ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index and bispectral index during the induction of anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil

Comparison of the Effect of Anesthesia With Midazolam-Fentanyl Versus Propofol-Remifentanil on Bispectral Index in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of anesthesia with midazolam-fentanyl versus propofol-remifentanil on the BIS (bispectral index) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Sixty-four patients undergoing CABG were randomly assigned to one of two study groups: midazolam-fentanyl (MF, N= 32) or propofol-remifentanil (PR, N= 32). The BIS was measured before induction of anesthesia, five minutes after induction of anesthesia, at skin incision, sternotomy, pericardiotomy, aorta cannulation, onset of cardiopulmonary bypass, during rewarming, five minutes after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, at thorax closure, and at the end of the surgery. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age and gender. The difference in mean BIS between the two groups was significant (P < 0.05) at all times, except before induction, five minutes after induction, at skin incision and on rewarming. Changes in the BIS were lower in the PR group than in the MF group. Both techniques can provide adequate anesthesia in patients undergoing CABG. However, the probability of awareness during anesthesia is lower with propofol-remifentanil than with midazolam-fentanyl.

Bispectral index-guided anaesthesia for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring may assist reduction in utilisation of anaesthetic agents during general surgical procedures. This study was designed to test whether the use of BIS monitoring reduces the anaesthetic requirements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This prospective - clinical trial was conducted on 40 adult patients undergoing elective off-pump CABG. Patients received either isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia. BIS monitoring, which guided the dose of anaesthetic, was carried out in 50 percent of the patients. The amount of anaesthetic agent (isoflurane or propofol) administered from the start of anaesthesia to the end of surgical procedure was calculated and were compared in four groups of patients - namely Group A (I-no BIS) received isoflurane; end tidal concentration was maintained at 1-1.2% in a low flow technique throughout the procedure, Group B (I-BIS) received isoflurane in a low flow technique; inspired concentration was dictated by BIS value maintained at 50; Group C (P-no BIS) received propofol at a dose range of 4-8 mg/kg/hr and in Group D(P-BIS) the propofol infusion rate was dictated by BIS value maintained at 50. The quantity of isoflurane was significantly less for Group B (I-BIS) as compared with Group A (I-no BIS) (37 +/- 4 vs. 24 +/- 4 ml; p< 0.05) and similarly the amount of propofol infused was significantly less in Group D (P-BIS) as compared with Group C (P-no BIS) (176 +/- 9 vs. 120 +/- 6 ml; p< 0.05). BIS guided anaesthesia reduces the anaesthetic agent required for the performance of off-pump CABG. This can be extrapolated in terms of saving agent and reduced cardiac depression during off-pump CABG.

Relative Reliability of the Auditory Evoked Potential and Bispectral Index for Monitoring Sedation Level in Surgical Intensive Care Patients

Sedation is an important adjunct therapy for patients in the intensive care unit. The objective of the present study was to observe correlation between an established subjective measure, the Ramsay Sedation Scale, and two objective tools for monitoring critically ill patients: the Bispectral Index (BIS) and auditory evoked potential. Ninety patients undergoing major surgery scheduled for postoperative mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation with propofol and fentanyl were selected. Electrodes for determining BIS and auditory evoked potential were placed on the foreheads of all patients according to manufacturer's specifications at least six hours after patients’ arrival at the intensive care unit. Ramsay Sedation Scale, BIS, signal quality index, composite A-line autoregressive index (AAI) and electromyographic activities were recorded every five minutes for 30 minutes. BIS and AAI showed good correlation amongst readings (rs=0.697, P <0.07). Both were significantly influenced by electromyographic activities (BIS, rs=0.735, P <0.07; AAI, rs=0.856, P <0.07). Comparison of BIS and AAI revealed an acceptable correlation between electroencephalogram variables and the Ramsay Sedation Scale (BIS, τ=-0.689; AAI, τ=-0.621; P <0.07). In conclusion, the auditory evoked potential and BIS monitors revealed an acceptable correlation with the Ramsay Sedation Scale. However, the BIS and auditory evoked potential monitors do not perform adequately as a substitute in the assessment of sedated intensive care unit patients. These monitors could be used as part of an integrated approach for the evaluation of those patients especially when the subjective scales do not work well in the setting of neuromuscular blockade or may not be sufficiently sensitive to evaluate very deep sedation.

