Depression in epilepsy, migraine, and multiple sclerosis: Epidemiology and how to screen for it

Severity of Epilepsy and Response to Antiseizure Medications in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of a Real-World Dataset

Background and objectives:

Epilepsy is an important comorbidity that affects outcomes for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, it is unclear if seizure severity among individuals with coexistence of multiple sclerosis and epilepsy (MS+E) is higher than in those with other focal epilepsies. Our goal was to compare the overall severity of epilepsy in individuals with MS+E versus those with focal epilepsy without MS (E-MS) as defined by seizure-related healthcare utilization, frequency and duration of status epilepticus, and frequency of antiseizure medication (ASM) regimen changes.

Methods:

In this hypothesis-generating study, we analyzed a U.S. commercial nationwide de-identified claims dataset with > 86 million individuals between 1/1/2008 and 8/31/2019. Using validated algorithms, we identified adults with E-MS and those with MS+E. We compared the number and length of seizure-related hospital admissions, the number of claims and unique days with claims for status epilepticus, and the rates of ASM regimen changes between the MS+E and the E-MS groups.

Results:

During the study period, 66,708 individuals with E-MS and 537 with MS+E had ≥ 2 years of coverage after their initial diagnosis of epilepsy. There was no difference between the MS+E and E-MS groups in the percentage of individuals admitted for seizures and/or status epilepticus. However, MS+E with seizure-related admissions had more admissions and longer hospital stays than those with E-MS. MS+E who experienced status epilepticus had more unique days with status epilepticus claims compared to E-MS. MS+E were more likely to have ASM regimen changes in Year 2 after the initial diagnosis of epilepsy and had more ASM changes during Year 2 compared to E-MS. Among individuals with MS+E, there were no differences in our measures of seizure severity for those treated with sodium channel blockers/modulators versus other ASM classes.

Discussion:

This study supports the notion that individuals with MS+E can have more severe epilepsy than those with E-MS. Seizure severity among individuals with MS+E treated with sodium-channel blockers/modulators versus other ASM classes shows no significant differences.

Classification of evidence:

This study provides Class III evidence that individuals with MS+E can have more severe epilepsy than those with E-MS.

Association Between Migraine Comorbidity and Psychiatric Symptoms Among People With Newly Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about psychiatric symptoms among patients with migraine and newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. The investigators compared symptoms of depression, anxiety, and suicidality among people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy with migraine versus without migraine.

METHODS

The Human Epilepsy Project is a prospective multicenter study of patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Depression (measured with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), anxiety (measured with the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale), and suicidality scores (measured with the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale [C-SSRS]) were compared between participants with versus without migraine. Data analysis was performed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality assessment, the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and linear regression.

RESULTS

Of 349 patients with new-onset focal epilepsy, 74 (21.2%) had migraine. There were no differences between the patients without migraine versus those with migraine in terms of age, race, and level of education. There were more women in the group with migraine than in the group without migraine (75.7% vs. 55.6%, p=0.0018). The patients with epilepsy and comorbid migraine had more depressive symptoms than the patients with epilepsy without migraine (35.2% vs. 22.7%, p=0.031). Patients with epilepsy with comorbid migraine had more anxiety symptoms than patients with epilepsy without migraine, but this relation was mediated by age in logistic regression, with younger age being associated with anxiety. Comorbid migraine was not associated with C-SSRS ideation or behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Among a sample of patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy, 21.2% had migraine. Migraine comorbidity was associated with higher incidence of depressive symptoms. Future studies should be performed to better assess these relationships and possible treatment implications.

Point prevalence of depression in persons with active epilepsy and impact of methodological moderators: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the pooled prevalence of depression in persons with epilepsy and assess the methodological moderators affecting the prevalence estimates.

METHODS

Five electronic databases PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, WHO Global Index Medicus, and Clinicaltrial.gov were searched for studies reporting prevalence of depression in PWE ≥ 18 years of age in any setting.

