block improves analgesia and prolongs block duration.

The effects of dexmedetomidine added to spinal levobupivacaine for transurethral endoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal α2 agonists prolong the duration of action of local anesthetics and reduce the required dose. Dexmedetomidine is an α2 receptor agonist and its α2/α1 selectivity is 8 times higher than that of clonidine.

AIMS

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of adding dexmedetomidine to intrathecal levobupivacaine on the onset time and duration of motor and sensory blocks.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled study.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group L (n= 30) patients received 3 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine +0.3 mL normal saline and Group LD (n= 30) patients received 3 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine + 0.3 mL (3 μg) dexmedetomidine. Sensory block onset time, block reaching time to T10 dermatome, the most elevated dermatome level, two dermatome regression time, sensory block complete regression time as well as motor block onset time, reaching Bromage 3 and regressing to Bromage 0 were recorded.

RESULTS

Sensory and motor block onset times were shorter in Group LD than in Group L (p<0.001). The regression of the sensory block to S1 dermatome and Bromage 0 were longer in Group LD than Group L (p<0.001). The two dermatome regression time was longer in Group LD than Group L (p< 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in blood pressure and heart rate. There was no statistically significant difference between groups when adverse effects were compared.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that intrathecal dexmedetomidine addition to levobupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia shortens sensory and motor block onset time and prolongs block duration without any significant adverse effects.

The effects of single-dose intravenous dexmedetomidine on hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia

PURPOSE

Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist, has analgesic and sedative effects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of small, single-dose intravenous dexmedetomidine administration after hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

Sixty adult patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2 and scheduled for lower extremity surgery under spinal anesthesia were studied. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups and administered hyperbaric intrathecal bupivacaine 12 mg. 5 min after spinal anesthesia, patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 received normal saline 10 ml, dexmedetomidine 0.25 μg/kg, and dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg, respectively, over 10-min intravenous administration. The onset time, maximum block level, two-dermatome sensory regression time, duration of motor and sensory anesthesia, and side effects were assessed.

RESULTS

The two-dermatome sensory regression time was significantly increased in groups 2 and 3. The duration of motor and sensory anesthesia was significantly increased in group 3. Onset time, maximum block level, level of sedation, and incidence of hypotension and treatment-needed bradycardia were no different among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.25-0.5 μg/kg, administered 5 min after intrathecal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine, improved the duration of spinal anesthesia without significant side effects. This method may be useful for increasing the duration of spinal anesthesia, even after intrathecal injection of local anesthetics.

Pharmacological mechanisms involved in the antinociceptive effects of dexmedetomidine in mice

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a α₂ -adrenoceptor (α₂ -AR) agonist used as an anesthetic adjuvant and as sedative in critical care settings. Typically, α₂ -AR agonists release nitric oxide (NO) and subsequently activate NO-GMPc pathway and have been implicated with antinociception. In this study, we investigate the pharmacological mechanisms involved in the antinociceptive effects of DEX, using an acetic acid-induced writhing assay in mice. Saline or DEX (1, 2, 5, or 10 μg/kg) was intravenously injected 5 min before ip administration of acetic acid and the resulting abdominal constrictions were then counted for 10 min. To investigate the possible mechanisms related to antinociceptive effect of DEX (10 μg/kg), the animals were also pretreated with one of the following drugs: 7-nitroindazole (7-NI; 30 mg/kg ip); 1H-[1,2,4] oxadiazole [4,3-a] quinoxaline-1-one (ODQ; 2.5 mg/kg, ip); yohimbine (YOH; 1 mg/kg, ip); atropine (ATRO; 2 mg/kg, ip); glibenclamide (GLIB; 1 mg/kg, i.p.) and naloxone (NAL; 0.2 mg/kg, ip). A rotarod and open-field performance test were performed with DEX at 10 μg/kg dose. DEX demonstrated its potent antinociceptive effect in a dose-dependent manner. The pretreatment with 7-NI, ODQ, GLIB, ATRO, and YOH significantly reduced the antinociceptive affects of DEX. However, NAL showed no effecting DEX-induced antinociception. The rotarod and open-field tests confirmed there is no detectable sedation or even significant motor impairment with DEX at 10 μg/kg dose. Our results suggest that the α₂ -AR and NO-GMPc pathways play important roles in the systemic antinociceptive effect of DEX in a murine model of inflammatory pain. Furthermore, the antinociceptive effect exerted by DEX appears to be dependent on KATP channels, independent of opioid receptor activity.