[Measurement of the depth of anaesthesia]

One of the most important mandates of the anaesthesiologist is to control the depth of anaesthesia. An unsolved problem is that a straight definition of the depth of anaesthesia does not exist. Concerning this it is rational to separate hypnosis from analgesia, from muscle relaxation and from block of cardiovascular reactions. Clinical surrogate parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate are not well-suited for a valid statement about the depth of hypnosis. To answer this question the brain has become the focus of interest as the target of anaesthesia. It is possible to visualize the brain's electrical activity from anelectroencephalogram (EEG). The validity of the spontaneous EEG as an anesthetic depth monitor is limited by the multiphasic activity, especially when anaesthesia is induced (excitation) and in deep anaesthesia (burst suppression). Recently, various commercial monitoring systems have been introduced to solve this problem. These monitoring systems use different interpretations of the EEG or auditory-evoked potentials (AEP). These derived and calculated variables have no pure physiological basis. For that reason a profound knowledge of the algorithms and a validation of the monitoring systems is an indispensable prerequisite prior to their routine clinical use. For the currently available monitoring systems various studies have been reported. At this time it is important to know that the actual available monitors can only value the sedation and not the other components of anaesthesia. For example, they cannot predict if a patient will react to a painful stimulus or not. In the future it would be desirable to develop parameters which allow an estimate of the other components of anaesthesia in addition to the presently available monitoring systems to estimate sedation and muscle relaxation. These could be sensoric-evoked potentials to estimate analgesia and AEPs for the detection of awareness.

Manually controlled total intravenous anesthesia augmented by electrophysiologic monitoring for complex stereotactic neurosurgical procedures

Stereotactically guided procedures are performed for an ever extending range of conditions. They present a unique anesthetic challenge. In our institution, a standardized anesthetic protocol for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) augmented by electrophysiologic monitoring with BIS or AEP monitors was introduced. We conducted a retrospective study of 21 patients (ASA status 2-3) presenting for stereotactically guided procedures who were anesthetized according to the protocol. Median duration of anesthesia was 260 minutes (222 to 325 min); on average 3.0 (1.0 to 4.2) adjustments to the TIVA-protocol were made per patient. Highest and lowest mean arterial blood pressures in relation to baselines were 100% (87.5% to 109.8%) and 68.7% (64.0% to 72.6%), respectively. Likewise highest and lowest heart rates recorded were 106.7% (98.5% to 119.0%) and 75.0% (68.2% to 83.3%). After discontinuation of TIVA, spontaneous breathing returned after 5.0 minutes (4.0 to 8.0 min), extubation was possible after 6.0 minutes (5.0 to 10.0 min) and patients were ready for discharge to the ward after 15.0 minutes (12.0 to 18.0 min). There were no cases of postoperative nausea or vomiting. We found that manually controlled TIVA, augmented by electrophysiologic monitoring, facilitated maintenance of an appropriate depth of anesthesia with stable hemodynamics and excellent recovery times.

Quantifying cortical activity during general anesthesia using wavelet analysis

This paper reports on a novel method for quantifying the cortical activity of a patient during general anesthesia as a surrogate measure of the patient's level of consciousness. The proposed technique is based on the analysis of a single-channel (frontal) electroencephalogram (EEG) signal using stationary wavelet transform (SWT). The wavelet coefficients calculated from the EEG are pooled into a statistical representation, which is then compared to two well-defined states: the awake state with normal EEG activity, and the isoelectric state with maximal cortical depression. The resulting index, referred to as the wavelet-based anesthetic value for central nervous system monitoring (WAV(CNS)), quantifies the depth of consciousness between these two extremes. To validate the proposed technique, we present a clinical study which explores the advantages of the WAV(CNS) in comparison with the BIS monitor (Aspect Medical Systems, MA), currently a reference in consciousness monitoring. Results show that the WAV(CNS) and BIS are well correlated (r = 0.969) during periods of steady-state despite fundamental algorithmic differences. However, in terms of dynamic behavior, the WAV(CNS) offers faster tracking of transitory changes at induction and emergence, with an average lead of 15-30 s. Furthermore, and conversely to the BIS, the WAV(CNS) regains its preinduction baseline value when patients are responding to verbal command after emergence from anesthesia. We conclude that the proposed analysis technique is an attractive alternative to BIS monitoring. In addition, we show that the WAV(CNS) dynamics can be modeled as a linear time invariant transfer function. This index is, therefore, well suited for use as a feedback sensor in advisory systems, closed-loop control schemes, and for the identification of the pharmacodynamic models of anesthetic drugs.

