A Controlled Study of Transesophageal Echocardiography to Guide Central Venous Catheter Placement in Congenital Heart Surgery Patients

Comparison of Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe as Surface Probe with Vascular Probe During Right Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization in Cardiac Surgeries

CONTEXT

USG vascular probe and TEE probe can help during central venous catheterization (CVC) and can confirm the location of guide wire in the neck vessels. We proposed this study, as there are only few studies comparing between TEE probe as surface probe and USG vascular probe for right IJV cannulation.

AIMS

To compare the TEE probe as a surface probe and USG vascular probe during right IJV catheterization in cardiac surgeries.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Prospective, comparative study.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

One twenty-four patients of either sex posted for major elective cardiac surgery were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups (TEE group and USG group) of 62 by assigning the study participants alternatively to each group. The goal of this study was to compare the puncture time, visualization of IJV to first successful puncture, quality of the imaging with needle tip positioning, and catheter positioning using both TEE probe and vascular probe. The primary outcome was comparison of time from visualization of the IJV to successful puncture using both TEE probe as a surface probe and vascular probe. Secondary outcome was to compare the quality of image with respect to needle tip positioning and compare quality of image with respect to catheter position using both probes.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Statistical analyses were performed by using a statistical software package SPSS, version 20.0.

RESULTS

The observation and results of our study clearly show the feasibility of TEE as surface probe for guiding central venous catheter in right IJV just like the vascular linear probe. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). No statistical differences were found in the puncture time, image quality, needle tip positioning, wire positioning, and catheter positioning between the two groups. All the P values were greater than 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

The TEE probe can be used as an alternative method to guide IJV puncturing and catheterization when the vascular probe is not available. It is feasible especially in cardiac surgeries where the TEE monitoring machine is a must in modern anesthesia and readily available than an ultrasound machine.

The value of transthoracic echocardiography and chest X-ray in locating the tip of central venous catheter in dialysis patients: a comparative study with computed tomography imaging

To determine the tip position of the central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with dialysis, the guidelines recommend that it be determined using chest radiography (CXR) after catheterization, without fluoroscopy. However, some researchers have proposed that transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can replace CXR, but this has not been widely adopted. This study aimed to determine which of the two aforementioned methods is more suitable for locating the tip position of the CVC. This prospective study included 160 patients who underwent hemodialysis at our hospital from March 2021 to December 2022. After inserting the CVC through the internal jugular vein, we used transthoracic echocardiography and CXR to determine the tip of the CVC and compared the results with those of computed tomography (CT). In the comparison between TTE and CXR for locating the CVC tip, we obtained three main findings. (1) TTE was associated with fewer misdiagnosed cases than CXR. (2) TTE provided higher sensitivity (similar sensitivity in position 2), specificity, positive/negative predictive values, and accuracy than CXR. (3) When comparing the receiver operating characteristic curves of TTE and CXR, the area under the curve (95% confidence interval) for the former was larger. Additionally, we made anatomical discoveries: the "hyperechoic triangle" recognized by TTE was equivalent to the entrance of the superior vena cava into the right atrium shown by transesophageal transthoracic echocardiography. TTE is more suitable than CXR as the first examination for CVC tip localization, as it improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces X-ray radiation damage.

Transesophageal echocardiography-guided implantation of totally implantable venous access devices via the internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 297 cases in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Accurately positioning totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) catheters and reducing complications in pediatric patients are important and challenging. A number of studies have shown methods for locating the tip of the TIVAD catheter. We assessed the success and complications of TIVAD implantation guided by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) via the internal jugular vein (IJV) for 294 patients in this retrospective study.

METHODS

From May 2019 to March 2021, 297 cases of TIVADs in our hospital were analyzed in this observational, non-randomized, single-center study. The position of the catheter tip under TEE and chest radiography and rates of periprocedural, early, and late complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The implantation was successful in 242 (82.3%) cases which was in a proper position, and the results were consistent with those of postoperative chest radiography. A total of 72 complications were recorded. Of these, 1 case had a perioperative complication, 66 had early complications, and 5 had late complications after port implantation. The most common complications were local infection and catheter malposition, namely 10 (13.9%) cases of incision infection and 58 (80.6%) cases of catheter malposition. In total, 6 (8.3%) cases of port explantation were required.

CONCLUSION

Confirmation of proper TIVAD catheter positioning by TEE through an internal jugular approach in children was accurate and safe.

