Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

Muscle biopsy practices in the evaluation of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: An international survey of expert clinicians

BACKGROUND

Muscle biopsy is an important test in the evaluation of individuals with suspected myopathy, including those with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). Various approaches, including open surgical biopsy, needle biopsy and conchotome forceps, have been reported. However the real-world utilisation of these approaches remains unclear. There are no established guidelines for the use of muscle biopsy, or selection of biopsy technique, in investigating IIM and international practices are not well-documented. This study describes current approaches to muscle biopsy amongst clinicians with expertise in IIM.

METHODS

A survey regarding muscle biopsy practices was disseminated among members of the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) group. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

One-hundred and sixteen clinicians completed the survey, primarily rheumatologists. Open surgical biopsy was the most commonly employed technique (74.5 %), followed by needle (11.3 %) and conchotome (9.4 %) approaches. Clinical examination was the most common method of muscle selection, with 85.2 % of respondents reporting they 'always or almost always' relied on it. MRI and electromyography were also frequently utilised for muscle selection (51.9 %, 45.4 % respectively). There was variability in the perceived utility of muscle biopsy in certain clinical contexts, such as presence of myositis specific antibodies or cutaneous manifestations of dermatomyositis. While respondents generally reported low complication rates following muscle biopsy, non-diagnostic histopathology was commonly reported, regardless of procedural approach.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians managing IIM report muscle biopsy to be well tolerated however, non-diagnostic results are common. Substantial heterogeneity regarding perceived indications for biopsy, procedural approaches, and muscle selection strategies were observed within this expert group. Future research is needed to establish best practice and determine the role of muscle biopsy in the context of continued advancements in serological profiling of IIM.

CD163+ macrophage density in perimysial connective tissue associated with prognosis in IMNM

OBJECTIVE

The pathological features of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) are dominated by the infiltration of macrophages. We aimed to perform a histopathologic semiquantitative analysis to investigate the relationship between macrophage markers and prognosis.

METHODS

Semiquantitative analysis of histologic features was performed in 62 samples of IMNM. Independent risk factors were identified through univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Cluster analysis was performed using the partitioning around the medoids (PAM) method. Decision tree modeling was utilized to efficiently determine cluster labels for IMNM patients. The validity of the developmental cohort was assessed by accuracy in comparison with the validation cohort.

RESULTS

The most enriched groups in patients with IMNM were macrophages expressing CD206 and CD163. In the multivariate logistic regression model, the high density of CD163+ macrophages in perimysial connective tissue increased the risk of unfavorable prognosis (p = 0.025, OR = 1.463, 95% CI: 1.049-2.041). In cluster analysis, patients in Cluster 1, with lower CD163+ macrophage density and inflammatory burden, had a more favorable prognosis. Conversely, patients in Cluster 3, which were enriched for CD163+ macrophages in the perimysial connective tissue, had the most severe clinical features and the worst prognosis. Correlations were found between the density of CD163+ macrophages in connective tissue and symptom duration (R2 = 0.166, p < 0.001), dysphagia (p = 0.004), cardiac involvement (p = 0.021), CK (R2 = 0.067, p = 0.042), CRP (R2 = 0.117, p < 0.001), and ESR (R2 = 0.171, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The density of CD163+ macrophages in perimysial connective tissue may serve as a potential marker for the prediction of IMNM prognosis.

Myositis with prominent B cell aggregates may meet classification criteria for sporadic inclusion body myositis

