Inhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxic respiratory failure in children and adults: a meta-analysis

Evaluation of Inhaled Alprostadil in Hospitalized Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Intermittent inhaled alprostadil (iPGE₁) may be a viable alternative to inhaled nitric oxide or epoprostenol for management of right ventricular failure, pulmonary hypertension (pHTN) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, limited evidence exists regarding iPGE₁ use in adults, ideal dosing strategies, or optimal use cases.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical characteristics of patients receiving iPGE₁ and identify specific sub-populations warranting further research.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, descriptive analysis of inpatients who received at least one dose of iPGE₁. The primary outcome was to describe patient characteristics and alprostadil dosing strategies. Secondary outcomes included changes in respiratory support requirements, hemodynamics, and inotropic/vasoactive use. Outcomes were stratified and compared based on primary therapeutic indication (cardiac or pulmonary).

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients received iPGE₁ 40 (75%) for pulmonary (pHTN or ARDS) and 14 (25%) for cardiac indications. There was no difference between indications in the number of patients de-escalated from level of respiratory (53% vs 57%, P = 0.76), inotropic (70% vs 57%, P = 0.39), or vasopressor support (78% vs 57%, P = 0.17). Furthermore, there was no significant improvement in cardiopulmonary parameters at multiple time intervals after iPGE₁ initiation.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This is the largest study to date on the use of intermittent iPGE₁ in adults. Alprostadil was safely utilized in novel populations; however, efficacy as evaluated by clinical or surrogate endpoints could not be demonstrated and further investigation is needed to determine its potential and optimal place in therapy.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide as an Adjunct to Thrombolytic Therapy in a Patient with Submassive Pulmonary Embolism and Severe Hypoxemia

Introduction

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is a selective pulmonary vasodilator with limited indications in adults. We present a patient with hypoxemia and right ventricular dysfunction due to submassive acute pulmonary emboli where iNO was used as a bridge to thrombolysis.

Case

A 29-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for alcohol intoxication complicated with aspiration pneumonia and acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. His medical history included morbid obesity (BMI 43) and alcohol dependence syndrome. Nine days after admission, he developed severe acute hypoxia and tachycardia with arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) of 52 mmHg requiring a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 14 cmH2O and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 1. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a large embolus in the right main pulmonary artery and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) reported new right ventricular dilatation with decreased right ventricular function. Due to the severe hypoxemia, he was started on iNO via the breathing circuit of the ventilator at a concentration of 20 parts per million (ppm) with steady improvement in oxygenation after 1 hour with a PaO2 of 81 mmHg on the same ventilator setting. The patient was given thrombolysis with alteplase and the iNO was slowly tapered off during the subsequent four days with concomitant successful tapering of PEEP to 8 cmH2O and FiO2 of 0.45.

Conclusion

Inhaled NO has been used to improve ventilation-perfusion matching and also to reduce pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Its effects on PVR may be useful in the setting of acute pulmonary emboli where vascular obstruction and vasoconstriction contribute to increased pulmonary arterial pressure and PVR which can present as acute right heart failure. We suggest that iNO, if available, could be considered in those patients with acute pulmonary emboli associated with significant hypoxemia as an adjunctive therapy or bridge to thrombolysis or thrombectomy.

Effect of Inhaled Nitric Oxide on Outcomes in Children With Acute Lung Injury: Propensity Matched Analysis From a Linked Database

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of inhaled nitric oxide on outcomes in children with acute lung injury.

DESIGN

Retrospective study with a secondary data analysis of linked data from two national databases. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for potential confounding variables between patients who received at least 24 hours of inhaled nitric oxide (inhaled nitric oxide group) and those who did not receive inhaled nitric oxide (no inhaled nitric oxide group).

SETTING

Linked data from Virtual Pediatric Systems (LLC) database and Pediatric Health Information System.

PATIENTS

Patients less than 18 years old receiving mechanical ventilation for acute lung injury at nine participating hospitals were included (2009-2014).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 20,106 patients from nine hospitals were included. Of these, 859 patients (4.3%) received inhaled nitric oxide for at least 24 hours during their hospital stay. Prior to matching, patients in the inhaled nitric oxide group were younger, with more comorbidities, greater severity of illness scores, higher prevalence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and greater resource utilization. Before matching, unadjusted outcomes, including mortality, were worse in the inhaled nitric oxide group (inhaled nitric oxide vs no inhaled nitric oxide; 25.7% vs 7.9%; p < 0.001; standardized mortality ratio, 2.6 [2.3-3.1] vs 1.1 [1.0-1.2]; p < 0.001). Propensity score matching of 521 patient pairs revealed no difference in mortality in the two groups (22.3% vs 20.2%; p = 0.40; standardized mortality ratio, 2.5 [2.1-3.0] vs 2.3 [1.9-2.8]; p = 0.53). However, the other outcomes such as ventilation free days (10.1 vs 13.6 d; p < 0.001), duration of mechanical ventilation (13.8 vs 10.1 d; p < 0.001), duration of ICU and hospital stay (15.5 vs 12.2 d; p < 0.001 and 28.0 vs 24.1 d; p < 0.001), and hospital costs ($150,569 vs $102,823; p < 0.001) were significantly worse in the inhaled nitric oxide group.

CONCLUSIONS

This large observational study demonstrated that inhaled nitric oxide administration in children with acute lung injury was not associated with improved mortality. Rather, it was associated with increased hospital utilization and hospital costs.

The effect of inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome in children and adults: a Cochrane Systematic Review with trial sequential analysis

Acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Inhaled nitric oxide has been used to improve oxygenation but its role remains controversial. Our primary objective in this systematic review was to examine the effects of inhaled nitric oxide administration on mortality in adults and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. We included all randomised, controlled trials, irrespective of date of publication, blinding status, outcomes reported or language. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We performed several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of inhaled nitric oxide. There was no statistically significant effect of inhaled nitric oxide on longest follow-up mortality (inhaled nitric oxide group 250/654 deaths (38.2%) vs. control group 221/589 deaths (37.5%; relative risk (95% CI) 1.04 (0.9-1.19)). We found a significant improvement in PaO₂ /F_I O₂ ratio at 24 h (mean difference (95% CI) 15.91 (8.25-23.56)), but not at 48 h or 72 h, while four trials indicated improved oxygenation in the inhaled nitric oxide group at 96 h (mean difference (95% CI) 14.51 (3.64-25.38)). There were no statistically significant differences in ventilator-free days, duration of mechanical ventilation, resolution of multi-organ failure, quality of life, length of stay in intensive care unit or hospital, cost-benefit analysis and methaemoglobin and nitrogen dioxide levels. There was an increased risk of renal impairment (risk ratio (95% CI) 1.59 (1.17-2.16)) with inhaled nitric oxide. In conclusion, there is insufficient evidence to support inhaled nitric oxide in any category of critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome despite a transient improvement in oxygenation, since mortality is not reduced and it may induce renal impairment.

Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and mostly acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are critical conditions. AHRF results from several systemic conditions and is associated with high mortality and morbidity in individuals of all ages. Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) has been used to improve oxygenation, but its role remains controversial. This Cochrane review was originally published in 2003, and has been updated in 2010 and 2016.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to examine the effects of administration of inhaled nitric oxide on mortality in adults and children with ARDS. Secondary objectives were to examine secondary outcomes such as pulmonary bleeding events, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, etc. We conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses, examined the role of bias and applied trial sequential analyses (TSAs) to examine the level of evidence.

SEARCH METHODS

In this update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015 Issue 11); MEDLINE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), EMBASE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), CAB, BIOSIS and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We handsearched the reference lists of the newest reviews and cross-checked them with our search of MEDLINE. We contacted the main authors of included studies to request any missed, unreported or ongoing studies. The search was run from inception until 18 November 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language. We contacted trial investigators and study authors to retrieve relevant and missing data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved disagreements by discussion. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We performed several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of INO in adults and children and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We presented pooled estimates of the effects of interventions as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risk of bias through assessment of trial methodological components and risk of random error through trial sequential analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Our primary objective was to assess effects of INO on mortality. We found no statistically significant effects of INO on longest follow-up mortality: 250/654 deaths (38.2%) in the INO group compared with 221/589 deaths (37.5%) in the control group (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.19; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). We found no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality at 28 days: 202/587 deaths (34.4%) in the INO group compared with 166/518 deaths (32.0%) in the control group (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.27; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). In children, there was no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality: 25/89 deaths (28.1%) in the INO group compared with 34/96 deaths (35.4%) in the control group (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.18; I² statistic = 22%; moderate quality of evidence).Our secondary objective was to assess the benefits and harms of INO. For partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), we found significant improvement at 24 hours (mean difference (MD) 15.91, 95% CI 8.25 to 23.56; I² statistic = 25%; 11 trials, 614 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For the oxygenation index, we noted significant improvement at 24 hours (MD -2.31, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.89; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 368 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For ventilator-free days, the difference was not statistically significant (MD -0.57, 95% CI -1.82 to 0.69; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 804 participants; high quality of evidence). There was a statistically significant increase in renal failure in the INO groups (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16; I² statistic = 0%; high quality of evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is insufficient to support INO in any category of critically ill patients with AHRF. Inhaled nitric oxide results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful, as it seems to increase renal impairment.

High-flow oxygen therapy and other inhaled therapies in intensive care units

In this Series paper, we review the current evidence for the use of high-flow oxygen therapy, inhaled gases, and aerosols in the care of critically ill patients. The available evidence supports the use of high-flow nasal cannulae for selected patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Heliox might prevent intubation or improve gas flow in mechanically ventilated patients with severe asthma. Additionally, it might improve the delivery of aerosolised bronchodilators in obstructive lung disease in general. Inhaled nitric oxide might improve outcomes in a subset of patients with postoperative pulmonary hypertension who had cardiac surgery; however, it has not been shown to provide long-term benefit in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Inhaled prostacyclins, similar to inhaled nitric oxide, are not recommended for routine use in patients with ARDS, but can be used to improve oxygenation in patients who are not adequately stabilised with traditional therapies. Aerosolised bronchodilators are useful in mechanically ventilated patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but are not recommended for those with ARDS. Use of aerosolised antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia and ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis shows promise, but the delivered dose can be highly variable if proper attention is not paid to the delivery method.

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Mortality in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To establish the current respiratory practice patterns in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients and investigate their associations with mortality across multiple centers.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort between 2009 and 2014.

SETTING

Twelve children's hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

Two hundred twenty-two pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with acute respiratory failure using invasive mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

PICU mortality of our cohort was 60.4%. Mortality at 180 days post PICU discharge was 74%. Length of PICU stay prior to initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation was significantly lower in survivors, and the odds of mortality increased for longer length of PICU stay prior to intubation. A total of 91 patients (41%) received noninvasive ventilation at some point during their PICU stay prior to intubation. Noninvasive ventilation use preintubation was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.6; p = 0.010). Patients ventilated longer than 15 days had higher odds of death (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.2; p = 0.004). Almost 40% of patients (n = 85) were placed on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation with a mortality of 76.5% (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.7-6.5; p = 0.0004). Of the 20 patients who survived high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, 18 were placed on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation no later than the third day of invasive mechanical ventilation. In this subset of 85 patients, transition to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation within 2 days of the start of invasive mechanical ventilation resulted in a 76% decrease in the odds of death compared with those who transitioned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation later in the invasive mechanical ventilation course.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that perhaps earlier more aggressive critical care interventions in the pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant patient with respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation may offer an opportunity to improve outcomes.

Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Fibrosis versus Repair

Clinical and basic experimental approaches to pediatric acute lung injury (ALI), including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), have historically focused on acute care and management of the patient. Additional efforts have focused on the etiology of pediatric ALI and ARDS, clinically defined as diffuse, bilateral diseases of the lung that compromise function leading to severe hypoxemia within 7 days of defined insult. Insults can include ancillary events related to prematurity, can follow trauma and/or transfusion, or can present as sequelae of pulmonary infections and cardiovascular disease and/or injury. Pediatric ALI/ARDS remains one of the leading causes of infant and childhood morbidity and mortality, particularly in the developing world. Though incidence is relatively low, ranging from 2.9 to 9.5 cases/100,000 patients/year, mortality remains high, approaching 35% in some studies. However, this is a significant decrease from the historical mortality rate of over 50%. Several decades of advances in acute management and treatment, as well as better understanding of approaches to ventilation, oxygenation, and surfactant regulation have contributed to improvements in patient recovery. As such, there is a burgeoning interest in the long-term impact of pediatric ALI/ARDS. Chronic pulmonary deficiencies in survivors appear to be caused by inappropriate injury repair, with fibrosis and predisposition to emphysema arising as irreversible secondary events that can severely compromise pulmonary development and function, as well as the overall health of the patient. In this chapter, the long-term effectiveness of current treatments will be examined, as will the potential efficacy of novel, acute, and long-term therapies that support repair and delay or even impede the onset of secondary events, including fibrosis.