Accuracy of Catheter Positioning during Left Subclavian Venous Access: A Randomized Comparison between Radiological and Topographical Landmarks

Left subclavian venous access increases the risk of vascular damage and thrombosis based on the catheter course and location of the catheter tip. We investigated the accuracy of tip positioning with conventional landmarks using transesophageal echocardiography. The carina as a radiological landmark and the right third intercostal space as a topographical landmark were selected for tip positioning within the target zone, defined as 2 cm above and 1 cm below the right atrial junction. A total of 120 participants were randomized into two groups. The catheter insertion depth was determined as 1.5 cm more than the distance between the venous insertion point and the carina via the right first intercostal space in the radiological group, and between the venous insertion point and the right third intercostal space via the right first intercostal space in the topographical group. The determined insertion depth and actual distance to the right atrial junction of the radiological and topographical groups were 19.5 cm and 20.5 cm, and 19.8 cm and 20.4 cm, respectively. Acceptable positioning was more frequent in the topographical group (96.4% vs. 85.7%; p = 0.047). The catheter tip is more accurately positioned in the distal superior vena cava using topographical landmarks than radiological landmarks.

Ultrasound localization of central vein catheter tip by contrast-enhanced transthoracic ultrasonography: a comparison study with trans-esophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND

To assess the usefulness of pre-operative contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (CE-TTE) and post-operative chest-x-ray (CXR) for evaluating central venous catheter (CVC) tip placements, with trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) as gold standard.

METHODS

A prospective single-center, observational study was performed in 111 patients requiring CVC positioning into the internal jugular vein for elective cardiac surgery. At the end of CVC insertion by landmark technique, a contrast-enhanced TTE was performed by both the apical four-chambers and epigastric bicaval acoustic view to assess catheter tip position; then, a TEE was performed and considered as a reference technique. A postoperative CXR was obtained for all patients.

RESULTS

As per TEE, 74 (67%) catheter tips were correctly placed and 37 (33%) misplaced. Considering intravascular and intracardiac misplacements together, they were detected in 8 patients by CE-TTE via apical four-chamber view, 36 patients by CE-TTE via epigastric bicaval acoustic view, and 12 patients by CXR. For the detection of catheter tip misplacement, CE-TTE via epigastric bicaval acoustic view was the most accurate method providing 97% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 92% diagnostic accuracy if compared with either CE-TTE via apical four-chamber view or CXR. Concordance with TEE was 79% (p < 0.001) for CE-TTE via epigastric bicaval acoustic view.

CONCLUSIONS

The concordance between CE-TTE via epigastric bicaval acoustic view and TEE suggests the use of the former as a standard technique to ensure the correct positioning of catheter tip after central venous cannulation to optimize the use of hospital resources and minimize radiation exposure.

Intelligent Internet of Things Medical Technology in Implantable Intravenous Infusion Port in Children with Malignant Tumors

Due to the recent technological revolution that is centered around information technology, the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) has become an important research domain. IoMT is a combination of Internet of Things (IoT), big data, cloud computing, ubiquitous network, and three-dimensional holographic technology, which is used to build a smart medical diagnosis and treatment system. Additionally, this system should automate various activities, such as the patient's health record and health monitoring, which is an important issue in the development of modern and smart healthcare system. In this paper, we have thoroughly examined the role of a smart healthcare system architecture and other key supporting technologies in improving the health status of both indoor and outdoor patients. The proposed system has the capacity to investigate and predict (if feasible) the clinical application and nursing effects of totally implantable intravenous port (TIVAP) in pediatric hematological tumors. For this purpose, seventy children with hematologic tumors were treated with TIVAP, and IoMT-enabled care was provided to them, where the occurrence of adverse events, specifically after the treatment, was observed. The experimental results collected after the 70 children were treated and cared for by TIVAP show that there were five cases of adverse events, whereas the incidence rate of the adverse events was 7.14%. Moreover, TIVAP has significant efficacy in the treatment of hematologic tumors in children, and it equally reduces the vascular injury caused by chemotherapy in younger patients. Likewise, targeted care reduces the incidence of adverse events in children with expected ratio.

Comparison of Peres' Formula and Radiological Landmark Formula for Optimal Depth of Insertion of Right Internal Jugular Venous Catheters

Background

Central venous catheterization is a vital procedure for volume resuscitation, infusion of drugs, and for central venous pressure monitoring in the perioperative period and intensive care unit (ICU). It is associated with position-related complications like arrhythmia's, thrombosis, tamponade, etc. Several methods are used to calculate the catheter insertion depth so as to prevent these position-related complications.

