Familial congenital mirror movements: report of a large 4-generation family

A novel homozygous frameshift mutation in the DCC gene in a Pakistani family with autosomal recessive horizontal gaze palsy with progressive scoliosis-2 with impaired intellectual development

Horizontal Gaze Palsy with Progressive Scoliosis-2 with Impaired Intellectual Development (HGPPS2) is a rare congenital disorder characterized by absence of conjugate horizontal eye movements, and progressive scoliosis developing in childhood and adolescence. We report three new patients with HGPPS2 in a consanguineous Pakistani family, presenting varying degrees of progressive scoliosis, developmental delays, horizontal gaze palsy, agenesis of corpus callosum, and absence of cerebral commissures. Analysis of genotyping data identified shared loss of heterozygosity (LOH) region on chromosomes 5p15.33-15.31, 6q11.2-12, and 18q21.1-21.3. A hypothesis-free, unbiased exome data analysis detected an insertion of nucleotide A (c.2399dupA) in exon 16 of the DCC gene. The insertion is predicted to cause frameshift p.(Asn800Lysfs*11). Interestingly, DCC gene is present in the LOH region on chromosome 18. Variant (c.2399dupA) in the DCC gene is considered as the most probable candidate variant for HGPPS2 based on the presence of DCC in the LOH region, previously reported role of DCC in HGPPS2, perfect segregation of candidate variant with the disease, prediction of variant pathogenicity, and absence of variant in variation databases. Sanger Sequencing confirmed the presence of the novel homozygous mutation in all three patients; the parents were heterozygous carriers of the mutation, in accordance with an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern. DCC encodes a netrin-1 receptor protein; its role in the development of the CNS has recently been established. Biallelic DCC mutations have previously been shown to cause HGPPS2. A novel homozygous variant in patients of the reported family extend the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of HGPPS2.

A novel heterozygous loss-of-function DCC Netrin 1 receptor variant in prenatal agenesis of corpus callosum and review of the literature

Agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) is a common prenatally-detected brain anomaly. Recently, an association between mutations in the DCC Netrin 1 receptor (DCC) gene and ACC, with or without mirror movements, has been demonstrated. In this manuscript, we present a family with a novel heterozygous frameshift mutation in DCC, review the available literature, and discuss the challenges involved in the genetic counseling for recently discovered disorders with paucity of medical information. We performed whole exome sequencing in a healthy nonconsanguineous couple that underwent two pregnancy terminations due to prenatal diagnosis of ACC. A heterozygous variant c.2774dupA (p.Asn925Lysfs*17) in the DCC gene was demonstrated in fetal and paternal DNA samples, as well as in a healthy 4-year-old offspring. When directly questioned, both father and child reported having mirror movements not affecting quality of life. Segregation analysis demonstrated the variant in three paternal siblings, two of them having mirror movements. Brain imaging revealed normal corpus callosum. Summary of literature data describing heterozygous loss-of-function variants in DCC (n = 61) revealed 63.9% penetrance for mirror movements, 9.8% for ACC, and 5% for both. No significant neurodevelopmental abnormalities were reported among the seven published patients with DCC loss-of-function variants and ACC. Prenatal diagnosis of ACC should prompt a specific anamnesis regarding any neurological disorder, as well as intentional physical examination of both parents aimed to detect mirror movements. In suspicious cases, detection of DCC pathogenic variants might markedly improve the predicted prognosis, alleviate the parental anxiety, and possibly prevent pregnancy termination.

Abnormal subcortical activity in congenital mirror movement disorder with RAD51 mutation

PURPOSE

Congenital mirror movement disorder (CMMD) is characterized by unintended, nonsuppressible, homologous mirroring activity contralateral to the movement on the intended side of the body. In healthy controls, unilateral movements are accompanied with predominantly contralateral cortical activity, whereas in CMMD, in line with the abnormal behavior, bilateral cortical activity is observed for unilateral motor tasks. However, task-related activities in subcortical structures, which are known to play critical roles in motor actions, have not been investigated in CMMD previously.

METHODS

We investigated the functional activation patterns of the motor components in CMMD patients. By using linkage analysis and exome sequencing, common mutations were revealed in seven affected individuals from the same family. Next, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) we investigated cortical and subcortical activity during manual motor actions in two right-handed affected brothers and sex, age, education, and socioeconomically matched healthy individuals.

