Emergence from minimally conscious state: insights from evaluation of posttraumatic confusion

A prediction model of clinical outcomes in prolonged disorders of consciousness: A prospective cohort study

Objective

This study aimed to establish and validate a prediction model for clinical outcomes in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDOC).

Methods

A total of 170 patients with pDOC enrolled in our rehabilitation unit were included and divided into training (n = 119) and validation sets (n = 51). Independent predictors for improved clinical outcomes were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram model was established. The nomogram performance was quantified using receiver operating curve (ROC) and calibration curves in the training and validated sets. A decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of this nomogram model.

Results

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that age, diagnosis at entry, serum albumin (g/L), and pupillary reflex were the independent prognostic factors that were used to construct the nomogram. The area under the curve in the training and validation sets was 0.845 and 0.801, respectively. This nomogram model showed good calibration with good consistency between the actual and predicted probabilities of improved outcomes. The DCA demonstrated a higher net benefit in clinical decision-making compared to treating all or none.

Conclusion

Several feasible, cost-effective prognostic variables that are widely available in hospitals can provide an efficient and accurate prediction model for improved clinical outcomes and support clinicians to offer suitable clinical care and decision-making to patients with pDOC and their family members.

Effect of single and combined median nerve stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of median nerve stimulation (MNS) combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), MNS alone, and rTMS alone in elevating the level of consciousness in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDOC).

Participants and methods

We enrolled 75 eligible inpatients suffering from pDOC as a result of traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the following three treatment groups: (1) rTMS+sham-MNS; (2) MNS + sham-rTMS; or (3) MNS + rTMS. The rTMS protocol involved stimulation above the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at a 10 Hz frequency and 90% resting motor threshold. The MNS protocol involved the delivery of a 15-20 mA current at the median nerve point 2 cm from the wrist crease of the right distal forearm. The primary outcome was the change from baseline of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) score after treatment. Secondary outcomes included post-treatment changes from baseline of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, awaken ratio, electroencephalography (EEG) scores, and the latency and amplitude of N20 on somatosensory evoked potentials.

Results

Before the intervention, there were no significant differences between groups in the CRS-R, GCS scores, age, duration of pDOC, clinical diagnosis, EEG scores, latency and amplitude of N20, sex, job, marital status, education level, or disease etiology. Within the three groups, the total CRS-R, GCS scores and amplitude of N20 on both side significantly increased and latency of N20 on poor side significantly decreased post-intervention. Significantly greater improvement in CRS-R, GCS total scores, amplitude of N20 on both side and latency of N20 on the poor side were observed in the MNS + TMS group compared to those of the groups receiving rTMS alone or MNS alone. The patients receiving TMS and MNS intervention showed a greater EEG activity improvement, and the EEG activity improved ratio significantly differ between groups, while there were no significant differences in the awakening ratios between the three groups.

Conclusion

The combination of MNS + rTMS was more efficacious in improving the level of consciousness than MNS alone or rTMS alone in patients with pDOC.

Pain assessment during physiotherapy and noxious stimuli in patients with disorders of consciousness: A preliminary study

Objectives

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) (unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, UWS; minimally conscious state, MCS) experience pain during physiotherapy and noxious stimuli in a larger patient population.

Materials and methods

The patients’ level of consciousness was measured with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Additionally, the Nociception Coma Scale-revised (NCS-R) was used to assess their pain response. The NCS-R total scores between UWS and MCS at baseline, physiotherapy and noxious stimulus were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test (Wilcoxon rank-sum test) and the Kruskal-Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction.

Results

The study enrolled 93 participants. There was a statistically significant difference in NCS-R total scores between the three conditions (H = 215.25, p < 0.001). At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference between MCS and UWS (U = 378, z = –1.35, p = 0.178). While there was a statistically significant difference between MCS and UWS during physiotherapy (U = 1,362, z = –3.06, p < 0.01) and under noxious stimuli (U = 5142.5, z = –11.22, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Physiotherapy improved the activity responsiveness of DOC patients, and patients experienced less potential pain. However, some DOC patients, especially MCS patients, perceived pain under the noxious stimuli.

The misdiagnosis of prolonged disorders of consciousness by a clinical consensus compared with repeated coma-recovery scale-revised assessment

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that a single Coma-Recovery Scale-Revision (CRS-R) assessment can identify high rates of misdiagnosis by clinical consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of misdiagnosis by clinical consensus compared to repeated behavior-scale assessments in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC).

METHODS

Patients with prolonged DOC during hospitalization were screened by clinicians, and the clinicians formed a clinical-consensus diagnosis. Trained professionals used the CRS-R to evaluate the consciousness levels of the enrolled patients repeatedly (≥5 times) within a week. Based on the repeated evaluation results, the enrolled patients with prolonged DOC were divided into unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), minimally conscious state (MCS), and emergence from MCS (EMCS). Finally, the relationship between the results of the CRS-R and the clinical consensus were analyzed.

RESULTS

In this study, 137 patients with a clinical-consensus diagnosis of prolonged DOC were enrolled. It was found that 24.7% of patients with clinical UWS were actually in MCS after a single CRS-R behavior evaluation, while the repeated CRS-R evaluation results showed that the proportion of misdiagnosis of MCS was 38.2%. A total of 16.7% of EMCS patients were misdiagnosed with clinical MCS, and 1.1% of EMCS patients were misdiagnosed with clinical UWS.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of the misdiagnosis by clinical consensus is still relatively high. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the importance of the bedside CRS-R behavior assessment and should apply the CRS-R tool in daily procedures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04139239 ; Registered 24 October 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

Recovery from vegetative state of patients with a severe brain injury: a 4-year real-practice prospective cohort study

Patients who have suffered severe traumatic or nontraumatic brain injuries can show a progressive recovery, transitioning through a range of clinical conditions. They may progress from coma to a vegetative state (VS) and/or a minimally conscious state (MCS). A longer duration of the VS is known to be related to a lower probability of emergence from it; furthermore, the literature seems to lack evidence of late improvements in these patients. This real-practice prospective cohort study was conducted in inpatients in a VS following a severe brain injury, consecutively admitted to a vegetative state unit (VSU). The aim of the study was to assess their recovery in order to identify variables that might increase the probability of a VS patient transitioning to MCS. Rehabilitation treatment included passive joint mobilisation and helping/placing patients into an upright sitting position on a tilt table. All the patients underwent a specific assessment protocol every month to identify any emergence, however late, from the VS. Over a 4-year period, 194 patients suffering sequelae of a severe brain injury, consecutively seen, had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8. Of these, 63 (32.5%) were in a VS, 84 (43.3%) in a MCS, and 47 (24.2%) in a coma; of the 63 patients admitted in a VS, 49 (57.1% males and 42.9% females, mean age 25.34 ± 19.12 years) were transferred to a specialist VSU and put on a slow-to-recover brain injury programme. Ten of these 49 patients were still in a VS after 36 months; of these 10, 3 recovered consciousness, transitioning to a MCS, 2 died, and 5 remained in a VS during the last 12 months of the observation. Univariate analysis identified male sex, youth, a shorter time from onset of the VS, diffuse brain injury, and the presence of status epilepticus as variables increasing the likelihood of transition to a MCS. Long-term monitoring of patients with chronic disorders of consciousness should be adequately implemented in order to optimise their access to rehabilitation services.