Objective

To compare Peres’ formula and radiological landmark formula for central venous catheter insertion depth through right internal jugular vein (IJV) by the anterior approach.

Materials and methods

A total of 102 patients posted for elective cardiac surgery were selected and divided into two equal groups—Peres’ group (group P) and radiological landmark group (group R). Central venous catheterization of right IJV was done under ultrasound (USG) guidance. In group P, central venous catheter insertion depth was calculated as height (cm)/10. In group R, central venous catheter insertion depth was calculated by adding the distances from the puncture point to the right sternoclavicular joint and on chest X-ray the distance from the right sternoclavicular joint to carina. After insertion, the catheter tip position was confirmed using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in both the groups.

Results

About 49% of the catheters in group P and 74.5% in group R were positioned optimally as confirmed by TEE, which was statistically significant. No complications were observed in both the groups.

Conclusion

Radiological landmark formula is superior to Peres’ formula for measuring optimal depth of insertion of right internal jugular venous catheter.

How to cite this article

Manudeep AR, Manjula BP, Dinesh Kumar US. Comparison of Peres’ Formula and Radiological Landmark Formula for Optimal Depth of Insertion of Right Internal Jugular Venous Catheters. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020; 24(7):527–530.

Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access 2020

These practice guidelines update the Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access, adopted by the American Society of Anesthesiologists in 2011 and published in 2012. These updated guidelines are intended for use by anesthesiologists and individuals under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and may also serve as a resource for other physicians, nurses, or healthcare providers who manage patients with central venous catheters.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Transoesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of central venous catheter positioning using Peres' formula or a radiological landmark-based approach: a prospective randomized single-centre study

BACKGROUND

The lower superior vena cava (SVC), near its junction with the right atrium (RA), is considered the ideal location for the central venous catheter tip to ensure proper function and prevent injuries. We determined catheter insertion depth with a new formula using the sternoclavicular joint and the carina as radiological landmarks, with a 1.5 cm safety margin. The accuracy of tip positioning with the radiological landmark-based technique (R) and Peres' formula (P) was compared using transoesophageal echocardiography.

METHODS

Real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion was done through the right internal jugular or subclavian vein. Patients were randomly assigned to either the P group (n=93) or the R group (n=95). Optimal catheter tip position was considered to be within 2 cm above and 1 cm below the RA-SVC junction. Catheter tip position, abutment, angle to the vascular wall, and flow stream were evaluated on a bicaval view.

RESULTS

The distance from the skin insertion point to the RA-SVC junction and determined depth of catheter insertion were more strongly correlated in the R group [17.4 (1.2) and 16.7 (1.5) cm; r=0.821, P<0.001] than in the P group [17.3 (1.2) and 16.4 (1.1) cm; r=0.517, P<0.001], with z=3.96 (P<0.001). More tips were correctly positioned in the R group than in the P group (74 vs 93%, P=0.001). Abutment, tip angle to the lateral wall >40°, and disrupted flow stream were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter tip position was more accurate with a radiological landmark-based technique than with Peres' formula.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registry of Korea: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp KCT0001937.

Evaluation of a central venous catheter tip placement for superior vena cava-subclavian central venous catheterization using a premeasured length: A retrospective study

Subclavian central venous catheterization is a common procedure for which misplacement of the central venous catheter (CVC) is a frequent complication that can potentially be fatal. The carina is located in the mid-zone of the superior vena cava (SVC) and is considered a reliable landmark for CVC placement in chest radiographs. The C-length, defined as the distance from the edge of the right transverse process of the first thoracic spine to the carina, can be measured in posteroanterior chest radiographs using a picture archiving and communication system. To evaluate the placement of the tip of the CVC in subclavian central venous catheterizations using the C-length, we reviewed the medical records and chest radiographs of 122 adult patients in whom CVC catheterization was performed (from January 2012 to December 2014) via the right subclavian vein using the C-length. The tips of all subclavian CVCs were placed in the SVC using the C-length. No subclavian CVC entered the right atrium. Tip placement was not affected by demographic characteristics such as age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index. The evidence indicates that the C-length on chest radiographs can be used to determine the available insertion length and place the right subclavian CVC tip into the SVC.