The objective of this study was to report the clinical, serological and pathological features of patients with autoimmune myositis other than dermatomyositis, who displayed both muscle weakness on physical examination and prominent B cell aggregates on muscle pathology, defined as ≥ 30 CD20+ cells/aggregate. Specifically, the presence of a brachio-cervical inflammatory myopathies or a sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) phenotype was recorded. Over a three-year period, eight patients were identified from two university neuropathology referral centers. Seven of 8 (88%) patients had an associated connective tissue disease (CTD): rheumatoid arthritis (n=3), systemic sclerosis (n=2), Sjögren's syndrome (n=1) and systemic lupus erythematosus (n=1), while one patient died on initial presentation without a complete serological and cancer investigation. A brachio-cervical phenotype, i.e. neck weakness, proximal weakness more than distal and shoulder abduction weakness greater than hip flexors, was seen in two patients (25%), while one patient had both proximal and diaphragmatic weakness. In contrast, an IBM-like clinical phenotype was seen in the last five patients (63%), who either had finger flexor weakness and/or quadriceps weakness ≤ 4 on the manual muscle testing MRC-5 scale. Although these 5 patients met at least one set of classification criteria for sIBM, an integrated clinico-sero-pathological approach argued against a diagnosis of sIBM. In summary, in a weak patient with myositis plus an associated CTD and lymphoid aggregates at muscle pathology, B cell predominant aggregates may represent a morphological biomarker against a diagnosis of sIBM.

Scleromyositis: A distinct novel entity within the systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis spectrum. Implications for care and pathogenesis

Systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis are both associated with decreased quality of life and increased mortality. Their prognosis and management largely depend on the disease subgroups. Indeed, systemic sclerosis is a heterogeneous disease, the two predominant forms of the disease being limited and diffuse scleroderma. Autoimmune myositis is also a heterogeneous group of myopathies that classically encompass necrotizing myopathy, antisynthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myositis. Recent data revealed that an additional disease subset, denominated "scleromyositis", should be recognized within both the systemic sclerosis and the autoimmune myositis spectrum. We performed an in-depth review of the literature with the aim of better delineating scleromyositis. Our review highlights that this concept is supported by recent clinical, serological and histopathological findings that have important implications for patient management and understanding of the disease pathophysiology. As compared with other subsets of systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis, scleromyositis patients can present with a characteristic pattern of muscle involvement (i.e. distribution of muscle weakness) along with multisystemic involvement, and some of these extra-muscular complications are associated with poor prognosis. Several autoantibodies have been specifically associated with scleromyositis, but they are not currently integrated in diagnostic and classification criteria for systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis. Finally, striking vasculopathic lesions at muscle biopsy have been shown to be hallmarks of scleromyositis, providing a strong anatomopathological substratum for the concept of scleromyositis. These findings bring new insights into the pathogenesis of scleromyositis and help to diagnose this condition, in patients with subtle SSc features and/or no autoantibodies (i.e. "seronegative" scleromyositis). No guidelines are available for the management of these patients, but recent data are showing the way towards a new therapeutic approach dedicated to these patients.

Is it really myositis? Mimics and pitfalls

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous set of systemic inflammatory disorders primarily affecting muscle. Signs and symptoms vary greatly between and within subtypes, requiring supportive laboratory and pathologic evidence to confirm the diagnosis. Several studies are typical assessments for patients with suspected inflammatory myopathy, including muscle enzymes, autoimmune markers, imaging, and muscle biopsy. Misdiagnoses of myositis are not only related to the overlap of clinical phenotype with non-inflammatory myopathies, but also due to the limitations of diagnostic tests employed. Since many of the investigative tests are non-specific, they share features with other disorders, including muscular dystrophies, endocrine, toxic, and metabolic myopathies, and other neuromuscular or rheumatologic conditions. Recognizing the limitations of tests and understanding the shared features between inflammatory and non-inflammatory myopathies can help prevent misdiagnosing myositis with one of its several mimics.

