Long-lasting treatment effect of rituximab in MuSK myasthenia

Prevalence and course of muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies in myasthenia gravis - A retrospective study

Myasthenia gravis is a neuromuscular disease typically associated with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibodies. However, in AChR-negative cases, autoantibodies against muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK) may be present. Given the rarity of MuSK autoantibodies, there is limited information on their development and significance as biomarkers of disease activity. In a retrospective 10-year study, we tested 749 serum samples from 641 patients for MuSK autoantibodies. For MuSK-positive Myasthenia gravis cases, we extended the observation period to almost 17 years and analyzed the correlation between MuSK titers and clinical severity (Besinger score). We also examined the association between elevated but formally negative MuSK titers and other autoimmune diseases. Of the 749 samples, 21 (3 %, n = 7 patients) were MuSK-positive. In these patients, MuSK titers did not correlate with disease severity or treatment changes. 78 samples (10 %, n = 73 patients) showed elevated but formally negative MuSK titers, with no link to other autoimmune diseases. Our results contradict previous studies suggesting that MuSK autoantibodies could serve as biomarkers of Myasthenia gravis severity, and they shed light on the clinical relevance of elevated but formally negative MuSK titers.

[Treatment and clinical course of autoimmune myasthenia in Burkina Faso]

Introduction

In sub-Saharan Africa, autoimmune myasthenia gravis (AMG) is still poorly known and underdiagnosed (delayed diagnosis, poor availability and accessibility of proven effective diagnostic and therapeutic tools), resulting in a poor functional prognosis and high mortality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the therapeutic and clinical course of AMG in Burkina Faso.

Patients and Methods

This was a longitudinal, multicenter study conducted from March 2015 to April 2023. It included patients with clinical signs suggestive of myasthenia associated with the presence of serum anti-acetylcholine receptor (anti-RACh) antibodies and/or anti-muscle specific kinase (anti-MuSK) antibodies, and/or with the presence of a decrease >10% on electroneuromyography, and/or with a positive therapeutic test to oral anticholinesterase drugs. Data on treatment modalities and clinical evolution were analyzed using Epi InfoTM 7.2.5.0 software. Bivariate analysis with p-value calculation (<0.05) was used to identify factors associated with adverse clinical outcome.

Results

A total of 40 patients with AMG were included, with a female predominance (60%). The median age of onset was 25 years (IQ=7). The median time to neurological consultation and diagnosis was 21 months (IQ=12) and 22 months (IQ=12), respectively. The disease affected young adults in 85% of cases and was generalized in 35 cases. Anti-RACh and anti-MuSK antibodies were present in 22 and 4 of 33 patients, respectively. Thymic hyperplasia and thymoma were found on chest CT in 22 and 6 of 38 patients, respectively. All patients received symptomatic treatment with oral anticholinesterase agents and 36 patients received background treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants (azathioprine). Four of 9 patients received a course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasma exchange (PE) for myasthenic crises. Thymectomy was performed in 16 of the 40 patients. At the end of a median outpatient follow-up of 53 months (IQ=16), of the 40 patients included in the study, 6 (15%) had died, 14 (35%) were in stable clinical remission, and 17 (43%) had partial clinical improvement.

Conclusion

AMG suffers from delayed diagnosis in Burkina Faso. Almost all patients treated for AMG receive anticholinesterase and corticosteroid therapy alone or in combination with azathioprine. Access to IVIG, PE and thymectomy remains limited. Mortality occurs in nearly one in six patients, and stable clinical remission affects only about one third of patients. To improve the prognosis, we need to make available and accessible diagnostic tools and treatments of proven efficacy, such as thymectomy, immunosuppressants, IVIG and PE.

Efficacy and safety of different dosages of rituximab for myasthenia gravis: a single-arm meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rituximab (RTX) is one of the treatment options for refractory myasthenia gravis (MG), yet the optimal dosing schedule remains undetermined. Our study aims to explore this issue and offer a valuable reference for clinical dosing.

METHODS

This is a single-arm meta-analysis. Studies in adults with myasthenia gravis published before 31 December 2023 were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and other databases. Two primary effectiveness outcomes were analyzed: (1) Proportion of patients achieving minimal manifestation status (MMS) or better, (2) Change in Quantitative MG Score (QMGs) after RTX treatment. Safety outcomes included the incidence and description of serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs). Forest plots were generated to provide an overview and detailed combined effects. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and the Egger test. Conventional dose refers to an RTX regimen similar to that used for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma: 375 mg/m2 per week for 4 weeks or 1000 mg for Weeks 1 and 3. Dosing regimens below the conventional dose in a treatment cycle are defined as low dose.

RESULTS

A total of 1037 MG patients received RTX treatment. Overall, 59.0% (95% CI: 48.2-69.8%, n = 599) of patients achieved MMS or better, with a mean decrease in QMGs of 6.81 (95% CI, -9.27 to -4.35, n = 222). The low-dose group showed a higher proportion of patients achieving MMS or better (76.6% vs 51.6%) and a more significant decrease in QMGs from baseline (-9.04 vs -3.62) compared to the conventional dose group (P < 0.01). Differences in the incidence of SAEs and AEs between the two groups were not significant (P > 0.05). Univariate meta-regression analyses showed that the dose administered was significantly associated with the proportion of MMS or better and the change in QMGs, whereas the proportion of Musk patients was not significantly associated with any of the outcomes. Stepwise logistic regression analyses showed that non-refractory MG, mild disease severity (MGFA classification), and low-dose were significant predictors for achieving an MMS or better prognosis, whereas for achieving improvement or better, only low dose was an independent predictor.

CONCLUSION

RTX can improve clinical symptoms, reduce QMGs in MG patients and the use of oral glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressants. The efficacy of low-dose RTX in treating MG patients is more effective than conventional-dose RTX and demonstrates a better safety profile. Mild disease severity, non-refractory MG, low dose, and MuSK-MG over AChR-MG predict better efficacy. Large randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX in MG patients and its various subtypes.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in anti-MuSK myasthenia Gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in patients with myasthenia gravis harboring antibodies to muscle-specific kinase (anti-MuSK). Four databases were searched from inception to December 23, 2023. We included adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who were diagnosed with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis and who received rituximab. The outcomes assessed were the proportions of patients who achieved minimal manifestations or better and those who achieved complete stable remission or pharmacologic remission, according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Postintervention Status (MGFA-PIS) scale at the last follow-up. Additional outcomes were mean glucocorticoid dose reduction and severe adverse events. Twelve studies with 111 participants were included. Overall, 82% (95% CI, 71‒91%; I2 = 30.12%, P = 0.15) of patients achieved MGFA-PIS minimal manifestations or better, and 56% (95% CI, 45‒67%; I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.60) achieved MGFA-PIS complete stable remission or pharmacologic remission. The mean reduction in the glucocorticoid dose was 17.15 mg (95% CI, 11.77‒22.53; I2 = 32.40%, P = 0.19). Only one patient developed osteomyelitis during rituximab treatment. This study demonstrated that rituximab is a safe and effective treatment for anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis, helping patients achieve minimal manifestations, complete stable remission, or pharmacologic remission with minimal serious adverse events.

Patterns and predictors of therapeutic response to efgartigimod in acetylcholine receptor-antibody generalized myasthenia gravis subtypes

Background

Efgartigimod is an approved biologic for generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), which is an autoimmune disease and can potentially be life-threatening. However, the therapeutic response to efgartigimod among the acetylcholine receptor gMG (AChR-gMG) subtypes remains inconclusive.

Objective

To explore the patterns and predictors for the therapeutic response to efgartigimod among AChR-gMG subtypes.

Design

This prospective, observational study included AChR-gMG patients treated with efgartigimod at 15 centers in China with a follow-up for at least 20 weeks.

