The inhibitory effects of alphaxalone on M1 and M3 muscarinic receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes

Allosteric Modulation of Muscarinic Receptors by Cholesterol, Neurosteroids and Neuroactive Steroids

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are membrane receptors involved in many physiological processes. Malfunction of muscarinic signaling is a cause of various internal diseases, as well as psychiatric and neurologic conditions. Cholesterol, neurosteroids, neuroactive steroids, and steroid hormones are molecules of steroid origin that, besides having well-known genomic effects, also modulate membrane proteins including muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Here, we review current knowledge on the allosteric modulation of muscarinic receptors by these steroids. We give a perspective on the research on the non-genomic effects of steroidal compounds on muscarinic receptors and drug development, with an aim to ultimately exploit such knowledge.

Neurosteroids and steroid hormones are allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors

The membrane cholesterol was found to bind and modulate the function of several G-protein coupled receptors including muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. We investigated the binding of 20 steroidal compounds including neurosteroids and steroid hormones to muscarinic receptors. Corticosterone, progesterone and some neurosteroids bound to muscarinic receptors with the affinity of 100 nM or greater. We established a structure-activity relationship for steroid-based allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors. Further, we show that corticosterone and progesterone allosterically modulate the functional response of muscarinic receptors to acetylcholine at physiologically relevant concentrations. It can play a role in stress control or in pregnancy, conditions where levels of these hormones dramatically oscillate. Allosteric modulation of muscarinic receptors via the cholesterol-binding site represents a new pharmacological approach at diseases associated with altered cholinergic signalling.

The recent progress in research on effects of anesthetics and analgesics on G protein-coupled receptors

The exact mechanisms of action behind anesthetics and analgesics are still unclear. Much attention was focused on ion channels in the central nervous system as targets for anesthetics and analgesics in the 1980s. During the 1990s, major advances were made in our understanding of the physiology and pharmacology of G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. Thus, several lines of studies have shown that G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the targets for anesthetics and analgesics and especially, that some of them inhibit the functions of GPCRs, i.e,, muscarinic receptors and substance P receptors. However, these studies had been focused on only G(q) coupled receptors. There has been little work on G(s)- and G(i)-coupled receptors. In the last decade, a new assay system, using chimera G(i/o)-coupled receptor fused to Gq(i5), has been established and the effects of anesthetics and analgesics on the function of G(i)-coupled receptors is now more easily studied. This review highlights the recent progress of the studies regarding the effects of anesthetics and analgesics on GPCRs.

Effect of alfaxalone infusion on the electroencephalogram of dogs anaesthetized with halothane

OBJECTIVE

To describe the effects of alfaxalone on the canine electroencephalogram (EEG).

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study.

ANIMALS

Eight healthy adult Huntaway dogs.

METHODS

Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with halothane (0.85-0.95 end-tidal volume %) in oxygen. Animals were ventilated to maintain stable end-tidal CO(2) and halothane concentrations. Following a 30 minute stabilisation period, alfaxalone (0.5 mg kg(-1) ) was infused intravenously over a 5 minute period. The electroencephalogram was recorded from the beginning of the stabilisation period until 60 minutes following the start of alfaxalone treatment. Data were subjected to fast Fourier transformation, and median frequency, 95% spectral edge frequency and total EEG power were calculated. Two-factorial repeated measures anova (time and EEG channels were factors) was used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

A shift in the dominant frequency band from beta to delta after alfaxalone treatment and occasional burst suppression were observed. Median frequency decreased significantly below baseline (9.2 ± 1.4 Hz) (mean ± SD) during alfaxalone infusion. The lowest value (4.8 ± 1.2 Hz) was recorded 5 minutes after the start of infusion. Spectral edge frequency also decreased below baseline (26.2 ± 1.5 Hz) and the lowest value (22.6 ± 1.5 Hz) also was detected at 5 minutes after the start of infusion. Total EEG power did not change significantly. In some frequencies EEG power increased soon after the start of alfaxalone infusion, then decreased below baseline later (biphasic pattern).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Alfaxalone induced biphasic changes on EEG and decreased F(50) and F(95) in halothane anaesthetized dogs.

Dexmedetomidine inhibits muscarinic type 3 receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes and muscarine-induced intracellular Ca2+ elevation in cultured rat dorsal root ganglia cells

Dexmedetomidine, an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, has been approved for clinical use, although the mechanism of dexmedetomidine action has not been fully elucidated. Several studies have shown that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are recognized as targets for anesthetics and analgesics. Therefore, it is of interest to determine whether dexmedetomidine affects the function of GPCRs other than the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor. We examined the effects of dexmedetomidine on M(1), M(3), 5-HT(2C), substance P, and orexin 1 receptors in Xenopus oocytes expressing individual receptors. In addition, we investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine on muscarinic receptor-mediated changes in [Ca(2+)](i) in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of 3-week-old Wister rats. Dexmedetomidine did not affect the 5-HT(2C)-, or substance P-induced Cl(-) currents and had little inhibition on the orexin A-induced current in oocytes expressing the respective receptors. The compound also had little effect on the acetylcholine (ACh, 1 microM)-induced Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-) currents in Xenopus oocytes expressing M(1) receptors. In contrast, dexmedetomidine inhibited the ACh-induced currents in Xenopus oocytes expressing M(3) receptors; 1 nM, 10 nM, 100 nM, and 1 microM dexmedetomidine reduced the current to 66.5 +/- 4.8, 51.3 +/- 12, 34.6 +/- 11, and 26.8 +/- 6.4% of the control value, respectively (EC(50) = 3.5 +/- 0.7 nM). Dexmedetomidine reduced the ACh-induced Cl(-) currents after treatment with the selective protein kinase C inhibitor GF109203X. Moreover, the compound inhibited the muscarinic receptor-mediated increases in [Ca(2+)](i) in cultured DRG cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Dexmedetomidine inhibits the function of M(3) receptors, in addition to its agonistic effects on alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, which provides further insight into the pharmacological properties of dexmedetomidine.