Optimal regional anesthesia for circumcision

Comparison of the effects of ring block and dorsal penile nerve block on parental satisfaction for circumcision operation in children: randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

In children, circumcision is a procedure associated with perioperative pain and parental satisfaction is an important parameter in the evaluation of anesthesia procedures. Inadequate dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) for the ventral shaft of the penis might impact parental satisfaction negatively. To evaluate this hypothesis, we compared the effects of penile ring block (RB) and dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) on parental satisfaction. Postoperative pain, need for additional analgesia, intraoperative hemodynamic data, recovery status, side effects, and postoperative complications were evaluated as secondary outcomes between the blocks.

METHODS

Parental satisfaction and anesthetic effectiveness of RB and DPNB for circumcision in children were compared. 86 patients were randomized 1:1 to Group RB and Group DPNB, which were administered the same dose of anesthesia. Parental satisfaction was evaluated with the Pediatric Anesthesia Parental Satisfaction Questionnaire (PAPS). Postoperative pain evaluations were made with the Face, Legs, Activity, Crying, Consolability Pain Scale (FLACC).

RESULTS

In terms of parent satisfaction, no differences were detected between the groups in the pre-anesthesia, pre-anesthesia and post-anesthesia, post-anesthesia, hospital team, and anesthesia team parameters (p > 0.05). The scores of Group DPNB patients were higher only in the "Q11" subparameter in the "anesthesia team" parameter, and this difference was significant (0.024).

CONCLUSION

RB and DPNB were compared in circumcision, which is the most common surgical procedure for children. Parental satisfaction, anesthesia, and analgesic effects of both blocks were found to be similar.

CLINICAL TRIALS

ACTRN12622001211752.

Anesthesia Analysis of Compound Lidocaine Cream Alone in Adult Male Device-Assisted Circumcision

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the anesthetic effect among adult male patients with the single use of compound lidocaine cream in device-assisted circumcision, hoping to provide an anesthetic method for the simplification of the surgical process.

METHODS

Male adult patients undergoing device-assisted circumcision through prepuce local anesthesia using lidocaine cream in Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from December 2020 to August 2021 were selected. According to different age groups and different surgical procedures, the anesthetic effect of compound lidocaine cream was analyzed considering the aspects of anesthetic cost, anesthetic time, anesthetic duration, anesthetic effect, anesthetic side effects and anesthetic satisfaction.

RESULTS

In the study, 99.1% of 649 patients needed only 1 application of compound lidocaine cream to complete the operation. The time taken for anesthesia was short; the whole anesthesia process only required approximately 2-5 min. However, for patients with severe phimosis, the time to complete the anesthesia procedure was correspondingly longer. The pain degree caused by anesthesia was low, and the patients with a pain score of ≤3 points accounted for 96.7%. The anesthetic effect lasted for a sufficiently long period, and the time of algesia recovery from local anesthesia was almost 1 h after surgery. The anesthesia effect was sufficient, and patients with an intraoperative pain score of ≤3 accounted for 98.7%, which could meet the surgical requirements. There were few side effects of the anesthesia. The overwhelming majority of patients were pleased with the anesthesia, and 98.9% of patients had an anesthesia satisfaction score of ≥7.

CONCLUSION

The compound lidocaine cream, as a local anesthetic, is safe and effective for most adult male device-assisted circumcisions. More useful information needs to be corroborated by more advanced evidence, especially for severe phimosis.

Ultrasound Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Children

We describe a technique for using a portable ultrasound scanner (38 mm broadband (10-5 MHz) linear array transducer (Sonosite Titan® SonoSite, Inc. 21919 30th Drive SE Bothell, W.A.)) to guide dorsal penile nerve block in children under general anaesthesia. Real-time scanning is used to guide bilateral injections into the subpubic space, deep to Scarpa's fascia either side of the midline fundiform ligament. Scanning can confirm that the local anaesthetic has spread to contact the deep fascia on each side. A subcutaneous wheal of local anaesthetic along the penoscrotal junction completes the block.

Dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in pediatric patients: A prospective, observer-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial for the comparison of ultrasound-guided vs landmark technique

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Circumcision is a frequently performed procedure in day case pediatric surgery. Dorsal penile nerve block has proven its effectiveness for the management of acute postoperative pain after circumcision. We investigated if the ultrasound-guided placement of a dorsal penile nerve block could reduce opioid requirement as compared to a landmark-based technique.

METHODS

Three hundred and ten prepubertal children, aged between 52 weeks postconception and 11 years, were included in this prospective, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial and received either a landmark- or an ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block, using a caudal needle and injecting 0.1 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.5% bilaterally. A single, experienced investigator performed all blocks. The primary endpoint was the number of patients in need of piritramide postoperatively as triggered by the Objective Pain Scale. Secondary outcome parameters included the cumulative dose of postoperatively administered opioids, the requirement to administer fentanyl intraoperatively, the need for paracetamol and ibuprofen during the first 24 postoperative hours, postoperative pain scores, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, the anesthesia induction time, and the time to discharge.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients requiring postoperative piritramide did not differ significantly between both groups (Landmark: 38% vs Ultrasound: 47%, with a difference in proportion between both conditions (95% CI): 0.09 (0.2 to 0.02); P = .135). In addition, the cumulative doses of postoperative piritramide and intraoperative fentanyl, the postoperative need for paracetamol or ibuprofen, pain scores, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the time to discharge were not different either. However, the anesthesia induction time was significantly longer in the ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block (median time [IQR]: Landmark: 11[9; 13] min vs Ultrasound: 13[11; 15] min, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the landmark-guided, the ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block did not reduce the need for postoperative analgesia after circumcision in children, but was associated with an increase in the procedural time.

The analgesic effect of clonidine as an adjuvant in dorsal penile nerve block

INTRODUCTION

Dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) is a commonly performed regional anesthetic technique for male circumcision. The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic effect of the adjunction of clonidine to bupivacaine 0.5% in this block.

METHODS

It was a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial including 40 ASA1 boys aged from 1 to 4 years undergoing elective circumcision. Dorsal penile nerve block was performed under general Anesthesia. Patients were randomized in two groups: Group 1 (G1): received 0.1 ml/Kg of bupivacaine 0.5% with 1µg/kg of clonidine in each side. Group 2 (G2): received 0.1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.5% with placebo in each side. The failure of the DNPB was defined by the increase of heart rate by more than 25% comparing to baseline and in his case an intravenous injection of 20 µg/kg of alfentanyl was given. Post-operative pain was assessed by CHEOPS score.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were enrolled. Demographic parameters were similar in both groups. We noted no case of DNPB failure in this study. The supply for additional analgesia was seen in 12 patients in group 2 versus 3 cases in group 1. CHEOPS (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) was significantly lower in group 1 from 2nd post operative hour until the 24th hour.

CONCLUSION

Clonidine can be used in dorsal penile nerve block to improve and to prolong its analgesic effects after male circumcision.

Regional anaesthesia in neonates, infants and children: an educational review

Prophylactic analgesia with local anaesthesia is widely used in children and has a good safety record. Performing regional blocks in anaesthetised children is a safe and generally accepted practice. When compared with adults, lower concentrations of local anaesthetics are sufficient in children; the onset of a block occurs more rapidly but the duration is usually shorter. Local anaesthetics have a greater volume of distribution, a lower clearance and a higher free (non-protein-bound) fraction. The recommended maximum dose has to be calculated for every individual. Peripheral blocks provide analgesia restricted to the site of surgery, and some of them have a very long duration of action. Abdominal wall blocks, such as transverse abdominis plane or ilio-inguinal nerve block, should be performed with the aid of ultrasound. Caudal anaesthesia is the single most important technique. Ropivacaine 0.2% or levobupivacaine 0.125 to 0.175% at roughly 1 ml  kg⁻¹ is adequate for most indications. Clonidine and morphine can be used to prolong the duration of analgesia. Ultrasound is not essential for performing caudal blocks, but it may be helpful in case of anomalies suspected at palpation and for teaching purposes. The use of paediatric epidural catheters will probably decline in the future because of the potential complications.