Simple Formula to Place Central Venous Catheter Tip at T6 After Surgical Cutdown in Neonates

The objective of this paper was to develop a generally applicable formula to estimate correct catheter length after surgical cutdown in right internal jugular vein (RIJV) in neonates. The carina has been utilized as an anatomic landmark indicating superior vena cava-right atrium junction (SVC-RA) for the optimal placement of the central venous catheter (CVC) tip position. However, this landmark may not be accurate in neonates. Recent researches noted that the sixth vertebral body (T6) could better serve as a new landmark of SVC-RA in neonates and smaller children. We prospectively performed RIJV cutdown. For a controlled and reproducible surgical procedure, the venous entry site was consistently taken as the point where the omohyoid muscle crosses the RIJV. On intraoperative infantogram, the vertical distance between the venous entry site and T6 was measured and the catheter was inserted to this length. A linear regression model was investigated using the following variables to elicit the best prediction model for catheter length: gestational age, postconceptional age, birth weight, and weight at operation. Weight at operation best correlated with the measured CVC length (R2 = 0.916, P = 0.00), and the following linear equation was derived: estimated CVC length (mm) = 9 × [weight at operation (Kg)] + 30. There was no statistically significant difference between measured and estimated CVC length. With this formula, the optimal catheter length could easily be estimated when considering RIJV cutdown.

Factors Influencing Intracavitary Electrocardiographic P-Wave Changes during Central Venous Catheter Placement

Amplitude changes in the P-wave of intracavitary electrocardiography have been used to assess the tip placement of central venous catheters. The research assessed the sensitivity and specificity of this sign in comparison with standard radiographic techniques for tip location, focusing on factors influencing its clinical utility. Both intracavitary electrocardiography guided tip location and X-ray positioning were used to verify catheter tip locations in patients undergoing central venous catheter insertion. Intracavitary electrocardiograms from 1119 patients (of a total 1160 subjects) showed specific amplitude changes in the P-wave. As the results show, compared with X-ray positioning, the sensitivity of electrocardiography-guided tip location was 97.3%, with false negative rate of 2.7%; the specificity was 1, with false positive rate of zero. Univariate analyses indicated that features including age, gender, height, body weight, and heart rate have no statistically significant influence on P-wave amplitude changes (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that catheter insertion routes (OR = 2.280, P = 0.003) and basal P-wave amplitude (OR = 0.553, P = 0.003) have statistically significant impacts on P-wave amplitude changes. As a reliable indicator of tip location, amplitude change in the P-wave has proved of good sensitivity and excellent specificity, and the minor, zero, false positive rate supports the clinical utility of this technique in early recognition of malpositioned tips. A better sensitivity was achieved in placement of centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) than that of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). In clinical practice, a combination of intracavitary electrocardiography, ultrasonic inspection and the anthropometric measurement method would further improve the accuracy.

[Bedside prediction of right subclavian venous catheter insertion length]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate whether right subclavian vein (SCV) catheter insertion depth can be predicted reliably by the distances from the SCV insertion site to the ipsilateral clavicular notch directly (denoted as I-IC), via the top of the SCV arch, or via the clavicle (denoted as I-T-IC and I-C-IC, respectively).

METHOD

In total, 70 SCV catheterizations were studied. The I-IC, I-T-IC, and I-C-IC distances in each case were measured after ultrasound-guided SCV catheter insertion. The actual length of the catheter between the insertion site and the ipsilateral clavicular notch, denoted as L, was calculated by using chest X-ray.

RESULTS

L differed from the I-T-IC, I-C-IC, and I-IC distances by 0.14±0.53, 2.19±1.17, and -0.45±0.68cm, respectively. The mean I-T-IC distance was the most similar to the mean L (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.89). The mean I-IC was significantly shorter than L, while the mean I-C-IC was significantly longer. Linear regression analysis provided the following formula: Predicted SCV catheter insertion length (cm)=-0.037+0.036×Height (cm)+0.903×I-T-IC (cm) (adjusted r(2)=0.64).

CONCLUSION

The I-T-IC distance may be a reliable bedside predictor of the optimal insertion length for a right SCV cannulation.

