Propofol Anesthesia Enhances Pressor Response to Ephedrine in Patients Given Clonidine

Hemodynamic impact of ephedrine on hypotension during general anesthesia: a prospective cohort study on middle-aged and older patients

BACKGROUND

Ephedrine is a mixed α- and β-agonist vasopressor that is frequently used for the correction of hypotension during general anesthesia. β-responsiveness has been shown to decrease with age; therefore, this study aimed to determine whether aging would reduce the pressor effect of ephedrine on hypotension during general anesthesia.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients aged ≥ 45 years were included in this study, with 25 patients allocated to each of the three age groups: 45-64 years, 65-74 years, and ≥ 75 years. All patients received propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium for the induction of general anesthesia, followed by desflurane and remifentanil. Cardiac output (CO) was estimated using esCCO technology. Ephedrine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered for the correction of hypotension. The primary and secondary outcome measures were changes in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CO, respectively, at 5 min after the administration of ephedrine.  RESULTS: The administration of ephedrine significantly increased MAP (p < 0.001, mean difference: 8.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.95-10.75] mmHg) and CO (p < 0.001, mean difference: 7.43 [95% CI, 5.20-9.65] %) across all groups. However, analysis of variance revealed that the degree of elevation of MAP (F [2, 72] = 0.546, p = 0.581, η2 = 0.015 [95% CI, 0.000-0.089]) and CO (F [2, 72] = 2.023, p = 0.140, η2 = 0.053 [95% CI, 0.000-0.162]) did not differ significantly among the groups. Similarly, Spearman's rank correlation and multiple regression analysis revealed no significant relation between age and the changes in MAP or CO after the administration of ephedrine.

CONCLUSION

The administration of ephedrine significantly increased MAP and CO; however, no significant correlation with age was observed in patients aged > 45 years. These findings suggest that ephedrine is effective for the correction of hypotension during general anesthesia, even in elderly patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN-CTR (UMIN000045038; 02/08/2021).

Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine and phenylephrine bolus injection in patients in the prone position under general anesthesia for lumbar spinal surgery

Ephedrine and phenylephrine (PE) are vasoconstrictors commonly used to restore the blood pressure (BP) to normal values. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of ephedrine and PE bolus administration on intra-arterial systolic BP (ISBP), intra-arterial diastolic BP (IDBP) and cardiac output (CO) in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia (GA). In this prospective, randomized, and double-blind study, a total of 60 patients aged 20-60 years and undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery were administered either a single dose of ephedrine (0.1 mg/kg) or PE (1 µg/kg) through a central venous catheter as a bolus injection following the achievement of a stable hemodynamic status for ≥10 min. Following bolus injection of ephedrine or PE, a significant increase in ISBP was observed in the two experimental groups compared with pre-ephedrine and pre-PE values. The duration of the increment in ISBP however was significantly longer in the ephedrine group compared with the PE group. A similar response was observed in IDBP. A significant increase in CO began 1 min following ephedrine injection and lasted for the entire observation period, whereas the increase was only sustained for 3 min following bolus injection in the PE group. The results of the present study demonstrated that bolus ephedrine produces a more persistent pressor response and durable increase in CO and CI compared with PE when patients are in the prone position with GA for spine surgery.

Prone position results in enhanced pressor response to ephedrine compared with supine position during general anesthesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To elucidate and compare the pressor response to ephedrine in the prone or supine position during general anesthesia (GA).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Department of General Surgery or Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

PATIENTS

Fifty-six patients who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery in the supine or prone position (n = 28 each) and using a generic GA protocol.

INTERVENTIONS

During surgery, the patients received intravenous (IV) ephedrine when their systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased to 90 to 110 mm Hg.

MEASUREMENTS

Hemodynamic changes were measured at 1-minute intervals for 10 minutes and were compared with baseline.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (23 in the prone position and 26 in the supine position) completed the study. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to demographic characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane, and dose of propofol and remifentanil (all P> .05). After the bolus injection of ephedrine, a significant increase in SBP was observed in both groups compared to baseline, but the duration and magnitude of the increase in SBP were longer and greater in the prone position than in the supine position. The magnitude of increase of the mean blood pressure was significantly greater in the prone position compared to the supine position at 2 to 7 minutes after ephedrine injection. Ephedrine could cause significant increase in diastolic blood pressure 2 minutes after IV injection, which could last until at least 9 minutes in the prone position group compared to only for 5 minutes in the supine position group (all P< .05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the supine position, the prone position could augment the pressor response to IV ephedrine during GA. Further studies are recommended to identify its association with other confounding factors such as surgery type or duration, patient history of cardiovascular disease, or patient hydration status.

Propofol anesthesia enhances the pressor response to intravenous ephedrine

The induction of anesthesia with propofol is often associated with a decrease in arterial blood pressure (BP). Although vasopressors are sometimes required to reverse the propofol-induced hypotension, little is known about the effect of propofol on these drugs. We studied the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on pressor response to i.v. ephedrine. Thirty adult patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the Propofol group (n = 15), patients received propofol 2.5 mg/kg i.v. for induction followed by 100 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) i.v. for maintenance. In the Sevoflurane group (n = 15), anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane 3%-4% in oxygen and maintained with sevoflurane 2% in oxygen. All patients in both groups received ephedrine 0.1 mg/kg i.v. before and after the anesthetic induction. Ephedrine increased the heart rate significantly (P < 0.05) in awake patients in both study groups. In contrast, there was no increase in heart rate after the ephedrine administration under propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. In awake patients, transient increases in mean BP were observed after i.v. ephedrine in both groups. In the Propofol group, 2 min after the administration of ephedrine, mean BP increased 16% +/- 10% under anesthesia but increased only 4% +/- 6% when the same patients were awake. The magnitudes of the pressor responses to ephedrine during propofol anesthesia were significantly greater (P < 0.05) than during the awake state. However, ephedrine 0.1 mg/kg i.v. showed no significant increases in BP during sevoflurane anesthesia. We conclude that propofol, not sevoflurane, anesthesia augments the pressor responses to i.v. ephedrine.

IMPLICATIONS

The effect of anesthetics on vasopressor-mediated cardiovascular effects is poorly understood. We evaluated the pressor response to ephedrine during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. Our study suggests that anesthesia-induced hypotension may be easier to reverse with ephedrine during propofol anesthesia than during sevoflurane anesthesia.