α2C-adrenoceptor modulators: a patent review

INTRODUCTION

α2-Adrenoceptors (α2-ARs) are membrane proteins belonging to the superfamily of GPCRs. Detailed studies have shown three different subtypes, namely α2A, α2B and α2C. Although numerous α2-AR ligands exist, only a small set of compounds have shown even a degree of selectivity among the three α2-AR subtypes. Moreover, these compounds suffer from binding to receptor sites outside the α2-AR subfamily. Efforts made to understand the biological significance of each α2-AR subtype have greatly been assisted by genetically engineered mice. The main results obtained suggest that α2C-AR stimulation may represent a therapeutic strategy to get an analgesic response with reduced sedative effects and undesirable changes in blood pressure due to α2A-AR activation.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the patent literature about the development of α2C-AR modulators from 2000 to early 2010 and their therapeutic effects evoked by the interaction with this receptor subtype.

EXPERT OPINION

Over 90 patents have been deposited in the last 10 years regarding different methods of α2C-AR modulation (use of agonists or antagonists, nucleic acids and polypeptides) for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of disorders involving this receptor. Nevertheless, despite the numerous published patents, ligands highly selective for the α2C-AR subtype, which continues to be enigmatic, are lacking.

Combination of high-dose dexmedetomidine sedation and fascia iliaca compartment block for hip fracture surgery

Two patients with hip fracture and with severe cardiac disease, who were anesthetized using a combination of dexmedetomidine sedation and fascia iliaca compartment block, are reported. The block covered almost the entire skin incision area and the major area of the fractured bone. The hemodynamic status and respiratory condition of both patients were stable throughout the surgery.

High concentrations of dexmedetomidine inhibit compound action potentials in frog sciatic nerves without alpha(2) adrenoceptor activation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dexmedetomidine, an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, exhibits anti-nociceptive actions at the spinal cord and enhances the effect of local anaesthetics in the peripheral nervous system. Although the latter action may be attributed in part to inhibition of nerve conduction produced by dexmedetomidine, this has not been fully examined yet.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We examined the effects of various adrenoceptor agonists including dexmedetomidine, and tetracaine, a local anaesthetic, on compound action potentials (CAPs) recorded from the frog sciatic nerve, using the air-gap method.

KEY RESULTS

Dexmedetomidine reversibly and concentration-dependently reduced the peak amplitude of CAPs (IC(50)= 0.40 mmol x L(-1)). This action was not antagonized by two alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonists, yohimbine and atipamezole; the latter antagonist itself reduced CAP peak amplitude. Clonidine and oxymetazoline, two other alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, also inhibited CAPs; the maximum effect of clonidine was only 20%, while oxymetazoline was less potent (IC(50)= 1.5 mmol x L(-1)) than dexmedetomidine. On the other hand, (+/-)-adrenaline, (+/-)-noradrenaline, alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist (-)-phenylephrine and beta-adrenoceptor agonist (-)-isoprenaline (each 1 mmol x L(-1)) had no effect on CAPs. Tetracaine reversibly reduced CAP peak amplitude (IC(50) of 0.014 mmol x L(-1)).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Dexmedetomidine reduced CAP peak amplitude without alpha(2)-adrenoceptor activation (at concentrations >1000-fold higher than those used as alpha(2) adrenoceptor agonist), with a lower potency than tetracaine. CAPs were inhibited by other alpha(2) adrenoceptor agonists, oxymetazoline and clonidine, and also an alpha(2) adrenoceptor antagonist atipamezole. Thus, some drugs acting on alpha(2) adrenoceptors are able to block nerve conduction.

Intravenous dexmedetomidine, but not midazolam, prolongs bupivacaine spinal anesthesia

PURPOSE

Midazolam has only sedative properties. However, dexmedetomidine has both analgesic and sedative properties that may prolong the duration of sensory and motor block obtained with spinal anesthesia. This study was designed to compare intravenous dexmedetomidine with midazolam and placebo on spinal block duration, analgesia, and sedation in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.

METHODS

In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, 75 American Society of Anesthesiologists' I and II patients received dexmedetomidine 0.5 microg . kg(-1), midazolam 0.05 mg . kg(-1), or saline intravenously before spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% 15 mg (n = 25 per group). The maximum upper level of sensory block and sensory and motor regression times were recorded. Postoperative analgesic requirements and sedation were also recorded.