Assessment of pain and hemodynamic response in older children undergoing circumcision: comparison of eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream and dorsal penile nerve block

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) or local topical anesthesia (LT) provided better postoperative analgesia and less hemodynamic stimulation during and after circumcision surgery with Plastibell in older children.

METHODS

Forty-one subjects (age: 2-13 years) undergoing circumcision with Plastibell were randomly divided into LT and DPNB groups. Inhalation induction was performed with an 8% end-tidal sevoflurane concentration. In the LT group, a eutectic ointment of 5% lidocaine and 5% prilocaine was applied to the foreskin 1 h before surgery. At 10 min after anesthesia induction, the end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was decreased to 2%. In the other group, a DPNB was performed with 0.5% bupivacaine (1 mg/kg). Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and involuntary movements were evaluated at anesthesia induction (T0), 1 min after DPNB (T1), 1 min after incision (T2), and 1 min after surgery (T3). Pain was evaluated at 1 and 24 h after surgery, and complications were evaluated at 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

The groups were homogeneous with respect to age, weight, glans diameter, penile length, Kayaba classification, and surgical duration. The LT group showed increased HR (p = 0.073) and MAP (p = 0.046) at T2 as compared to T0. No hemodynamic changes were observed in the HPDB group. The LT group showed a higher pain score at 1 h after surgery than the DPNB group, whereas the DPNB group had a higher incidence of hematoma (p = 0.02) at 24 h after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Anesthesia with 5% lidocaine and 5% prilocaine cream during circumcision of older children with Plastibell under general anesthesia with sevoflurane does not provide satisfactory perioperative hemodynamic stability or postoperative analgesia.

Penile block for paediatric urological surgery: A comparative evaluation with general anaesthesia

AIM

Peri-operative pain relief in children can be provided by conventional general anaesthesia or by regional nerve blocks. The present study was carried out to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of penile block for penile surgery with the standard technique of general anaesthesia (GA) of short duration of less than two hours, and also to evaluate the postoperative pain relief obtained by penile block.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in the department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive care of our hospital, on 60 children in the age group of 1-10 years, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I and II, and divided randomly into two groups: Group B and group G, comprising of 30 patients each. Group B children received a penile block whereas group G children underwent a standard general anaesthetic procedure. Baseline, intra-operative and post-operative heart rate (HR), electrocardiogram (ECG), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) (systolic and diastolic) and pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) were recorded at regular intervals. The duration of post-operative pain relief, time to rescue analgesia and time to first feed were also evaluated and recorded. Statistical analysis was carried out using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) 11 version for windows and employing analysis of variance (ANOVA), unpaired student t test, Chi-square test and Mann Whitney U test for various parameters. Value of P<0.05 was considered as significant and P<0.0001 as highly significant.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics were comparable in both the groups. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse oximetry showed remarkable differences at various time intervals during intra-operative and post-operative period, which were statistically significant on comparison (P<0.05 and P<0.0001). Post-operative pain relief, time to first rescue analgesia and time to first feed also showed statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Penile block is very effective when used along with light sedation for distal penile surgeries of less than 2 hours duration as compared to standard GA as reflected by more stable haemodynamics in peri-operative period, excellent pain relief extending up to 6-8 hrs postoperatively and absence of any significant complications or side effects.

Dorsal penile nerve block for male pediatric circumcision--randomized comparison of ultrasound-guided vs anatomical landmark technique

BACKGROUND

Dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) is a commonly performed regional anesthetic technique for male circumcision. Traditionally, DPNB is based on an anatomical landmark technique. Recently, an ultrasound-guided technique for DPNB has been described.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to compare the anatomical landmark technique with this ultrasound-guided technique. The hypothesis to be tested was that ultrasound guidance of DPNB would lead to less administration of opioid when compared to the anatomical landmark technique.