Clinical characteristics and outcome in muscular sarcoidosis: a retrospective cohort study and literature review

We evaluated the clinical features and treatment response of patients with muscular sarcoidosis. A retrospective cohort of 12 patients showed muscle weakness in 11 and myalgia in seven. One had focal myositis. Four had a negative medical history for sarcoidosis. Muscle imaging showed muscle edema in all and replacement of muscle tissue by fat in half of patients. Muscle biopsy showed non-caseating granulomas in six of nine patients and inflammation without granulomas in three. None of the muscle biopsies showed features of inclusion body myositis. Imaging in three patients without muscle biopsy showed focal intramuscular masses or a 'tiger man' appearance typical for muscular sarcoidosis. Treatment consisted of glucocorticoids in 11, additional methotrexate or azathioprine in seven and infliximab in two patients. Half of the patients had symptoms leading to substantial disability (modified Rankin scale score >1) at last follow-up. A literature review of articles describing more than one muscular sarcoidosis patient published in the last 25 years identified 153 additional patients. We found muscular sarcoidosis to be a rare and often disabling disease which may be recognized by typical muscle imaging characteristics and add focal myositis to the muscular phenotypes of sarcoidosis.

Muscle Biopsy: A Requirement for Precision Medicine in Adult-Onset Myopathy

Muscle biopsy is a fundamental procedure to assist the final diagnosis of myopathy. With the recent advances in molecular diagnosis, serology tests, and mechanism-based classification in myopathy, the précised diagnosis for myopathy required the applications of multiple tools. This study intends to reappraise the benefit of muscle biopsy in adult-onset myopathy under the setting of an optimized muscle biopsy protocol and comprehensive serology tests. A one-group pretest-posttest study design was used. The pre- and post-biopsy diagnoses and treatments in 69 adult patients were compared. Muscle biopsy yielded 85.5% of definitive diagnoses, including changes in pre-biopsy diagnoses (40.6%) and narrowing down the suspicious myopathies (49.3%). The demographic data and clinical parameters between the group “with change” and “without change” after biopsy were not different. Among those with changes in diagnosis, 39.3% also had a corresponding shift in treatment, which benefits the patients significantly. Regarding the most common adult-onset myopathy, idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), 41% of patients with pre-biopsy diagnosis as IIM had changes in their IIM subtype diagnosis, and 53% was finally not IIM after muscle biopsy. Although there have been advances in molecular diagnosis recently, muscle biopsy still undoubtedly critically guided the diagnosis and treatment of adult-onset myopathy in the era of precision medicine.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), also known as myositis, are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders with varying clinical manifestations, treatment responses and prognoses. Muscle weakness is usually the classical clinical manifestation but other organs can be affected, including the skin, joints, lungs, heart and gastrointestinal tract, and they can even result in the predominant manifestations, supporting that IIM are systemic inflammatory disorders. Different myositis-specific auto-antibodies have been identified and, on the basis of clinical, histopathological and serological features, IIM can be classified into several subgroups - dermatomyositis (including amyopathic dermatomyositis), antisynthetase syndrome, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis, polymyositis and overlap myositis. The prognoses, treatment responses and organ manifestations vary among these groups, implicating different pathophysiological mechanisms in each subtype. A deeper understanding of the molecular pathways underlying the pathogenesis and identifying the auto-antigens of the immune reactions in these subgroups is crucial to improving outcomes. New, more homogeneous subgroups defined by auto-antibodies may help define disease mechanisms and will also be important in future clinical trials for the development of targeted therapies and in identifying biomarkers to guide treatment decisions for the individual patient.

Clinical features and diagnostic tools in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are rare autoimmune disorders affecting primarily muscles, but other organs can be involved. This review describes the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment for IIMs, namely polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and myositis associated with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS). The diagnostic approach has been updated recently based on the discovery of circulating autoantibodies, which has enhanced the management of patients. Currently, validated classification criteria for IIMs allow clinical studies with well-defined sets of patients but diagnostic criteria to guide the care of individual patients in routine clinical practice are still missing. This review analyzes the clinical manifestations and laboratory findings of IIMs, discusses the efficiency of modern and standard methods employed in their workup, and delineates optimal practice for clinical care. Α multidisciplinary diagnostic approach that combines clinical, neurologic and rheumatologic examination, evaluation of electrophysiologic and morphologic muscle characteristics, and assessment of autoantibody immunoassays has been determined to be the preferred approach for effective management of patients with suspected IIMs.