Noninferiority of Inhaled Epoprostenol to Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Treatment of ARDS

Background: Inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled epoprostenol have been evaluated for the management of hypoxemia in acute respiratory distress syndrome, with clinical trials demonstrating comparable improvements in oxygenation. However, these trials have several limitations, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding clinical outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the noninferiority and safety of inhaled epoprostenol compared with inhaled nitric oxide in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients with a primary outcome of ventilator-free days from day 1 to day 28. Methods: This was a retrospective, noninterventional, propensity-matched, noninferiority cohort study. Propensity score for receipt of inhaled nitric oxide was developed and patients were matched accordingly using a prespecified algorithm. Secondary objectives included evaluating day 28 intensive care unit–free days, changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio after inhalation therapy initiation, and hospital mortality. Safety endpoints assessed included hypotension, methemoglobinemia, renal dysfunction, rebound hypoxemia, significant bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. Results: Ninety-four patients were included, with 47 patients in each group. Patients were well-matched with similar baseline characteristics, except patients in inhaled nitric oxide group had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Management of ARDS was similar between groups. Mean difference in ventilator-free days between inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide was 2.16 days (95% confidence interval = −0.61 to 4.9), with lower limit of 95% confidence interval greater than the prespecified margin, hence satisfying noninferiority. There were no differences in any secondary or safety outcomes. Conclusions: Inhaled epoprostenol was noninferior to inhaled nitric oxide with regard to ventilator-free days from day 1 to day 28 in ARDS patients.

Suppression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 by inhaled nitric oxide attenuates the adverse effects of hyperoxia in a rat model of acute lung injury

INTRODUCTION

Locally increased expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in acute lung injury (ALI) is largely responsible for fibrin deposition in the alveolae and lung microvasculature. In vitro, nitric oxide (NO) effectively suppresses the ischemic induction of PAI-1. We aimed to investigate the effects of inhaled NO on PAI-1 expression in ALI in a rat model with and without hyperoxia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Healthy adult rats were primed with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) via an intraperitoneal challenge followed by a second dose of LPS given intratracheally to induce ALI (LPS group), whereas the control groups were given sterile saline. All groups were allocated to subgroups according to gas exposure: NO (20 parts per million, NO), 95% oxygen (O), both (ONO), or room air (A). At 4h, 24h, 48h (after 4h or 24h exposure to the various gases, 24h gas intervention and then observation until 48h), the rat lungs were processed and PAI-1 protein and mRNA expression, histopathological lung injury scores and fibrin deposition were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 4 and 24h, inhaled NO caused the PAI-1 mRNA levels in the LPS-NO and LPS-ONO subgroups to decrease compared with the untreated LPS subgroups. At 48h, higher PAI-1 mRNA levels than those of the corresponding control subgroup were only observed in the LPS-O subgroup, and these values were lower in the LPS-ONO subgroup than in the LPS-O subgroup. The trends of the PAI-1 protein levels mirrored those of PAI-1 mRNA. At 48h, PAI-1 protein levels in the LPS-NO and LPS-ONO subgroups were decreased compared with those in the untreated LPS subgroups. The histopathological lung injury scores and fibrin deposition in LPS subgroups that inhaled NO showed a decreasing trend compared with the untreated LPS subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled NO can suppress elevated PAI-1 expression in rats with ALI induced by endotoxin. Although exposure to high-concentration oxygen prolongs the duration of PAI-1 mRNA overexpression in ALI, inhaled NO can reduce this effect and alleviate both fibrin deposition and lung injury.

Hypoxaemic rescue therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Why, when, what and which one?

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an inflammatory condition of the lungs which can result in refractory and life-threatening hypoxaemic respiratory failure. The risk factors for the development of ARDS are many but include trauma, multiple blood transfusions, burns and major surgery, therefore this condition is not uncommon in the severely injured patient. When ARDS is severe, high-inspired oxygen concentrations are frequently required to minimise hypoxaemia. In these situations clinicians commonly utilise interventions termed 'hypoxaemic rescue therapies' in an attempt to improve oxygenation, as without these, conventional mechanical ventilation can be associated with high mortality. However, their lack of efficacy on mortality when used prophylactically in generalised ARDS cohorts has resulted in their use being confined to clinical trials and the subset of ARDS patients with refractory hypoxaemia. First line hypoxaemic rescue therapies include inhaled nitric oxide, prone positioning, alveolar recruitment manoeuvres and high frequency oscillatory ventilation, which have all been shown to be effective in improving oxygenation. In situations where these first line rescue therapies are inadequate extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation has emerged as a lifesaving second line rescue therapy. Rescue therapies in critically ill patients with traumatic injuries presents specific challenges and requires careful assessment of both the short and longer term benefits, therapeutic limitations, and specific adverse effects before their use.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome after pulmonary resection

Postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a recognized complication of pulmonary resection. It is characterized by the acute onset of hypoxemia with radiographic infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema, without elevations in the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Many studies suggest that around 2-5 % of patients develop some degree of lung injury, and the mortality from ARDS following pulmonary resection remains high. ARDS following thoracotomy and lung resection has a miserable prognosis, with overall hospital mortality rates over 25 %. The present review evaluates the evidence available in the literature tracking perioperative mortality and morbidity as well as the pathogenesis and management of ARDS in patients undergoing pulmonary resection.

Improvements in pulmonary and general critical care reduces mortality following ventilator-associated pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common hospital-acquired infection in the intensive care unit, with substantial subsequent mortality. The mortality following VAP declined in the 1980s and 1990s. Experts suggest that little progress has been made in the outcomes from VAP since several novel interventions have failed. We nonetheless hypothesized that mortality following VAP has continued to decrease owing to advances in pulmonary critical care.

METHODS

We identified all adult patients with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined, intensive care unit-acquired VAP between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2008, from a prospectively collected database.

RESULTS

A total of 793 cases of VAP occurred in the study period. Cases were divided into four periods (1997-1999, 2000-2002, 2003-2005, or 2006-2008) to compare outcomes over time. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were stable, while mortality was significantly lower in Period 4 when compared with Periods 1 and 2 (p = 0.004 and 0.009, respectively). A logistic regression model predicting death (c statistic = 0.871) revealed age (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.05), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (1.09, 1.05-1.14), white blood cell count (1.03, 1.00-1.06), transplant recipient (3.45, 1.40-8.53), transfusions (3.25, 1.37-7.68), and pulmonary disease (3.01, 1.67-5.45) were independent predictors of death, as was the presence of trauma (0.10, 0.06-0.18), chronic steroid therapy (0.39, 0.17-0.91), and patient length of stay (0.99, 0.98-0.99), with odds ratios less than 1.0. In addition, those patients treated in Period 1 (2.23, 1.16-4.29) or Period 2 (2.13, 1.12-4.06) had twice the risk of death following an episode of VAP when compared with those treated in the most recent period.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that mortality following an episode of VAP continues to decrease over time and attribute this to advancements in pulmonary and general critical care rather than any specific interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, level II.

Acute respiratory failure

Acute respiratory failure is common in critically ill children, who are at increased risk of respiratory embarrassment because of the developmental variations in the respiratory system. Although multiple etiologies exist, pneumonia and bronchiolitis are most common. Respiratory system monitoring has evolved, with the clinical examination remaining paramount. Invasive tests are commonly replaced with noninvasive monitors. Children with ALI/ARDS have better overall outcomes than adults, although data regarding specific therapies are still lacking. Most children will have some degree of long-term physiologic respiratory compromise after recovery from ALI/ARDS. The physiologic basis for respiratory failure and its therapeutic options are reviewed here.

