Neurofascin-155 Immunoglobulin Subtypes: Clinicopathologic Associations and Neurologic Outcomes

Conduction slowing, conduction block and temporal dispersion in demyelinating, dysmyelinating and axonal neuropathies: Electrophysiology meets pathology

Nerve conduction studies are usually the first diagnostic step in peripheral nerve disorders and their results are the basis for planning further investigations. However, there are some commonplaces in the interpretation of electrodiagnostic findings in peripheral neuropathies that, although useful in the everyday practice, may be misleading: (1) conduction block and abnormal temporal dispersion are distinctive features of acquired demyelinating disorders; (2) hereditary neuropathies are characterized by uniform slowing of conduction velocity; (3) axonal neuropathies are simply diagnosed by reduced amplitude of motor and sensory nerve action potentials with normal or slightly slow conduction velocity. In this review, we reappraise the occurrence of uniform and non-uniform conduction velocity slowing, conduction block and temporal dispersion in demyelinating, dysmyelinating and axonal neuropathies attempting, with a translational approach, a correlation between electrophysiological and pathological features as derived from sensory nerve biopsy in patients and animal models. Additionally, we provide some hints to navigate in this complex field.

Paraneoplastic neuropathies and peripheral nerve hyperexcitability disorders

Peripheral neuropathy is a common referral for patients to the neurologic clinics. Paraneoplastic neuropathies account for a small but high morbidity and mortality subgroup. Symptoms include weakness, sensory loss, sweating irregularity, blood pressure instability, severe constipation, and neuropathic pain. Neuropathy is the first presenting symptom of malignancy among many patients. The molecular and cellular oncogenic immune targets reside within cell bodies, axons, cytoplasms, or surface membranes of neural tissues. A more favorable immune treatment outcome occurs in those where the targets reside on the cell surface. Patients with antibodies binding cell surface antigens commonly have neural hyperexcitability with pain, cramps, fasciculations, and hyperhidrotic attacks (CASPR2, LGI1, and others). The antigenic targets are also commonly expressed in the central nervous system, with presenting symptoms being myelopathy, encephalopathy, and seizures with neuropathy, often masked. Pain and autonomic components typically relate to small nerve fiber involvement (nociceptive, adrenergic, enteric, and sudomotor), sometimes without nerve fiber loss but rather hyperexcitability. The specific antibodies discovered help direct cancer investigations. Among the primary axonal paraneoplastic neuropathies, pathognomonic clinical features do not exist, and testing for multiple antibodies simultaneously provides the best sensitivity in testing (AGNA1-SOX1; amphiphysin; ANNA-1-HU; ANNA-3-DACH1; CASPR2; CRMP5; LGI1; PCA2-MAP1B, and others). Performing confirmatory antibody testing using adjunct methods improves specificity. Antibody-mediated demyelinating paraneoplastic neuropathies are limited to MAG-IgM (IgM-MGUS, Waldenström's, and myeloma), with the others associated with cytokine elevations (VEGF, IL6) caused by osteosclerotic myeloma, plasmacytoma (POEMS), and rarely angiofollicular lymphoma (Castleman's). Paraneoplastic disorders have clinical overlap with other idiopathic antibody disorders, including IgG4 demyelinating nodopathies (NF155 and Contactin-1). This review summarizes the paraneoplastic neuropathies, including those with peripheral nerve hyperexcitability.

Aggressive Acquired Demyelinating Neuropathy Caused by NF-155: Initially Treatment-Resistant

OBJECTIVES

Anti-neurofascin-155 IgG4 (NF-155) antibody disease has previously been associated with a subset of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. We report a case of NF-155 positive polyneuropathy that initially presented as an acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. The patient responded appropriately to treatment but subsequently progressed over a 3-month period, resulting in quadriplegia, areflexia, and oculobulbar paralysis.

METHODS

Case report and literature review.

RESULTS

A 40-year-old male presented with acute bilateral arm and thigh weakness, areflexia, and distal sensory loss. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for acute acquired demyelinating neuropathy resulted in initial improvement but subsequent decline. Lack of response to additional IVIg and plasmapheresis (PLEX) prompted testing for NF-155. Treatment with rituximab and steroids resulted in virtually complete recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Early testing for nodal and paranodal proteins is indicated in patients who present with acute acquired demyelinating neuropathy but fail to respond to conventional treatments, such as IVIg or PLEX. Identification of nodal and paranodal antibodies should prompt treatment with rituximab and steroids to increase likelihood of recovery.

[The significance of autoantibodies against nodal and paranodal proteins in autoimmune nodopathies]

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is recognized as a syndrome caused by multiple pathologies. Since the 2010s, it has been clarified that autoantibodies against membranous proteins localized in the nodes of Ranvier and paranodes are positive in subsets of CIDP patients, leading to proposing a new disease concept called autoimmune nodopathies, which is independent of CIDP, in the revised international CIDP guidelines. This article reviews the significance of these autoantibodies, especially anti-neurofascin 155 and anti-contactin 1 antibodies, which have been the most prevalent and achieved a higher degree of consensus.