METHODS

Boys of ASA status I/II scheduled for day case circumcision were prospectively recruited and randomized. DPNB was performed under general anesthesia using the anatomical landmark technique or ultrasound guidance. Fentanyl was administered intraoperatively and immediately postoperatively if patients demonstrated signs of pain. Similarly, oral codeine was given prior to discharge if required. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients requiring fentanyl. Secondary outcome measures included initial pain score on emergence from general anesthesia, requirement for codeine predischarge, and time to perform block.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were recruited to the landmark group and 34 to the ultrasound group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of fentanyl administration. The ultrasound technique took longer to perform but was associated with a reduction in codeine requirement prior to discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not support the routine use of ultrasound for the performance of DPNB in male pediatric circumcision. Nonetheless, an associated reduction in codeine administration postoperatively suggests some benefit in terms of postoperative pain.

Does ultrasound guidance improve the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block in children?

BACKGROUND

Penile nerve block (PNB) is a well-established technique used for circumcision; it requires the injection of local anesthetics close to the dorsal nerve of the penis. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided PNB versus the classical landmark-based technique (LBT) in children undergoing circumcision.

METHODS

Forty boys, aged 1-14 years old that were scheduled for circumcision were randomly assigned to ultrasound-guided and landmark-based groups. All patients were placed under standard anesthesia with sevoflurane. In each group, patients received the penile block with ropivacaine, 0.75 mg·kg(-1) per side, and 0.05 mg·kg(-1) at the penis base. Groups were compared for intraoperative failure rate of the block, anesthesia time, postoperative pain scale, time of first required dose of paracetamol, time to first micturition, and average duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit.

RESULTS

  The failure rate of dorsal PNB was not statistically different between groups (P = 0.5). Ultrasound guidance improved the efficacy of the PNB compared to the LBT in terms of postoperative pain scores on arrival in the PACU (P < 0.01) and after 30 min (P < 0.01). The ultrasound-guided technique also delayed the time to the first paracetamol dose administration (P < 0.0001), but the duration of the procedure, defined as the time between anesthesia induction and the end of surgery, was increased by 10 min in the US-guided group (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

  Ultrasound-guided PNB improved the efficacy of the block compared with the LBT in terms of the postoperative pain during the first postoperative hour and the time to the first requirement for postoperative analgesia.

A retrospective audit of three different regional anaesthetic techniques for circumcision in children

Postoperative analgesia for male circumcision surgery has been traditionally provided by a landmark-based dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB-LM) or by caudal epidural analgesia (CEA). In this study we report on a retrospective analysis of the effectiveness and safety of CEA, DPNB-LM and ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB-US) in our institution over a six-year period. Information was gathered from each patient's medical record. A total of 216 circumcisions were performed on patients aged from five months to 15 years. One hundred and fifteen patients received CEA, 46 DPNB-LM and 55 DPNB-US. Patients in the DPNB-LM group required rescue morphine administration in the recovery unit more frequently (30.4%) than either the DPNB-US (3.5%) or CEA groups (3.6%). Similarly, the DPNB-LM group required a larger total dose of morphine, and had longer recovery ward stays than CEA or DPNB-US groups. Time to first analgesia was greatest for the CEA group while there was no significant difference between time to first analgesia for DPNB-LM and DPNB-US. Sixty-three percent of patients in the DPNB-LM group, 1.7% of CEA and 5.5% of the DPNB-US required intraoperative opiates (P < 0.0001). There was no difference in time to hospital discharge.

A preliminary study of the sensory distribution of the penile dorsal and ventral nerves: implications for effective penile block for circumcision

OBJECTIVE

To determine the sensory innervation of the penis, as regional anaesthesia is often used either for postoperative analgesia or as the sole anaesthetic technique for circumcision. Since first described in 1978 the dorsal penile nerve block has become the standard technique, but some blocks are ineffective; a better understanding of the sensory innervation of the penis might improve the efficacy of the dorsal penile block technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 13 men undergoing circumcision with local anaesthetic, cutaneous sensation was tested before and after infiltration of the dorsal aspect of the penis, and then again after infiltration of the ventral aspect. The area of anaesthesia was mapped using pin-prick sensation.

