B-type natriuretic peptide and cardiovalvulopathy in Parkinson disease with dopamine agonist

Risks of Cardiac Valve Regurgitation and Heart Failure Associated with Ergot- and Non-Ergot-Derived Dopamine Agonist Use in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Dopamine agonists (DAs) are commonly used in the therapy of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, several observational studies have suggested a putative association between DAs and specific cardiac adverse events.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to systematically review and summarize the available epidemiologic evidence on the association between use of ergot- and non-ergot-derived DAs and the risk of valvular heart disease, specifically cardiac valve regurgitation (CVR) and heart failure (HF) in patients with PD.

METHODS

The databases MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were searched for all relevant articles published before February 2015. Studies were eligible if they met the following inclusion criteria: exposure to any approved non-ergot- or ergot-derived DA, presentation of original data, inclusion of an unexposed reference group, and valvular heart disease or heart failure as the primary outcome of interest.

RESULTS

Thirteen publications for CVR were identified (two nested case-control, one cohort and ten cross-sectional studies). Compared with non-ergot DAs or other anti-parkinsonian drugs, exposure to ergot-derived DAs pergolide and cabergoline was associated with an increased risk of CVR among PD patients. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) in the nested case-control and cohort studies ranged from 2.00 to 7.10 and 4.58 to 4.90, respectively. Longer treatment duration and higher dose of those DAs was also associated with a higher risk of CVR. Risk of HF was estimated in three nested case-control studies and one cohort study. Use of cabergoline (IRR range 1.30-2.39) and the non-ergot-derived DA pramipexole (IRR range 1.40-1.81) was associated with a higher HF risk among patients with PD. Pergolide may also be associated with a higher risk of HF.

CONCLUSION

Despite the heterogeneous methodological approaches of the included studies, there is strong evidence that treatment with pergolide and cabergoline is associated with a higher risk of CVR, and moderate evidence that treatment with pramipexole and cabergoline is associated with a higher risk of HF in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Regression of cardiac valvulopathy related to ergot-derived dopamine agonists

AIMS

In a previous echocardiographic prevalence study we reported a significant increase in the frequency of heart valve regurgitation in patients with Parkinson's disease taking the ergot-derived dopamine agonists pergolide and cabergoline versus controls. We followed-up our original cohort of patients to ascertain whether valvulopathy regressed after discontinuation of treatment and/or its incidence increased over time.

METHODS

Prospective follow-up of 101 patients treated with ergot-derived dopamine agonists included in the prevalence study: 53 given pergolide and 48 cabergoline (64% male; 66.4 ± 8.7 years of age, 11.5 ± 5.9 years of disease, 21.8 ± 5.9 months of follow-up); 55 stopped treatment while 46 continued. The main outcomes measures, were: echocardiographic quantification of regurgitant valve disease, abnormal leaflet, or cusp thickening and measurement of mitral valve tenting area.

RESULTS

Valve abnormalities regressed in about one third of patients with significant multivalvular and in about half of the patients with monovalvular regurgitation who withdrew; no progression was observed in remaining patients. Patients continuing ergot-derived dopamine agonists showed progression of cardiac valvulopathy: seven new cases with three to four regurgitation grade of any valve occurred during follow-up; this regarded also patients who had been on pergolide for many years.

CONCLUSION

Owing to the persistence of risk of heart valve damage over time and the lack of its mid-term reversibility in many patients, we believe that pergolide and cabergoline should be prescribed only when therapeutic alternatives with a better risk/benefit ratio are unavailable and the patient has access to echocardiography.