Inhaled nitric oxide reduces secondary brain damage after traumatic brain injury in mice

Ischemia, especially pericontusional ischemia, is one of the leading causes of secondary brain damage after traumatic brain injury (TBI). So far efforts to improve cerebral blood flow (CBF) after TBI were not successful because of various reasons. We previously showed that nitric oxide (NO) applied by inhalation after experimental ischemic stroke is transported to the brain and induces vasodilatation in hypoxic brain regions, thus improving regional ischemia, thereby improving brain damage and neurological outcome. As regional ischemia in the traumatic penumbra is a key mechanism determining secondary posttraumatic brain damage, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of NO inhalation after experimental TBI. NO inhalation significantly improved CBF and reduced intracranial pressure after TBI in male C57 Bl/6 mice. Long-term application (24 hours NO inhalation) resulted in reduced lesion volume, reduced brain edema formation and less blood-brain barrier disruption, as well as improved neurological function. No adverse effects, e.g., on cerebral auto-regulation, systemic blood pressure, or oxidative damage were observed. NO inhalation might therefore be a safe and effective treatment option for TBI patients.

S-nitrosothiol transport via PEPT2 mediates biological effects of nitric oxide gas exposure in macrophages

The pharmacological effects of nitric oxide (NO) administered as a gas are dependent on the conversion to S-nitrosocysteine, and as such are largely mediated by the L-type amino-acid transporters (LATs) in several cell types. The dipeptide transporter PEPT2 has been proposed as a second route for S-nitrosothiol (SNO) transport, but this has never been demonstrated. Because NO governs important immune functions in alveolar macrophages, we exposed rat alveolar macrophages (primary and NR8383 cells) to NO gas at the air-liquid interface ± LPS stimulation in the presence of PEPT2 substrate Cys-Gly (or the LAT substrate L-Cys) ± transporter competitors. We found that SNO uptake and NO-dependent actions, such as the activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC), the augmentation of sGC-dependent filamentous actin (F-actin) polymerization, phagocytosis, and the inhibition of NF-κB activation, were significantly augmented by the addition of Cys-Gly in a manner dependent on PEPT2 transport. We found parallel (and greater) effects that were dependent on LAT transport. The contribution of cystine/cysteine shuttling via system x cystine transporter (xCT) to SNO uptake was relatively minor. The observed effects were unaffected by NO synthase inhibition. The NO gas treatment of alveolar macrophages increased SNO uptake, the activation of sGC, F-actin polymerization, and phagocytosis, and inhibited NF-κB activation, in a manner dependent on SNO transport via PEPT2, as well as via LAT.

Update: adjuncts to mechanical ventilation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the most recent advances and clinical applications of adjunctive techniques in mechanical ventilation, focusing on their overall impact on mortality and their potential indications in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The modern variants of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are not only rescue alternatives but also therapeutic options for patients with severe but potentially reversible acute respiratory distress syndrome. Prone positioning returns as a desirable therapeutic option for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Recent reports suggest that permissive hypercapnia, therapeutic paralysis, sedation, and controlled hypothermia could potentially improve important clinical outcomes. Although more clinical trials are clearly needed to support the use of inhaled prostacyclins in severe respiratory failure, encouraging results have been described in recent publications.

SUMMARY

Giving the complexity and dynamism of acute lung injury, timing, severity, and pathophysiologic pertinence are mandatory components of decision-making when considering the application of adjunctive measures to support mechanical ventilation.

Inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome: what is the evidence?

The mortality for acute respiratory distress syndrome remains unacceptably high. Two vasodilators, inhaled prostacyclin and inhaled nitric oxide, are reviewed in this article. Knowledge of inhaled prostacyclin has grown substantially in the past 30 years, but less research exists about its utility in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Inhaled prostacyclin and other prostaglandin derivatives are used in acute respiratory distress syndrome with increasing frequency. Currently, only randomized controlled trials exist for inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Randomized controlled trials with consistent dosing methods are needed for both vasodilators to better define their role in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

'Safe' methaemoglobin concentrations are a mortality risk factor in patients receiving inhaled nitric oxide

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) can reduce pulmonary arterial hypertension and improve oxygenation in some patients with severe respiratory or heart failure. Despite this, iNO has not been found to improve survival. This study aimed to perform a local practice audit to assess the mortality predictors of critically ill patients who had received iNO as therapy for pulmonary hypertension and respiratory or heart failure. A retrospective audit in a single tertiary centre intensive care unit of patients receiving iNO was conducted between 2004 and 2009. The indications for iNO use, comorbidities, severity of illness, organ function, oxygenation, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores, patterns of iNO use, adverse events and outcomes were reviewed. In 215 patients receiving iNO, improvement in oxygenation after one hour from iNO commencement did not predict either intensive care unit (P = 0.36) or hospital (P = 0.72) mortality. The independent risk factors for intensive care unit mortality were worsening Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores within 24 hours of commencing iNO (adjusted odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.18), the Charlson Comorbidity Score (adjusted odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.91) and the peak methaemoglobin concentration in arterial blood while receiving iNO (adjusted odds ratio 2.67, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 4.96). Inhaled nitric oxide as salvage therapy for severe respiratory failure in critically ill patients is not routinely justified. Increased methaemoglobin concentration during iNO therapy, even when predominantly less than 3%, is associated with increased mortality.

Endothelial activation and dysregulation in malaria: a potential target for novel therapeutics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite parenteral artesunate therapy, the fatality rate of cerebral malaria remains high. Adjunctive therapy targeting the underlying pathophysiology of cerebral malaria may further improve the clinical outcome. Endothelial activation and dysfunction is a central process in the pathogenesis of cerebral malaria. An improved understanding of how endothelium is perturbed in cerebral malaria may yield novel strategies to diagnose and intervene. Here, we discuss recent findings on the key molecular mediators of endothelial activation/dysregulation in cerebral malaria, and innovative endothelial-based experimental approaches to improve detection and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Biomarkers of endothelial activation [e.g., angiopoietin (Ang)-1, Ang-2, and a soluble form of the Ang-receptor (soluble Tie-2)] have been shown to be reliable predictors of malarial disease severity and mortality, and may improve clinical triage and management. Moreover, they may represent novel therapeutic targets to improve clinical outcome. Restoring bioavailable nitric oxide by administration of inhaled nitric oxide or its substrate, L-arginine, may rescue endothelial function, decrease Ang-2, and improve disease outcome in cerebral malaria.

SUMMARY

Interventions targeting the Ang-Tie-2 axis to promote endothelial quiescence, including agents to improve endothelial nitric oxide, represent potential adjunctive therapies for cerebral malaria.

Utilization patterns and patient outcomes associated with use of rescue therapies in acute lung injury

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with use of rescue therapies in patients with acute lung injury.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of multicentered, randomized, controlled trial data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network.

SETTING

Intensive care units of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network centers across the United States.