RESULTS

Ten of the 13 patients showed a similar pattern of sensory distribution. After the dorsal block, the dorsal aspect of the shaft of the penis and glans penis became insensate. The ventral aspect of the shaft remained sensate up to and including the frenulum. After successful ventral infiltration all sensate areas became insensate and circumcision proceeded. In one case the frenulum and distal ventral foreskin was anaesthetized after the dorsal block and ventral infiltration was not required. No patient experienced pain during circumcision.

CONCLUSION

For consistently successful regional anaesthesia of the foreskin in circumcision, a dorsal block must be used. This should be combined with ventral infiltration at the site of incision. This method will avoid inconsistencies and allow pain-free circumcision using local anaesthesia in most men.

Regional Anesthesia in Children

The future of regional anesthesia in children is to continue to use current techniques, but also to search for ways to make them easier to employ. The potential development of safe local anesthetic agents with much longer durations, will serve to facilitate improvements in the techniques and styles of practice. The advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques do not mean that regional techniques will not be necessary, but will result in an adaptation of techniques. Peripheral nerve blockade and local wound infiltration can still be used and in some instances, may be very appropriate.

Addition of clonidine and fentanyl: comparison between three different regional anesthetic techniques in circumcision

BACKGROUND

Several techniques have been used for alleviating post-circumcision pain with regional anesthetics being more effective than systemic opioids. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of dorsal penile block, ring block (RB) and dorsal penile block associated with RB in reducing post-circumcision pain in children.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial on 100 boys aged between 1 month and 5 years undergoing elective circumcision. Each 20 ml of local anesthetic mixture contained 9 ml lidocaine 1% without epinephrine, 9 ml bupivacaine 0.5%, 1 ml fentanyl (50 microg.ml(-1)) and 1 ml clonidine (75 microg.ml(-1)). They were allocated to one of three groups: 33 boys were given a RB with 1-1.5 ml (group 1), 32 had a dorsal penile block with 1.5-4 ml (group 2) and 35 had a combined ring and dorsal penile block with 2.5-5 ml of anesthetic mixture based on the child's age.

RESULTS

Ninety-one children (91%) completed the clinical trial (three failed blocks and six follow-up losses). The groups were similar with regard to age, weight, height, duration of surgery and hemodynamic status. The average pain scores were significantly higher with a RB compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05) for the first postoperative day. RB children and dorsal penile block children consumed significantly more analgesics for the first six postoperative hours (P < 0.05). The surgeon's satisfaction was significantly higher with the ring + dorsal penile block group (100%) compared with the other two groups (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Dorsal penile block plus RB technique is superior to dorsal penile block alone and RB alone in reducing postcircumcision pain in children.

The Effect of Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Blockade on Pain After Transvaginal Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of preemptive pudendal nerve blockade on pain and consumption of narcotic analgesia following transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery under general anesthesia were randomized to receive pudendal block with either bupivacaine 0.25% or placebo (normal saline 0.9%) immediately before surgery. All patients received postoperative intravenous hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia. Patients were asked to report on their pain intensity 1, 3, 5, 7, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively, using a validated visual analog pain scale from 0-10. Main outcome measures included postoperative pain intensity and hydromorphone consumption.

RESULTS

One hundred ten patients enrolled in the study, of whom 106 underwent randomization, and 102 received pudendal nerve blockade, 51 with bupivacaine and 51 with saline. Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 patients groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative pain intensity (median scores: 1 hour, 4.0 versus 5.0; 3 hours, 3.0 versus 4.0; 7 hours, 2.0 versus 3.0; 18 hours, 3.0 versus 4.0), the consumption of hydromorphone (0-3 hours, 1.84 mg versus 1.77 mg; 4-7 hours, 1.19 mg versus 1.20 mg; 8-18 hours, 2.89 mg versus 2.35 mg), or mean hospital stay (39.6 versus 37.3 hours) between the bupivacaine and saline groups.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive pudendal nerve blockade does not affect postoperative pain intensity or the consumption of narcotic analgesia after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Neuroanatomy of the male urethra and perineum