Changes in the auditory evoked potentials index by induction doses of four different intravenous anesthetics

BACKGROUND

Many studies have investigated the electroencephalographic changes during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. However, no comparative studies have been performed on the effects of intravenous anesthetics on the auditory evoked potentials index (AAI). The present study was performed to compare the changes in AAI caused by induction doses of thiopental, propofol, midazolam and ketamine.

METHODS

Eighty females, aged 30-70 years, referred for mastectomy, had anesthesia induced with thiopental 4 mg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, midazolam 0.1 mg/kg or ketamine 1 mg/kg (each 20 patients). The response to verbal command and the AAI were measured every minute for 5 min.

RESULTS

The AAI decreased to less than 40 within 1 min with thiopental and propofol. The AAI increased after 3 min with thiopental, but remained low with propofol. The AAI gradually decreased to less than 40 within 4 min with midazolam, but was higher than the AAI with propofol or thiopental. The AAI increased significantly with ketamine. The AAIs at the loss of verbal command were 19 +/- 7 with thiopental, 21 +/- 8 with propofol, 31 +/- 10 with midazolam and 92 +/- 2 with ketamine.

CONCLUSION

The AAI correlated with changes in hypnotic level, as measured by the response to verbal command, with induction doses of thiopental, propofol and midazolam, but not with ketamine. The AAI decreased to lower levels with propofol and thiopental than with midazolam at the induction of anesthesia.

The impact of acoustic stimulation on the AEP monitor/2 derived composite auditory evoked potential index under awake and anesthetized conditions

The AEP Monitor/2 features an auditory evoked potential (AEP) and electroencephalogram (EEG)-derived hybrid index of the patient's hypnotic state. The composite AEP index (AAI) is preferably calculated from the AEP, but in case of low signal quality it is based entirely on the spontaneous EEG. We investigated the impact of auditory input on the AAI in 16 patients with correctly positioned headphones for acoustic stimulation and headphones disconnected from the patient's ears under awake and anesthetized conditions. The AAI and the Narcotrend Index (NI), another EEG-based measure of hypnotic depth, were recorded simultaneously. AAI values under awake and anesthetized conditions were higher with correctly positioned headphones than with headphones disconnected from the patient's ears (P < 0.05) but remained within the range indicating the patient's actual hypnotic state as given by the manufacturer of the monitor. Under awake conditions with correctly positioned headphones we observed frequent fluctuations between AEP-derived and EEG-derived AAI, whereas with headphones disconnected from the patient's ears the AAI calculation was completely EEG based. Acoustic stimulation had no impact on the Narcotrend Index. Although relevant misinterpretations of the patient's hypnotic state as a consequence of a turnover from AEP-derived to EEG-derived AAI values should not occur, an improved harmonization of the two methods of indexing would be desirable.

IMPLICATIONS

The AEP Monitor/2 generates an Index (AAITM) indicating the patient's hypnotic state by analyzing either auditory evoked potentials (AEP) or spontaneous electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. We demonstrate that, though significantly different under AEP-derived or EEG-derived conditions, AAI values remain within the range indicating the patient's actual hypnotic state as given by the manufacturer of the device.

The correlation of the Narcotrend Index and classical electroencephalographic parameters with endtidal desflurane concentrations and hemodynamic parameters in different age groups

BACKGROUND

The Narcotrend Index (NI) for assessment of depth of anesthesia by analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG), is potentially a pharmacodynamic measure of the effects of desflurane on the brain.

METHODS

In this prospective study of 30 pediatric and adult patients (group 1: 3-6 years, n = 10; group 2: > 6 < 12 years; group 3: 12-40 years), undergoing ophthalmological surgery, we investigated the pharmacodynamic relationship between nonsteady state endtidal desflurane concentrations (eT(Des)), NI, classical EEG parameters (cEEG), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). The performance of the Narcotrend for differentiation between consciousness and unconsciousness was evaluated using prediction probability (P(K)).

RESULTS

Spearman correlation analysis showed significant negative correlations (P < 0.001) between eT(Des) and NI (group 1: r = -0.93, group 2: r = -0.86, group 3: r = -0.66). Correlations between eT(Des) and MAP or HR were either only weak negative (r < -0.5) or not significant. Desflurane EC(50) (eT(Des) with half maximal effect on NI) was 7.18% for group 1, 7.34% for group 2, and 4.15% for group 3 (P < 0.001 Vs groups 1 and 2). Overall awake NI values (96.7 +/- 1.4) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than at the moment of loss of consciousness (58.3 +/- 17.5), with no overlap (P(K) 1.0), whereas P(K) values for cEEG, MAP and HR were all <0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacodynamic relationship between eT(Des) and NI is age dependent with a significantly higher EC(50) in children than in adolescents and adults. The NI appears to be superior to cEEG, MAP and HR in differentiating consciousness from unconsciousness.

