New onset refractory status epilepticus research: What is on the horizon?

Did pediatric drug development advance epilepsy treatment in young patients? It is time for new research goals

Modern drugs have changed epilepsy, which affects people of all ages. However, for young people with epilepsy, the framework of drug development has stalled. In the wake of the thalidomide catastrophe, the misconception emerged that for people < 18 years of age drugs, including antiseizure medications (ASMs), need separate proof of efficacy and safety, overall called "pediatric drug development". For ASMs, this has changed to some degree. Authorities now accept that ASMs are effective in < 18 years as well, but they still require "extrapolation of efficacy," as if minors were another species. As a result, some of the pediatric clinical epilepsy research over the past decades was unnecessary. Even more importantly, this has hampered research on meaningful research goals. We do not need to confirm that ASMs work before as they do after the 18th birthday. Instead, we need to learn how to prevent brain damage in young patients by preventing seizures and optimize ASMs' uses. Herein we discuss how to proceed in this endeavor.

Further advances in epilepsy

In 2017, one of us reviewed advances in epilepsy (Manford in J Neurol 264:1811-1824, 2017). The current paper brings that review up to date and gives a slight change in emphasis. Once again, the story is of evolution rather than revolution. In recognition that most of our current medications act on neurotransmitters or ion channels, and not on the underlying changes in connectivity and pathways, they have been renamed as antiseizure (ASM) medications rather than antiepileptic drugs. Cenobamate is the one newly licensed medication for broader use in focal epilepsy but there have been a number of developments for specific disorders. We review new players and look forward to new developments in the light of evolving underlying science. We look at teratogenicity; old villains and new concerns in which clinicians play a vital role in explaining and balancing the risks. Medical treatment of status epilepticus, long without evidence, has benefitted from high-quality trials to inform practice; like buses, several arriving at once. Surgical treatment continues to be refined with improvements in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients, especially with new imaging techniques. Alternatives including stereotactic radiotherapy have received further focus and targets for palliative stimulation techniques have grown in number. Individuals' autonomy and quality of life continue to be the subject of research with refinement of what clinicians can do to help persons with epilepsy (PWE) achieve control. This includes seizure management but extends to broader considerations of human empowerment, needs and desires, which may be aided by emerging technologies such as seizure detection devices. The role of specialist nurses in improving that quality has been reinforced by specific endorsement from the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE).

[Electroencephalogram characteristics of 26 children with febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome]

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the electroencephalogram (EEG) characteristics and progression of febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) in children, aiming to enhance diagnosis and treatment approaches.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 26 children with FIRES between May 2017 and December 2021.

RESULTS

All 26 children (100%) presented with fever at the onset, followed by frequent convulsions that rapidly progressed into convulsive status. Ventilator support was required for 22 cases (85%). During the acute phase, EEG features demonstrated the disappearance of background activity and physiological sleep cycles in all children. Diffuse slow waves and multifocal slow spike slow waves were observed as abnormal waves during the interictal period. A characteristic pattern of focal low amplitude fast wave initiation was detected in all children during seizure episodes. In the chronic phase, the background EEG activity gradually recovered, and the presence of abnormal waves was relatively limited. The characteristic pattern of focal slow wave rhythm initiation was evident during seizure episodes. Additionally, extreme δ brushes were observed in four cases (15%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that EEG manifestations in children with FIRES exhibit distinctive patterns during the acute and chronic stages, providing significant value for early diagnosis and clinical staging. Extreme δ brushes may be one of the distinctive markers of children with FIRES.