Methods

The primary outcome was the proportion of minimal symptom expression (MSE) responders, denoted by a Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of 0 or 1 within 4 weeks and maintained for ⩾4 weeks. AChR antibody-positive MG (AChR-MG) subtypes were classified into early onset myasthenia gravis (EOMG), late-onset myasthenia gravis (LOMG), and thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis (TAMG). The predictive factors for MSE responders were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

One hundred sixteen patients were included with a median follow-up duration of 238 days (172.5-306.3). There were 50 (43.1%) patients with EOMG, 28 (24.1%) with LOMG and 38 (32.8%) with TAMG. After efgartigimod initiation, 35 (30.2%) patients were MSE responders, and the proportion of MSE responders was highest in the LOMG group (42.9%). The MG-ADL score reduction in the LOMG group was more significant than in the EOMG group by weeks 16 and 20 (both p = 0.022). Response patterns to efgartigimod among the AChR-MG subtypes differed as measured by the proportion of improved patients and MSE. LOMG presented sustained symptom control, while EOMG and TAMG showed more fluctuations. Eight TAMG patients (21.1%) switched to another biologic (p = 0.005). Baseline MG-ADL was an independent predictor for therapeutic response to efgartigimod (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings revealed patterns of treatment responses among AChR-gMG subtypes, with LOMG patients potentially presenting a more sustained response. These findings likely provide preliminary data for precision therapy in MG in the era of biologics.

Trial registration

NCT04535843.

Concurrent myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a rare intersection of autoimmune pathologies

This case report describes a woman in her 50s with a rare coexistence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myasthenia gravis (MG), highlighting the diagnostic challenges and therapeutic considerations. Initially diagnosed with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive MG, she later developed progressive visual impairment, leading to a diagnosis of NMOSD. Rituximab treatment was effective in managing both conditions, demonstrating the benefits of targeted therapies in reducing complications related to polypharmacy. This case underscores the importance of clinical vigilance and a multidisciplinary approach in managing overlapping autoimmune disorders, offering insights into their inter-relationships and therapeutic strategies.

Advances in B Cell Targeting for Treating Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase-Associated Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a typical autoimmune disease of the nervous system. It is characterized by skeletal muscle weakness and fatigue due to impaired neuromuscular junction transmission mediated by IgG autoantibodies. Muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase-associated MG (MuSK-MG), a rare and severe subtype of MG, is distinguished by the presence of anti-MuSK antibodies; it responds poorly to traditional therapies. Recent research on MuSK-MG treatment has focused on specific targeted therapies. Since B cells play a critical pathogenic role in producing autoantibodies and inflammatory mediators, they are often considered the preferred target for treating MuSK-MG. Currently, various B cell-targeted drugs have been developed to treat MuSK-MG; they have shown good therapeutic effects. This review explores the evolving landscape of B cell-targeted therapies in MuSK-MG, focusing on their mechanisms, efficacy, and safety, and the current limitations associated with their use. We discuss current B cell-targeted therapies aimed at depleting or modulating B cells via both direct and indirect approaches. Furthermore, we focus on novel and promising strategies such as Chimeric Autoantibody Receptor T cell therapy, which explicitly targets MuSK-specific B cells without compromising general humoral immunity. Finally, this review provides an outlook on the potential benefits and limitations of B cell-targeted therapy in developing new therapies for MuSK-MG. We conclude by discussing future research efforts needed to optimize these therapies, expand treatment options, and improve long-term outcomes in MuSK-MG management.

A clinical perspective on muscle specific kinase antibody positive myasthenia gravis

The discovery of autoantibodies directed against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) in "seronegative" myasthenia gravis (MG) patients marked a milestone in MG research. In healthy muscle, MuSK regulates a phosphorylation pathway, which is essential for the development and maintenance of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clusters at the neuromuscular junction. Autoantibodies directed against MuSK are predominantly of the IgG4 subclass, but there is increasing evidence that IgG1-3 could also contribute to the pathology underlying MuSK-MG. MuSK-IgG4 are monovalent and block the binding site for LRP4 on MuSK, thereby inhibiting the downstream phosphorylation pathway and compromising the formation of AChR clusters. Clinically, MuSK-MG is commonly associated with the predominant involvement of bulbar, facial, shoulder and neck muscles. Cholinesterase inhibitors should be avoided in MuSK-MG due to the risk of clinical impairment and cholinergic crisis. Corticosteroids and other non-steroidal immunosuppressants are less effective with the need for higher doses and prolonged treatment. Rituximab, by contrast, has been shown to be particularly effective and is now often used early in the disease course. Its use is associated with a significant improvement in the clinical outcome of MuSK-MG patients over time. This review aims to describe the pathophysiology underlying MuSK-MG and provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical features and therapeutic options.

Clinical and laboratory remission with rituximab in anti-MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Increasing data are available on the use and efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in patients with anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-positive myasthenia gravis (MG), especially those steroid-dependent or unresponsive to traditional immunotherapies.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment responses of adult patients with generalized anti-MuSK-positive MG treated with RTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 16 patients who were on RTX, between January 2010 and September 2023. RTX was given 1000 mg/day intravenously twice, two weeks apart. Maintenance treatment was administered at intervals of 3-6 months based on clinical evaluation. The outcome was assessed by Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI) scores. Additionally, anti-MuSK antibody levels were retested after treatment in all patients except one.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were female. The mean age at disease onset was 35.3 ± 17.3 years. The median duration between disease onset and RTX administration was 2.4 years (min-max: 0.5-36.5 years). The worst MGFA class before RTX was between IIIb-V. After RTX treatment, 81.3% of patients achieved MGFA minimal manifestations or better and MGSTI level 1 or better. Anti-MuSK antibodies became negative in 12 patients, while they remained positive in three. The changes in antibody levels seemed associated with clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

RTX is an effective treatment in anti-MuSK-positive MG. Furthermore, our results support the inhibition of antibody production by RTX and we recommend monitoring anti-MuSK antibody titers to follow disease progression and treatment response.

Efgartigimod treatment in patients with anti-MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis in exacerbation

Background

The prevalence of patients positive for muscle-specific kinase antibody (hereafter, MuSK-Ab) accounts for 5-8% of all myasthenia gravis (MG) cases. Currently, efgartigimod has shown good therapeutic effects in MUSK-Ab-positive MG patients in a phase III clinical trial. However, phase III clinical trials tend to exclude MG patients in exacerbation, and there are only few real-world studies on the efficacy of efgartigimod in MuSK-Ab-positive myasthenic crisis (MC) patients. This retrospective, real-world study aimed to explore the efficacy of efgartigimod in MuSK-Ab-positive MG with exacerbation.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical data of four MuSK-Ab-positive patients with exacerbation of MG who received efgartigimod at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, including two patients with MC. All patients were admitted between September 2023 and May 2024. Most patients are simultaneously undergoing rituximab treatment.

Results

Each patient completed one cycle of efgartigimod. After the first administration, four patients showed a clinically meaningful decrease in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score (a reduction of more than 4 points compared to baseline), and all patients showed a decrease in IgG levels after one cycle of efgartigimod. Regarding safety, none of the patients experienced any obvious adverse effects. At the final follow-up, all patients achieved the minimal symptom expression status (an MG-ADL score of 0 or 1) following the first administration of efgartigimod for 8.75 ± 5.56 weeks. This article presents a case involving a patient who exhibited prompt alleviation of symptoms following the administration of a high dose of efgartigimod (20 mg/kg, given on days 1 and 5), without the use of any other fast-acting treatment.

Conclusion

This retrospective real-world study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in these four MuSK-Ab-positive, female Asian patients with exacerbation of MG, as well as in patients experiencing MC. It is important to note that efgartigimod should not be viewed as a substitute for foundational immunotherapy; rather, it is intended as a rescue treatment during exacerbations and as an adjunctive therapy in the context of long-term immunotherapy. This non-invasive approach has the potential to become another treatment option for MuSK-Ab-positive MG patients.

Autoantibodies in neuromuscular disorders: a review of their utility in clinical practice

A great proportion of neuromuscular diseases are immune-mediated, included myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, acute- and chronic-onset autoimmune neuropathies (anti-MAG neuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndromes, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, CANDA and autoimmune nodopathies), autoimmune neuronopathies, peripheral nerve hyperexcitability syndromes and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. The detection of autoantibodies against neuromuscular structures has many diagnostic and therapeutic implications and, over time, allowed a better understanding of the physiopathology of those disorders. In this paper, we will review the main autoantibodies described in neuromuscular diseases and focus on their use in clinical practice.