Transthoracic echocardiographic guidance for obtaining an optimal insertion length of internal jugular venous catheters in infants

BACKGROUND

There are multiple methods of determining the optimal position of central venous catheter (CVC) tips. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and compare TTE and height-based method for correct positioning of CVCs in infants undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization was performed via the right internal jugular vein. Longitudinal images of the right atrium and superior vena cava were obtained using TTE. The catheter tip was located 10 mm above the crista terminalis. If the catheter tip was not clearly visualized, the probe was rotated to obtain transverse images and the CVC tip was positioned at the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation. The mean distance from the catheter tip to the level of the carina was compared with that calculated using a height-based formula.

RESULTS

Among 106 cases, positioning of the CVC tip under TTE guidance failed in four patients; thus, the success rate was 96.2%. The mean distance from the CVC tip to the level of the carina was different for positioning using the TTE method (-3.8 ± 8.2 mm; 95% confidence interval, -5.5 to -2.2 mm) and that using the height-based formula (6.1 ± 9.6 mm; 95% CI, 4.2 to 8.0 mm; P = 0.001). The distance was consistent regardless of the height when the insertion length was determined using TTE (r = -0.048, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Transthoracic echocardiography is a practical method for the correct placement of the CVC tip with less variability compared to the height-based method.

Simple formulas to determine optimal subclavian central venous catheter tip placement in infants and children

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Optimal central venous catheter (CVC) tip location is necessary to decrease the incidence of complications related to their use. We sought to create a practical method to reliably predict the length of catheter to insert into the subclavian vein during CVC placement in children.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 727 chest radiographs of children who underwent either left or right subclavian CVC placement. We measured the distance from the subclavian entry site to the to the right atrium/superior vena cava (RA/SVC) junction, following the catheter's course. We analyzed the relationship between that length and patient characteristics, including: age, gender, height, weight and body surface area (BSA).

RESULTS

Two derived formulas using the BSA best correlated with the optimal subclavian CVC length. For the left subclavian vein approach, the optimal catheter length was 6.5 BSA+7 cm, and for the right subclavian vein approach it was 5 BSA+6. The use of these formulas correlated in CVC tip placement in a clinically proper location in 92.9% of smaller children and in 95.7% of larger children.

CONCLUSION

The optimal length of central venous catheter to insert into the subclavian vein may be determined through the use of a simple formula using the BSA.

Is traditional reading of the bedside chest radiograph appropriate to detect intraatrial central venous catheter position?

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, the positioning of central venous catheters (CVCs) outside the right atrium (RA) in patients receiving intensive care is determined by surrogate landmarks on bedside chest radiographs (CXRs). The validity of this method was examined by comparing readings of radiologists with the results of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).

METHODS

Prospective study at university hospital. Two hundred thirteen adults scheduled for cardiothoracic surgery were randomized to right or left internal jugular vein catheterization under ECG guidance. One senior radiologist and two radiologists in training independently read the CXRs, and determined whether the CVC tip ended in the RA and measured the vertical distance from the CVC tip to the carina (TC-distance).

RESULTS

Two hundred twelve CVC tips could be identified by TEE. Only left-sided CVCs (n = 5) ended in the upper RA (2.4%). Three of those patients were shorter than 160 cm. Specificity was 94% for senior radiologist, 44% for the first radiologist in training, and 60% for the second radiologist in training. The TC-distance of intraatrial catheters was 39, 55, 59, 80, and 83 mm, respectively. Thus, a TC-distance < or = 55 mm ensured extraatrial tip position in four of five intraatrial CVCs (80%, p = 0.002). The TC-distance of extraatrial catheters ranged from - 26 to 102 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Reading of a bedside CXR alone is not very accurate to identify intraatrial CVC tip position. TC-distance is a helpful marker, and its specificity is as good as that of an experienced radiologist if a cutoff value of 55 mm is chosen.

Transesophageal Echocardiography and Laryngeal Mask Airway for Placement of Permanent Central Venous Catheter in Cancer Patients with Radiographically Unidentifiable SVC-RA Junction: Effectiveness and Safety

