Pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during nitrous oxide-fentanyl, enflurane, isoflurane, and halothane anesthesia in surgical patients

Neuromuscular effects of sevoflurane in myasthenia gravis patients

BACKGROUND

Little information is available regarding the neuromuscular effects of sevoflurane in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We evaluated the neuromuscular effects of sevoflurane alone in patients with MG and in those with normal neuromuscular transmission.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with generalized type MG (MG group) and 12 otherwise healthy patients (control group) entered into this study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam followed by nitrous oxide in oxygen. Neuromuscular monitoring was recorded from the adductor pollicis muscle using electromyography with train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. After a stabilization period, and before sevoflurane administration, baseline T4/T1 was obtained and MG patients were classified as non-fade MG group (baseline T4/T1 > or = 0.90) (n = 10) and fade MG group (baseline T4/T1 < 0.90) (n = 6). End-tidal sevoflurane concentration was kept constant at 1.7% for 30 min and doubled thereafter to 3.4% and maintained for a further 30 min.

RESULTS

Sevoflurane produced a concentration-dependent decrease in T1 and T4/T1 values. At 3.4% sevoflurane, T1 and T4/T1 decreased significantly from baseline values in all three groups. From baseline until the patient woke up from anaesthesia, the T4/T1 of the fade MG group was significantly lower than the other groups. At the end of anaesthesia, T4/T1 returned to values similar to the baseline in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

During sevoflurane anaesthesia, concentration-dependent inhibition of neuromuscular transmission was observed in MG and control patients. The inhibitory effects of sevoflurane were more prominent in MG patients with baseline T4/T1 <0.90.

Conformation, action, and mechanism of action of neuromuscular blocking muscle relaxants

Since curare was introduced into clinical anaesthesia in 1942, efforts to create better neuromuscular blocking (NMB) muscle relaxants have continued. Today, muscle relaxation remains a mainstay of modern anaesthesia and intensive care. Through manipulation of the traditional structure-action relationships, many new and improved muscle relaxants have been created, and several have been brought to clinical use. However, structure-action relationship is inconsistent and has its limits. Using computer-aided molecular conformational analyses, the conformation-action relationships of NMB agents of various chemical classes have been explored. Conformation, no less than structure, of the NMB agents has shed new light on their mechanisms of action. By reflection, the conformations also suggest new details of the topology of the receptive sites of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor modeled for the motor endplate of the skeletal muscle.

Comparison of the infusion requirements and recovery profiles of vecuronium and cisatracurium 51W89 in intensive care unit patients

The selection and administration of neuromuscular blocking (NMB) drugs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients remain controversial. We compared the dose-response and recovery pharmacodynamics of a new intermediate-acting NMB drug, cisatracurium besylate, to the intermediate-acting NMB drug, vecuronium (VEC), in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study in critically ill adults. After informed consent, 58 mechanically ventilated ICU patients from five medical centers were randomized to receive either cisatracurium or VEC. Fifty-four of the 58 patients received NMB drugs before entering this study but demonstrated at least partial recovery (> or = one twitch) in the train-of-four (TOF) response before initiation of the NMB study drug. NMB drug infusion was titrated by peripheral nerve stimulation to maintain at least one twitch in the TOF response. NMB drugs were infused for 1-5 days. After discontinuation of NMB drug infusion, recovery of neuromuscular transmission was monitored with an accelerometer. NMB drug infusion for 28 cisatracurium patients averaged 2.6 +/- 0.2 (mean +/- SEM) micrograms.kg-1.min-1 with a mean duration of 80 +/- 7 h. After discontinuing cisatracurium administration, recovery to 70% TOF ratio averaged 68 +/- 13 min. The mean infusion rate for 30 VEC patients was 0.9 +/- 0.1 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 with a mean duration of 66 +/- 12 h. Neuromuscular recovery after VEC averaged 387 +/- 163 min, which was significantly longer (P = 0.02) than that after cisatracurium. Prolonged recovery of neuromuscular function after discontinuation of NMB drug infusion (identified by the primary investigator at each medical center) was reported in two cisatracurium patients and 13 VEC patients (P = 0.002), and occurred despite the routine use of neuromuscular twitch monitoring. Seven VEC and one cisatracurium patients died during the infusion of study drug or within 48 h after discontinuation of the NMB drug infusion. In summary, we found recovery of neuromuscular function after discontinuation of NMB drug infusion in ICU patients is significantly faster with cisatracurium than with VEC. In addition, routine neuromuscular monitoring was not sufficient to eliminate prolonged recovery and myopathy in ICU patients.

Newer neuromuscular blocking agents

Four neuromuscular blocking drugs, doxacurium, mivacurium, pipecuronium, and rocuronium have been or are about to be introduced into clinical practice. The purpose of this MiniReview is to describe their pharmacology, to consider their place in clinical anaesthetic practice, and to examine whether the needs of the clinician have been met. Two of the agents (doxacurium, mivacurium) are benzylisoquinolines resembling atracurium and two (pipecuronium, rocuronium) are aminosteroids related to pancuronium and vecuronium. Two (doxacurium, pipecuronium) are long-acting compounds, similar in duration of action to pancuronium, although the need for such a profile is questionable. Rocuronium has an intermediate duration of action and produces its maximum effect within two minutes which is much more rapid than any other non-depolarizing relaxant and this is probably a result of its poor potency. However, the onset of paralysis is not as quick as after succinylcholine. Mivacurium is unique because it is metabolized by plasma cholinesterase which produces a rapid recovery although slower than succinylcholine. All of the new drugs are devoid of serious cardiovascular or other side effects. The anaesthetist is now presented with an armamentarium of safe, nondepolarizing muscle relaxants with varying durations of action. However, the rapid onset and recovery associated with succinylcholine are unique and important in the urgent control of a patient's airway and respiration. The indications for succinylcholine will not disappear and the search for a non-polarizing replacement will continue.