Direct Health Care Costs Associated With Multiple Sclerosis: A Population-Based Cohort Study in British Columbia, Canada, 2001-2020

Benefits of early highly effective versus escalation treatment strategies in relapsing multiple sclerosis estimated using a treatment-sequence model

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty about disproportionate impact on health care budgets limits implementation of early highly effective treatment (EHT) in multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE

To estimate cost-effectiveness of escalation versus EHT disease-modifying treatment (DMT) sequences.

METHODS

Using a health-economic approach, we analysed health benefits (relapse rate reduction, disability prevention), direct/indirect DMT and societal costs of escalation versus EHT DMT sequences. In scenario analyses, we allowed (1) earlier use of alemtuzumab (ALE) and (2) a single retreatment with cladribine (CLA).

RESULTS

In our model, we showed that the ratio between costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for the most cost-effective EHT and escalation sequence results into a similar net health benefit with higher costs and also higher QALYs associated with an EHT versus escalation strategy. Earlier use of ALE is more cost-effective than in later lines, even when aggravating the impact of its side-effects tenfold. Retreatment with CLA was more cost-effective in both escalation and EHT sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain EHT sequences are equally cost-effective to escalation sequences and are likely to result in more health at uncertain additional costs. The favourable cost-benefit ratio of CLA and ALE suggests that a wider application of affordable highly effective therapies could promote the cost-effectiveness both EHT and escalation approaches.

Healthcare utilization and costs associated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Norwegian patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients experience long-term deterioration of neurological function, reduced quality of life, long-lasting treatment cycles, and an increased risk of early workability loss imposing an economic burden to society. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has shown promising treatment effects for relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). This study employs a micro-costing approach to estimate healthcare utilization and costs associated with AHSCT in Norwegian RRMS patients. Patient-level data were extracted from medical journals of 30 RRMS patients receiving AHSCT treatment at Haukeland University Hospital in the period from January 2015 to January 2018. The time horizon for the analysis was from the pretransplant screening until one year after AHSCT. A correlation was found between patient body weight and total healthcare cost. The average total healthcare cost of AHSCT for RRMS patients was estimated to EUR 66 304 (95% CI: EUR 63 598 - EUR 69 010) including costs associated with the pre-AHSCT period, AHSCT treatment phases and one-year follow-up. The majority of the costs, EUR 64 329, occurred during the treatment phase and within the first 100 days after AHSCT. The results indicate that long-term healthcare cost savings may be achieved using AHSCT in selected patients with aggressive RRMS. This is due to the high costs of most used disease modifying treatments. Further research including long-term clinical data is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of this treatment.

Multiple Sclerosis: An Emergency Medicine-Focused Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a rare but serious condition associated with significant morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

This review provides a focused assessment of MS for emergency clinicians, including the presentation, evaluation, and emergency department (ED) management based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

MS is an autoimmune disorder targeting the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by clinical relapses and radiological lesions disseminated in time and location. Patients with MS most commonly present with long tract signs (e.g., myelopathy, asymmetric spastic paraplegia, urinary dysfunction, Lhermitte's sign), optic neuritis, or brainstem syndromes (bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia). Cortical syndromes or multifocal presentations are less common. Radiologically isolated syndrome and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) may or may not progress to chronic forms of MS, including relapsing remitting MS, primary progressive MS, and secondary progressive MS. The foundation of outpatient management involves disease-modifying therapy, which is typically initiated with the first signs of disease onset. Management of CIS and acute flares of MS in the ED includes corticosteroid therapy, ideally after diagnostic testing with imaging and lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Emergency clinicians should evaluate whether patients with MS are presenting with new-onset debilitating neurological symptoms to avoid unnecessary testing and admissions, but failure to appropriately diagnose CIS or MS flare is associated with increased morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of MS can assist emergency clinicians in better diagnosing and managing this neurologically devastating disease.

Treatment transitions in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder increase risk for disease advancement

BACKGROUND

People with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (PwNMOSD) commonly switch between disease modifying therapies, yet the consequence of transitions remains unknown. We aimed to understand if treatment transitions due to medical, non-medical, and tolerability reasons were related to disease progression.

METHODS

A retrospective study of medical records for PwNMOSD was performed between 2008 and 2022. A comprehensive clinical timeline was created for each person including details related to treatment history and associated clinical and radiological outcomes (i.e., hospital admission, relapses, and MRI advancement). If a transition occurred, the reason for the switch was categorized as being due to medical, non-medical, or tolerability issues. A proportional hazards model was created, and the assumptions were tested based on weighted residuals.

RESULTS

The cohort included 164 aquaporin-4 IgG positive NMOSD subjects with 89 (79 female; median disease duration (range) = 10.1 years (y) (1.7-32.8)) people switching therapies at least once (once: 42; twice: 26; three times: 12; four times: 6; 5 or more times: 3). A similar amount of higher efficacy therapies was used by PwNMOSD that switched due to a non-medical/tolerability or a medical-related reason. The results of the recurrent event survival analysis revealed that after an initial transition due to non-medical/tolerability reasons, the risk of a hospital admission, relapse, and MRI advancement decreases by 40.3 % (p = 0.005), 53.1 % (p = 0.002), and 65.9 % (p = 0.005), respectively. However, with each additional discontinuation due to non-medical/tolerability reasons, the risk of hospitalization increased by 25.2 % (p = 0.0003) and risk for MRI advancement increased by 41.9 % (p = 0.03). For transitions due to medical reasons, a significant increased risk of MRI advancement by 32.2 % (p = 0.005) for the first switch was identified with no associated observed risk with each additional discontinuation (p = 0.33). Within the first six months after stopping a medication due to non-medical/tolerability reasons, the rate of starting a new medication was less (p<0.0001) when compared to a discontinuation due to a medical-related event.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk associated with the time course of treatment transitions for people with NMOSD may assist in transforming the way healthcare providers bridge the gap between therapies and the approach to the timing of a switch. These data highlight additional factors that may be equatable to the efficacy of prescribed treatments in the prevention of acute neurological events.