PATIENTS

Subjects enrolled in six Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network trials occurring between 1996 and 2005.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One hundred sixty-six of 2632 (6.3%) subjects received rescue therapy, defined as prone positioning (97 of 166 [58%]), inhaled vasodilators (47 of 166 [28%]), high-frequency ventilation (12 of 166 [7%]), or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (10 of 166 [6%]). Use of inhaled vasodilators increased whereas use of prone position decreased over time (p for trend = 0.04 and 0.0013, respectively). Multivariate predictors for use of rescue therapy included age (odds ratio per 10 yrs and 95% confidence interval: 0.88; 0.78-0.99; p = .049), positive end-expiratory pressure (odds ratio per 5-cm H2O increase: 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.69; p = .019), Pao2/Fio2; odds ratio per 5-cm H2O increase: 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.99; p = .017), peak airway pressure (odds ratio per 5-cm H2O increase: 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.237; p = .047), and study order (odds ratio per subsequent Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network study: 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.41; p = .02). Cox proportional hazards analysis of propensity score-matched subjects showed no difference in survival for those who received rescue therapy vs. those who did not (hazard ratio for death after rescue therapy or index date, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.78; p = .72). No differences in survival were found between those who received prone positioning vs. inhaled vasodilators (propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio for prone 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.10; p = .76).

CONCLUSIONS

Rescue therapies are utilized in younger patients with more severe oxygenation deficits. Patterns of rescue therapy utilization appear to be changing over time. Within the limits of an observational study design, we did not find evidence of a survival benefit with use of rescue therapies in acute lung injury.

Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury in adults and children: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, defined as acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, are critical conditions associated with frequent mortality and morbidity in all ages. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been used to improve oxygenation, but its role remains controversial. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We searched CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, International Web of Science, LILACS, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and CINHAL (up to January 31, 2010). Additionally, we hand-searched reference lists, contacted authors and experts, and searched registers of ongoing trials. Two reviewers independently selected all parallel group RCTs comparing iNO with placebo or no intervention and extracted data related to study methods, interventions, outcomes, bias risk, and adverse events. All trials, irrespective of blinding or language status were included. Retrieved trials were evaluated with Cochrane methodology. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of iNO in adults and children and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We assessed the risk of bias through assessment of trial methodological components. We assessed the risk of random error by applying trial sequential analysis.

RESULTS

We included 14 RCTs with a total of 1303 participants; 10 of these trials had a high risk of bias. iNO showed no statistically significant effect on overall mortality (40.2%versus 38.6%) (relative risks [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93 to 1.22; I² = 0) and in several subgroup and sensitivity analyses, indicating robust results. Limited data demonstrated a statistically insignificant effect of iNO on duration of ventilation, ventilator-free days, and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. We found a statistically significant but transient improvement in oxygenation in the first 24 hours, expressed as the ratio of Po₂ to fraction of inspired oxygen (mean difference [MD] 15.91, 95% CI 8.25 to 23.56; I² = 25%). However, iNO appears to increase the risk of renal impairment among adults (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16; I² = 0) but not the risk of bleeding or methemoglobin or nitrogen dioxide formation.

CONCLUSION

iNO cannot be recommended for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. iNO results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful.

Acute lung injury in children: therapeutic practice and feasibility of international clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

To describe mechanical ventilation strategies in acute lung injury and to estimate the number of eligible patients for clinical trials on mechanical ventilation management. In contrast to adult medicine, there are few clinical trials to guide mechanical ventilation management in children with acute lung injury.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study for six 24-hr periods from June to November 2007.

SETTING

Fifty-nine pediatric intensive care units in 12 countries in North America and Europe.

PATIENTS

We identified children meeting acute lung injury criteria and collected detailed information on illness severity, mechanical ventilatory support, and use of adjunctive therapies.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 3823 patients screened, 414 (10.8%) were diagnosed with acute lung injury by their treating physician, but only 165 (4.3%) patients met prestablished inclusion/exclusion criteria to this trial and, therefore, would have been eligible for a clinical trial. Of these, 124 (75.2%) received conventional mechanical ventilation, 27 (16.4%) received high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, and 14 (8.5%) received noninvasive mechanical ventilation. In the conventional mechanical ventilation group, 43.5% were ventilated in a pressure control mode with a mean tidal volume of 8.3 ± 3.3 mL/kg; and there was no clear relationship between positive end-expiratory pressure and Fio2 delivery in the conventional mechanical ventilation group. Use of adjunctive treatments, including nitric oxide, prone positioning, surfactant, hemofiltration, recruitment maneuvers, steroids, bronchodilators, and fluid restriction, was highly variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals inconsistent mechanical ventilation practice and use of adjunctive therapies in children with acute lung injury. Pediatric clinical trials assessing mechanical ventilation management are needed to generate evidence to optimize outcomes. We estimate that a large number of centers (∼60) are needed to conduct such trials; it is imperative, therefore, to bring about international collaboration.

Pulmonary vascular and right ventricular dysfunction in adult critical care: current and emerging options for management: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vascular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension (PH), and resulting right ventricular (RV) failure occur in many critical illnesses and may be associated with a worse prognosis. PH and RV failure may be difficult to manage: principles include maintenance of appropriate RV preload, augmentation of RV function, and reduction of RV afterload by lowering pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). We therefore provide a detailed update on the management of PH and RV failure in adult critical care.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, based on a search of the literature from 1980 to 2010, by using prespecified search terms. Relevant studies were subjected to analysis based on the GRADE method.

RESULTS

Clinical studies of intensive care management of pulmonary vascular dysfunction were identified, describing volume therapy, vasopressors, sympathetic inotropes, inodilators, levosimendan, pulmonary vasodilators, and mechanical devices. The following GRADE recommendations (evidence level) are made in patients with pulmonary vascular dysfunction: 1) A weak recommendation (very-low-quality evidence) is made that close monitoring of the RV is advised as volume loading may worsen RV performance; 2) A weak recommendation (low-quality evidence) is made that low-dose norepinephrine is an effective pressor in these patients; and that 3) low-dose vasopressin may be useful to manage patients with resistant vasodilatory shock. 4) A weak recommendation (low-moderate quality evidence) is made that low-dose dobutamine improves RV function in pulmonary vascular dysfunction. 5) A strong recommendation (moderate-quality evidence) is made that phosphodiesterase type III inhibitors reduce PVR and improve RV function, although hypotension is frequent. 6) A weak recommendation (low-quality evidence) is made that levosimendan may be useful for short-term improvements in RV performance. 7) A strong recommendation (moderate-quality evidence) is made that pulmonary vasodilators reduce PVR and improve RV function, notably in pulmonary vascular dysfunction after cardiac surgery, and that the side-effect profile is reduced by using inhaled rather than systemic agents. 8) A weak recommendation (very-low-quality evidence) is made that mechanical therapies may be useful rescue therapies in some settings of pulmonary vascular dysfunction awaiting definitive therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights that although some recommendations can be made to guide the critical care management of pulmonary vascular and right ventricular dysfunction, within the limitations of this review and the GRADE methodology, the quality of the evidence base is generally low, and further high-quality research is needed.

Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute lung injury in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), defined as acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), are critical conditions. AHRF results from a number of systemic conditions and is associated with high mortality and morbidity in all ages. Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) has been used to improve oxygenation but its role remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically assess the benefits and harms of INO in critically ill patients with AHRF.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified from electronic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 1); MEDLINE; EMBASE; Science Citation Index Expanded; International Web of Science; CINAHL; LILACS; and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (up to 31st January 2010). We contacted trial authors, authors of previous reviews, and manufacturers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all RCTs, irrespective of blinding or language, that compared INO with no intervention or placebo in children or adults with AHRF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently abstracted data and resolved any disagreements by discussion. We presented pooled estimates of the intervention effects on dichotomous outcomes as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our primary outcome measure was all cause mortality. We performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of INO in adults and children and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We assessed the risk of bias through assessment of trial methodological components and the risk of random error through trial sequential analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 RCTs with a total of 1303 participants; 10 of these trials had a high risk of bias. INO showed no statistically significant effect on overall mortality (40.2% versus 38.6%) (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.22; I(2) = 0) and in several subgroup and sensitivity analyses, indicating robust results. Limited data demonstrated a statistically insignificant effect of INO on duration of ventilation, ventilator-free days, and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. We found a statistically significant but transient improvement in oxygenation in the first 24 hours, expressed as the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen and the oxygenation index (MD 15.91, 95% CI 8.25 to 23.56; I(2) = 25%). However, INO appears to increase the risk of renal impairment among adults (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16; I(2) = 0) but not the risk of bleeding or methaemoglobin or nitrogen dioxide formation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

INO cannot be recommended for patients with AHRF. INO results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful.

Prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of sepsis: 1st revision of S-2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. (DSG)) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI))

Practice guidelines are systematically developed statements and recommendations that assist the physicians and patients in making decisions about appropriate health care measures for specific clinical circumstances taking into account specific national health care structures. The 1^st revision of the S-2k guideline of the German Sepsis Society in collaboration with 17 German medical scientific societies and one self-help group provides state-of-the-art information (results of controlled clinical trials and expert knowledge) on the effective and appropriate medical care (prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care) of critically ill patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. The guideline had been developed according to the “German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal” of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF). In view of the inevitable advancements in scientific knowledge and technical expertise, revisions, updates and amendments must be periodically initiated. The guideline recommendations may not be applied under all circumstances. It rests with the clinician to decide whether a certain recommendation should be adopted or not, taking into consideration the unique set of clinical facts presented in connection with each individual patient as well as the available resources.

Pathophysiology, management and treatment of smoke inhalation injury

Smoke inhalation injury continues to increase morbidity and mortality in burn patients in both the third world and industrialized countries. The lack of uniform criteria for the diagnosis and definition of smoke inhalation injury contributes to the fact that, despite extensive research, mortality rates have changed little in recent decades. The formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, as well as the procoagulant and antifibrinolytic imbalance of alveolar homeostasis, all play a central role in the pathogenesis of smoke inhalation injury. Further hallmarks include massive airway obstruction owing to cast formation, bronchospasm, the increase in bronchial circulation and transvascular fluid flux. Therefore, anticoagulants, antioxidants and bronchodilators, especially when administered as an aerosol, represent the most promising treatment strategies. The purpose of this review article is to provide an overview of the pathophysiological changes, management and treatment options of smoke inhalation injury based on the current literature.

Bench-to-bedside review: Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults

Nitric oxide (NO) is an endogenous mediator of vascular tone and host defence. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) results in preferential pulmonary vasodilatation and lowers pulmonary vascular resistance. The route of administration delivers NO selectively to ventilated lung units so that its effect augments that of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and improves oxygenation. This 'Bench-to-bedside' review focuses on the mechanisms of action of iNO and its clinical applications, with emphasis on acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Developments in our understanding of the cellular and molecular actions of NO may help to explain the hitherto disappointing results of randomised controlled trials of iNO.

Acute lung injury review

The first report of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was published in 1967, and even now acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS are severe forms of diffuse lung disease that impose a substantial health burden all over the world. Recent estimates indicate approximately 190,000 cases per year of ALI in the United States each year, with an associated 74,500 deaths per year. Common causes of ALI/ARDS are sepsis, pneumonia, trauma, aspiration pneumonia, pancreatitis, and so on. Several pathologic stages of ALI/ARDS have been described: acute inflammation with neutrophil infiltration, fibroproliferative phase with hyaline membranes, with varying degrees of interstitial fibrosis, and resolution phase. There has been intense investigation into the pathophysiologic events relevant to each stage of ALI/ARDS, and much has been learned in the alveolar epithelial, endobronchial homeostasis, and alveolar cell immune responses, especially neutrophils and alveolar macrophages in an animal model. However, these effective results in the animal models are not equally adoptive to those in randomized, controlled trials. The clinical course of ALI/ARDS is variable with the likely pathophysiologic complexity of human ALI/ARDS. In 1994, the definition was recommended by the American-European Consensus Conference Committee, which facilitated easy nomination of patients with ALI/ARDS for a randomized, clinical trial. Here, we review the recent randomized, clinical trials of ALI/ARDS.

Recently published papers: therapies failed, disputed, and beneficent

A recent meta-analysis puts another nail in the coffin of a therapy that held great promise for management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Two papers further highlight the growing controversy surrounding the safety profile of drotrecogin alfa (activated) and increase the clamour for a new independent trial. Also covered are steroids and their role in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation, and success in instituting hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Finally, which form of renal replacement therapy should we be using in the intensive care unit?

Pediatric acute lung injury

Among ventilated children, the incidence of acute lung injury (ALI) was 9%; of that latter group 80% developed the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The population-based prevalence of pediatric ARDS was 5.5 cases/100.000 inhabitants. Underlying diseases in children were septic shock (34%), respiratory syncytial virus infections (16%), bacterial pneumonia (15%), near-drowning 9%, and others. Mortality ranged from 18% to 27% for ALI (including ALI-non ARDS and ARDS) and from 29% to 50% for ARDS. Mortality was only 3%-11% in children with ALI-non ARDS. As risk factors, oxygenation indices and multi-organ failure have been identified. New insights into the pathophysiology (for example the interplay between intraalveolar coagulation/fibrinolysis and inflammation and the genetic polymorphism for the angiotensin-converting enzyme) offer new therapeutic options. Lung protective mechanical ventilation with optimal lung recruitment is the mainstay of supportive therapy. New therapeutic modalities refer to corticosteroid and surfactant treatment. Well-designed follow up studies are needed.

