The effect of three inhaled anesthetics in mice harboring mutations in the GluR6 (kainate) receptor gene

Selective vulnerability of hippocampal CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cells: What are possible pathomechanisms and should more attention be paid to the CA3 region in future studies?

Transient ischemia and reperfusion selectively damage neurons in brain, with hippocampal pyramidal cells being particularly vulnerable. Even within hippocampus, heterogeneous susceptibility is evident, with higher vulnerability of CA1 versus CA3 neurons described for several decades. Therefore, numerous studies have focused exclusively on CA1. Pediatric cardiac surgery is increasingly focusing on studies of hippocampal structures, and a negative impact of cardiopulmonary bypass on the hippocampus cannot be denied. Recent studies show a shift in selective vulnerability from neurons of CA1 to CA3. This review shows that cell damage is increased in CA3, sometimes stronger than in CA1, depending on several factors (method, species, age, observation period). Despite a highly variable pattern, several markers illustrate greater damage to CA3 neurons than previously assumed. Nevertheless, the underlying cellular mechanisms have not been fully deciphered to date. The complexity is reflected in possible pathomechanisms discussed here, with numerous factors (NMDA, kainate and AMPA receptors, intrinsic oxidative stress potential and various radicals, AKT isoforms, differences in vascular architecture, ratio of pro- and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 factors, vulnerability of interneurons, mitochondrial dysregulation) contributing to either enhanced CA1 or CA3 vulnerability. Furthermore, differences in expressed genome, proteome, metabolome, and transcriptome in CA1 and CA3 appear to influence differential behavior after damaging stimuli, thus metabolomics-, transcriptomics-, and proteomics-based analyses represent a viable option to identify pathways of selective vulnerability in hippocampal neurons. These results emphasize that future studies should focus on the CA3 field in addition to CA1, especially with regard to improving therapeutic strategies after ischemic/hypoxic brain injury.

Sevoflurane activates hippocampal CA3 kainate receptors (Gluk2) to induce hyperactivity during induction and recovery in a mouse model

BACKGROUND

In addition to general anaesthetic effects, sevoflurane can also induce hyperactive behaviours during induction and recovery, which may contribute to neurotoxicity; however, the mechanism of such effects is unclear. Volatile anaesthetics including isoflurane have been found to activate the kainate (GluK2) receptor. We developed a novel mouse model and further explored the involvement of kainate (GluK2) receptors in sevoflurane-induced hyperactivity.

METHODS

Maximal speed, mean speed, total movement distance and resting percentage of C57BL/6 mice were quantitatively measured using behavioural tracking software before and after sevoflurane anaesthesia. Age dependence of this model was also analysed and sevoflurane-induced hyperactivity was evaluated after intracerebral injection of the GluK2 receptor blocker NS-102. Neurones from the hippocampal CA3 region were used to undertake in vitro electrophysiological measurement of kainate currents and miniature excitatory postsynaptic potential (mEPSP).

RESULTS

Sevoflurane induced significant hyperactivities in mice under sevoflurane 1% anaesthesia and during the recovery period, characterized as increased movement speed and total distance. The hyperactivity was significantly increased in young mice compared with adults (P<0.01) and pre-injection of NS-102 significantly prevented this sevoflurane-induced hyperactivity. In electrophysiological experiments, sevoflurane significantly increased the frequency of mEPSP at low concentrations and evoked kainate currents at high concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a behavioural model in mice that enabled characterization of sevoflurane-induced hyperactivity. The kainate (GluK2) receptor antagonist attenuated these sevoflurane-induced hyperactivities in vivo, suggesting that kainate receptors might be the underlying therapeutic targets for sevoflurane-induced hyperactivities in general anaesthesia.

General anesthesia mediated by effects on ion channels

Although it has been more than 165 years since the first introduction of modern anesthesia to the clinic, there is surprisingly little understanding about the exact mechanisms by which general anesthetics induce unconsciousness. As a result, we do not know how general anesthetics produce anesthesia at different levels. The main handicap to understanding the mechanisms of general anesthesia is the diversity of chemically unrelated compounds including diethyl ether and halogenated hydrocarbons, gases nitrous oxide, ketamine, propofol, benzodiazepines and etomidate, as well as alcohols and barbiturates. Does this imply that general anesthesia is caused by many different mechanisms Until now, many receptors, molecular targets and neuronal transmission pathways have been shown to contribute to mechanisms of general anesthesia. Among these molecular targets, ion channels are the most likely candidates for general anesthesia, in particular γ-aminobutyric acid type A, potassium and sodium channels, as well as ion channels mediated by various neuronal transmitters like acetylcholine, amino acids amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolpropionic acid or N-methyl-D-aspartate. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated the involvement in general anesthesia of other ion channels with distinct gating properties such as hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic- nucleotide-gated channels. The main aim of the present review is to summarize some aspects of current knowledge of the effects of general anesthetics on various ion channels.