Serological Markers of Clinical Improvement in MuSK Myasthenia Gravis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In this retrospective longitudinal study, we aimed at exploring the role of (a) MuSK-immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, (b) predominant MuSK-IgG subclasses, and (c) antibody affinity as candidate biomarkers of severity and outcomes in MuSK-MG, using and comparing different antibody testing techniques.

METHODS

Total MuSK-IgGs were quantified with radioimmunoassay (RIA), ELISA, flow cytometry, and cell-based assay (CBA) serial dilutions using HEK293 cells transfected with MuSK-eGFP. MuSK-IgG subclasses were measured by flow cytometry. SAffCon assay was used for determining MuSK-IgG affinity.

RESULTS

Forty-three serum samples were obtained at different time points from 20 patients with MuSK-MG (median age at onset: 48 years, interquartile range = 27.5-72.5; women, 16/20), with 9 of 20 (45%) treated with rituximab. A strong correlation between MuSK-IgG levels measured by flow cytometry and RIA titers was found (rs = 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-0.89, p = 0.0003), as well as a moderate correlation between CBA end-point titers and RIA titers (rs = 0.47, 95% CI 0.01-0.77, p = 0.0414). A significant correlation was found between MuSK-IgG flow cytometry levels and disease severity (rs = 0.39, 95% CI 0.06-0.64, p = 0.0175; mixed-effects model estimate: 2.296e-06, std. error: 1.024e-06, t = 2.243, p = 0.032). In individual patients, clinical improvement was associated with decrease in MuSK-IgG levels, as measured by either flow cytometry or CBA end-point titration. In all samples, MuSK-IgG4 was the most frequent isotype (mean ± SD: 90.95% ± 13.89). A significant reduction of MuSK-IgG4 and, to a lesser extent, of MuSK-IgG2, was seen in patients with favorable clinical outcomes. A similar trend was confirmed in the subgroup of rituximab-treated patients. In a single patient, MuSK-IgG affinity increased during symptom exacerbation (KD values: 62 nM vs 0.6 nM) while total MuSK-IgG and IgG4 levels remained stable, suggesting that affinity maturation may be a driver of clinical worsening.

DISCUSSION

Our data support the quantification of MuSK antibodies by flow cytometry. Through a multimodal investigational approach, we showed that total MuSK-IgG levels, MuSK-IgG4 and MuSK-IgG2 levels, and MuSK-IgG affinity may represent promising biomarkers of disease outcomes in MuSK-MG.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody that has been increasingly used in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG). In most studies, the therapeutic protocol of RTX has been similar to that adopted for B cell lymphoma, with an increasing number of studies aimed at exploring the efficacy of low-dose RTX in MG. However, the beneficial effects of low-dose RTX in MG remain a subject of critical debate.

Methods

This study was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Two reviewers (Xishuai Yang and Bingxia Li) independently conducted searches across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). A meta-analysis, utilizing representative forest plots, was performed to assess "Improved clinical status" and changes in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score before and after treatment.

Results

A total of 17 studies involving 292 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A noticeable improvement in clinical status was observed in 91% of patients at the final follow-up after therapy (95% CI: 84-96%, P < 0.001). The QMG score showed a significant reduction following the treatment, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -1.69 (95% CI: -2.21 to -1.16, Z = 6.29, P < 0.001). In the acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (AChR-MG) group, 90% of patients achieved improved clinical status (95% CI: 80-97%, P < 0.001) and the QMG score significantly decreased after low-dose RTX treatment, with an SMD of -1.51 (95% CI: -0.80 to -2.21, Z = 4.50, P < 0.001). In the muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG) group, 97% of patients achieved improved clinical status (95% CI: 89-100%, P < 0.001). The QMG score also significantly decreased following low-dose RTX treatment, with an SMD of -2.31 (95% CI: -2.99 to -1.62, Z = 6.60, P < 0.001). Adverse effects were reported in 29 out of 207 patients (14%, including infusion reactions in 22 patients (10.1%), infections in three patients (1.45%), cytopenia in two patients (0.96%), eosinophilia in one patient (0.48%), and hemiplegia in one patient (0.48%). Additionally, one patient (0.48%) succumbed to complications from invasive thymoma.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis shows that low-dose RTX is both effective and safe for treating MG.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42024509951.

Rituximab alone is as effective as associated with steroids on naive patients with generalized myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab (RTX) has been proven effective in managing refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), and its use is increasing worldwide. MG stabilization may initially require oral corticosteroid (CS) therapy, but its long-term side effects require the shortest duration of treatment. We studied the clinical effectiveness and usefulness of corticosteroids associated with RTX compared to RTX alone on MG remission.

METHODS

In a monocentric retrospective cohort in the Nice University Hospital, we compared naïve MG patients treated with RTX as first-line therapy alone (G1) or associated with CS (G2). After the RTX induction, we evaluated efficacy with the Osserman score (OS) and the requirement for any rescue therapy (IVIg or plasmapheresis).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were treated with RTX, of which 19 (27.94%) benefited from an association with at least 0.5 mg/kg of corticosteroids. RTX-CS patients were more severe than RTX alone (OS for G1: 74.1 and G2: 64.94, p = 0.044). However, OS at 3 (83.44 and 83.12, p = 0.993), 6 (88.69 and 86.36, p = 0.545), 9 (82.91 and 85.73, p = 0.563), and 12 months (86.6 and 88.69, p = 0.761) from the treatment induction were similar. Rescue therapy following RTX induction was significantly higher for the RTX-CS (20.41% and 47.37%, p = 0.037). Regarding safety, adverse event rates were similar in the two groups (0% and 14.29%, p = 0.178).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that RTX alone is as effective as RTX-CS in MG patients, indicating that avoiding steroids could reduce side effects, decrease rescue therapies, and not affect MG outcomes.

Targeting autoimmune mechanisms by precision medicine in Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a chronic disabling autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies to the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), characterized clinically by fluctuating weakness and early fatigability of ocular, skeletal and bulbar muscles. Despite being commonly considered a prototypic autoimmune disorder, MG is a complex and heterogeneous condition, presenting with variable clinical phenotypes, likely due to distinct pathophysiological settings related with different immunoreactivities, symptoms' distribution, disease severity, age at onset, thymic histopathology and response to therapies. Current treatment of MG based on international consensus guidelines allows to effectively control symptoms, but most patients do not reach complete stable remission and require life-long immunosuppressive (IS) therapies. Moreover, a proportion of them is refractory to conventional IS treatment, highlighting the need for more specific and tailored strategies. Precision medicine is a new frontier of medicine that promises to greatly increase therapeutic success in several diseases, including autoimmune conditions. In MG, B cell activation, antibody recycling and NMJ damage by the complement system are crucial mechanisms, and their targeting by innovative biological drugs has been proven to be effective and safe in clinical trials. The switch from conventional IS to novel precision medicine approaches based on these drugs could prospectively and significantly improve MG care. In this review, we provide an overview of key immunopathogenetic processes underlying MG, and discuss on emerging biological drugs targeting them. We also discuss on future direction of research to address the need for patients' stratification in endotypes according with genetic and molecular biomarkers for successful clinical decision making within precision medicine workflow.

A Case Report of MuSK Antibody-Positive Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is characterized by muscle weakness and fatigability. The presence of autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptors (AChR) at the neuromuscular junction, which impairs neuromuscular transmission, is the hallmark of the disease. However, a minority of patients have antibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK), which is referred to as MuSK myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG). We present the case of a 56-year-old female patient presenting with progressive dysphagia, slurred speech, and fatigable ptosis. She had a positive icepack test and a positive repetitive nerve stimulation test (RNST). Her AchR antibodies were negative, and the MuSK antibodies were positive. Her clinical response to pyridostigmine was unsatisfactory, but she had a good recovery with rituximab. Even though MuSK-MG is rare, it is an important diagnostic consideration, particularly in patients presenting with atypical symptoms or lacking AChR antibodies and in patients who have a poor response to conventional treatment. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and newer biologic agents targeting B cells are some of the treatments.