Effect of nitric oxide on oxygenation and mortality in acute lung injury: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the use of inhaled nitric oxide to treat acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) and to summarise the effects of nitric oxide, compared with placebo or usual care without nitric oxide, in adults and children with ALI or ARDS.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and CENTRAL (to October 2006), proceedings from four conferences, and additional information from authors of 10 trials.

REVIEW METHODS

Two reviewers independently selected parallel group randomised controlled trials comparing nitric oxide with control and extracted data related to study methods, clinical and physiological outcomes, and adverse events.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, duration of ventilation, oxygenation, pulmonary arterial pressure, adverse events.

RESULTS

12 trials randomly assigning 1237 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall methodological quality was good. Using random effects models, we found no significant effect of nitric oxide on hospital mortality (risk ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.94 to 1.30), duration of ventilation, or ventilator-free days. On day one of treatment, nitric oxide increased the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) (13%, 4% to 23%) and decreased the oxygenation index (14%, 2% to 25%). Some evidence suggested that improvements in oxygenation persisted until day four. There was no effect on mean pulmonary arterial pressure. Patients receiving nitric oxide had an increased risk of developing renal dysfunction (1.50, 1.11 to 2.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Nitric oxide is associated with limited improvement in oxygenation in patients with ALI or ARDS but confers no mortality benefit and may cause harm. We do not recommend its routine use in these severely ill patients.

[Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis]

A recent survey conducted by the publicly funded Competence Network Sepsis (Sep- Net) reveals that severe sepsis and/or septic shock occurs in 75,000 inhabitants (110 out of 100,000) and sepsis in 79,000 inhabitants (116 out of 100,000) in Germany annually. This illness is responsible for approx. 60,000 deaths and ranges as the third most frequent cause of death after acute myocardial infarction. Direct costs for the intensive care of patients with severe sepsis alone amount to approx. 1.77 billion euros, which means that about 30% of the budget in intensive care is used to treat severe sepsis. However, until now German guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of severe sepsis did not exist. Therefore, the German Sepsis Society initiated the development of guidelines which are based on international recommendations by the International Sepsis Forum (ISF) and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and take into account the structure and organisation of the German health care system. Priority was given to the following guideline topics: a) diagnosis, b) prevention, c) causative therapy, d) supportive therapy, e) adjunctive therapy. The guidelines development process was carefully planned and strictly adhered to according to the requirements of the Working Group of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF).

Inhaled nitric oxide increases endothelial permeability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

Pneumonia is a frequent cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading pathogen in nosocomial pneumonia. The management of ARDS remains a major problem, and only a limited number of options can improve the oxygenation. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been widely used, although this molecule is a free radical potentially harmful through the generation of toxic radical derivatives. The goal of our study was to assess the consequences of iNO (10 ppm) in a rat model of P. aeruginosa-induced lung injury.

DESIGN

The animals were exposed for 24 h to iNO after instillation of the pathogen. Distal alveolar fluid clearance (DAFC) and epithelial and endothelial permeability were measured with a double flux of radio-labeled albumin.

RESULTS

DAFC and epithelial permeability were increased in pneumonia but not influenced by iNO. In contrast, endothelial permeability was statistically significantly higher in the pneumonic animals exposed to iNO than in the pneumonic group without iNO (0.24+/-0.03 vs 0.47+/-0.1, p<0.05). This increase was not related to the production of nitrate/nitrite, nor to the increase of the inflammatory response evaluated by cytokine levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-10). The alveolar recruitment of polymorphonuclear neutrophils was comparable in the pneumonic group exposed to iNO and the pneumonic group without iNO.

CONCLUSION

iNO increases the endothelial permeability in P. aeruginosa pneumonia. The mechanism is not related to the production of nitrate/nitrite or to a greater inflammatory response.

[Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis. Guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine]

A recent survey conducted by the publicly funded Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet) reveals that severe sepsis and/or septic shock occurs in 75,000 inhabitants (110 out of 100,000) and sepsis in 79,000 inhabitants (116 out of 100,000) in Germany annually. This illness is responsible for approximately 60,000 deaths and ranges as the third most frequent cause of death after acute myocardial infarction. Direct costs for the intensive care of patients with severe sepsis alone amount to approximately 1.77 billion euros, which means that about 30% of the budget in intensive care is used to treat severe sepsis. However, until now German guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of severe sepsis did not exist. Therefore, the German Sepsis Society initiated the development of guidelines which are based on international recommendations by the International Sepsis Forum (ISF) and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and take into account the structure and organization of the German health care system. Priority was given to the following guideline topics: a) diagnosis, b) prevention, c) causative therapy, d) supportive therapy, e) adjunctive therapy. The guidelines development process was carefully planned and strictly adhered to the requirements of the Working Group of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF).

Severe respiratory failure: advanced treatment options

BACKGROUND

Severe respiratory failure (including acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome) continues to be associated with significant mortality and morbidity in patients of all ages.

OBJECTIVE

To review the laboratory and clinical data in support of and future directions for the advanced treatment of severe respiratory failure.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE/PubMed search of all relevant primary and review articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Our understanding of lung pathophysiology and the role of ventilator-induced lung injury through basic science investigation has led to advances in lung protective strategies for the mechanical ventilation support of patients with severe respiratory failure. Specific modalities reviewed include low-tidal volume ventilation, permissive hypercapnia, the open lung approach, recruitment maneuvers, airway pressure release ventilation, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, prone positioning, and extracorporeal life support. The pharmacologic strategies (including corticosteroids, surfactant, and nitric oxide) investigated for the treatment of severe respiratory failure are also reviewed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe respiratory failure, an incremental approach to the management of severe hypoxemia requires implementation of the strategies reviewed, with knowledge of the evidence base to support these strategies.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the pathophysiology and treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) during pregnancy.

DATA SOURCE

Review of select articles from MEDLINE, including published abstracts, case reports, observational studies, controlled trials, review articles, and institutional experience.

DATA SUMMARY

ARDS occurs in pregnancy and may have unique causes. Despite extensive clinical research to improve the management of ARDS, mortality remains high, and few strategies have shown a mortality benefit. Furthermore, in most published studies, pregnancy is an exclusionary criterion, and thus, few treatments have been adequately evaluated in obstetric populations. The treatment of ARDS in pregnancy is extrapolated from studies performed in the general ARDS patient population, with consideration given to the normal physiologic changes of pregnancy. In general, the best support of the fetus is support of the mother. From the age of viability (24-26 wks at most institutions) until full term, decisions regarding delivery should be made based primarily on the standard obstetric indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Little evidence exists regarding the management of ARDS specifically in pregnancy, and thus, treatment approaches must be drawn from studies performed in a general patient population. A multidisciplinary approach involving maternal-fetal medicine, neonatology, anesthesiology, and intensivist clinicians is essential to optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes.