A practical approach to in-hospital management of new-onset refractory status epilepticus/febrile infection related epilepsy syndrome

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is "a clinical presentation, not a specific diagnosis, in a patient without active epilepsy or other preexisting relevant neurological disorder, with new onset of refractory status epilepticus without a clear acute or active structural, toxic, or metabolic cause." Febrile infection related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is "a subcategory of NORSE that requires a prior febrile infection, with fever starting between 2 weeks and 24 h before the onset of refractory status epilepticus, with or without fever at the onset of status epilepticus." These apply to all ages. Extensive testing of blood and CSF for infectious, rheumatologic, and metabolic conditions, neuroimaging, EEG, autoimmune/paraneoplastic antibody evaluations, malignancy screen, genetic testing, and CSF metagenomics may reveal the etiology in some patients, while a significant proportion of patients' disease remains unexplained, known as NORSE of unknown etiology or cryptogenic NORSE. Seizures are refractory and usually super-refractory (i.e., persist despite 24 h of anesthesia), requiring a prolonged intensive care unit stay, often (but not always) with fair to poor outcomes. Management of seizures in the initial 24-48 h should be like any case of refractory status epilepticus. However, based on the published consensus recommendations, the first-line immunotherapy should begin within 72 h using steroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, or plasmapheresis. If there is no improvement, the ketogenic diet and second-line immunotherapy should start within seven days. Rituximab is recommended as the second-line treatment if there is a strong suggestion or proof of an antibody-mediated disease, while anakinra or tocilizumab are recommended for cryptogenic cases. Intensive motor and cognitive rehab are usually necessary after a prolonged hospital stay. Many patients will have pharmacoresistant epilepsy at discharge, and some may need continued immunologic treatments and an epilepsy surgery evaluation. Extensive research is in progress now via multinational consortia relating to the specific type(s) of inflammation involved, whether age and prior febrile illness affect this, and whether measuring and following serum and/or CSF cytokines can help determine the best treatment.

A case report: New-onset refractory status epilepticus in a patient with FASTKD2-related mitochondrial disease

Objectives

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite extensive work-up, the underlying etiology remains unknown in 50% of affected individuals. Mitochondrial disorders represent rare causes of NORSE. Biallelic variants in FASTKD2 were reported as a cause of infantile encephalomyopathy with refractory epilepsy.

Case description

In the study, we report a previously healthy 14-year-old with a new, homozygous FASTKD2 variant presenting with NORSE. Following a seizure-free period of 7 years, he experienced another super-refractory SE and subsequently developed drug-resistant focal epilepsy, mild myopathy, optic atrophy, and discrete psychomotor slowing. Structural MRI at the time of NORSE showed right temporo-parieto-occipital FLAIR hyperintensity and diffusion restriction, with extensive right hemispheric atrophy at the age of 22 years. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a novel homozygous loss of function variant [c.(1072C>T);(1072C>T)] [p.(Arg358Ter);(Arg358Ter)] in FASTKD2 (NM_001136193), resulting in a premature termination codon in the protein-coding region and loss of function of FASTKD2. Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in muscle and skin fibroblasts was unremarkable.

Conclusion

This is the first case of a normally developed adolescent with a new homozygous loss of function variant in FASTKD2, manifesting with NORSE. The phenotypical spectrum of FASTKD2-related mitochondrial disease is heterogeneous, ranging from recurrent status epilepticus and refractory focal epilepsy in an adolescent with normal cognitive development to severe forms of infantile mitochondrial encephalopathy. Although mitochondrial diseases are rare causes of NORSE, clinical features such as young age at onset and multi-system involvement should trigger genetic testing. Early diagnosis is essential for counseling and treatment considerations.

Early identification of NORSE and transfer to care setting with appropriate supports: A proposed algorithm

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a clinical presentation where an individual develops refractory status epilepticus without active epilepsy, or related neurological conditions. A subset of these individuals has a preceding fever and would be diagnosed with febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). The underlying etiology of this condition varies and includes autoimmune and viral encephalitides. These conditions require multiple specialized health care teams working collaboratively and specific resources for investigation of the underlying etiology and management to provide optimal patient care. In this paper, we provide: (1) recommendations upon early recognition of NORSE and FIRES, (2) guidance on the resources needed to optimally provide care, and (3) guidance on considerations to initiate transfer of patients to a more specialized medical center. Additional recommendations for resource-austere centers without the ability to transfer such patients are also discussed. These recommendations are only for adult patients with NORSE as pediatric patients may require additional special considerations.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in paediatric patients: causes, characteristics and outcomes

Background

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) refers to patients without a previous history of seizures who have refractory status epilepticus for at least 72 hours without an identified aetiology. Despite the severe neurological sequelae of NORSE, little is known about this condition in paediatric patients.