Refocusing generalized myasthenia gravis: Patient burden, disease profiles, and the role of evolving therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) continues to present significant challenges for clinical management due to an unpredictable disease course, frequent disease fluctuations, and varying response to therapy. The recent availability of new pharmacologic therapies presents a valuable opportunity to reevaluate how this disease is classified, assessed, and managed and identify new ways to improve the clinical care of patients with gMG.

METHODS

Narrative review was made of publications identified via searches of PubMed and selected congresses (January 2000-September 2022).

RESULTS

New consensus definitions are required to ensure consistency, to better characterize patients, and to identify patients who will benefit from specific drugs and earlier use of these agents. There is a need for more frequent, standardized patient assessment to identify the cause of motor function deficits, provide a clearer picture of the disease burden and its impact on daily living and quality of life (QoL), and better support treatment decision-making. Novel approaches that target different components of the immune system will play a role in more precise treatment of patients with gMG, alongside the development of new algorithms to guide individualized patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

gMG has a physical, mental, and social impact, resulting in a considerable burden of disease and substantially decreased QoL, despite standard treatments. The availability of novel, targeted treatments that influence key pathological mediators of gMG, together with new biomarkers, offers the potential to optimize patient management and ultimately enables a greater number of patients to achieve minimal manifestation status and a reduced burden of disease.

A retrospective multicenter study on clinical and serological parameters in patients with MuSK myasthenia gravis with and without general immunosuppression

Introduction

Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK)- myasthenia gravis (MG) is caused by pathogenic autoantibodies against MuSK that correlate with disease severity and are predominantly of the IgG4 subclass. The first-line treatment for MuSK-MG is general immunosuppression with corticosteroids, but the effect of treatment on IgG4 and MuSK IgG4 levels has not been studied.

Methods

We analyzed the clinical data and sera from 52 MuSK-MG patients (45 female, 7 male, median age 49 (range 17-79) years) from Italy, the Netherlands, Greece and Belgium, and 43 AChR-MG patients (22 female, 21 male, median age 63 (range 2-82) years) from Italy, receiving different types of immunosuppression, and sera from 46 age- and sex-matched non-disease controls (with no diagnosed diseases, 38 female, 8 male, median age 51.5 (range 20-68) years) from the Netherlands. We analyzed the disease severity (assessed by MGFA or QMG score), and measured concentrations of MuSK IgG4, MuSK IgG, total IgG4 and total IgG in the sera by ELISA, RIA and nephelometry.

Results

We observed that MuSK-MG patients showed a robust clinical improvement and reduction of MuSK IgG after therapy, and that MuSK IgG4 concentrations, but not total IgG4 concentrations, correlated with clinical severity. MuSK IgG and MuSK IgG4 concentrations were reduced after immunosuppression in 4/5 individuals with before-after data, but data from non-linked patient samples showed no difference. Total serum IgG4 levels were within the normal range, with IgG4 levels above threshold (1.35g/L) in 1/52 MuSK-MG, 2/43 AChR-MG patients and 1/45 non-disease controls. MuSK-MG patients improved within the first four years after disease onset, but no further clinical improvement or reduction of MuSK IgG4 were observed four years later, and only 14/52 (26.92%) patients in total, of which 13 (93.3%) received general immunosuppression, reached clinical remission.

Discussion

We conclude that MuSK-MG patients improve clinically with general immunosuppression but may require further treatment to reach remission. Longitudinal testing of individual patients may be clinically more useful than single measurements of MuSK IgG4. No significant differences in the serum IgG4 concentrations and IgG4/IgG ratio between AChR- and MuSK-MG patients were found during follow-up. Further studies with larger patient and control cohorts are necessary to validate the findings.

Exploring the depths of IgG4: insights into autoimmunity and novel treatments

IgG4 subclass antibodies represent the rarest subclass of IgG antibodies, comprising only 3-5% of antibodies circulating in the bloodstream. These antibodies possess unique structural features, notably their ability to undergo a process known as fragment-antigen binding (Fab)-arm exchange, wherein they exchange half-molecules with other IgG4 antibodies. Functionally, IgG4 antibodies primarily block and exert immunomodulatory effects, particularly in the context of IgE isotype-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. In the context of disease, IgG4 antibodies are prominently observed in various autoimmune diseases combined under the term IgG4 autoimmune diseases (IgG4-AID). These diseases include myasthenia gravis (MG) with autoantibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK), nodo-paranodopathies with autoantibodies against paranodal and nodal proteins, pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus with antibodies against desmoglein and encephalitis with antibodies against LGI1/CASPR2. Additionally, IgG4 antibodies are a prominent feature in the rare entity of IgG4 related disease (IgG4-RD). Intriguingly, both IgG4-AID and IgG4-RD demonstrate a remarkable responsiveness to anti-CD20-mediated B cell depletion therapy (BCDT), suggesting shared underlying immunopathologies. This review aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of B cells, antibody subclasses, and their general properties before examining the distinctive characteristics of IgG4 subclass antibodies in the context of health, IgG4-AID and IgG4-RD. Furthermore, we will examine potential therapeutic strategies for these conditions, with a special focus on leveraging insights gained from anti-CD20-mediated BCDT. Through this analysis, we aim to enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of IgG4-mediated diseases and identify promising possibilities for targeted therapeutic intervention.

Promising efficacy of Low-Dose rituximab in Muscle specific kinase antibody positive Myasthenia Gravis

AIMS

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of low dose rituximab (RTX) in patients with muscle-specific kinase antibody positive myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG).

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective study. A total of 10 patients with MuSK-MG were admitted to the Department of Neurology, First Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, between April 2021 to April 2023. Of them, 9 patients had been treated with low dose RTX (500 mg every 6 month) and recruited in this study. The clinical information, including the severity before and after RTX treatment, were collected from the medical records. Clinical effectiveness was assessed by Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA)-postintervention status (PIS), MG-related activities of daily living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores, Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item revised (MG-QOL15r), dosage of steroid at the end of follow up.

RESULTS

All nine patients showed clinical improvement at the final follow-up after low-dose RTX treatment. The mean dose of prednisolone decreased significantly from 50 mg at baseline to 18.33 mg at the last follow-up (z = -3.417, p = 0.001). The administration of low-dose RTX treatment led to significant improvements in ADL levels (Z = -2.675, P < 0.01), QMG score levels (Z = -2.371, P < 0.05) and QOL-15r levels (Z = -2.547, P < 0.01) at last visit.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose RTX is effective for treating MuSK-MG patients. Longer-term follow-up and larger-scale studies are needed to provide further evidence.

Guideline for the management of myasthenic syndromes

Myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) represent an etiologically heterogeneous group of (very) rare chronic diseases. MG and LEMS have an autoimmune-mediated etiology, while CMS are genetic disorders. A (strain dependent) muscle weakness due to neuromuscular transmission disorder is a common feature. Generalized MG requires increasingly differentiated therapeutic strategies that consider the enormous therapeutic developments of recent years. To include the newest therapy recommendations, a comprehensive update of the available German-language guideline 'Diagnostics and therapy of myasthenic syndromes' has been published by the German Neurological society with the aid of an interdisciplinary expert panel. This paper is an adapted translation of the updated and partly newly developed treatment guideline. It defines the rapid achievement of complete disease control in myasthenic patients as a central treatment goal. The use of standard therapies, as well as modern immunotherapeutics, is subject to a staged regimen that takes into account autoantibody status and disease activity. With the advent of modern, fast-acting immunomodulators, disease activity assessment has become pivotal and requires evaluation of the clinical course, including severity and required therapies. Applying MG-specific scores and classifications such as Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis, and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America allows differentiation between mild/moderate and (highly) active (including refractory) disease. Therapy decisions must consider age, thymic pathology, antibody status, and disease activity. Glucocorticosteroids and the classical immunosuppressants (primarily azathioprine) are the basic immunotherapeutics to treat mild/moderate to (highly) active generalized MG/young MG and ocular MG. Thymectomy is indicated as a treatment for thymoma-associated MG and generalized MG with acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab)-positive status. In (highly) active generalized MG, complement inhibitors (currently eculizumab and ravulizumab) or neonatal Fc receptor modulators (currently efgartigimod) are recommended for AChR-Ab-positive status and rituximab for muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-Ab-positive status. Specific treatment for myasthenic crises requires plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, or IVIG. Specific aspects of ocular, juvenile, and congenital myasthenia are highlighted. The guideline will be further developed based on new study results for other immunomodulators and biomarkers that aid the accurate measurement of disease activity.