RESULTS

Genetic analyses revealed heterozygous RAD51 c.401C>T mutation which cosegregated with the phenotype in two affected members of the family. Consistent with previous literature, our fMRI results on these two affected individuals showed that mirror movements were closely related to abnormal cortical activity in M1 and SMA during unimanual movements. Furthermore, we have found previously unknown abnormal task-related activity in subcortical structures. Specifically, we have found increased and bilateral activity during unimanual movements in thalamus, striatum, and globus pallidus in CMMD patients.

CONCLUSION

These findings reveal further neural correlates of CMMD, and may guide our understanding of the critical roles of subcortical structures for unimanual movements in healthy individuals.

Mesocorticolimbic Connectivity and Volumetric Alterations in DCC Mutation Carriers

The axon guidance cue receptor DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer) plays a critical role in the organization of mesocorticolimbic pathways in rodents. To investigate whether this occurs in humans, we measured (1) anatomical connectivity between the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) and forebrain targets, (2) striatal and cortical volumes, and (3) putatively associated traits and behaviors. To assess translatability, morphometric data were also collected in Dcc-haploinsufficient mice. The human volunteers were 20 DCC^+/- mutation carriers, 16 DCC^+/+ relatives, and 20 DCC^+/+ unrelated healthy volunteers (UHVs; 28 females). The mice were 11 Dcc^+/- and 16 wild-type C57BL/6J animals assessed during adolescence and adulthood. Compared with both control groups, the human DCC^+/- carriers exhibited the following: (1) reduced anatomical connectivity from the SN/VTA to the ventral striatum [DCC^+/+: p = 0.0005, r(effect size) = 0.60; UHV: p = 0.0029, r = 0.48] and ventral medial prefrontal cortex (DCC^+/+: p = 0.0031, r = 0.53; UHV: p = 0.034, r = 0.35); (2) lower novelty-seeking scores (DCC^+/+: p = 0.034, d = 0.82; UHV: p = 0.019, d = 0.84); and (3) reduced striatal volume (DCC^+/+: p = 0.0009, d = 1.37; UHV: p = 0.0054, d = 0.93). Striatal volumetric reductions were also present in Dcc^+/- mice, and these were seen during adolescence (p = 0.0058, d = 1.09) and adulthood (p = 0.003, d = 1.26). Together these findings provide the first evidence in humans that an axon guidance gene is involved in the formation of mesocorticolimbic circuitry and related behavioral traits, providing mechanisms through which DCC mutations might affect susceptibility to diverse neuropsychiatric disorders.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Opportunities to study the effects of axon guidance molecules on human brain development have been rare. Here, the identification of a large four-generational family that carries a mutation to the axon guidance molecule receptor gene, DCC, enabled us to demonstrate effects on mesocorticolimbic anatomical connectivity, striatal volumes, and personality traits. Reductions in striatal volumes were replicated in DCC-haploinsufficient mice. Together, these processes might influence mesocorticolimbic function and susceptibility to diverse neuropsychiatric disorders.

DCC mutation update: Congenital mirror movements, isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum, and developmental split brain syndrome

The deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC) gene encodes the netrin-1 (NTN1) receptor DCC, a transmembrane protein required for the guidance of commissural axons. Germline DCC mutations disrupt the development of predominantly commissural tracts in the central nervous system (CNS) and cause a spectrum of neurological disorders. Monoallelic, missense, and predicted loss-of-function DCC mutations cause congenital mirror movements, isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC), or both. Biallelic, predicted loss-of-function DCC mutations cause developmental split brain syndrome (DSBS). Although the underlying molecular mechanisms leading to disease remain poorly understood, they are thought to stem from reduced or perturbed NTN1 signaling. Here, we review the 26 reported DCC mutations associated with abnormal CNS development in humans, including 14 missense and 12 predicted loss-of-function mutations, and discuss their associated clinical characteristics and diagnostic features. We provide an update on the observed genotype-phenotype relationships of congenital mirror movements, isolated ACC and DSBS, and correlate this to our current understanding of the biological function of DCC in the development of the CNS. All mutations and their associated phenotypes were deposited into a locus-specific LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/DCC).