Case Report: Telitacicept in treating a patient with NF155+ autoimmune nodopathy: a successful attempt to manage recurrent elevated sero-anti-NF155 antibodies

This report presents a case of a neurofascin-155 (NF155)+ autoimmune nodopathy (AN) patient who exhibited resistance to conventional treatments but responded positively to telitacicept therapy. Telitacicept, a dual inhibitor of B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) and A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), suppressed the development and survival of plasma cells and mature B cells. The patient's unique clinical features were consistent with NF155+ AN, showing limited response to standard treatments like rituximab and a recurrent significant increase in anti-NF155 antibody titers. Administering telitacicept (160mg, ih) led to an improvement in clinical symptoms, inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) scale and inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability scale (I-RODS), and stabilized anti-NF155 antibody levels without a rebound. This case demonstrates telitacicept as a potential novel therapy for NF155+ AN, particularly when conventional treatments fail. Further investigation into its safety, efficacy, dosage, and treatment cycle in NF155+ AN is warranted.

Current Biomarker Strategies in Autoimmune Neuromuscular Diseases

Inflammatory neuromuscular disorders encompass a diverse group of immune-mediated diseases with varying clinical manifestations and treatment responses. The identification of specific biomarkers has the potential to provide valuable insights into disease pathogenesis, aid in accurate diagnosis, predict disease course, and monitor treatment efficacy. However, the rarity and heterogeneity of these disorders pose significant challenges in the identification and implementation of reliable biomarkers. Here, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of biomarkers currently established in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), myasthenia gravis (MG), and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). It highlights the existing biomarkers in these disorders, including diagnostic, prognostic, predictive and monitoring biomarkers, while emphasizing the unmet need for additional specific biomarkers. The limitations and challenges associated with the current biomarkers are discussed, and the potential implications for disease management and personalized treatment strategies are explored. Collectively, biomarkers have the potential to improve the management of inflammatory neuromuscular disorders. However, novel strategies and further research are needed to establish clinically meaningful biomarkers.

Different binding and pathogenic effect of neurofascin and contactin-1 autoantibodies in autoimmune nodopathies

Introduction

IgG4 autoantibodies against paranodal proteins are known to induce acute-onset and often severe sensorimotor autoimmune neuropathies. How autoantibodies reach their antigens at the paranode in spite of the myelin barrier is still unclear.

Methods

We performed in vitro incubation experiments with patient sera on unfixed and unpermeabilized nerve fibers and in vivo intraneural and intrathecal passive transfer of patient IgG to rats, to explore the access of IgG autoantibodies directed against neurofascin-155 and contactin-1 to the paranodes and their pathogenic effect.

Results

We found that in vitro incubation resulted in weak paranodal binding of anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies whereas anti-neurofascin-155 autoantibodies bound to the nodes more than to the paranodes. After short-term intraneural injection, no nodal or paranodal binding was detectable when using anti-neurofascin-155 antibodies. After repeated intrathecal injections, nodal more than paranodal binding could be detected in animals treated with anti-neurofascin-155, accompanied by sensorimotor neuropathy. In contrast, no paranodal binding was visible in rats intrathecally injected with anti-contactin-1 antibodies, and animals remained unaffected.

Conclusion

These data support the notion of different pathogenic mechanisms of anti-neurofascin-155 and anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies and different accessibility of paranodal and nodal structures.

Peripherally-induced Movement Disorders: An Update

Background

Peripherally-induced movement disorders (PIMD) should be considered when involuntary or abnormal movements emerge shortly after an injury to a body part. A close topographic and temporal association between peripheral injury and onset of the movement disorders is crucial to diagnosing PIMD. PIMD is under-recognized and often misdiagnosed as functional movement disorder, although both may co-exist. Given the considerable diagnostic, therapeutic, and psychosocial-legal challenges associated with PIMD, it is crucial to update the clinical and scientific information about this important movement disorder.

Methods

A comprehensive PubMed search through a broad range of keywords and combinations was performed in February 2023 to identify relevant articles for this narrative review.

Results

The spectrum of the phenomenology of PIMD is broad and it encompasses both hyperkinetic and hypokinetic movements. Hemifacial spasm is probably the most common PIMD. Others include dystonia, tremor, parkinsonism, myoclonus, painful leg moving toe syndrome, tics, polyminimyoclonus, and amputation stump dyskinesia. We also highlight conditions such as neuropathic tremor, pseudoathetosis, and MYBPC1-associated myogenic tremor as examples of PIMD.

