Temporal arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: nosographic and nosologic considerations

The spectrum of giant cell arteritis through a rheumatology lens

Treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) aims initially to prevent acute visual loss, and subsequently to optimise long-term quality of life. Initial prevention of acute visual loss in GCA is well-standardised with high-dose glucocorticoid therapy but in the longer term optimising quality of life requires tailoring of treatment to the individual. The licensing of the IL-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab combined with advances in vascular imaging have resulted in many changes to diagnostic and therapeutic practice. Firstly, GCA is a systemic disease that may involve multiple vascular territories and present in diverse ways. Broadening of the "spectrum" of what is called GCA has been crystallised in the 2022 GCA classification criteria. Secondly, the vascular inflammation of GCA frequently co-exists with the extracapsular musculoskeletal inflammation of the related disease, polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Thirdly, GCA care must often be delivered across multiple specialities and healthcare organisations requiring effective interprofessional communication. Fourthly, both GCA and PMR may follow a chronic or multiphasic disease course; long-term management must be tailored to the individual patient's needs. In this article we focus on some areas of current rheumatology practice that ophthalmologists need to be aware of, including comprehensive assessment of extra-ocular symptoms, physical signs and laboratory markers; advanced imaging techniques; and implications for multi-speciality collaboration.

Current concepts in giant cell (temporal) arteritis

Giant cell (temporal) arteritis continues to be a sight-threatening, systemic vasculitis with a poorly understood pathogenesis. The characteristic granulomatous inflammation of the vessel wall commonly leads to local ischemia. Recent advances in immunological investigations have characterized the cellular components of the disease process, but the etiology has so far remained unresolved. A reappraisal of the clinical features of giant cell (temporal) arteritis demonstrates the heterogeneity of the manifestations of the disease, including ischemic optic neuropathy. A range of new laboratory investigations and blood flow studies with color Doppler imaging have demonstrated promising roles, with respect to diagnosis and long-term follow-up. Prompt diagnosis and expeditious treatment require a high index of clinical suspicion, particularly for atypical cases. Corticosteroids remain the treatment of choice, other immuno-suppressive agents being used as second line steroid-sparing agents. Giant cell (temporal) arteritis leads to increased vascular and visual morbidity and, if untreated, may prove fatal. To maintain high standards of management of this enigmatic disorder, ophthalmologists need to be aware of the clinical spectrum of giant cell (temporal) arteritis and currently available diagnostic tests and treatment strategies.

Large vessel vasculitis (giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis)

Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis are separate but similar idiopathic diseases clinically characterized by constitutional symptoms, shared surrogate markers of systemic inflammation and indistinguishable granulomatous pan-arteritis of large vessels. This review emphasizes and analyses changing perceptions about the diseases. Recent series suggest that aortic involvement in giant cell arteritis may be more common than was previously appreciated. The case for and against inflammatory arthritis in giant cell arteritis is discussed. Ethnic new geographical variation in Takayasu arteritis-disease expression is reviewed. New philosophies of treatment are presented for both diseases. Prognosis in giant cell arteritis and its relationship to treatment is analysed. The utility of the laboratory for diagnosis and monitoring disease activity is appraised for each.