Objective

To describe the profile of paediatric patients with NORSE, the profile of seizures, possible causes attributed to this condition, treatments offered to patients and the outcomes at discharge from the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Methods

This retrospective, multicentre, descriptive study (case series) was conducted in the PICUs of three tertiary hospitals. We reviewed the medical records of all patients aged 0–16 years admitted to the participating PICUs between December 2013 and December 2017 with refractory status epilepticus, without a previous history of seizures or neurological disease.

Results

Fifteen patients (2.4%) had NORSE. The median age of patients was 62.3 (IQR 26.2–75.4) months. All patients experienced prodromes before progressing to refractory status epilepticus. Twelve patients (80%) had fever up to 24 hours before seizures. NORSE was classified as cryptogenic in 66% of patients. Twelve patients were treated with complementary therapies, in addition to anticonvulsants. There was no standardisation in the treatment of patients. The overall mortality rate was 20%.

Conclusions

NORSE is associated with high morbidity and mortality, without an identified aetiology in most cases and with a wide range of proposed therapies.

International consensus recommendations for management of New Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE) incl. Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES): Statements and Supporting Evidence

OBJECTIVE

To develop consensus-based recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric patients with NORSE/FIRES based on best evidence and experience.

METHODS

The Delphi methodology was followed. A facilitator group of 9 experts was established, who defined the scope, users and suggestions for recommendations. Following a review of the current literature, recommendation statements concerning diagnosis, treatment and research directions were generated which were then voted on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree) by a panel of 48 experts in the field. Consensus that a statement was appropriate was reached if the median score was greater or equal to 7, and inappropriate if the median score was less than or equal to 3. The analysis of evidence was mapped to the results of each statement included in the Delphi survey.

RESULTS

Overall, 85 recommendation statements achieved consensus. The recommendations are divided into five sections: 1) disease characteristics, 2) diagnostic testing and sampling, 3) acute treatment, 4) treatment in the post-acute phase, and 5) research, registries and future directions in NORSE/FIRES. The detailed results and discussion of all 85 statements are outlined herein. A corresponding summary of findings and practical flowsheets are presented in a companion article.

SIGNIFICANCE

This detailed analysis offers insight into the supporting evidence and the current gaps in the literature that are associated with expert consensus statements related to NORSE/FIRES. The recommendations generated by this consensus can be used as a guide for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with NORSE/FIRES, and for planning of future research.

Management of Status Epilepticus, Refractory Status Epilepticus, and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Status epilepticus is a serious condition caused by disorders and diseases that affect the central nervous system. In status epilepticus, hypersynchronous epileptic activity lasts longer than the usual duration of isolated self-limited seizures (time t1), which causes neuronal damage or alteration of neuronal networks at a certain time point (time t2), depending on the type of and duration of status epilepticus. The successful management of status epilepticus includes both the early termination of seizure activity and the earliest possible identification of a causative etiology, which may require independent acute treatment. In nonconvulsive status epilepticus, patients present only with subtle clinical signs or even without any visible clinical manifestations. In these cases, EEG allows for the assessment of cerebral function and identification of patterns in need of urgent treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new definition and classification of status epilepticus, encompassing four axes: symptomatology, etiology, EEG, and age. Various validation studies determined the practical usefulness of EEG criteria to identify nonconvulsive status epilepticus. The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society has incorporated these criteria into their most recent critical care EEG terminology in 2021. Etiology, age, symptomatology, and the metabolic demand associated with an increasing duration of status epilepticus are the most important determinants of prognosis. The consequences of status epilepticus can be visualized in vivo by MRI studies.

SUMMARY

The current knowledge about status epilepticus allows for a more reliable diagnosis, earlier treatment, and improved cerebral imaging of its consequences. Outcome prediction is a soft tool for estimating the need for intensive care resources.