Unveiling the autoreactome: Proteome-wide immunological fingerprints reveal the promise of plasma cell depleting therapy

The prevalence and burden of autoimmune and autoantibody mediated disease is increasing worldwide, yet most disease etiologies remain unclear. Despite numerous new targeted immunomodulatory therapies, comprehensive approaches to apply and evaluate the effects of these treatments longitudinally are lacking. Here, we leverage advances in programmable-phage immunoprecipitation (PhIP-Seq) methodology to explore the modulation, or lack thereof, of proteome-wide autoantibody profiles in both health and disease. We demonstrate that each individual, regardless of disease state, possesses a distinct set of autoreactivities constituting a unique immunological fingerprint, or "autoreactome", that is remarkably stable over years. In addition to uncovering important new biology, the autoreactome can be used to better evaluate the relative effectiveness of various therapies in altering autoantibody repertoires. We find that therapies targeting B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) profoundly alter an individual's autoreactome, while anti-CD19 and CD-20 therapies have minimal effects, strongly suggesting a rationale for BCMA or other plasma cell targeted therapies in autoantibody mediated diseases.

Clinical relevance of distinguishing autoimmune nodopathies from CIDP: longitudinal assessment in a large cohort

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine treatment response and whether it is associated with antibody titre change in patients with autoimmune nodopathy (AN) previously diagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and to compare clinical features and treatment response between AN and CIDP.

METHODS

Serum IgG antibodies to neurofascin-155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) were detected with cell-based assays in patients diagnosed with CIDP. Clinical improvement was determined using the modified Rankin scale, need for alternative and/or additional treatments and assessment of the treating neurologist.

RESULTS

We studied 401 patients diagnosed with CIDP and identified 21 patients with AN (10 anti-NF155, 6 anti-CNTN1, 4 anti-CASPR1 and 1 anti-NF155/anti-CASPR1 double positive). In patients with AN ataxia (68% vs 28%, p=0.001), cranial nerve involvement (34% vs 11%, p=0.012) and autonomic symptoms (47% vs 22%, p=0.025) were more frequently reported; patients with AN improved less often after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (39% vs 80%, p=0.002) and required additional/alternative treatments more frequently (84% vs 34%, p<0.001), compared with patients with CIDP. Antibody titres decreased or became negative in patients improving on treatment. Treatment withdrawal was associated with a titre increase and clinical deterioration in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinguishing CIDP from AN is important, as patients with AN need a different treatment approach. Improvement and relapses were associated with changes in antibody titres, supporting the pathogenicity of these antibodies.

Therapeutic effect of ofatumumab in patients with myasthenia gravis: immunoregulation of follicular T helper cells and T helper type 17 cells

Introduction

This study aimed to study the therapeutic effects of ofatumumab in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) in addition to the immunomodulatory effects on peripheral follicular T helper (Tfh) cells and T helper type 17 (Th17) cells.

Methods

Thirty-one patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive MG were included in this study. At weeks 0, 1, 2, and 4, an initial dose of 20 mg of ofatumumab was injected subcutaneously, with a 2-month follow-up after completing this first cycle. At baseline, 1 month, and 3 months, we assessed the Quantitative MG (QMG), 15-item MG-Quality of Life (MG-QOL15), and MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scales and measured the frequencies of Tfh, Th17, and B cells and the levels of anti-AChR antibody, IL-6, IL-21, and IL-17 in the peripheral blood.

Results

At 1 month and 3 months, the QMG, MG-QOL15, and MG-ADL scores were all significantly reduced. At 3 months, doses of prednisone were reduced by an average of 37%. Decreased frequencies of Tfh and Th17 cells, depletion of B cells, and reduced levels of IL-6, IL-21, and IL-17 were all observed at 1 month or 3 months.

Discussion

Therefore, the therapeutic effect of ofatumumab could be detected after one cycle of treatment, which was maintained for 2 months. The immunomodulatory effect of ofatumumab during the observation period may involve depletion of B cells, reduction of Tfh and Th17 cells frequencies, and reduced levels of IL-6, IL-21, and IL-17. The findings provide novel data for the potential application of ofatumumab in MG.

Autoantibody subclass predominance is not driven by aberrant class switching or impaired B cell development

A subset of autoimmune diseases is characterized by predominant pathogenic IgG4 autoantibodies (IgG4-AID). Why IgG4 predominates in these disorders is unknown. We hypothesized that dysregulated B cell maturation or aberrant class switching causes overrepresentation of IgG4+ B cells and plasma cells. Therefore, we compared the B cell compartment of patients from four different IgG4-AID with two IgG1-3-AID and healthy donors, using flow cytometry. Relative subset abundance at all maturation stages was normal, except for a, possibly treatment-related, reduction in immature and naïve CD5+ cells. IgG4+ B cell and plasma cell numbers were normal in IgG4-AID patients, however they had a (sub)class-independent 8-fold increase in circulating CD20-CD138+ cells. No autoreactivity was found in this subset. These results argue against aberrant B cell development and rather suggest the autoantibody subclass predominance to be antigen-driven. The similarities between IgG4-AID suggest that, despite displaying variable clinical phenotypes, they share a similar underlying immune profile.

Efficacy of innovative therapies in myasthenia gravis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Therapy for myasthenia gravis (MG) is undergoing a profound change, with new treatments being tested. These include complement inhibitors and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blockers. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized and placebo-controlled trials of innovative therapies in MG with available efficacy data.

METHODS

We assessed statistical heterogeneity across trials based on the Cochrane Q test and I2 values, and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Treatment efficacy was assessed after 26 weeks of eculizumab and ravulizumab, 28 days of efgartigimod, 43 days of rozanolixizumab, 12 weeks of zilucoplan, and 16, 24 or 52 weeks of rituximab treatment.

RESULTS

We observed an overall mean Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) score change of -2.17 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.67, -1.67; p < 0.001) as compared to placebo. No significant difference emerged between complement inhibitors and anti-FcRn treatment (p = 0.16). The change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scale (QMG) score was -3.46 (95% CI -4.53, -2.39; p < 0.001), with a higher reduction with FcRns (-4.78 vs. -2.60; p < 0.001). Rituximab did not significantly improve the MG-ADL (-0.92 [95% CI -2.24, 0.39]; p = 0.17) or QMG scores (-1.9 [95% CI -3.97, 0.18]; p = 0.07). In the network meta-analysis, efgartigimod had the highest probability of being the best treatment, followed by rozanolixizumab.

CONCLUSION

Anti-complement and FcRn treatments both proved to be effective in MG patients, whereas rituximab did not show a significant benefit for patients. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, including efficacy time points, FcRn treatments showed a greater effect on QMG score in the short term. Real-life studies with long-term measurements are needed to confirm our results.

Rituximab treatment in myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease mediated by antibodies against post-synaptic proteins of the neuromuscular junction. Up to 10%-30% of patients are refractory to conventional treatments. For these patients, rituximab has been used off-label in the recent decades. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 protein that leads to B cell depletion and to the synthesis of new antibody-secreting plasma cells. Although rituximab was created to treat B-cell lymphoma, its use has widely increased to treat autoimmune diseases. In MG, the benefit of rituximab treatment in MuSK-positive patients seems clear, but a high variability in the results of observational studies and even clinical trials has been reported for AChR-positive patients. Moreover, few evidence has been reported in seronegative MG and juvenile MG and some questions about regimen of administration or monitoring strategies, remains open. In this review, we intend to revise the available literature on this topic and resume the current evidence of effectiveness of Rituximab in MG, with special attention to results on every MG subtype, as well as the administration protocols, monitoring strategies and safety profile of the drug.