Discussion

There is considerable heterogeneity among PIMD in terms of severity and nature of injury, natural course, association with pain, and response to treatment. As some patients may have co-existing functional movement disorder, neurologists should be able to differentiate the two disorders. While the exact pathophysiology remains elusive, aberrant central sensitization after peripheral stimuli and maladaptive plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex, on a background of genetic (two-hit hypothesis) or other predisposition, seem to play a role in the pathogenesis of PIMD.

Vision Loss as a Presenting Feature of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired, immune-mediated, and clinically heterogeneous demyelinating disease affecting the nerve roots and peripheral nerves. We report a series of 4 patients who presented with early and progressive vision loss in the context of new-onset CIDP: 3 due to papilledema and 1 due to optic neuropathy without papilledema.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series of 4 patients with vision loss as a presenting feature of CIDP evaluated at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from January 2016 to August 2021. Demographic, clinical, diagnostic, and treatment data were collected via retrospective medical record review.

RESULTS

Case 1 was a 51-year-old man with 2 months of progressive bilateral papilledema associated with reduced visual acuity (count fingers at 1 foot in each eye) and severely constricted visual fields. Case 2 was a 36-year-old man with 4 months of worsening headaches, reduced visual acuity (count fingers at 1 foot in each eye), severely constricted visual fields, and papilledema. Case 3 was a 39-year-old man with papilledema causing progressive vision loss (20/80 in both eyes), headaches, and relapsing limb sensorimotor deficits. Case 4 was a 19-year-old man with 3 months of progressive bilateral visual decline (20/400 in the right eye, 20/600 in the left eye), central scotoma, and optic disc pallor consistent with optic neuropathy without papilledema. All 4 patients met clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria of CIDP. Cases 3 and 4 each tested positive for serum neurofascin-155 IgG4 antibodies. All patients were managed with immunomodulatory therapy. Cases 1 and 2 also each required surgical intervention with bilateral optic nerve sheath fenestration and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting procedures.

CONCLUSION

Vision loss from optic neuropathy with or without papilledema has rarely been reported in CIDP, and typically has been described in the context of longstanding disease. Our cases highlight how CIDP can present with early vision loss that may be profound and challenging to manage if diagnosis is delayed. CIDP should be considered in any patient with new progressive vision loss when associated with peripheral sensorimotor symptoms and elevated CSF protein. The small subgroup of CIDP patients with neurofascin-155 antibodies may be at particular risk of optic nerve involvement.

Value of Antibody Determinations in Chronic Dysimmune Neuropathies

Chronic dysimmune neuropathies encompass a group of neuropathies that share immune-mediated pathomechanism. Chronic dysimmune antibody-related neuropathies include anti-MAG neuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and neuropathies related to immune attack against paranodal antigens. Such neuropathies exhibit distinguishing pathomechanism, clinical and response to therapy features with respect to chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and its variants, which represent the most frequent form of chronic dysimmune neuropathy. This narrative review provides an overview of pathomechanism; clinical, electrophysiological, and biochemical features; and treatment response of the antibody-mediated neuropathies, aiming to establish when and why to look for antibodies in chronic dysimmune neuropathies.

What Is in the Literature

What is in the Literature focuses on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), a neuropathy with challenges in diagnosis and treatment. A recent revision of diagnostic criteria (EFN/PNS criteria) has helped define clinical features of typical and atypical variants and what is not considered CIDP. Initiating pathologic factors is not known for typical CIDP or variants. New treatment approaches are based on immunologic mechanisms. Rare patients with a CIDP-like clinical pattern are found to have antibodies to proteins at and around the node of Ranvier and are not considered to be CIDP but a nodal-paranodopathy. Although occurring mainly in adults, CIDP also occurs in children. CIDP may have clinical and electrodiagnostic features that overlap with hereditary neuropathies, and the latter might show some response to treatment. Articles published in the past year that address these issues are discussed in this review.

Movement disorders and neuropathies: overlaps and mimics in clinical practice

Movement disorders as well as peripheral neuropathies are extremely frequent in the general population; therefore, it is not uncommon to encounter patients with both these conditions. Often, the coexistence is coincidental, due to the high incidence of common causes of peripheral neuropathy, such as diabetes and other age-related disorders, as well as of Parkinson disease (PD), which has a typical late onset. Nonetheless, there is broad evidence that PD patients may commonly develop a sensory and/or autonomic polyneuropathy, triggered by intrinsic and/or extrinsic mechanisms. Similarly, some peripheral neuropathies may develop some movement disorders in the long run, such as tremor, and rarely dystonia and myoclonus, suggesting that central mechanisms may ensue in the pathogenesis of these diseases. Although rare, several acquired or hereditary causes may be responsible for the combination of movement and peripheral nerve disorders as a unique entity, some of which are potentially treatable, including paraneoplastic, autoimmune and nutritional aetiologies. Finally, genetic causes should be pursued in case of positive family history, young onset or multisystemic involvement, and examined for neuroacanthocytosis, spinocerebellar ataxias, mitochondrial disorders and less common causes of adult-onset cerebellar ataxias and spastic paraparesis. Deep phenotyping in terms of neurological and general examination, as well as laboratory tests, neuroimaging, neurophysiology, and next-generation genetic analysis, may guide the clinician toward the correct diagnosis and management.