RESULTS

Sensory block was higher with dexmedetomidine (T 4.6 +/- 0.6) than with midazolam (T 6.4 +/- 0.9; P < 0.001) or saline (T 6.4 +/- 0.8; P < 0.001). Time for sensory regression of two dermatomes was 145 +/- 26 min in the dexmedetomidine group, longer (P < 0.001) than in the midazolam (106 +/- 39 min) or the saline (97 +/- 27 min) groups. Duration of motor block was similar in all groups. Dexmedetomidine also increased the time to first request for postoperative analgesia (P < 0.01 compared with midazolam and saline) and decreased analgesic requirements (P < 0.05). The maximum Ramsay sedation score was greater in the dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups than in the saline group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous dexmedetomidine, but not midazolam, prolonged spinal bupivacaine sensory blockade. It also provided sedation and additional analgesia.

Interaction of morphine with a new alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist in mice

Finding new chemicals or adjuvants with analgesic effects in the central nervous system is clinically relevant due to the limited number of drugs with these properties. Here, we present PT-31, which is chemically related to 3-benzyl-imidazolidine, with an analgesic profile that results from alpha(2)-adrenoceptor activation. Intraperitoneal administration of PT-31 dose-dependently produced antinociception in the hot plate test, and interacted synergistically with morphine. This effect was completely reversed by yohimbine, a non-selective antagonist of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, and by BRL 44408, a selective alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor antagonist. The combination of morphine and PT-31 produced greater antinociceptive activity than either alone, and isobolographic analysis revealed a synergistic interaction between these compounds. Docking results confirm the high affinity of the PT-31 ligand at the alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor.

PERSPECTIVE

This study introduces a new analgesic compound (PT-31) that acts via alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor activation. A significant increase in analgesia was observed when co-administered with morphine. PT-31 is an interesting new substance for pain therapy.

The efficacy and neurotoxicity of dexmedetomidine administered via the epidural route

BACKGROUND

alpha(2)-Adrenoceptor agonists administered into the intrathecal and epidural space have been found to be effective in the treatment of chronic pain. Moreover, it was shown that they increase the analgesic effects of local anaesthetics and provide sedation, anxiolysis and haemodynamic stability. Dexmedetomidine, a potent and highly selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, is in current clinical use, particularly in the intensive care unit. Our aim was to investigate whether dexmedetomidine produced motor and sensory blockade and neurotoxic effects when administrated via the epidural catheter in rabbits.

METHODS

Twenty-one New Zealand white rabbits were included in the study. Animals were randomized into three groups. In Group L: lidocaine (2%), in Group LD: lidocaine (2%) + dexmedetomidine (5 microg) and in Group D: dexmedetomidine (10 microg) were administered by epidural catheter. Motor and sensory blockade were evaluated. After the evaluation of block, the animals were euthanized and their spinal cords removed for neuropathological evaluations.

RESULTS

Motor and sensory blockade were lower in Group D than in Group L and Group LD (P < 0.01). Although there were no differences between the groups for ischaemia of the medulla spinalis, evidence of demyelinization of the oligodendrocytes in the white matter in Group D was significantly higher than in Group L (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that dexmedetomidine does not have motor and sensory effects, but it may have a harmful effect on the myelin sheath when administered via the epidural route.

Neuraxial drug administration: a review of treatment options for anaesthesia and analgesia

Neuraxial drug administration describes techniques that deliver drugs in close proximity to the spinal cord, i.e. intrathecally into the CSF or epidurally into the fatty tissues surrounding the dura, by injection or infusion. This approach was initially developed in the form of spinal anaesthesia over 100 years ago. Since then, neuraxial drug administration has evolved and now includes a wide range of techniques to administer a large number of different drugs to provide anaesthesia, but also analgesia and treatment of spasticity in a variety of acute and chronic settings. This review concentrates on the pharmacological agents used and the clinical basis behind currently utilised approaches to neuraxial drug administration. With regard to local anaesthetics, the main focus is on the development of the enantiomer-specific compounds ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, which provide similar efficacy to bupivacaine with a reduced risk of severe cardiotoxicity. Opioids are the other group of drugs widely used neuraxially, in particular to provide analgesia alone or more commonly in combination with other agents. The physicochemical properties of the various opioids explain the main differences in efficacy and safety between these drugs when used intrathecally, of which morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil are most commonly used. Another group of drugs including clonidine, dexmedetomidine and epinephrine (adrenaline) provide neuraxial analgesia via alpha-adrenergic receptors and are used mainly as adjuvants to local anaesthetics and opioids. Furthermore, intrathecal baclofen is in routine clinical use to treat spasticity in a number of neurological conditions. Beside these established approaches, a wide range of other drugs have been assessed for neuraxial administration to provide analgesia; however, most are in various early stages of investigation and are not used routinely. These drugs include neostigmine, ketamine, midazolam and adenosine, and the conotoxin ziconotide. The latter is possibly the most unusual compound here; it has recently gained registration for intrathecal use in specific chronic pain conditions.