Nitric oxide synthase inhibition in sepsis? Lessons learned from large-animal studies

Nitric Oxide (NO) plays a controversial role in the pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock. Its vasodilatory effects are well known, but it also has pro- and antiinflammatory properties, assumes crucial importance in antimicrobial host defense, may act as an oxidant as well as an antioxidant, and is said to be a "vital poison" for the immune and inflammatory network. Large amounts of NO and peroxynitrite are responsible for hypotension, vasoplegia, cellular suffocation, apoptosis, lactic acidosis, and ultimately multiorgan failure. Therefore, NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors were developed to reverse the deleterious effects of NO. Studies using these compounds have not met with uniform success however, and a trial using the nonselective NOS inhibitor N(G)-methyl-l-arginine hydrochloride was terminated prematurely because of increased mortality in the treatment arm despite improved shock resolution. Thus, the issue of NOS inhibition in sepsis remains a matter of debate. Several publications have emphasized the differences concerning clinical applicability of data obtained from unresuscitated, hypodynamic rodent models using a pretreatment approach versus resuscitated, hyperdynamic models in high-order species using posttreatment approaches. Therefore, the present review focuses on clinically relevant large-animal studies of endotoxin or living bacteria-induced, hyperdynamic models of sepsis that integrate standard day-to-day care resuscitative measures.

Lack of alteration of endogenous nitric oxide pathway during prolonged nitric oxide inhalation in intensive care unit patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare hemodynamic and gasometric variables and the plasma concentrations of nitric oxide metabolites (cyclic guanosine monophosphate and nitrate and nitrite), endothelin-1, and renin-angiotensin metabolites before and after the start of nitric oxide inhalation, after prolonged nitric oxide inhalation, and before and after nitric oxide withdrawal.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit, university hospital.

SUBJECTS

Patients with acute lung injury and right ventricular failure.

INTERVENTIONS

Nitric oxide inhalation (10-12 ppm) during a median of 2.9 days (12 hrs to 6.5 days).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The pulmonary vasodilator effects of inhaled nitric oxide improved arterial oxygenation in patients with acute lung injury (p < .05) and reduced right atrial pressure in patients with right ventricular dysfunction (p < .01). These beneficial effects lasted the whole period of prolonged inhaled nitric oxide therapy up to 6.5 days. However, when inhaled nitric oxide was withdrawn, pulmonary vasodilator effects rapidly disappeared, and Pao2/Fio2 ratio markedly deteriorated in all studied patients to return to pre-inhaled nitric oxide levels. Changes in plasma cyclic guanosine monophosphate and nitrate and nitrite paralleled those of pulmonary vasodilatory effects. An immediate increase in plasma cyclic guanosine monophosphate with a slightly delayed increase in plasma nitrate and nitrite was observed at inhaled nitric oxide start with no attenuation during the prolonged inhaled nitric oxide therapy. A marked decrease toward pre-inhaled nitric oxide levels was seen within hours of inhaled nitric oxide withdrawal. In addition, no alteration of plasma endothelin-1 or renin-angiotensin mediators was observed during or after inhaled nitric oxide therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed a lack of attenuation in the beneficial effects of inhaled nitric oxide and a lack of alteration of endogenous nitric oxide, endothelin-1, and renin-angiotensin pathways during prolonged nitric oxide inhalation.

A critical appraisal of a systematic review: Sokol J, Jacob SE, Bohn D: Inhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003 (1): CD002787

OBJECTIVE

To review the findings and discuss the implications of the use of inhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients beyond the neonatal period.

DESIGN

A critical appraisal of a systematic review.

FINDINGS

The authors conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the effect of inhaled nitric oxide on clinical outcomes of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The outcomes included mortality, changes in oxygenation, ventilator-free days, duration of intensive care and hospital stays, and adverse effects. It was a high-quality systematic review provided with strict entry criteria, an extensive literature search, and thorough critical appraisals. Only five trials (n = 623) met entry criteria. Inhaled nitric oxide had no effect on mortality in studies without crossover of treatment failures to open-label inhaled nitric oxide (relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.44). A statistically significant improvement in oxygenation was observed in one study. The effect, however, was observed only in the first 4 days of treatment and was not clinically significant. The heterogeneity in study findings precluded meta-analyses of other clinical outcomes and adverse effects in the selected studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to determine whether inhaled nitric oxide is beneficial or harmful for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in children and adults. While awaiting further studies to prove its benefit, inhaled nitric oxide should not either be recommended as a standard management or excluded for the treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome: update on the latest developments in basic and clinical research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome is a common, serious condition affecting a heterogeneous population of critically ill patients. Other than low tidal volume ventilation, no specific therapy has improved survival. Understanding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and lessons to be learned from previous clinical trials is necessary for the development of new therapies and the rational design of studies assessing their efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome occurs in 6-8% of the general intensive care unit population, with a mortality of 32-45%. A recent epidemiologic study found that multi-organ dysfunction, use of tidal volumes higher than 6 ml/kg, and high mean fluid balance were independent risks for mortality. Although high levels of inflammatory mediators are also markers for acute respiratory distress syndrome development and death, short courses of high-dose steroids are not effective in acute cases. The latest theory of biotrauma proposes cellular mechanisms by which mechanical ventilation incites a local and systemic inflammatory response; protective lung ventilation with low tidal volumes can attenuate this inflammation and injury to distal organs. Endogenous surfactant function is clearly impaired, but no commercially available surfactant preparation has been shown to reduce mortality. Results of trials to determine efficacy of steroids in late cases and optimal fluid management are pending.

SUMMARY

The results of recent clinical trials have raised more questions. Further study of the inflammatory response, surfactant regulation, and the cellular impact of mechanical ventilation should help to develop new therapies, target patients most likely to benefit, and identify appropriate timing of intervention.

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation and adjunctive therapies: Inhaled nitric oxide and prone positioning

OBJECTIVE

To review the use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) with adjunctive therapies (inhaled nitric oxide [iNO] and prone positioning [PP]) in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

DATA SOURCES

Published studies evaluating the use of iNO, PP, and HFOV in adult patients with ARDS.

DATA SUMMARY

Despite ongoing preclinical and clinical research, the therapeutic armamentarium for ARDS remains limited. Although a pressure- and volume-limited strategy aimed at mitigating ventilator-associated lung injury has demonstrated mortality benefit, patients with severe ARDS may still develop life-threatening hypoxemia. As a result, various salvage therapies aimed at improving oxygenation, including HFOV, iNO, and PP alone or in combination, have been evaluated in patients with refractory ARDS. Although the few preclinical and clinical trials of combination therapy to date have shown promising improvements in oxygenation and other physiological variables, with few adverse clinical events, the impact on survival awaits the performance of large randomized trials.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited clinical data to recommend the widespread use of combination therapy in patients with ARDS. In the subset of patients with life-threatening hypoxemia from refractory ARDS, combination therapy is safe and may be considered for salvage therapy. More rigorous randomized, controlled trials are needed to help delineate the therapeutic role of combination therapy in adults with ARDS.