Specific characteristics and current diagnostic and treatment modalities performance of super refractory status epilepticus in children: A comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in children. We explored the clinical spectrum, specific characteristics, and outcome in SRSE patients admitted in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and investigated how well current diagnostic or treatment modalities perform compared to Status Epilepticus (SE) and Refractory SE (RSE) patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of PICU patients admitted with convulsive SE during 2009-2019. Eighty-six patients were classified as SE, RSE, and SRSE. New-onset RSE (NORSE) and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) were also identified. Functional outcome was evaluated by the modified Rankin scale.

RESULTS

Patients with SRSE (n = 20) had longer weaning off anesthetics (p = 0.014), length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, higher illness severity scores, and poorer outcome compared to SE (n = 13) or RSE (n = 53) patients (all p < 0.001). Diagnosis, mainly expressed by high prevalence of NORSE (n = 13) and FIRES (n = 9), was independently associated with SRSE (p = 0.024). Abnormal MRI findings (p = 0.005), and epilepsy-related pathogenic variants identified by whole-exome sequencing (WES) were mostly found in SRSE patients. Compared to intravenous immunoglobulins and steroid pulses, plasmapheresis and ketogenic diet, more often used in SRSE (p < 0.01), contributed better to seizure control. Only SRSE (AUROC > 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68-0.94, p < 0.001) and diagnosis (AUROC > 0.70, 95% CI = 0.55-0.83, p = 0.02) could predict a poor outcome.

CONCLUSION

The majority of SRSE patients are characterized by considerable functional decline and morbidity. WES analysis may reveal epilepsy-related pathogenic variants while early aggressive immunotherapy and/or ketogenic diet might prove beneficial. Multicenter studies for prediction models of outcome are needed.

Chinese expert recommendations on ketogenic diet therapy for super-refractory status epilepticus

Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is a serious and life-threatening neurological condition. Ketogenic diet (KD) is a diet characterized by high fat, low carbohydrate, and moderate protein. As KD shows effectiveness in controlling seizures in more than half of SRSE patients, it can be a treatment option for SRSE. Currently, KD treatment for SRSE is based on personal experience and observational evidence has been published. In the context of a lack of a validated guideline, we convened a multicenter expert panel within the China Association Against Epilepsy (CAAE) Ketogenic Diet Commission to work out the Chinese expert recommendations on KD for SRSE. We summarize and discuss the latest clinical practice of KD for SRSE in critical care settings. Recommendations are given on patient selection, the timing of KD, diet implementation, and follow-up. More research data are needed in this area to support better clinical practice.

New onset refractory status epilepticus: State of the art

NORSE (new onset refractory status epilepticus) has recently been defined as a clinical presentation, not a specific diagnosis, in a patient without active epilepsy or other preexisting relevant neurological disorder, with new onset of refractory status epilepticus without a clear acute or active structural, toxic or metabolic cause. It includes the concept of FIRES described in children with a similar condition but preceded by a 2-14-day febrile illness. NORSE constitutes the acute phase of an entity preceded by a prodromal phase which may be accompanied by numerous manifestations (febrile episode, behavioural changes, headache, …), and followed by a chronic phase marked by long-term neurological sequelae, cognitive impairment, epilepsy and functional disability. There are many causes of NORSE: autoimmune, infectious, genetic, toxic, … but in half of the cases, despite an exhaustive assessment, the cause remains undetermined. Paraneoplastic and non-paraneoplastic autoimmune encephalitis remains by far the leading cause of NORSE. For these reasons, immunotherapy should be considered rapidly in parallel with the treatment of the status epilepticus, including in cryptogenic NORSE. Good communication with the family is important because the management of the acute phase is long and difficult. Although mortality remains high (11-22%), and sequelae can be severe, the majority of survivors can have a good or fair outcome.

