Stereochemistry and Anesthetic Pharmacology

Chirality and anaesthetic drugs: A review and an update

Many molecules can exist as right-handed and left-handed forms that are non-superimposable mirror images of each other. They are known as enantiomers or substances of opposite shape. Such compounds are also said to be chiral (Greek chiros meaning ‘hand’). Such chiral molecules are of great relevance to anaesthetic theory and practice. This review summarizes the basic concepts, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of chirality, and some specific examples of their application in anaesthesia, along with recent advances to elucidate the anaesthetic mechanisms. Chirality is relevant to anaesthesia, simply because more than half of the synthetic agents used in anaesthesia practice are chiral drugs. Almost all these synthetic chiral drugs are administered as racemic mixture, rather than as single pure enantiomers. These mixtures are not drug formulations containing two or more therapeutic substances, but combination of isomeric substances, with the therapeutic activity residing mainly in one of the enantiomer. The other enantiomer can have undesirable properties, have different therapeutic activities or be pharmacologically inert. Specific examples of application of chirality in anaesthetic drugs include inhalational general anaesthetics (e.g. isoflurane), intravenous anaesthetics (e.g. etomidate, thiopentone), neuromuscular blocking agents (e.g. cisatracurium), local anaesthetics (e.g. ropivacaine and levobupivacaine) and other agents (e.g. levosimendan, dexmedetomidine, L-cysteine). In the recent advances, chirality study has not only helped new drug development as mentioned above, but has also contributed in a more profound way to the understanding of the mechanism of anaesthesia and anaesthetic drugs.

Barbiturates for acute neurological and neurosurgical emergencies--do they still have a role?

A number of clinical studies have reported poor clinical outcomes for patients treated with barbiturate therapy in acute neurological and neurosurgical emergencies. Barbiturate therapy, as currently practised with thiopentone and pentobarbitone at least, is also associated with a prolonged post-infusion period of clinical unresponsiveness. Hence, the popularity of barbiturate therapy for sedation of critically ill neurological and neurosurgical patients has declined over the past decade. A retrospective study of traumatic brain injury patients treated at the Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, with high-dose thiopentone therapy between 1987 and 1997 has found disappointing results with a 1-month mortality outcome of 50% (14 of 28 patients). Nevertheless, barbiturate therapy remains a consideration for patients with severe cranial trauma in whom preferred treatments have failed to control intracranial or cerebral perfusion pressures. More favourable results ( approximately 10% 1-month mortality rate) were encountered for patients with refractory vasospasm complicating subarachnoid haemorrhage or intracerebral haemorrhage complicating supratentorial arteriovenous malformation resection. A well designed, prospective and randomised controlled trial may be of value in further determining the role of barbiturate therapy in acute neurovascular emergencies refractory to standard therapy.

Arterial and pulmonary arterial concentrations of the enantiomers of bupivacaine after epidural injection in elderly patients

Bupivacaine HCl is a 50:50 racemic mixture of the levo [S(-)] and dex [R(+)] enantiomers. The R(+) enantiomer exhibits greater cardiac tissue binding and toxicity. To determine whether the lung exhibits selective uptake of one of the enantiomers of bupivacaine, we measured pulmonary artery and radial artery blood concentrations of the two enantiomers after a lumbar epidural injection of 20 mL of 0.75% bupivacaine in 10 elderly patients undergoing one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Significantly lower concentrations of R(+) than S(-) were noted in both pulmonary artery and arterial blood. Both enantiomers were absorbed by the lung to a similar extent within the first 5 min after epidural injection (extraction ratio approximately equal to 0.1 or 10%). Mean time of maximal concentration (Tmax) was 6 min. In 3 of the 10 patients, Tmax occurred in 1-3 min. We conclude that the lung absorbs both the R(+) and S(-) enantiomers of bupivacaine to a similar extent after epidural injection and that this is of doubtful clinical significance. This study also suggests that peak concentrations of bupivacaine may occur earlier after epidural injection in certain elderly patients than previously believed.

IMPLICATIONS

In the first 5 min after epidural injection, approximately 10% of the local anesthetic bupivacaine was absorbed by the lung. Absorption of the two enantiomers (mirror images) of bupivacaine were similar. Lung absorption of bupivacaine is unlikely to influence local anesthetic toxicity.

Systemic and regional pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine enantiomers in sheep

Commercially available bupivacaine is an equimolar mixture of R(+)- and S(-)-bupivacaine. S(-)-bupivacaine (levobupivacaine) is the subject of current clinical evaluation. We conducted partial cross-over systemic and regional pharmacokinetic studies of i.v. bupivacaine (12.5-200 mg) and levobupivacaine (6.25-200 mg) in ewes. Enantiospecific analysis of blood drug concentration-time data and of regional myocardial and brain drug mass balance data indicated that (a) there was a higher mean total body clearance of R(+)-bupivacaine than of S(-)-bupivacaine (as previously reported); (b) there were no differences in the systemic pharmacokinetics of S(-)-bupivacaine whether administered alone or as a component of bupivacaine; (c) there was no evidence of dose-dependent pharmacokinetics with either enantiomer; (d) for both enantiomers, mean calculated myocardial tissue concentrations of 1%-4% dose occurred between 3 and 5 min. Mean brain concentrations of 0.2%-1% dose occurred between 2 and 4 min after the administration of bupivacaine but between 4 and 5 min after the administration of levobupivacaine. There was no evidence that systemic toxicity induced by these local anesthetics significantly modified their pharmacokinetics, and there was no evidence of an enantiomer-enantiomer pharmacokinetic interaction for bupivacaine.

IMPLICATIONS

Levobupivacaine comprises 50% of commercially available bupivacaine and is being considered for use in its own right. As a part of its preclinical evaluation, this study considered whether levobupivacaine behaved kinetically in the body in the same way as when administered as a component of bupivacaine.