OBJECTIVE

To describe the topography of the perineal nerves from their pudendal origin to their course into the male genitalia, with specific attention on the course of the perineal nerve along the ventral penis, including branches into bulbospongiosus muscle and corpus spongiosum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study comprised 18 normal human fetal penile specimens at 17.5-38 weeks of gestation (determined by fetal heel-to-toe length). Specimens were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin wax and serially sectioned at 6 micro m. The penile specimens contained the whole penis from the glans to the crural bodies, beneath the pubic arch and the perineum up to the anal verge. Immunocytochemistry was assessed on selected sections with antibodies against the neuronal markers S-100 and nitric oxide synthase (nNOS). Three-dimensional computer reconstruction of serial sections allowed an in-depth analysis of the neuroanatomy of the fetal penis, perineum and surrounding structures.

RESULTS

After the pudendal nerve leaves the pudendal canal it gives rise to the perineal nerve branches in the ischiorectal fossa. Perineal nerves travel alongside the ischiocavernous and bulbospongiosus muscles and before reaching the latter, nerve branches course into the bulbospongiosus muscle. During its pathway within this muscle, fine nerve fibres course into the corpus spongiosum by piercing through the junction of the muscle. At the penoscrotal area, the perineal nerves give branches to the scrotum, funnelling into the interscrotal septum. Perineal nerves continue their pathway over the ventral side of penis covering the ventral surface of corpus spongiosum. Branches of the dorsal nerve of the penis at the junction of corpus cavernosum and corpus spongiosum assemble into a network with the perineal nerves. All perineal nerves from their main trunk at the ischiorectal fossa until their interaction with dorsal nerve of penis at the base of penis were nNOS negative. After the interaction with the dorsal nerve of penis, they become nNOS positive.

CONCLUSION

Integrating neuroanatomical knowledge about the perineal nerves and their communication with the dorsal nerve of penis should facilitate a strategic approach to reconstructive procedures on the penis. Special care should be taken at the junction between the corpora cavernosa and spongiosa, where the dorsal nerve joins the perineal nerve, and at the proximal bulbospongiosus muscle, thereby protecting the fine nerves piercing into the cavernosa spongiosa.

EMLA cream versus dorsal penile nerve block for postcircumcision analgesia in children

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial comparing preoperative application of EMLA cream and sodium chloride solution dorsal penile block (n = 31) with placebo cream and bupivacaine dorsal penile nerve block (n = 32) for postcircumcision analgesia. Pain was assessed using modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale and the duration of block by the time to requirement of first dose of postoperative analgesic. There was no difference in Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale between the two groups, but bupivacaine dorsal penile nerve block resulted in longer analgesia (P = 0.003). There were no local or systemic complications related to either technique, and there was a very small incidence of vomiting. We conclude that preoperative application of EMLA cream is an effective and simple method to produce postcircumcision analgesia with a very small incidence of adverse effects.

Penile prosthesis surgery under local penile block anaesthesia via the infrapubic space

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and patient tolerance to local penile block anaesthesia via the infrapubic space with penile prosthesis implantation. Local anaesthesia was administered using a 23-guage 1.5-inch needle. A 50-50 mixture of 0.5% bupivicaine (Marcaine) and 0.5% lidocaine (Xylocaine) without adrenaline was injected into the infrapubic space with additional subcutaneous penile ring infiltration at the level of the penile root. A total number of 159 patients underwent this technique, mean age 57 years (range 34-86). In 148 (93%) patients, no booster sedation was needed; eight (5%) patients needed a boost of the pre-operative sedative during crural dilatation; three (1.8%) patients required general anaesthesia owing to insufficiently effective local anaesthesia and unexpectedly difficult dilatation. It is concluded that local anaesthesia was effective and safe to produce a pain-free procedure in 93% of cases. However, as the need for booster sedation or general anaesthesia exists, the procedure should be performed under monitored anaesthetic care and pre-operative evaluation should be performed as for general anaesthesia.

