Heritability of cervical spinal cord structure

Biological variation in cervical spinal cord MRI morphometry in healthy individuals and people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Conclusions from prior literature regarding the impact of sex, age, and height on spinal cord (SC) MRI morphometrics are conflicting, while the effect of body weight on SC morphometrics has been found to be nonsignificant. The purpose of this case-control study is to assess the associations between cervical SC MRI morphometric parameters and age, sex, height, and weight to establish their potential role as confounding variables in a clinical study of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) compared to a cohort of healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Sixty-nine healthy volunteers and 31 people with MS underwent cervical SC MRI at 3 Tesla field strength. Images were centered at the C3/C4 intervertebral disc and processed using Spinal Cord Toolbox v.4.0.2. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to evaluate the effects of biological variables and disease status on morphometric parameters.

RESULTS

Sex, age, and height had significant effects on cord and gray matter (GM) cross-sectional area (CSA) as well as the GM:cord CSA ratio. There were no significant effects of body weight on morphometric parameters. The effect of MS disease duration on cord CSA in the C4 level was significant when controlling for all other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies of disease-related changes in SC morphometry should control for sex, age, and height to account for physiological variation.

Spinal cord atrophy after spinal cord injury - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cervical spinal cord atrophy occurs after spinal cord injury. The atrophy and how level of injury affects atrophy differs between studies. A systematic review and metaanalysis were done after systematic searches of PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo and Web of Science. English language original studies analyzing MRI cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area in adults with spinal cord injury were included. Atrophy and correlation between injury level and atrophy were estimated with random-effects models, standardized mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals. 24 studies were identified. 13/24 studies had low risk of bias. Cord atrophy meta-analysis of 18 articles corresponded to a standardized mean difference of -1.48 (95% CI -1.78 to -1.19) with moderate to large interstudy heterogeneity. Logarithmic time since injury influenced heterogeneity. Longitudinal atrophy was best described by a logarithmic model, indicating that rate of spinal atrophy decreases over time. Meta-correlation of eight studies indicated more severe atrophy in more rostral injuries (0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.59). Larger and preferably longitudinal studies, data sharing, and standardized protocols are warranted.

Automatic measure and normalization of spinal cord cross-sectional area using the pontomedullary junction

Spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) is a relevant biomarker to assess spinal cord atrophy in neurodegenerative diseases. However, the considerable inter-subject variability among healthy participants currently limits its usage. Previous studies explored factors contributing to the variability, yet the normalization models required manual intervention and used vertebral levels as a reference, which is an imprecise prediction of the spinal levels. In this study we implemented a method to measure CSA automatically from a spatial reference based on the central nervous system (the pontomedullary junction, PMJ), we investigated factors to explain variability, and developed normalization strategies on a large cohort (N = 804). Following automatic spinal cord segmentation, vertebral labeling and PMJ labeling, the spinal cord CSA was computed on T1w MRI scans from the UK Biobank database. The CSA was computed using two methods. For the first method, the CSA was computed at the level of the C2-C3 intervertebral disc. For the second method, the CSA was computed at 64 mm caudally from the PMJ, this distance corresponding to the average distance between the PMJ and the C2-C3 disc across all participants. The effect of various demographic and anatomical factors was explored, and a stepwise regression found significant predictors; the coefficients of the best fit model were used to normalize CSA. CSA measured at C2-C3 disc and using the PMJ differed significantly (paired t-test, p-value = 0.0002). The best normalization model included thalamus, brain volume, sex and the interaction between brain volume and sex. The coefficient of variation went down for PMJ CSA from 10.09 (without normalization) to 8.59%, a reduction of 14.85%. For CSA at C2-C3, it went down from 9.96 to 8.42%, a reduction of 15.13 %. This study introduces an end-to-end automatic pipeline to measure and normalize cord CSA from a neurological reference. This approach requires further validation to assess atrophy in longitudinal studies. The inter-subject variability of CSA can be partly accounted for by demographics and anatomical factors.

Erratum: Heritability of cervical spinal cord structure

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000401.].