Immunotherapies in MuSK-positive Myasthenia Gravis; an IgG4 antibody-mediated disease

Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) Myasthenia Gravis (MG) represents a prototypical antibody-mediated disease characterized by predominantly focal muscle weakness (neck, facial, and bulbar muscles) and fatigability. The pathogenic antibodies mostly belong to the immunoglobulin subclass (Ig)G4, a feature which attributes them their specific properties and pathogenic profile. On the other hand, acetylcholine receptor (AChR) MG, the most prevalent form of MG, is characterized by immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 and IgG3 antibodies to the AChR. IgG4 class autoantibodies are impotent to fix complement and only weakly bind Fc-receptors expressed on immune cells and exert their pathogenicity via interfering with the interaction between their targets and binding partners (e.g. between MuSK and LRP4). Cardinal differences between AChR and MuSK-MG are the thymus involvement (not prominent in MuSK-MG), the distinct HLA alleles, and core immunopathological patterns of pathology in neuromuscular junction, structure, and function. In MuSK-MG, classical treatment options are usually less effective (e.g. IVIG) with the need for prolonged and high doses of steroids difficult to be tapered to control symptoms. Exceptional clinical response to plasmapheresis and rituximab has been particularly observed in these patients. Reduction of antibody titers follows the clinical efficacy of anti-CD20 therapies, a feature implying the role of short-lived plasma cells (SLPB) in autoantibody production. Novel therapeutic monoclonal against B cells at different stages of their maturation (like plasmablasts), or against molecules involved in B cell activation, represent promising therapeutic targets. A revolution in autoantibody-mediated diseases is pharmacological interference with the neonatal Fc receptor, leading to a rapid reduction of circulating IgGs (including autoantibodies), an approach already suitable for AChR-MG and promising for MuSK-MG. New precision medicine approaches involve Chimeric autoantibody receptor T (CAAR-T) cells that are engineered to target antigen-specific B cells in MuSK-MG and represent a milestone in the development of targeted immunotherapies. This review aims to provide a detailed update on the pathomechanisms involved in MuSK-MG (cellular and humoral aberrations), fostering the understanding of the latest indications regarding the efficacy of different treatment strategies.

The Clinical Outcome in AChR-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease affecting the neuromuscular junction, and in over 80% of cases, antibodies are identified against the nicotinic type of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) on the muscle endplate. Despite the availability of various treatment options, patients with MG experience relapses and remission during the course of the disease. Aims and Objective: To understand the clinical profile, predictors of outcomes in acetyl choline receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized MG.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study of 108 patients with AChR positive generalized MG. We collected data on clinical and demographical profiles, treatments received, and treatment responses from those who fulfilled inclusion criteria over a mean follow up period of 33.75 ±7.30 months. Clinical outcomes were studied in terms of the type of remission and crisis or disease exacerbations patients had, considering different variables and treatment received.

Results

We found the commonest initial symptoms were ocular or oculo-bulbar, which progressed to generalized MG in the first year of disease onset. 36 (33.3%) patients experienced a crisis requiring mechanical ventilation within a mean period of 9.4 ±4.77 months from the disease onset. Multivariate regression analysis showed late-onset MG (age of onset between 50-70 years) and treatment with rituximab were better correlated with remission, (odd ratio of 4.7; 95 % CI ,1.12 -12.6; P value < 0.05 and odd ratio of 4.56; 95 % CI ,1.2 -10.04; P value < 0.05) respectively. While treatment with Mycofenolate Mofetile (MMF) was associated with a higher number of relapses (odd ratio of 1.8; 95 % CI ,0.08 -0.96; P value < 0.05). Treatment with Rituximab showed a higher rate of remission as compared to treatment refractory (TR) on conventional immunosuppressant therapy (IST). Out of 35(32 %) thymoma patients, 21 patients underwent thymectomy and these patients showed significantly greater rate of remission as compared both thymoma patients who denied thymectomy as a treatment option (N = 10 ;55.60 % vs N = 4; 23.50%).

Conclusion

In this study of AChR antibody positive generalized MG patients, we found that nearly one-third of them experienced myasthenic crisis despite receiving the best medical care. Rituximab appeared to be effective in the treatment of refractory MG and those who failed thymectomy. Thymectomy was associated with better outcomes in patients, both with or without a thymoma.

Comparative the efficacy and acceptability of immunosuppressive agents for myasthenia gravis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive drugs are routinely used to treat myasthenia gravis (MG). However, current recommendations provide limited evidence to support treatment options, leading to considerable variation in practice among healthcare specialists. Hence, we present a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to update the evidence by comparing the efficacy and acceptability of oral immunosuppressive drugs for the treatment of MG.

METHODS

We will conduct a systematic review and NMA of all randomized controlled trials evaluating the following oral immunosuppressive drugs for the treatment of MG. Published studies will be searched using the following databases from inception to November 23, 2021: CENTRAL, the CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and 3 Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Literatures Database, CNKI, and Wan Fang database). Assessment of study eligibility and data extraction will be conducted independently by 2 reviewers. The main outcome will be a quantitative MG scoring system. We will conduct Bayesian NMA to synthesize all evidence for each outcome and obtain a comprehensive ranking of all treatments. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.

RESULTS

The objective of this study was to assess the relative clinical efficacy and acceptability of first-line immunosuppressants for the treatment of MG, using a systematic review and NMA approach.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of head-to-head trials comparing therapies, evidence from this NMA of available clinical trials will inform clinicians, patients, and families the risk-benefit profiles of different treatment options.

A single low-dose rituximab infusion in severe chronic refractory myasthenia gravis in resource-limited settings

The benefits of multi-dose rituximab cycles in patients with refractory anti-muscle-specific kinase antibody myasthenia gravis (MuSK+MG) are well reported, although less consistently in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody MG (AChR+MG). Responsivity data to single low-dose rituximab infusions for refractory autoimmune myasthenia, are limited. Here, observational outcomes using MG grading scores and prednisone doses, before and after at least six months of a single-dose infusion of rituximab, were audited in previously treatment-refractory MG patients in a resource-limited setting. Seventeen moderately-severe to severely symptomatic MG patients received single low-dose rituximab infusions (median 500-600 mg) after a median MG duration of 6 years; 13 individuals responded including 5/5 MuSK+MG, 7/10 AChR+MG and 1/2 double seronegative MG. Three (60%) MuSK+MG and three (30%) AChR+MG achieved persistent asymptomatic status. Although more MuSK+MG vs AChR+MG cases stopped prednisone (80% vs 20%, respectively), the prednisone doses in the AChR+MG group was significantly reduced ≥30% (p = 0.008) due to improved MG composite scores (p = 0.016) and with durable benefit (median 12 months). There were no differences between responders and non-responders in MG duration and age at infusion. These results suggest that a single low-dose rituximab infusion is worth trying in refractory MG, including AChR+MG patients, as some patients showed good and durable responses. These results are particularly relevant to resource-limited settings.

Reemergence of pathogenic, autoantibody-producing B cell clones in myasthenia gravis following B cell depletion therapy

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoantibody-mediated autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction. A small subset of patients (<10%) with MG, have autoantibodies targeting muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK). MuSK MG patients respond well to CD20-mediated B cell depletion therapy (BCDT); most achieve complete stable remission. However, relapse often occurs. To further understand the immunomechanisms underlying relapse, we studied autoantibody-producing B cells over the course of BCDT. We developed a fluorescently labeled antigen to enrich for MuSK-specific B cells, which was validated with a novel Nalm6 cell line engineered to express a human MuSK-specific B cell receptor. B cells (≅ 2.6 million) from 12 different samples collected from nine MuSK MG patients were screened for MuSK specificity. We successfully isolated two MuSK-specific IgG4 subclass-expressing plasmablasts from two of these patients, who were experiencing a relapse after a BCDT-induced remission. Human recombinant MuSK mAbs were then generated to validate binding specificity and characterize their molecular properties. Both mAbs were strong MuSK binders, they recognized the Ig1-like domain of MuSK, and showed pathogenic capacity when tested in an acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clustering assay. The presence of persistent clonal relatives of these MuSK-specific B cell clones was investigated through B cell receptor repertoire tracing of 63,977 unique clones derived from longitudinal samples collected from these two patients. Clonal variants were detected at multiple timepoints spanning more than five years and reemerged after BCDT-mediated remission, predating disease relapse by several months. These findings demonstrate that a reservoir of rare pathogenic MuSK autoantibody-expressing B cell clones survive BCDT and reemerge into circulation prior to manifestation of clinical relapse. Overall, this study provides both a mechanistic understanding of MuSK MG relapse and a valuable candidate biomarker for relapse prediction.