SNAP index and Bispectral index during different states of propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia

The accuracy of the new SNAP index with the Bispectral index (BIS) to distinguish different states of propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia was compared in 19 female patients who were undergoing minor gynaecological surgery. Comparisons of the SNAP index, BIS, spectral edge frequency, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were performed. The ability of all parameters to distinguish between the steps of anaesthesia -awake vs. loss of response, awake vs. anaesthesia, anaesthesia vs. first reaction and anaesthesia vs. extubation - were analysed with the prediction probability. The prediction probability to differentiate between two interesting nuances of anaesthetic states -loss of response vs. first reaction - was calculated. Only the BIS showed no overlap between the investigated steps of anaesthesia. Both the SNAP index and BIS failed to differentiate the nuances of anaesthesia. The SNAP index and BIS were superior to mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate and spectral edge frequency in distinguishing between different steps of anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil and provided useful additional information.

Impact of the AEP-Monitor/2-derived composite auditory-evoked potential index on propofol consumption and emergence times during total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in children

BACKGROUND

The composite auditory evoked potential index (cAAI), derived from the AEP Monitor/2 (version 1.6; Danmeter A/S, Odense, Denmark) is a measure of the hypnotic component of general anaesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of cAAI guidance on propofol consumption and emergence times in children receiving total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil.

METHODS

Twenty children, aged 3-11 years, scheduled for strabismus repair under TIVA with propofol and remifentanil were enrolled. Remifentanil was given to all patients at a constant infusion rate of 0.3 microg kg(-1) min(-1) throughout the anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous propofol infusion adjusted either according to a conventional clinical practice (Group C, n = 10) or guided by cAAI-monitoring (Group G, n = 10, target cAAI 25-35). All patients were connected to the AEP Monitor/2, but in group C the anaesthetist was blinded to cAAI values. Propofol consumption (mgkg(-1)h(-1)) and emergence times (min) were the primary and secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Propofol consumption and emergence times (mean +/- SD) were significantly lower in group G compared to group C (Propofol: G: 4.2 +/- 1.7 vs. C 6.4 +/- 1.3 mg kg(-1) h(-1); P < 0.01; emergence times: G: 5.1 +/- 3.7 vs. C 13.2 +/- 8.2 min; P < 0.01). Intraoperative cAAI values (median [interquartile range]) were significantly higher in group G (23.9 [18-29.7]) than in group C (18.4 [16.0-22.1]; P < 0.01). Haemodynamic variables remained stable within age-related limits, and there were no observations of adverse events, especially no clinical signs of intraoperative awareness in any patient.

CONCLUSION

Composite auditory evoked potential index monitoring during propofol/remifentanil-TIVA in children results in reduced propofol consumption and faster emergence.

The Influence of Acupressure on the Monitoring of Acoustic Evoked Potentials in Unsedated Adult Volunteers

Approaches for monitoring depth of anesthesia can be influenced by things other than anesthetics. In this study, we evaluated the influence of acupressure on the A-line autoregressive index (AAI) and on stress levels in unsedated volunteers. Fifteen unsedated adult volunteers received pressure on the acupuncture Extra 1 point (EP) and on a control point for 10 min on different days. AAI was recorded 5 min before, during, and 5 min after the interventions. Before and after the procedures, the volunteers quantified their level of stress by means of a visual analog stress scale (VSS; 0-100). Corresponding data were compared by Wilcoxon's signed rank test (Bonferroni correction, P < 0.05). Data are median (range). AAI decreased from 73 (40-99) to 53 (33-94) after 10 min of pressure on EP (P = 0.0044). Five minutes after release of pressure there was no difference compared with initial values. There was a statistically significant difference between VSS before and after pressure on EP (36 [7-67] to 15 [0-44]; P = 0.0066), but not on control point. In conclusion, there was a wide range of AAI values in awake volunteers. The AAI was influenced by acupressure performed on the EP in unsedated adult volunteers. Acupressure on this point significantly reduced stress levels.