RESULTS

Out of 13,873 studies, after deduplication and screening, 56 studies with 10,527 PWE met the eligibility criteria. The overall pooled prevalence of depression in PWE was 32% (95%confidence interval [CI] 28-35%) and significant heterogeneity (Chi-square = 1171.53, p = 0.00; τ² = 0.02; I² = 94.36%). Prevalence has doubled in the recent years (16% in 2000-2005 vs. 35% in 2016-2020), was higher in Asia than in Europe (coefficient 0.899, 95%CI: 0.809-0.999; p = 0.049). Among assessment methods, prevalence was highest in HAM-D scale (54%, 95%CI: 27-82%) and lowest in MINI (22%, 95%CI: 19-26%). Sensitivity analysis also corroborated findings when MINI was excluded (35%, 95%CI: 31-38%).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of PWE have depression. Though there is substantial heterogeneity due to various methodological moderators, it is unlikely to affect the routine screening of PWE for depression. Use of a screening tool should be based on ease of administration, and cutoff selection should ensure identification of minimal depression as well.

Functional limitations in people with multimorbidity and the association with mental health conditions: Baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)

INTRODUCTION

Increasing multimorbidity is often associated with declining physical functioning, with some studies showing a disproportionate impact on functioning when mental health conditions are present. More research is needed because most multimorbidity studies exclude mental health conditions.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to improve our understanding of the association between functional limitation and multimorbidity, including a comparison of those with multimorbidity that includes versus excludes mental health conditions.

METHODS

This is a population-based, cross-sectional analysis of data from The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Functional limitation was defined as the presence of any of 14 activities of daily living (ADLs) or instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Multimorbidity, measured by the number of chronic conditions, included mood and anxiety disorders. Logistic regression explored the association between multimorbidity (with and without mental health conditions) and functional limitation. Factor analysis identified common condition clusters to help understand clinical complexity in those with mood/anxiety disorders and the potential influences on functional limitation.

RESULTS

There were 51,338 participants, with a similar proportion of men and women (49% versus 51%) and 42% age 65 years or older. Fifteen percent (15%) had no chronic conditions and 17% had 5+. Ten percent (10%) reported at least one ADL or IADL limitation. Odds ratios (ORs) for functional limitation increased with multimorbidity and were generally higher for those with versus without mental health conditions (e.g., ORs from 1 to 5+ chronic conditions increased 1.9 to 15.8 for those with mood/anxiety disorders versus 1.8 to 10.2 for those without). Factor analysis showed that mood/anxiety conditions clustered with somatic conditions (e.g., migraines, bowel/gastrointestinal disorders).

CONCLUSION

This study found higher odds of functional limitation for those with multimorbidity that included versus excluded mental health conditions, at all levels of multimorbidity. It highlights the need for concurrent management of mental and physical comorbidities to prevent functional limitations and future decline. This approach is aligned with the NICE clinical assessment and management guidelines for people with multimorbidity.

The association between systemic autoimmune disorders and epilepsy and its clinical implications

Systemic autoimmune disorders occur more frequently in patients with epilepsy than in the general population, suggesting shared disease mechanisms. The risk of epilepsy is elevated across the spectrum of systemic autoimmune disorders but is highest in systemic lupus erythematosus and type 1 diabetes mellitus. Vascular and metabolic factors are the most important mediators between systemic autoimmune disorders and epilepsy. Systemic immune dysfunction can also affect neuronal excitability, not only through innate immune activation and blood-brain barrier dysfunction in most epilepsies but also adaptive immunity in autoimmune encephalitis. The presence of systemic autoimmune disorders in subjects with acute seizures warrants evaluation for infectious, vascular, toxic and metabolic causes of acute symptomatic seizures, but clinical signs of autoimmune encephalitis should not be missed. Immunosuppressive medications may have antiseizure properties and trigger certain drug interactions with antiseizure treatments. A better understanding of mechanisms underlying the co-existence of epilepsy and systemic autoimmune disorders is needed to guide new antiseizure and anti-epileptogenic treatments. This review aims to summarize the epidemiological evidence for systemic autoimmune disorders as comorbidities of epilepsy, explore potential immune and non-immune mechanisms, and provide practical implications on diagnostic and therapeutic approach to epilepsy in those with comorbid systemic autoimmune disorders.

Right-Sided clinical findings are worse prognostic factor in Multiple Sclerosis patients?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the importance of the side of clinical findings in predicting the prognosis in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

METHODS

In our study we enrolled 361 MS patients. This study as retrospective was performed. On neurological examinations, clinical findings were recorded as right, left and bilateral. We used the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS), Progression Index (PI) for neurological status.