Unraveling the enigma of new-onset refractory status epilepticus: a systematic review of aetiologies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a clinical presentation, neither a specific diagnosis nor a clinical entity. It refers to a patient without active epilepsy or other pre-existing relevant neurological disorder, with a NORSE without a clear acute or active structural, toxic or metabolic cause. This study reviews the currently available evidence about the aetiology of patients presenting with NORSE and NORSE-related conditions.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out for clinical trials, observational studies, case series and case reports including patients who presented with NORSE, febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome or the infantile hemiconvulsion-hemiplegia and epilepsy syndrome.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fifty records were initially identified, of which 197 were included in the review. The selected studies were retrospective case-control (n = 11), case series (n = 83) and case reports (n = 103) and overall described 1334 patients both of paediatric and adult age. Aetiology remains unexplained in about half of the cases, representing the so-called 'cryptogenic NORSE'. Amongst adult patients without cryptogenic NORSE, the most often identified cause is autoimmune encephalitis, either non-paraneoplastic or paraneoplastic. Infections are the prevalent aetiology of paediatric non-cryptogenic NORSE. Genetic and congenital disorders can have a causative role in NORSE, and toxic, vascular and degenerative conditions have also been described.

CONCLUSIONS

Far from being a unitary condition, NORSE is a heterogeneous and clinically challenging presentation. The development and dissemination of protocols and guidelines to standardize diagnostic work-up and guide therapeutic approaches should be implemented. Global cooperation and multicentre research represent priorities to improve the understanding of NORSE.

Status epilepticus suspected autoimmune: Neuronal surface antibodies and main clinical features

OBJECTIVES

Status epilepticus (SE) can be associated with neuronal surface antibodies (NS-Abs) but NS-Ab detection rate remains unknown in patients with SE of unclear etiology at symptom presentation but suspected of having an autoimmune etiology (SE suspected autoimmune). We aimed to determine the NS-Ab detection rate and the clinical features that predict the presence of NS-Abs in patients with SE suspected autoimmune.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical information of 137 patients with SE suspected autoimmune who underwent testing for NS-Abs between January 2007 and September 2020. NS-Abs were examined in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained at symptom onset with established assays. We classified brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings into unremarkable, autoimmune limbic encephalitis (ALE) (bilateral abnormalities highly restricted to the medial temporal lobes), ALE-Plus (ALE pattern and additional extramedial temporal lobe abnormalities), multifocal cortico-subcortical (MCS), or other pattern. We compared the clinical features between patients with and without NS-Abs.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (32.1%) had NS-Abs, including 35 N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) (one with concurrent γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor [GABAbR] and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor [AMPAR]), 5 γ-aminobutyric acid A receptor (GABAaR), 2 leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1(LGI1), 1 GABAbR, and 1 unknown antigens. Compared with NS-Ab-negative patients, NS-Ab-positive patients were more likely to have a preceding headache (56.8% vs 26.7%), preceding psychobehavioral or memory alterations (65.9% vs 20.4%), involuntary movements (79.5% vs 16.1%), CSF pleocytosis (81.8% vs 62.0%), elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG) index (45.2% vs 15.6%), oligoclonal bands (51.5% vs 9.5%), tumor (47.7% vs 8.6%), and higher APE2 score (median of 9 vs 7), and they were less likely to have an ALE-Plus pattern (2.3% vs 23.7%). However, preceding fever and ALE or MCS pattern were not different between the two groups of patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

When an autoimmune etiology was suspected, there was a relatively high likelihood (one of three patients) of identifying NS-Abs. Some clinical features (preceding symptoms, inflammatory CSF) predict a higher likelihood of finding NS-Ab positivity, but the ALE-Plus MRI pattern is more likely suggestive of NS-Ab negativity.

Permanent loss of independence in adult febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome survivors: an underestimated and unsolved challenge

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is an exceedingly rare and devastating subtype of new-onset refractory status epilepticus, which causes refractory epilepsy and permanent neurocognitive impairment.

METHODS

This was a long-term follow-up of adult FIRES survivors treated between 2005 and 2018 as part of the EpiCARE initiative, a European Reference Network for rare and complex epilepsies. Clinical, electroencephalography, imaging and functional outcome measures are described using the Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation, the modified Rankin Scale and the Global Assessment of Severity of Epilepsy Scale.