Biomarker und Histologie bei idiopathischen inflammatorischen Myopathien

Die idiopathischen inflammatorischen Myopathien (IIM) sind eine Gruppe entzündlicher Muskelerkrankungen für deren Diagnosestellung, Verlaufsbeurteilung, Prognoseabschätzung und Risikostratifizierung Biomarker eine jeweils essentielle Rolle spielen. Biomarker in diesem Kontext können sowohl „herkömmliche“ serologische Marker wie Muskelenzyme oder Autoantikörper, histologische Marker wie entitätsspezifische inflammatorische Muster, aber auch genomische und genetische Marker sein. Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Überblick über bewährte und innovative Marker.

Idiopathische inflammatorische Myopathien: Aktuelles zu Diagnose und Klassifikation

Auf dem Sektor der Kollagenosen ist der wissenschaftliche Fortschritt bei der Myositis in den letzten 15–20 Jahren bemerkenswert. Durch kontinuierliche Forschung und intensive Vernetzung der Myositis-Experten ist es gelungen, neue Untergruppen zu identifizieren und somit für die Prognose wichtige Organmanifestationen rechtzeitig zu erkennen. Vor dem Hintergrund dieser Neuerungen verfolgt diese Übersichtsarbeit sowohl das Ziel, möglichst alle Facetten der Erkrankung zu präsentieren, als auch die moderne Einteilung der idiopathischen inflammatorischen Myopathien zu erläutern. Außerdem werden die neuen Klassifikationskriterien vorgestellt, die die Kriterien von Bohan und Peter aus dem Jahr 1975 abgelöst haben. Im Artikel werden ihre Stärken und Schwächen sowie ihr Optimierungspotenzial diskutiert.

Tendon Transfers for the Treatment of Finger Flexion Weakness in a Patient With Inclusion Body Myositis: A Case Report

CASE

We describe a 71-year-old patient with inclusion body myositis (IBM), characterized by progressive atrophy and weakness in his left upper extremity. This patient underwent extensor carpi radialis longus to flexor pollicis longus and brachioradialis to flexor digitorum profundus tendon transfers in the left upper extremity to reduce IBM-related functional deficits. He had noticeable improvements in finger flexion after the transfers, which have been sustained for 2 years after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

This case reinforces that this novel tendon transfer may be an effective treatment option to improve hand function and activities of daily living in patients with IBM.

Histopathological features of systemic sclerosis-associated myopathy: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Scleromyositis (SM) is an emerging subset of myositis associated with features of systemic sclerosis (SSc) but it is currently not recognized as a distinct histopathological subset by the European NeuroMuscular Center (ENMC). Our aim was to review studies reporting muscle biopsies from SSc patients with myositis and to identify unique histopathological features of SM.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted and included all studies reporting histopathological findings in SSc patients with myositis searching the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and EBM-Reviews. Clinical, serological, and histopathological data were extracted using a standardized protocol.

RESULTS

Out of 371 citations, 77 studies that included 559 muscle biopsies were extracted. Fifty-seven percent (n = 227/400) had inflammatory infiltrates, predominantly T cells, which were endomysial (49%), perimysial (42%) and perivascular (41%). Few studies (18%, n = 8/44) evaluated the presence of B-cells. Myofiber atrophy was present in 48% (n = 104/218) of biopsies, and was predominantly perifascicular in 19% (n = 6/31), with necrosis reported in 56% (n = 162/290) of cases. Sarcolemmal MHC-I upregulation was found in 72% (n = 64/89) of biopsies. Non-specified C5b-9 deposition was described in 39% of muscle biopsies (n = 28/72). Neurogenic features were present in 23% (n = 44/191); endomysial fibrosis was reported in 35% (n = 120/340); and rimmed vacuoles were observed in 32% (n = 11/34) of biopsies. Capillaropathy, such as capillary dropout and/or ultrastructural endothelial abnormalities, was reported in 33% (n = 43/129) of cases. Reported ENMC categories were mainly polymyositis (21%), non-specific myositis (19%), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (16%), and dermatomyositis (8%). Histopathological features were analyzed according to serological subtypes in 28 studies, including anti-PM-Scl (n = 48), -Ku (n = 23) and -U1RNP (n = 90). Most of these biopsies demonstrated inflammatory infiltrates (range 49-85%) as well as MHC-I expression (range 63-81%). Necrosis was associated with anti-Ku (85%) and anti-U1RNP (73%), while anti-Ku was also associated with neurogenic features and rimmed vacuoles in 57% and 25% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our review suggests that SM is characterized by heterogeneous pathological features using definitions included in current histopathological criteria. Whether a distinct histopathological signature exists in SM remains to be determined. SSc-specific and SSc-associated autoantibodies may help define more homogeneous histopathological subsets.