Pre-movement planning processes in people with congenital mirror movements

OBJECTIVE

Pre-movement processes were investigated in people with Congenital mirrormovement (CMM), a rare disorder in which bilateral movement (mirroring) occurs in the upper distal extremities (primarily the hands and fingers) during intended unilateral movements. Abnormal density of ipsilateral corticospinal projections is an established hallmark of CMM. This study tested whether the Lateralised Readiness Potential (LRP), which reflects movement planning and readiness, is also abnormal in people with CMM.

METHODS

Twenty-eight neurologically-normal controls and 8 people with CMM were tested on a unimanual Go/No-go task while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded to assess the LRP.

RESULTS

No significant group differences were found in reaction time (RT). However, significantly smaller LRP amplitudes were found, on average, in the CMM group compared to Controls at central-motor (C3,C4) sites in stimulus-locked and response-locked epochs; similar group differences were also found at further frontal sites (F3,F4) during response-locked epochs.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal brain activity in pre-movement processes associated with response planning and preparation is present in people with CMM.

SIGNIFICANCE

Aberrant bilateral activity during pre-movement processes is clearly implicated; whether part of the etiology of CMM, or as a mechanism of neuro-compensation, is not yet known.

Congenital Mirror Movements in a New Italian Family

Mirror movements (MMs) occur on the contralateral side of a limb being used intentionally. Because few families with congenital MMs and no other neurological signs have been reported, the underlying mechanisms of MMs are still not entirely clear. We report on the clinical, genetic, neurophysiological and neuroimaging findings of 10 of 26 living members of a novel four-generation family with congenital MMs. DCC and RAD51 were sequenced in affected members of the family. Five of the ten subjects with MMs underwent neurophysiological and neuroimaging evaluations. The neurophysiological evaluation consisted of electromyographic (EMG) mirror recordings, investigations of corticospinal excitability, and analysis of interhemispheric inhibition using transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques. The neuroimaging evaluation included functional MRI during finger movements. Eight (all females) of the ten members examined presented MMs of varying degrees at the clinical assessment. Transmission of MMs appears to have occurred according to an autosomal-dominant fashion with variable expression. No mutation in DCC or RAD51 was identified. EMG mirror activity was higher in MM subjects than in healthy controls. Short-latency interhemispheric inhibition was reduced in MM subjects. Ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials were detectable in the most severe case. The neuroimaging evaluation did not disclose any significant abnormalities in MM subjects. The variability of the clinical features of this family, and the lack of known genetic abnormalities, suggests that MMs are heterogeneous disorders. The pathophysiological mechanisms of MMs include abnormalities of transcallosal inhibition and corticospinal decussation.

Interhemispheric control of unilateral movement

To perform strictly unilateral movements, the brain relies on a large cortical and subcortical network. This network enables healthy adults to perform complex unimanual motor tasks without the activation of contralateral muscles. However, mirror movements (involuntary movements in ipsilateral muscles that can accompany intended movement) can be seen in healthy individuals if a task is complex or fatiguing, in childhood, and with increasing age. Lateralization of movement depends on complex interhemispheric communication between cortical (i.e., dorsal premotor cortex, supplementary motor area) and subcortical (i.e., basal ganglia) areas, probably coursing through the corpus callosum (CC). Here, we will focus on transcallosal interhemispheric inhibition (IHI), which facilitates complex unilateral movements and appears to play an important role in handedness, pathological conditions such as Parkinson's disease, and stroke recovery.

Lateralization of motor control in the human nervous system: genetics of mirror movements

Mirror movements (MM) are a peculiar motor defect in humans where the intended unilateral movement of a body part results in involuntary movement of the same body part on the opposite side. This loss in the lateralization of motor control can be caused by genetic mutations that result in an aberrant projection of the corticospinal tract. However, recent evidence suggests that the same genes controlling corticospinal tract development also play roles in the development of other circuits involved in motor control, including local spinal circuits and the corpus callosum. These recent studies in humans and mouse models of MM will be discussed to provide an overview of the basis of MM and the molecular mechanisms underlying the lateralization of motor control.