RESULTS

At the first attack, there were differences in the EDSS, PI and MSSS of right-sided findings between remission and attack periods (p=0.057, p=0.008, p=0.017 respectively). In the right-sided clinical findings, the value of PI and MSSS were higher than the others between in remission and attack periods (p=0.002, p=0.045 respectively). At last attack, we found statically differences in EDSS, MSSS values between remission and attack periods in only right-sided clinical findings (p=0.042, p=0.027 respectively). In the first presentation the PI value in bilateral clinical signs was lower (p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Right-sided clinical findings were poor prognostic factors in all stages of MS, whereas bilateral findings were not poor prognostic factor in the early-stage MS.

Comorbidities in multiple sclerosis-a plea for interdisciplinary collaboration to improve the quality of life of MS patients

The negative influence of comorbidities on the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis is evident and the problem is increasingly acknowledged by numerous international studies in long-term care. One therapeutic option would be an add-on therapy with vitamin D (VD), with the aim of achieving a therapeutically effective dose. The individually required VD dose must be tested, since the response to a certain dose is subject to variations between individuals. A possible toxicity with increased 1.25(OH)D3 (active VD metabolite) is largely prevented by increased activity of 24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1). Monitoring of serum VD levels as well as serum calcium and phosphate levels (optional Ca excretion in 24-hour urine, Ca creatinine ratio in urine) provides safety and is necessary because possible mutations on the (catabolic) CYP24A1 gene can lead to a partial or total loss of 24-hydroxylase activity and provoke hypercalcemia/hyperphosphatemia. The main therapeutic objective is to maintain functional and social independence by using drugs with a high safety profile. The prevention and optimal management of comorbidities can influence the quality of life of patients with MS (PwMS) when included in patient care. Adequate measures can reduce the burden of MS only if the risk of comorbidity is reduced through targeted monitoring, early detection and diagnosis. Such a strategy will contribute to influencing the premature mortality of patients with MS. If VD is recognized as a "multipurpose steroid hormone", it could also be used to maintain cognitive function and prevent premature possible dementia, especially as there is evidence that VD deficiency correlates with brain atrophy (hippocampus). At present, MS therapy is still a balancing act between therapeutically efficient action and the management of unexpected side effects, with VD add-on therapy being almost unproblematic and most likely to be accepted by PwMS.

Depression and quality of life in patients with epilepsy in Northwest Greece

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to compare depression and QoL between patients with epilepsy and healthy controls, evaluating potentially related factors to depression and QoL in patients with epilepsy in Northwest Greece.

METHODS

A case study was conducted in adult patients with epilepsy followed up at the University Hospital of Ioannina and in healthy controls. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression's severity evaluation, the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire for the QoL estimation and the Adverse Event Profile (AEP) questionnaire for the Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs) adverse effects assessment were used.

RESULTS

Seventy patients with epilepsy and 70 controls were recruited. The PHQ-9 score was higher in patients compared to controls and slightly higher than reported in patients with epilepsy. PHQ-9 was significantly associated with the AEP score. Our patients had a poorer QoL compared to controls. The level of education, the AEP and the PHQ-9 scores were associated to QoL, the last two being the most powerful predictors of QoL.

CONCLUSION

Patients with epilepsy in Northwest Greece had higher rates of depression than reported in patients with epilepsy and poorer QoL compared to controls. The adverse effects of AEDs were related to depression in our study, while the adverse effects of AEDs and depression were more powerful predictors of QoL compared to demographics and other characteristics of epilepsy.

Headache and Its Management in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to discuss the prevalence, impact, pathophysiology, and treatment of headaches (H/As) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

RECENT FINDINGS

Headaches and multiple sclerosis are more common in women than in men with the ratio of female to male being 3:1. It is not entirely clear if there is a correlation or an incidental comorbidity of two neurological conditions. A review of the literature shows a variable prevalence of H/As in MS patients. Using the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria, the primary type of H/As, especially migraine, is the most common type seen in patients with MS. One of the theories of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of migraine in MS patients is inflammation leading to demyelinating lesions in the pain-producing centers in the midbrain. Secondary H/As due to MS medications such as interferons are also frequently present. H/As can be a cause for significant comorbidity in patients with MS. The treatment of H/As in patients with MS should be addressed in the same fashion as in the non-MS population, which is a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. Preventive medicines for the H/As should be carefully selected because of their side effect profiles. Acute attacks of migraines can be treated with medications such as triptans. Patients with MS who have migraine H/As should be educated about the phenomenon of overuse H/As, keeping headache journals, avoiding stress, and monitoring sleeping habits. The presence of depression in patients with MS and migraine affects quality of life (QOL) and should also be addressed for better outcomes.