In patients who require a permanent central venous catheter (PCVC), the usual aim is to put the catheter tip at the superior vena cava and right atrium (SVC-RA) junction. However, there is no study regarding how to guide the positioning of the catheter tip when the SVC-RA junction cannot be identified on chest radiograph. The objectives of this prospective study were: (1) to investigate the incidence and etiologies of radiographically undetermined SVC-RA junctions in cancer patients undergoing PCVC implantation; and (2) to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of combined transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) to guide the positioning of catheters during implantations in patients without this radiographic landmark. Over a 1-year study period, 83 consecutive patients with oncologic diseases who required implantation of a PCVC in a tertiary center were screened. Their preoperative chest radiographs were examined by radiologists to identify the presence of the SVC-RA junction. Patients without a radiographically identifiable SVC-RA junction were classified as cancer-related or cancer-unrelated in terms of etiology. For patients without this landmark, we used TEE with a pediatric biplane transducer and a LMA under intravenous general anesthesia during PCVC implantation to guide the positioning of the catheter tip at the SVC-RA junction. We found that in 16% (13/83) of patients, the SVC-RA junction could not be identified on radiograph. Among the 13 patients, only three (23%) had cancer-related etiologies. In all of the 13 patients, the LMA was successfully placed after the TEE transducer was inserted. No episode of air leak from the LMA was found during surgery. All had the catheter tip positioned in the anatomic SVC-RA junction under TEE guidance. In conclusion, 16% of cancer patients requiring PCVC implantation had no identifiable SVC-RA junction on chest radiograph and most causes were cancer-unrelated. In patients without a radiographically identifiable SVC-RA junction, guidance by TEE under LMA general anesthesia is a feasible, safe and effective management to position a PCVC at the SVC-RA junction.

Transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of ECG-guided central venous catheter placement

PURPOSE

To facilitate electrocardiography (ECG)-guided central venous catheter placement by observing the shape and size of the P wave at specific locations of a central venous catheter (CVC) tip.

METHODS

We evaluated 54 patients for whom central venous catheterization was planned as part of routine care for their elective surgery. The junction of the superior vena cava (SVC) and the right atrium (RA) was defined as the superior border of the crista terminalis by transesophageal echocardiography. The RA ECGs were recorded while withdrawing the CVC into the SVC or advancing it into the RA at 1-cm intervals. Saline was used as an electrical conductor via the distal lumen of the CVC.

RESULTS

The tallest peaked and biphasic P waves [median (interquartile range)] were observed when the CVC tip was located at positions 0.0 cm (-1.0 to 0.0) and -4.0 cm (-5.0 to -3.0) below the SVC/RA junction, respectively. The P wave returned to a normal shape and size at 4.0 cm (3.0 to 4.0) above the SVC/RA junction. Overshoot P waves were observed at - 4.0 cm (-5.0 to -3.0) below the SVC/RA junction in 22 patients, when the CVC tip appeared to be contacting or in close proximity to the RA wall.

CONCLUSIONS

During ECG-guided central venous catheterization, the tallest peaked P wave may be used to place the CVC tip at the SVC/RA junction, the normally-shaped P wave identifies the mid to upper SVC, and biphasic P waves identify RA localization.

The optimal length of insertion of central venous catheters for pediatric patients

Incorrect positioning of central venous catheters (CVC) in infants and children may lead to serious complications such as perforation of the heart or great vessels. CVC position is not usually assessed until the first postoperative chest radiograph, potentially leaving malposition undetected for several hours. We studied a series of 452 right internal jugular and subclavian catheter placements in infants and children undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease, and measured the distance from the skin insertion site to the radiographic junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium (RA). Based on these data, the following formulae predict that a CVC will be positioned above the RA 97% of the time: correct length of insertion (cm) = (height in cm/10) - 1 for patients < or =100 cm in height, and (height in cm/10) - 2 for patients >100 cm in height. Weight-based recommendations were also developed which predict placement of CVC above the RA 98% of the time.

IMPLICATIONS

This study assessed central venous catheter placement in 452 infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery. Simple, clinically useful guidelines based on height and weight were developed to prevent malposition of these catheters, which may cause serious complications such as perforation of the heart or great vessels.

Inadvertent placement of pulmonary artery catheter into right carotid artery

PURPOSE

To report a case of misplacement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) into the carotid artery after open heart surgery.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 20-mo-old boy underwent open heart surgery (VSD repair). On the first day postoperatively, he had severe pulmonary hypertension and a PAC was inserted via the left internal jugular approach without complication. Two hours later, chest radiography showed the PAC in the right internal carotid artery which it had reached via the right and left ventricles and aorta. The PAC was withdrawn and a new PAC was inserted and its position was confirmed by chest radiography. Two years later echocardiography failed to demonstrate the second VSD or a residual leak through the patch although a PAC could be passed from the right ventricle to the left ventricle and subsequently into the aorta and right carotid artery.

CONCLUSION

Correct placement of a PAC should be confirmed by chest radiography or other techniques to prevent complication.