Surgical Treatments for Epilepsies in Children Aged 1-36 Months: A Systematic Review

Identification and treatment of surgically-remediable causes of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is a common developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with poor long-term outcomes. A substantial proportion of patients with IESS have a potentially surgically remediable etiology. Despite this, epilepsy surgery is underutilized in this patient group. Some surgically remediable etiologies, such as focal cortical dysplasia and malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy (MOGHE), are under-diagnosed in infants and young children. Even when a surgically remediable etiology is recognised, for example, tuberous sclerosis or focal encephalomalacia, epilepsy surgery may be delayed or not considered due to diffuse EEG changes, unclear surgical boundaries, or concerns about operating in this age group.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors discuss the common surgically remediable etiologies of IESS, their clinical and EEG features, and the imaging techniques that can aid in their diagnosis. They then describe the surgical approaches used in this patient group, and the beneficial impact that early epilepsy surgery can have on developing brain networks.

EXPERT OPINION

Epilepsy surgery remains underutilized even when a potentially surgically remediable cause is recognized. Overcoming the barriers that result in under-recognition of surgical candidates and underutilization of epilepsy surgery in IESS will improve long-term seizure and developmental outcomes.

Postoperative Neurologic Outcome in Patients Undergoing Resective Surgery for Parietal Lobe Epilepsy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Parietal lobe epilepsy (PLE) surgery can be an effective treatment for selected patients with intractable epilepsy but can be associated with the risk of serious neurologic deficits. We performed a systematic review of the literature to obtain a comprehensive summary of the frequency and types of new postoperative neurologic deficits in patients undergoing PLE resective surgery.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles published between January 1, 1990, and April 28, 2022. We included studies that reported postoperative neurologic outcome following PLE resective surgery confined to the parietal lobe. We required that studies included ≥5 patients. The data collected included demographic information and specific details of postoperative neurologic deficits. When available, individual patient data were collected. We used the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool to assess the risk of bias and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the quality of the evidence.

RESULTS

Of the 3,461 articles screened, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 370 patients were included. One hundred patients (27.0%) had a new deficit noted postoperatively. Approximately half of the patients with deficits experienced only transient deficits. Motor deficits were the most commonly identified deficit. The rates of motor deficits noted after PLE surgery were 5.7%, 3.2%, and 2.2% for transient, long-term, and duration not specified, respectively. Sensory and visual field deficits were also commonly reported. Gerstmann syndrome was noted postoperatively in 4.9% of patients and was almost always transient. Individual patient data added information on parietal lobe subregion postoperative neurologic outcome.

DISCUSSION

Our systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of the frequency and types of neurologic deficits associated with PLE surgery. A significant percentage of postoperative deficits are transient. In addition to the expected sensory and visual deficits, PLE surgery is associated with a notable risk of motor deficits. The available literature has important deficiencies. Our study highlights gaps in the literature and provides recommendations for future directions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022313108, May 26, 2022).

A multi-center comparison of surgical techniques for corpus Callosotomy in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Corpus callosotomy (CC) is used to reduce seizures, primarily in patients with generalized drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The invasive nature of the procedure contributes to underutilization despite its potential superiority to other palliative procedures. The goal of this study was to use a multi-institutional epilepsy surgery database to characterize the use of CC across participating centers.

METHODS

Data were acquired from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Surgery Database, a prospective observational study collecting data on children 0-18 years referred for surgical evaluation of DRE across 22 U.S. pediatric epilepsy centers. Patient, epilepsy, and surgical characteristics were collected across multiple CC modalities. Outcomes and complications were recorded and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients undergoing 85 CC procedures at 14 participating epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. Mean age at seizure onset was 2.3 years (0-9.4); mean age for Phase I evaluation and surgical intervention were 9.45 (.1-20) and 10.46 (.2-20.6) years, respectively. Generalized seizure types were the most common (59%). Complete CC was performed in 88%. The majority of CC procedures (57%) were via open craniotomy, followed by laser interstitial thermal therapy (LiTT) (20%) and mini-craniotomy/endoscopic (mc/e) (22%). Mean operative times were significantly longer for LiTT, whereas mean estimated blood loss was greater in open cases. Complications occurred in 11 cases (13%) and differed significantly between surgical techniques (p < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in length of postoperative stay across approaches. Mean follow-up was 12.8 months (range 1-39). Favorable Engel outcomes were experienced by 37 (78.7%) of the patients who underwent craniotomy, 10 (58.8%) with LiTT, and 12 (63.2%) with mc/e; these differences were not statistically significant.

SIGNIFICANCE

CC is an effective surgical modality for children with DRE. Regardless of surgical modality, complication rates are acceptable and seizure outcomes generally favorable. Newer, less-invasive, surgical approaches may lead to increased adoption of this efficacious therapeutic option for pediatric DRE.