Blood Pressure During Endovascular Treatment Under Conscious Sedation or Local Anesthesia

Procedural Blood Pressure and Intracranial Hemorrhage on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography After Endovascular Stroke Treatment

PURPOSE

Optimal systolic blood pressure (SBP) management during endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke remains a topic of debate. Though BP is associated with worse functional outcome, the relationship between BP and post-procedural intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is less well-known. We aimed to investigate the association between BP during EVT and post-procedural ICH on dual-energy CT (DECT).

METHODS

We included all patients who underwent EVT for an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion between 2010 and 2019, and received DECT < 3 h post-EVT. All BP measurements during the EVT procedure were used to calculate mean arterial pressure (MAPmean), mean SBP (SBPmean), and SBPmax-min (highest minus lowest). ICH was assessed using virtual post-procedural unenhanced DECT reconstructions and classified as intraparenchymal or extraparenchymal. Symptomatic ICH was scored according to the Heidelberg criteria. The association between different BP parameters and ICH was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

We included 478 patients. Seventy-six patients (16%) demonstrated ICH on DECT, of which 26 (34%) were intraparenchymal. Symptomatic intraparenchymal and extraparenchymal ICH occurred in 10 (38%) and 4 (8%) patients. SBPmax, SBPmean, and MAPmean were associated with intraparenchymal ICH with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.19 (95%CI, 1.02-1.39), 1.22 (95%CI, 1.03-1.46), and 1.40 (95%CI, 1.09-1.81) per 10 mmHg, while BP was not significantly associated with extraparenchymal ICH. BP did not differ between asymptomatic and symptomatic ICH.

CONCLUSION

Procedural BP is associated with intraparenchymal ICH on post-EVT DECT but not with extraparenchymal ICH. Future studies should evaluate whether individual procedural BP management reduces post-EVT ICH and improves clinical outcome.

Factors influencing the need for emergent conversion to general anesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy in acute anterior circulation stroke - A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) for acute ischemic stroke can be conducted under conscious sedation (CS) or general anesthesia (GA). Emergency conversion from CS to GA during the procedure can occur, but its predictors and impact on clinical outcomes are not fully understood.

METHODS

A single centre retrospective analysis was conducted on 226 patients who underwent EMT for anterior circulation stroke. Two groups were identified: patients who completed the procedure under CS and those requiring emergency conversion to GA. The predictors of emergency conversion to GA and its impact on clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (19.9%) required conversion to GA. Atrial fibrillation (OR 2.38; CI 1.09-5.22; p = 0.03) and prolonged duration of procedure (OR 1.02; CI 1.01-1.04; p < 0.001) were identified as the independent predictors of emergency conversion to GA.

CONCLUSION

Patients with atrial fibrillation and prolonged duration of procedure especially when utilizing combined aspiration-stent retriever or angioplasty/stenting techniques, had a higher likelihood of requiring emergency conversion to general anesthesia (GA).

Blood pressure management in ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy

The relationship between presenting blood pressure in acute ischemic stroke patients and outcome is complex. Several studies have demonstrated a U-shaped curve with worse outcomes when blood pressure is high or low. The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines recommend values of blood pressure < 185/110 mmHg in patients treated with intravenous t-PA and "permissive hypertension" up to 220/120 mmHg in those not treated with intravenous t-PA. The optimal blood pressure target is less clear in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Before thrombectomy, the guidelines recommend a blood pressure < 185/110 mmHg though patients with even lower systolic blood pressures may have better outcomes. During and after thrombectomy, the guidelines recommend a blood pressure < 180/105 mmHg. However, several studies have suggested that during thrombectomy the primary goal should be to prevent significant low blood pressure (e.g., target systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg or MAP > 70 mmHg). After thrombectomy, the primary goal should be to prevent high blood pressure (e.g., target systolic blood pressure < 160 mmHg or MAP < 90 mmHg). To make more specific recommendations, large, randomized-control studies are needed that address factors such as the baseline blood pressure, timing and degree of revascularization, status of collaterals, and estimated risk of reperfusion injury.

Association of Blood Pressure Within 6 h After Endovascular Thrombectomy and Functional Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients With Successful Recanalization

Background and Purpose

Blood pressure in the days following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) can influence functional outcomes of patients who have suffered an acute ischemic stroke, but whether the same is true of blood pressure during the first few hours after EVT is unclear.

Methods

Several blood pressure parameters were retrospectively analyzed in acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent EVT at West China Hospital from March 2016 to December 2019. Baseline blood pressure, speed of blood pressure reduction, postoperative blood pressure, degree of blood pressure reduction, and quality of blood pressure management were evaluated during the first 24 h after EVT. We explored whether these parameters during different time windows correlated significantly with patients' modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days.

Results

Analysis of 163 patients showed that poor functional outcome (mRS scores 3–6) correlated significantly with higher postoperative blood pressure and worse blood pressure management during the first 6 h after EVT. Postoperative systolic blood pressure at 37 min after EVT was significantly higher in patients with poor outcome (141 mmHg) than in those with good outcome (mRS scores 0–2; 122 mmHg, p = 0.006), and systolic pressure >136 mmHg at this time point was associated with a significantly higher risk of poor outcome, before and after adjusting for other risk factors (adjusted OR 0.395, 95% CI 0.20–0.79).

Conclusions

Among acute ischemic patients who successfully undergo recanalization, adequate blood pressure management during the first 30–40 min after EVT may be important for ensuring good 90-day functional outcomes.

Hemodynamics of Leptomeningeal Collaterals after Large Vessel Occlusion and Blood Pressure Management with Endovascular Treatment

Endovascular therapy (EVT) is an effective treatment for ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Unlike intravenous thrombolysis, EVT enables visualization of the restoration of blood flow, also known as successful reperfusion in real time. However, until successful reperfusion is achieved, the survival of the ischemic brain is mainly dependent on blood flow from the leptomeningeal collaterals (LMC). It plays a critical role in maintaining tissue perfusion after LVO via pre-existing channels between the arborizing pial small arteries or arterioles overlying the cerebral hemispheres. In the ischemic territory where the physiologic cerebral autoregulation is impaired and the pial arteries are maximally dilated within their capacity, the direction and amount of LMC perfusion rely on the systemic perfusion, which can be estimated by measuring blood pressure (BP). After the EVT procedure, treatment focuses on mitigating the risk of hemorrhagic transformation, potentially via BP reduction. Thus, BP management may be a key component of acute care for patients with LVO stroke. However, the guidelines on BP management during and after EVT are limited, mostly due to the scarcity of high-level evidence on this issue. In this review, we aim to summarize the anatomical and physiological characteristics of LMC to maintain cerebral perfusion after acute LVO, along with a landscape summary of the literature on BP management in endovascular treatment. The objective of this review is to describe the mechanistic association between systemic BP and collateral perfusion after LVO and thus provide clinical and research perspectives on this topic.