Autoimmune Neurological Disorders with IgG4 Antibodies: a Distinct Disease Spectrum with Unique IgG4 Functions Responding to Anti-B Cell Therapies

The main IgG4 antibody-mediated neurological disorders (IgG4-ND) include MuSK myasthenia; CIDP with nodal/paranodal antibodies to Neurofascin-155, contactin-1/caspr-1, or pan-neurofascins; anti-LGI1 and CASPR2-associated limbic encephalitis, Morvan syndrome, or neuromyotonia; and several cases of the anti-IgLON5 and anti-DPPX-spectrum CNS diseases. The paper is centered on the clinical spectrum of IgG4-ND and their immunopathogenesis highlighting the unique functional effects of the IgG4 subclass compared to IgG1-3 antibody subclasses. The IgG4 antibodies exert pathogenic effects on their targeted antigens by blocking enzymatic activity or disrupting protein-protein interactions affecting signal transduction pathways, but not by activating complement, binding to inhibitory FcγRIIb receptor or engaging in cross-linking of the targeted antigen with immune complex formation as the IgG1-IgG3 antibody subclasses do. IgG4 can even inhibit the classical complement pathway by affecting the affinity of IgG1-2 subclasses to C1q binding. Because the IgG4 antibodies do not trigger inflammatory processes or complement-mediated immune responses, the conventional anti-inflammatory therapies, especially with IVIg, immunosuppressants, and plasmapheresis, are ineffective or not sufficiently effective in inducing long-term remissions. In contrast, aiming at the activated plasmablasts connected with IgG4 antibody production is a meaningful therapeutic target in IgG4-ND. Indeed, data from large series of patients with MuSK myasthenia, CIDP with nodal/paranodal antibodies, and anti-LGI1 and CASPR2-associated syndromes indicate that B cell depletion therapy with rituximab exerts long-lasting clinical remissions by targeting memory B cells and IgG4-producing CD20-positive short-lived plasma cells. Because IgG4 antibody titers seem reduced in remissions and increased in exacerbation, they may serve as potential biomarkers of treatment response supporting further the pathogenic role of self-reacting B cells. Controlled trials are needed in IgG4-ND not only with rituximab but also with the other anti-B cell agents that target CD19/20, especially those like obexelimab and obinutuzumab, that concurrently activate the inhibitory FcγRIIb receptors which have low binding affinity to IgG4, exerting a more prolonged anti-B cell action affecting also antigen presentation and cytotoxic T cells. Antibody therapies targeting FcRn, testing those anti-FcRn inhibitors that effectively catabolize the IgG4 antibody subclass, may be especially promising.

IgG4 Autoantibodies in Organ-Specific Autoimmunopathies: Reviewing Class Switching, Antibody-Producing Cells, and Specific Immunotherapies

Organ-specific autoimmunity is often characterized by autoantibodies targeting proteins expressed in the affected tissue. A subgroup of autoimmunopathies has recently emerged that is characterized by predominant autoantibodies of the IgG4 subclass (IgG4-autoimmune diseases; IgG4-AID). This group includes pemphigus vulgaris, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, subtypes of autoimmune encephalitis, inflammatory neuropathies, myasthenia gravis and membranous nephropathy. Although the associated autoantibodies target specific antigens in different organs and thus cause diverse syndromes and diseases, they share surprising similarities in genetic predisposition, disease mechanisms, clinical course and response to therapies. IgG4-AID appear to be distinct from another group of rare immune diseases associated with IgG4, which are the IgG4-related diseases (IgG4-RLD), such as IgG4-related which have distinct clinical and serological properties and are not characterized by antigen-specific IgG4. Importantly, IgG4-AID differ significantly from diseases associated with IgG1 autoantibodies targeting the same organ. This may be due to the unique functional characteristics of IgG4 autoantibodies (e.g. anti-inflammatory and functionally monovalent) that affect how the antibodies cause disease, and the differential response to immunotherapies of the IgG4 producing B cells/plasmablasts. These clinical and pathophysiological clues give important insight in the immunopathogenesis of IgG4-AID. Understanding IgG4 immunobiology is a key step towards the development of novel, IgG4 specific treatments. In this review we therefore summarize current knowledge on IgG4 regulation, the relevance of class switching in the context of health and disease, describe the cellular mechanisms involved in IgG4 production and provide an overview of treatment responses in IgG4-AID.