Novel pathophysiological insights in autoimmune myasthenia gravis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent insights into the immunopathogenesis of autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG). Mechanistic understanding is presented according to MG disease subtypes and by leveraging the knowledge gained through the use of immunomodulating biological therapeutics.

RECENT FINDINGS

The past two years of research on MG have led to a more accurate definition of the mechanisms through which muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies induce pathology. Novel insights have also emerged from the collection of stronger evidence on the pathogenic capacity of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 autoantibodies. Clinical observations have revealed a new MG phenotype triggered by cancer immunotherapy, but the underlying immunobiology remains undetermined. From a therapeutic perspective, MG patients can now benefit from a wider spectrum of treatment options. Such therapies have uncovered profound differences in clinical responses between and within the acetylcholine receptor and MuSK MG subtypes. Diverse mechanisms of immunopathology between the two subtypes, as well as qualitative nuances in the autoantibody repertoire of each patient, likely underpin the variability in therapeutic outcomes. Although predictive biomarkers of clinical response are lacking, these observations have ignited the development of assays that might assist clinicians in the choice of specific therapeutic strategies.

SUMMARY

Recent advances in the understanding of autoantibody functionalities are bringing neuroimmunologists closer to a more detailed appreciation of the mechanisms that govern MG pathology. Future investigations on the immunological heterogeneity among MG patients will be key to developing effective, individually tailored therapies.

Knowledge mapping of targeted immunotherapy for myasthenia gravis from 1998 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis

Background

The treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) has advanced from steroids and traditional immunosuppressants to targeted immunotherapy. Targeted immunotherapy has been successfully employed in clinical practice in recent years. This study aimed to explore the emerging trend of targeted immunotherapy in MG and summarize the knowledge structure through bibliometric methods.

Methods

The Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC) was chosen to retrieve the literature on targeted immunotherapy for MG. Two bibliometric analysis software, VOSviewer and CiteSpace, and bibliometric online platform were mainly used to evaluate the contributions from countries/regions, institutions, journals, and authors through the construction and visualization of bibliometric networks. By systematically reviewing a knowledge domain, future research developments were determined. The R version 4.1.2 and Microsoft Excel 365 were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 562 original articles and 262 reviews relevant to MG targeted immunotherapy were included. The number of publications on targeted immunotherapy for MG exhibited a two-phase advancement. The first stage showed a steady growth trend from 1998 to 2016, with an annual number of no more than 35 publications. The second stage revealed an explosive growth trend from 2017, reaching a peak number of publications in 2020. The United States ranked first in the number of publications, citations, and h-index. The author with the highest citation and h-index was Vincent A. And 28.03% of the articles were published in the top 10 journals. In addition to “myasthenia gravis”, the keyword with the highest consideration was “rituximab”, followed by “double-blind”, which indicate research hotspots gradually from basic research to clinical research over time, especially in the field of targeted immunotherapy. The MG treatment has entered a personalized precision treatment phase. Exploration into new target molecules and conducting high-quality randomized controlled trials on existing biological agents are the further research direction.

Conclusion

The current study summarized the global research trends concerning targeted immunotherapy for MG. Research interests gradually advanced from basic research to clinical research. MG treatment has entered a personalized precision treatment phase. Further investigations into new target molecules and high-quality randomized controlled trials on existing biological agents are required urgently to direct future immunotherapy research.

Long-Term Remission With Low-Dose Rituximab in Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Study

OBJETIVE

Rituximab (RTX) is a therapeutic option, for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) not responding to conventional immunosuppressive treatment. In this cohort, we evaluated long-term efficacy of RTX in the treatment of refractory generalized MG.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in adult patients with refractory generalized MG and at least 24 months of follow-up, between January/2015 and October/2021. The Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity Score was used to assess outcomes, and CD19/CD20+ B-cell counts were monitored.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with MG (8 antiacetylcholine receptor+ and 8 muscle-specific antikinase+; mean age 45.5 ± 16.2 years) treated with low-dose RTX protocols were included. CD19/CD20 levels remained undetectable 12 months after induction, and no new relapses were observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose RTX infusions were sufficient to achieve undetectable CD19/20 cell counts and sustained clinical remission. In low and middle-income countries, the impact of low-dose RTX therapy represents a paradigm shift in decision-making for long-term treatment.

Long-term-video monitoring EEG and 18F-FDG-PET are useful tools to detect residual disease activity in anti-LGI1-Abs encephalitis: A case report

Background

The use of CD20-depleting monoclonal antibodies has shown to improve the long-term outcome of patients with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 antibodies (anti-LGI1-Abs) encephalitis after first-line immunotherapy, but currently predictive markers of treatment response and disease activity are lacking.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old man presented cognitive impairment and faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS), with mild abnormalities at electroencephalography (EEG), normal brain magnetic resonance and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Anti-LGI1-Abs were detected in serum and CSF, and corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins were administered. Despite partial cognitive improvement, 18F-fluoridesoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) showed the persistence of temporo-mesial hypermetabolism, and FBDS were still detected by long-term monitoring video EEG (LTMV EEG). Rituximab was therefore administered with FBDS disappearance, further cognitive improvement, and resolution of 18F-FDG-PET temporo-mesial hypermetabolism.

Conclusions

Our experience supports the use of 18F-FDG-PET and LTMVEEG as useful tools to measure disease activity, evaluate treatment response and guide therapeutic decisions in the long-term management of anti-LGI1-antibody encephalitis.

Effect of low-dose rituximab treatment on autoimmune nodopathy with anti-contactin 1 antibody

Background

Autoimmune nodopathy with anti-contactin-1 (CNTN1) responds well to rituximab instead of traditional therapies. Although a low-dose rituximab regimen was administered to patients with other autoimmune diseases, such as myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, and satisfactory outcomes were obtained, this low-dose rituximab regimen has not been trialed in anti-CNTN1-positive patients.

Methods

Anti–CNTN1 nodopathy patients were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, self-controlled pilot study. A cell-based assay was used to detect anti-CNTN1 antibodies and their subclasses in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid. Clinical features were evaluated at baseline, 2 days, 14 days, and 6 months after single low-dose rituximab treatment (600 mg). The titers of the subclasses of anti-CNTN1 antibody and peripheral B cells were also evaluated at baseline, 2 days, and 6 months after the rituximab regimen.

Results

Two patients with anti–CNTN1 antibodies were enrolled. Both patients had neurological symptoms including muscle weakness, tremor, sensory ataxia, numbness and mild nephrotic symptoms. In the field of neurological symptoms, sensory ataxia markedly improved, and the titer of anti-CNTN1 antibody as well as CD19+ B cells decreased only two days following low-dose rituximab treatment. Other neurological symptoms improved within two weeks of rituximab treatment. At the 6-month follow-up, all neurological symptoms steadily improved with steroid reduction, and both the anti-CNTN1 antibody titer and CD19+ B cells steadily decreased. No adverse events were observed after this single low-dose rituximab treatment.

Conclusions

We confirmed the clinical efficacy of low-dose rituximab by B cell depletion in autoimmune nodopathy with anti-CNTN1 antibody. This rapid and long-lasting response suggests that low-dose rituximab is a promising option for anti-CNTN1 nodopathy.

Role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and other targeted immunotherapies in myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Several patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) do not adequately respond to available drugs or exhibit poor tolerance, necessitating the need for new therapies.

AREAS COVERED

The paper discusses the rapidly evolving target-specific immunotherapies that promise long-standing remissions in the management of MG. It is specifically focused on the role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and the anti-FcRn and B cell monoclonals.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-AChR antibodies cause internalization of the receptors and activate complement leading to in situ MAC formation that damages the post-synaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Inhibiting MAC formation by antibodies targeting key complements subcomponents is a reasonable therapeutic goal. Indeed, the anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies, Eculizumab, Ravulizumab, and Zilucoplan, have been successfully tested in MG with Eculizumab first and now Ravulizumab FDA-approved for refractory MG based on sustained long-term benefits. Among the biologics that inhibit FcRn, Efgartigimod caused rapid reduction of the circulating IgG in the lysosomes, and induced sustained clinical remission with good safety profile leading to FDA-approved indication. Anti-B cell agents, like Rituximab, can induce sustained long-term remissions, especially in IgG4 antibody-mediated Musk-MG, by targeting short-lived antibody-secreting plasmablasts. These biologics offer effective targeted immunotherapies with good tolerance promising to change the therapeutic algorithm in the chronic MG management.