RESULTS

Six patients with refractory epilepsy following FIRES were evaluated. Despite general improvement after intensive care unit discharge, disease severity was still high at follow-up in all patients. The functional outcome, as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, was moderately impaired in 2/6 patients. In contrast, the Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation indicated a loss of independence in 5/6, serious problems in memory and planning/problem-solving in 4/6 and serious attentional problems in 3/6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome survivors may regain vital functions and mobility but experience a significant loss of independence and participation due to recurring seizures, structural brain damage and neurocognitive decline. Minimization of disastrous outcomes through the systematic evaluation of rescue therapies within a network of specialized centres is crucial.

Characteristics and outcome-related factors of seizure at the first onset of autoimmune encephalitis: A retrospective study

Aims

Seizure outcome of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) varies from seizure‐free to refractory epilepsy, and the associated factors remain unclear. We aimed to describe seizure characteristics, identify seizure outcome‐related factors, and discuss the medication strategy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at the first onset of AE.

Methods

We retrospectively studied the data of 86 patients with clinically diagnosed AE. The clinical characteristics were described using a chi‐square test. Seizure outcome‐related factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

56 patients were finally enrolled, with antibodies to N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor found in 29, to γ‐aminobutyric acid receptor B found in 13, and to leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated protein 1 found in 14. Status epilepticus occurrence and onset with seizure lead to a poor seizure outcome, while administration of human gamma globulin and a low antibody titer contributed to a good seizure outcome.

Conclusions

In the acute phase, seizure characteristics may be considered in the utilization of AEDs. For patients with seizure‐free status in the acute phase, clinical manifestation (onset with seizure or not, whether status epilepticus occurs or not), therapy regimen (human gamma globulin administered or not), and antibody titer may be considered when formulating the strategy for withdrawal of AEDs post‐acute phase.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE)

New-onset refractory status epilepticus and its subcategory febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome are rare devastating clinical presentations in those without pre-existing relevant history, often in schoolchildren or young adults, without a clear cause on initial investigations. A cause is later identified in up to half of adults, but in many fewer children. Patients often require protracted intensive care and are at significant risk of dying. Functional disability is common and subsequent chronic epilepsy is the norm, but some people do have good outcomes, even after prolonged status epilepticus. Patients need prompt investigations and treatment. Anaesthetic and antiseizure medications are supplemented by other treatment modalities, including the ketogenic diet. Despite limited evidence, it is appropriate to try to modify the presumed underlying pathogenesis with immune modulation early, with a more recent focus on using interleukin inhibitors. Optimising management will require concerted multicentre international efforts.

How to Help Your Patients Enroll in the New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE) and Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES) Family Registry, and Other Rare Epilepsy Registries

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare clinical presentation of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) that occurs in people without active epilepsy or preexisting neurologic disorder. Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a subcategory of NORSE. New-onset refractory status epilepticus/FIRES are becoming increasingly recognized; however, information pertaining to disease course, clinical outcomes, and survivorship remains limited, and mortality and morbidity are variable, but often high. The objective of the NORSE/FIRES Family Registry is to (1) provide an easily accessible and internationally available multilingual registry into which survivors or NORSE/FIRES surrogates or family members of people affected by NORSE/FIRES or their physicians can enter data in a systematic and rigorous research study from anywhere in the world where internet is available; and (2) to examine past medical history, outcomes, and quality of life for people affected by NORSE/FIRES.

Clinically based score predicting cryptogenic NORSE at the early stage of status epilepticus

Objective

To determine whether a clinically based score predicts cryptogenic new-onset refractory status epilepticus (C-NORSE) at the early stage of status epilepticus (SE) with prominent motor symptoms (SE-M) of unclear etiology.

Methods

The score (range 0–6) included 6 clinical features: highly refractoriness to antiseizure drugs, previously healthy individual, presence of prodromal fever, absence of prodromal psychobehavioral or memory alterations, absence of dyskinesias, and symmetric brain MRI abnormalities (the first 2 mandatory). We retrospectively assessed the usefulness of a high scale score (≥5) in predicting C-NORSE in 83 patients with SE-M of unclear etiology, who underwent testing for neuronal surface antibodies (NS-Abs) between January 2007, and December 2019.

