cEEG electrode-related pressure ulcers in acutely hospitalized patients

Challenges and Prospects in Epilepsy Monitoring Units: A Comprehensive Review of Logistic Barriers

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological diseases with a prevalence ranging from 0.5% to 2% in different sittings. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that nearly 80% of this burden is borne by resource-poor countries where even conventional electroencephalogram (EEG) coverage is dramatically short.  Video EEG monitoring applied for days as conducted in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) is aimed at seizure localization, anti-seizure medication (ASM) adjustment, or epilepsy surgery evaluation and planning. However, the EEG approach in EMUs has its obstacles. The present article is aimed to concentrate on the logistic challenges of EMUs, discussing existing data and limitations and offering suggestions for future planning to enhance the utilization of existing technology. Shortages of adult and pediatric epileptologists, qualified nurses, as well as EEG technologists have been reported in different countries. Moreover, injuries and falls, psychosis, status epilepticus, and unexpected death have been stated to be the most frequent safety issues in EMUs. Enhancements to mitigate logistical and healthcare system-related barriers in EMUs include the implementation of large cohort studies and the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) for the identification and categorization of specific risks among EMU admissions. The establishment of EMUs and their associated challenges and barriers are best acknowledged through discussions and dialogue with various stakeholders.

Review of Noninvasive Neuromonitoring Modalities in Children II: EEG, qEEG

Critically ill children with acute neurologic dysfunction are at risk for a variety of complications that can be detected by noninvasive bedside neuromonitoring. Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is the most widely available and utilized form of neuromonitoring in the pediatric intensive care unit. In this article, we review the role of cEEG and the emerging role of quantitative EEG (qEEG) in this patient population. cEEG has long been established as the gold standard for detecting seizures in critically ill children and assessing treatment response, and its role in background assessment and neuroprognostication after brain injury is also discussed. We explore the emerging utility of both cEEG and qEEG as biomarkers of degree of cerebral dysfunction after specific injuries and their ability to detect both neurologic deterioration and improvement.

Neonatal Electroencephalogram Electrode-Related Pressure Injury Prevention Quality Improvement Study

OBJECTIVE

To lengthen the days between electroencephalogram electrode-related pressure injury (EERPI) to 100 EERPI-free days in 6 months of study implementation with a goal to maintain 200 EERPI-free days thereafter (≤1 EERPI event/year).

METHODS

This quality improvement study took place in a level IV neonatal ICU over three epochs spanning 2 years: epoch 1 or baseline (January-June 2019), epoch 2 or implementation of intervention (July-December 2019), and epoch 3 or sustainment (January-December 2020). A daily electroencephalogram (EEG) skin assessment tool, introduction in practice of a flexible hydrogel EEG electrode, and successive rapid-cycle staff-education sessions were key interventions of the study.

RESULTS

Seventy-six infants were monitored for 214 continuous EEG (cEEG) days, of which six (13.2%) developed EERPI in epoch 1. Eighty infants were monitored for 193 cEEG days, of which two (2.5%) developed EERPI in epoch 2. One hundred thirty-nine infants were monitored for 338 cEEG days, and none developed EERPI in epoch 3. There was no statistical difference with respect to the median cEEG days among study epochs. A G-chart of EERPI-free days showed an increase in EERPI-free days from an average of 34 days in epoch 1 to 182 days in epoch 2 and 365 days (or zero harm) in epoch 3. Skin erythema from EEG electrodes was noted during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The structured study interventions eliminated EERPI events in infants monitored with cEEG. Preventive intervention at the cEEG-electrode level coupled with skin assessment successfully reduced EERPIs in neonates.

Processed Electroencephalogram-Based Monitoring to Guide Sedation in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Recommendations from an International Expert Panel-Based Consensus

BACKGROUND

The use of processed electroencephalography (pEEG) for depth of sedation (DOS) monitoring is increasing in anesthesia; however, how to use of this type of monitoring for critical care adult patients within the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of international experts consisting of 21 clinicians involved in monitoring DOS in ICU patients was carefully selected on the basis of their expertise in neurocritical care and neuroanesthesiology. Panelists were assigned four domains (techniques for electroencephalography [EEG] monitoring, patient selection, use of the EEG monitors, competency, and training the principles of pEEG monitoring) from which a list of questions and statements was created to be addressed. A Delphi method based on iterative approach was used to produce the final statements. Statements were classified as highly appropriate or highly inappropriate (median rating ≥ 8), appropriate (median rating ≥ 7 but < 8), or uncertain (median rating < 7) and with a strong disagreement index (DI) (DI < 0.5) or weak DI (DI ≥ 0.5 but < 1) consensus.