Machine learning in medicine: Medical droids, tricorders, and a computer named Hal 9000

The usage of artificial intelligence to evaluate histological images was recently explored in many different areas of pathology. Studies focusing on nephropathology demonstrated that algorithms could be trained to identify various structures of the kidney, like glomeruli and interstitium, as well as performing a classification task just as good as highly experienced pathologists. It is conceivable that further development of digitalized pathology in combination with all opportunities that artificial intelligence and machine learning have to offer, will rapidly change the work of the clinical pathologist in a substantial way.

Pathologic Features of Anti-Mi-2 Dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

To identify the characteristic pathologic features of dermatomyositis (DM) associated with anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies (anti-Mi-2 DM).

METHODS

We reviewed 188 muscle biopsies from patients (1) pathologically diagnosed with DM through the sarcoplasmic expression for the myxovirus-resistant protein A and (2) serologically positive for 1 of 5 DM-specific autoantibodies (DMSAs) (anti-Mi-2, n = 30; other DMSAs, n = 152) or negative for all 5 DMSAs (n = 6). We then compared the histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of patients with anti-Mi-2 DM to those with non-Mi-2 DM and patients with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) (n = 212) using the t test, Fisher exact test, and a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Patients with anti-Mi-2 DM showed significantly higher severity scores in muscle fiber and inflammatory domains than non-Mi-2 DM patients. The presence of perifascicular necrosis, increased perimysial alkaline phosphatase activity, and sarcolemmal membrane attack complex deposition was more frequent in patients with anti-Mi-2 DM (p < 0.01). After Bonferroni correction, there were no significant differences in the percentages of the features mentioned above between the patients with anti-Mi-2 DM and those with ASS (p > 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Perifascicular necrosis and perimysial pathology, features previously reported in ASS, are common in patients with anti-Mi-2 DM. Our findings not only assist in differentiating anti-Mi-2 DM from other DM subtypes but also suggest the possibility of an overlapping mechanism between anti-Mi-2 DM and ASS.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that the muscle biopsies of DM patients with anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies are more likely to demonstrate higher severity scores in muscle fiber and inflammatory domains.

[Myositis: From classification to diagnosis]

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, or IIM, are a group of acquired diseases that affect the muscle to a certain extent, and may also affect other organs. They include dermatomyositis, which can affect the muscle eventualy, with a typical skin rash; inclusion body myositis, with a purely muscular expression resulting in a slow progressive deficit; and the former group of "polymyositis", a misnomer that actually includes other categories of IIM, such as immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies, with a severe muscle involvement often presents from the onset of the disease; antisynthetase syndrome, which combines muscle damage, joint involvement and a potentially life-threatening lung disease; and overlapping myositis, which combines muscle damage with other organs involvement connected to another autoimmune disease. The diagnosis of IIM is based on rigorous clinical examination and interrogation, electromyographic data and immunological testing for myositis specific antibodies. This antibody dosage must be extended or repeated if necessary to classify correctly the muscle disease under investigation, as the available tests may not perform well enough. Muscle biopsy, although very informative, is not anymore systematically recommended when the clinic and the antibodies are typical. However, some forms of IIM are sometimes difficult to classify; in these cases, muscle biopsy plays a crucial role in the precise etiological diagnosis.