Results

Thirty-one (37.3%) patients had a high score. Patients with a high score had more frequent prodromal fever (28/31 vs 24/52), mechanical ventilatory support (31/31 vs 36/52), and symmetric MRI abnormalities (26/31 vs 12/52), had less frequent involuntary movements (2/31 vs 30/52), and had absent prodromal psychobehavioral alterations (0/31 vs 27/52), CSF oligoclonal band detection (0/27 vs 11/38), tumor association (0/31 vs 13/52), or NS-Abs (0/31 vs 29/52) than those with a low score (<5). Thirty-three patients (median age, 27 years; 18 [54.5%] female) were finally regarded as C-NORSE. The sensitivity and specificity of a high score for predicting C-NORSE were 93.9% (95% CI 0.87–0.94) and 100% (95% CI 0.95–1.00), respectively.

Conclusions

Patients with a high score in the indicated scale are more likely to have C-NORSE, making it a useful diagnostic tool at the early stage of SE-M before antibody test results become available.

De Novo Status Epilepticus in patients with COVID-19

Neurological complications are increasingly recognized with SARS-CoV-2, the causative pathogen for COVID-19. We present a single-center retrospective case series reporting the EEG and outcome of de novo status epilepticus (SE) in two African-American women with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 virus. SE was the initial presentation in one asymptomatic individual. Patient 2 had COVID-19 pneumonia, and fluctuating mental status that raised the suspicion of subclinical SE. The patient with older age and higher comorbidities failed to recover from the viral illness that has no definitive treatment.

Status epilepticus - time is brain and treatment considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Status epilepticus is a neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of robust data to guide the management of this neurological emergency beyond the initial treatment. This review examines recent literature on treatment considerations including the choice of continuous anesthetics or adjunctive anticonvulsant, the cause of the status epilepticus, and use of nonpharmacologic therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Status epilepticus remains undertreated and mortality persists to be unchanged over the past 30 years. New anticonvulsant choices, such as levetiracetam and lacosamide have been explored as alternative emergent therapies. Anecdotal reports on the use of other generation anticonvulsants and nonpharmacologic therapies for the treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus have been described.Finally, recent evidence has examined etiology-guided management of status epilepticus in certain patient populations, such as immune-mediated, paraneoplastic or infectious encephalitis and anoxic brain injury.

SUMMARY

Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the role for newer generation anticonvulsants and nonpharmacologic modalities for the treatment of epilepticus remains and evaluate the long-term outcomes associated with continuous anesthetics.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus: A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical, laboratory, neuroimaging, electroencephalographic features, etiology, treatment, as well as short-term and long-term outcomes of adults with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE).

METHOD

A retrospective, single institution cohort study (2010-2018) of consecutive adult patients with NORSE.

RESULTS

Among 20 patients with NORSE, nine (45 %) had prodromal febrile illness, 12 (60 %) had evidence of inflammation on CSF profile. Six patients (30 %) met criteria for definite autoimmune encephalitis (AE) while 8 patients (40 %) had probable AE. Eleven out of 13 (85 %) patients had an abnormal FDG-PET scan with the most common finding being regional hypermetabolism. Fourteen patients (70 %) received immunotherapy and ten (50 %) received the ketogenic diet (KD). Fifteen patients (75 %) progressed to super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) and seven patients (35 %) died in the hospital or within six months of discharge. Among the surviving patients, eight (40 %) had a good outcome (i.e., modified Rankin Scale score 0-2); 12 (80 %) received a diagnosis of epilepsy of which nine (75 %) developed drug-resistant epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

New-onset refractory status epilepticus is a syndrome associated with multiple complications, high mortality, and subsequent intractable epilepsy. There are multiple causes, some of which are autoimmune encephalitides; however, in this series the majority of patients had no clear etiology identified after extensive evaluation. Prospective studies are needed to determine optimal evaluation and treatment.