Long-Term Efficacy of Non-steroid Immunosuppressive Agents in Anti-Muscle-Specific Kinase Positive Myasthenia Gravis Patients: A Prospective Study

Background and Purpose

Anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) positive myasthenia gravis (MG) is characterized by a high relapsing rate, thus, choosing the appropriate oral drug regimen is a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral immunosuppressants (IS) in preventing relapse in MuSK-MG.

Methods

This prospective cohort observational study included patients with MuSK-MG at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 1, 2018, and November 15, 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with (IS+) or without (IS-) non-steroid immunosuppressive agents. The primary outcome was relapsed at follow-up, and the log-rank test was used to compare the proportion of maintenance-free relapse between the groups; hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Fifty-three of 59 patients with MuSK-MG were included in the cohort, 14 were in the IS+ group, and 39 were in the IS- group. Twenty-four cases in the cohort experienced relapse at least once; the relapse rate was 2/14 (14.3%) in the IS+ group and 22/39 (56.4%) in the IS- group. At the end of follow-up, the proportion of maintenance-free relapse was significantly different between the two groups (log-rank χ2 = 4.94, P = 0.02). Of all the potential confounders, only the use of IS was associated with a reduced risk of relapse. The HR for relapse among patients in the IS+ group was 0.21 (95%CI 0.05-0.58) and was 0.23 (95%CI 0.05-0.93) in a model adjusted for age, sex, relapse history, highest Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA), and accumulated time of steroid therapy.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that oral non-steroid immunosuppressive agents may be beneficial in reducing relapse in patients with MuSK-MG.

Next-generation antibody-based therapies in neurology

Antibody-based therapeutics are now standard in the treatment of neuroinflammatory diseases, and the spectrum of neurological diseases targeted by those approaches continues to grow. The efficacy of antibody-based drug platforms is largely determined by the specificity-conferring antigen-binding fragment (Fab) and the crystallizable fragment (Fc) driving antibody function. The latter provides specific instructions to the immune system by interacting with cellular Fc receptors and complement components. Extensive engineering efforts have enabled tuning of Fc functions to modulate effector functions and to prolong or reduce antibody serum half-lives. Technologies that improve bioavailability of antibody-based treatment platforms within the CNS parenchyma are being developed and could invigorate drug discovery for a number of brain diseases for which current therapeutic options are limited. These powerful approaches are currently being tested in clinical trials or have been successfully translated into the clinic. Here, we review recent developments in the design and implementation of antibody-based treatment modalities in neurological diseases.

Novel treatment strategies for acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis and related disorders

The presence of autoantibodies directed against the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) is the most common cause of myasthenia gravis (MG). These antibodies damage the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction and cause muscle weakness by depleting AChRs and thus impairing synaptic transmission. As one of the best-characterized antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases, AChR-MG has often served as a reference model for other autoimmune disorders. Classical pharmacological treatments, including broad-spectrum immunosuppressive drugs, are effective in many patients. However, complete remission cannot be achieved in all patients, and 10% of patients do not respond to currently used therapies. This may be attributed to production of autoantibodies by long-lived plasma cells which are resistant to conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Hence, novel therapies specifically targeting plasma cells might be a suitable therapeutic approach for selected patients. Additionally, in order to reduce side effects of broad-spectrum immunosuppression, targeted immunotherapies and symptomatic treatments will be required. This review presents established therapies as well as novel therapeutic approaches for MG and related conditions, with a focus on AChR-MG.

Antibody Therapies in Autoimmune Neuromuscular Junction Disorders: Approach to Myasthenic Crisis and Chronic Management

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a neurological autoimmune disorder characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. It is a B cell-mediated disease caused by pathogenic antibodies directed against various components of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Despite the wide range of adverse effects, current treatment is still based on non-specific immunosuppression, particularly on long-term steroid usage. The increasing knowledge regarding the pathogenic mechanisms of MG has however allowed to create more target-specific therapies. A very attractive therapeutic approach is currently offered by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), given their ability to specifically and effectively target different immunopathological pathways, such as the complement cascade, B cell-related cluster of differentiation (CD) proteins, and the human neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). Up to now, eculizumab, a C5-directed mAb, has been approved for the treatment of generalized MG (gMG) and efgartigimod, a FcRn inhibitor, has just been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive gMG. Other mAbs are currently under investigation with encouraging preliminary results, further enriching the new range of therapeutic possibilities for MG. This review article provides an overview of the present status of mAb-based therapies for MG, which offer an exciting promise for better outcomes by setting the basis of a precision medicine approach.

Evolution of Anti-B Cell Therapeutics in Autoimmune Neurological Diseases

B cells have an ever-increasing role in the etiopathology of a number of autoimmune neurological disorders, acting as antigen-presenting cells facilitating antibody production but also as sensors, coordinators, and regulators of the immune response. In particular, B cells can regulate the T cell activation process through their participation in antigen presentation, production of proinflammatory cytokines (bystander activation or suppression), and contribution to ectopic lymphoid aggregates. Such an important interplay between B and T cells makes therapeutic depletion of B cells an attractive treatment strategy. The last decade, anti-B cell therapies using monoclonal antibodies against B cell surface molecules have evolved into a rational approach for successfully treating autoimmune neurological disorders, even when T cells seem to be the main effector cells. The paper summarizes basic aspects of B cell biology, discusses the roles of B cells in neurological autoimmunities, and highlights how the currently available or under development anti-B cell therapeutics exert their action in the wide spectrum and immunologically diverse neurological disorders. The efficacy of the various anti-B cell therapies and practical issues on induction and maintenance therapy is specifically detailed for the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis-spectrum disorders, autoimmune encephalitis and hyperexcitability CNS disorders, autoimmune neuropathies, myasthenia gravis, and inflammatory myopathies. The success of anti-B cell therapies in inducing long-term remission in IgG4 neuroautoimmunities is also highlighted pointing out potential biomarkers for follow-up infusions.

IgG4 Autoantibodies in Organ-Specific Autoimmunopathies: Reviewing Class Switching, Antibody-Producing Cells, and Specific Immunotherapies

Organ-specific autoimmunity is often characterized by autoantibodies targeting proteins expressed in the affected tissue. A subgroup of autoimmunopathies has recently emerged that is characterized by predominant autoantibodies of the IgG4 subclass (IgG4-autoimmune diseases; IgG4-AID). This group includes pemphigus vulgaris, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, subtypes of autoimmune encephalitis, inflammatory neuropathies, myasthenia gravis and membranous nephropathy. Although the associated autoantibodies target specific antigens in different organs and thus cause diverse syndromes and diseases, they share surprising similarities in genetic predisposition, disease mechanisms, clinical course and response to therapies. IgG4-AID appear to be distinct from another group of rare immune diseases associated with IgG4, which are the IgG4-related diseases (IgG4-RLD), such as IgG4-related which have distinct clinical and serological properties and are not characterized by antigen-specific IgG4. Importantly, IgG4-AID differ significantly from diseases associated with IgG1 autoantibodies targeting the same organ. This may be due to the unique functional characteristics of IgG4 autoantibodies (e.g. anti-inflammatory and functionally monovalent) that affect how the antibodies cause disease, and the differential response to immunotherapies of the IgG4 producing B cells/plasmablasts. These clinical and pathophysiological clues give important insight in the immunopathogenesis of IgG4-AID. Understanding IgG4 immunobiology is a key step towards the development of novel, IgG4 specific treatments. In this review we therefore summarize current knowledge on IgG4 regulation, the relevance of class switching in the context of health and disease, describe the cellular mechanisms involved in IgG4 production and provide an overview of treatment responses in IgG4-AID.