RESULTS

According to the statements evaluated by the panel, frontal pEEG (which includes a continuous colored density spectrogram) has been considered adequate to monitor the level of sedation (strong consensus), and it is recommended by the panel that all sedated patients (paralyzed or nonparalyzed) unfit for clinical evaluation would benefit from DOS monitoring (strong consensus) after a specific training program has been performed by the ICU staff. To cover the gap between knowledge/rational and routine application, some barriers must be broken, including lack of knowledge, validation for prolonged sedation, standardization between monitors based on different EEG analysis algorithms, and economic issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence on using DOS monitors in ICU is still scarce, and further research is required to better define the benefits of using pEEG. This consensus highlights that some critically ill patients may benefit from this type of neuromonitoring.

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial: Alternative Approach to EEG Application to Reduce Electrode-induced Skin Injury among Ambulatory EEG Patients

Ambulatory electroencephalography (AEEG) is a technique of continuous EEG recording of patients in their natural setting, outside the controlled environment of the hospital. Electrode-induced skin injury is a common complication of prolonged EEG monitoring. This randomized study aimed to investigate the performance of two methods of electrode application in reducing electrode-induced skin injury among patients undergoing 4-day AEEG monitoring. A randomized interventional study was conducted from November 2020 to May 2021 in the Neurosciences Ambulatory Care Unit at a metropolitan hospital in Sydney, Australia. We enrolled patients into two groups: i) Group 1 (standard protocol group) received Ten20 Conductive Paste^TM with Tensive® adhesive gel as the primary approach to electrode application and ii) Group 2 (intervention group) received Ten20 Conductive Paste^TM with Tensive® adhesive gel and hydrogel electrodes on hairless locations as the primary approach to electrode application. A total of 79 patients participated in this study. The group that received the addition of hydrogel electrodes (Group 2) performed better than the standard protocol group on electrode site inflammation for the frontal region, particularly FP1, FP2, F8, and the ground electrode sites. EEG quality and self-reports of patient comfort and mood did not differ significantly between the two groups. The addition of hydrogel electrodes using a Ten20 Conductive Paste^TM with a Tensive® adhesive gel protocol results in reduced inflammation at frontal lobe and ground electrode sites.

Reducing EEG (Electroencephalogram) Electrode-induced Skin Injury among Ambulatory EEG Monitored Patients: A Non-randomized Interventional Study of Two Commonly Used Cream-based Products for Electrode Application

Ambulatory electroencephalography (AEEG) seeks to capture inter-ictal epileptiform activity or paroxysmal events when patients are not in the clinic. Skin inflammation is a common complication of prolonged EEG monitoring. This non-randomized study aimed to investigate the performance of two commonly used cream-based methods of electrode application in reducing electrode-induced skin injury among patients undergoing AEEG monitoring. A non-randomized interventional study was conducted from July to December 2019 in the Neurosciences Ambulatory Care Unit at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia. Patients were enrolled into two groups: i) Group T, which received Ten20® Conductive Paste with Tensive® Conductive Adhesive Gel as the primary approach to electrode application; ii). Group E, which received EC2⁺® Conductive Cream as the primary approach to electrode application. Patients in Group T were enrolled in the 1st and 3rd week of the month, and patients in Group E were enrolled in the 2nd and 4th week for each month of the study. A total of 152 patients participated in this study. Two sub-groups were established: those who were monitored for two days (Group T; n = 36, Group E; n = 30) and those who were monitored for four days (Group T; n = 43, Group E; n = 43). Significant (p < 0.05) differences indicating greater inflammation in the Group E were noted for both Day 2 and Day 4 participants. Skin injury/inflammation was significantly less using the standard method (Group T: Ten20® with Tensive® gel) when compared to EC2⁺® (Group E) as the conductive material at the electrode site.