Alkalinizing local anesthetic does not decrease pain during injection for dorsal penile nerve block

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether alkalizing local anesthetic with sodium bicarbonate reduces pain related to infiltration of local anesthetic during dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

SETTING

E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.

PATIENTS

144 patients aged 15 to 54 years (mean +/- SD = 22.7 +/- 8.8 years), randomized before the block into four groups of 36 patients each.

INTERVENTIONS

Group A (control) received a standard solution of 1 mg/kg lidocaine 2% mixed with 0.5 mg/kg bupivacaine 0.5% without epinephrine (pH = 6.3). Patients in Group B, Group C, and Group D received this mixture added with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate for a mean final pH of 6.90, 7.16, and 7.43, respectively. Penile block was performed using a 23-gauge needle by an anesthetist who was blinded to the pH of the solution.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were questioned regarding pain suffered during injection of the anesthetic solutions by another physicians who also was blinded to the drug used. Pain was rated by a previously reported subjective pain scale. Mean pain scales were 2.0 +/- 0.17, 2.3 +/- 0.15, 2.2 +/- 0.16, and 1.94 +/- 0.15 for Groups A to D, respectively. The differences between these results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Alkalinizing the acidic local anesthetic solution by sodium bicarbonate does not decrease pain related to infiltration during penile nerve block for circumcision.

Slow injection of local anaesthetic will decrease pain during dorsal penile nerve block

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a very slow injection of local anaesthetics during dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision causes less pain than a more rapid injection.

METHODS

In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study, 75 patients aged 15 to 53 yr (mean +/- SD = 22 +/- 8.4 yr) were randomized into two groups. A solution of 2% lidocaine, 1 mg.kg-1, and 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5 mg.kg-1 without epinephrine to a maximum dose of 10 ml was injected using either a very slow rate (injection time 100 to 150 s, Group A) or a faster rate (injection time 40 to 80 s, Group B). Patients were questioned regarding pain by a physician who was blinded to the mode of therapy. Pain was rated as 1) mild (negligible), 2) moderate (non-negligible, but easily endurable), 3) intense (but endurable) and 4) total refusal to continue.

RESULTS

A significant pain score difference was found between Groups A and B (median = 1 vs. 2, P = 0.0006) as well as a significant correlation between pain score and the rate of infiltration (rs = -0.394, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Slow injection is an important factor in reducing pain during penile block.

Dorsal penile nerve block in children undergoing circumcision in a day-care surgery

PURPOSE

Circumcision is performed under general anaesthesia (GA) with dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) as an analgesic technique for postoperative pain. The purpose of this study was to compare DPNB as the sole anaesthetic procedure vs GA and DPNB for circumcision in children as an outpatient procedure.

METHODS

In a six-month prospective study, 250 boys aged 6 to 17 yr (mean age 11.5 +/- 3.5 yr) were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 122) received DPNB only prior to circumcision, and Group B (n = 128) received GA + DPNB. The groups were compared for complications of the block, effectiveness of anaesthesia, operating room time, postoperative time and ease of recovery.

RESULTS

There were no major operative complications in the two groups. Minor block complications, including oedema and haematoma, occurred in 16 (13.1%) boys in Group A and 27 (21.10%) boys in Group B (NS). At surgery, 3 (2.6%) from Group A received additional GA and 1 (0.8%) received additional local anaesthesia. They represent a DPNB failure rate of 3.3%. Mean operating room time was 11 +/- 2.5 min in Group A and 19 +/- 3.5 min in Group B, and post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) time was 51 +/- 10 min in Group A and 101 +/- 14.5 min in Group B (P < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting in the PACU were noted in one patient in Group A and in 15 in Group B (P < 0.05). Only patients in Group B required additional analgesia and tranquilizers in the PACU (0 versus 20; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that DPNB has advantages over GA + DPNB for paediatric circumcision in day-care surgery.