Medical Complications of Brain Tumors

A Comprehensive Review on Nanomedicine: Promising Approach for Treatment of Brain Tumor through Intranasal Administration

Brain tumors have become one of the deadliest cancers; however, their treatment is still limited by conventional approaches. Brain tumors, among other CNS diseases, are the most lethal form of cancer due to ineffective diagnosis and profiling. The major limiting factor in treating brain tumors is the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and the required therapeutic concentration is not achieved. Hence, most drugs are prescribed at higher doses, which have several unwanted side effects. Nanotechnology has emerged as an interesting and promising new approach for treating neurological disorders, including brain tumors, with the potential to overcome concerns related to traditional therapeutic approaches. Moreover, biomimetic nanomaterials have been introduced to successfully cross the blood-brain barrier and be consumed by deep skin cancer for imaging brain tumors using multimodal functional nanostructures for more specific and reliable medical assessment. These nanomedicines can address several challenges by enhancing the bioavailability of therapeutics through controlled pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Further nasal drug delivery has been considered as an alternative approach for the brain's targeting for the treatment of several CNS diseases. A drug can be directly delivered to the brain by bypassing the BBB through intranasal administration. This review discusses intranasal nanomedicine-based therapies for brain tumor targeting, which can be explored from different perspectives.

Standardizing Care of Neuro-oncology Patients Using a Customized Electronic Medical Record Toolkit

Objective

To develop and implement a customized toolkit within the electronic medical record (EMR) to standardize care of patients with brain tumors.

Patients and Methods

We built a customized structured clinical documentation support toolkit to capture standardized data at office visits. We detail the process by which this toolkit was conceptualized and developed. Toolkit development was a physician-led process to determine a work flow and necessary elements to support best practices as defined by the neuro-oncology clinical team.

Results

We have developed in our EMR system a customized work flow for clinical encounters with neuro-oncology patients. In addition to providing a road map for clinical care by our neuro-oncology team, the toolkit is designed to maximize discrete data capture. Several hundred fields of discrete data are captured through the toolkit in the context of our routine office visits. We describe the characteristics of patients seen at our clinic, the adoption of the toolkit, current initiatives supported by the toolkit, and future applications.

Conclusion

The EMR can be effectively structured to standardize office visits and improve discrete data capture. This toolkit can be leveraged to support quality improvement and practice-based research initiatives at the point of care in a neuro-oncology practice.