Alternatives to mammalian pain models 1: use of C. elegans for the study of volatile anesthetics

Performing genetic studies in model organisms is a powerful approach for investigating the mechanisms of volatile anesthetic action. Striking similarities between the results observed in Caenorhabditis elegans and in other organisms suggest that many of the conclusions can be generalized across disparate phyla, and that findings in these model organisms will be applicable in humans. In this chapter, we provide detailed protocols for working with C. elegans to study volatile anesthetics. First, we explain how to fabricate chambers for exposing worms to these compounds. Then, we describe how to use the chambers to perform a variety of experiments, including behavioral assays, dose-response studies, and mutant screening or selection. Finally, we discuss a convenient strategy for performing mutant rescue assays. These methods are the building blocks for designing and interpreting genetic experiments with volatile anesthetics in C. elegans. Genetic studies in this simple, easy-to-use organism will continue to contribute to a more thorough understanding of anesthetic mechanisms, and may lead to the development and safer use of anesthetic agents.

Anaesthetic mechanisms: update on the challenge of unravelling the mystery of anaesthesia

General anaesthesia is administered each day to thousands of patients worldwide. Although more than 160 years have passed since the first successful public demonstration of anaesthesia, a detailed understanding of the anaesthetic mechanism of action of these drugs is still lacking. An important early observation was the Meyer-Overton correlation, which associated the potency of an anaesthetic with its lipid solubility. This work focuses attention on the lipid membrane as a likely location for anaesthetic action. With the advent of cellular electrophysiology and molecular biology techniques, tools to dissect the components of the lipid membrane have led, in recent years, to the widespread acceptance of proteins, namely receptors and ion channels, as more likely targets for the anaesthetic effect. Yet these accumulated data have not produced a comprehensive explanation for how these drugs produce central nervous system depression. In this review, we follow the story of anaesthesia mechanisms research from its historical roots to the intensely neurophysiological research regarding it today. We will also describe recent findings that identify specific neuroanatomical locations mediating the actions of some anaesthetic agents.

Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?

A paradox arises from present information concerning the mechanism(s) by which inhaled anesthetics produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation. Several findings, such as additivity, suggest a common site at which inhaled anesthetics act to produce immobility. However, two decades of focused investigation have not identified a ligand- or voltage-gated channel that alone is sufficient to mediate immobility. Indeed, most putative targets provide minimal or no mediation. For example, opioid, 5-HT3, gamma-aminobutyric acid type A and glutamate receptors, and potassium and calcium channels appear to be irrelevant or play only minor roles. Furthermore, no combination of actions on ligand- or voltage-gated channels seems sufficient. A few plausible targets (e.g., sodium channels) merit further study, but there remains the possibility that immobilization results from a nonspecific mechanism.

Knockout of the gene encoding the K(2P) channel KCNK7 does not alter volatile anesthetic sensitivity

The molecular site of action for volatile anesthetics remains unknown despite many years of study. Members of the K(2P) potassium channel family, whose currents are potentiated by volatile anesthetics have emerged as possible anesthetic targets. In fact, a mouse model in which the gene for TREK-1 (KCNK2) has been inactivated shows resistance to volatile anesthetics. In this study we tested whether inactivation of another member of this ion channel family, KCNK7, in a knockout mouse displayed altered sensitivity to the anesthetizing effect of volatile anesthetics. KCNK7 knockout mice were produced by standard gene inactivation methods. Heterozygous breeding pairs produced animals that were homozygous, heterozygous or wild-type for the inactivated gene. Knockout animals were tested for movement in response to noxious stimulus (tail clamp) under varying concentrations of isoflurane, halothane, and desflurane to define the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) preventing movement. Mice homozygous for inactivated KCNK7 were viable and indistinguishable in weight, general development and behavior from heterozygotes or wild-type littermates. Knockout mice (KCNK7-/-) displayed no difference in MAC for the three volatile anesthetics compared to heterozygous (+/-) or wild-type (+/+) littermates. Because inactivation of KCNK7 does not alter MAC, KCNK7 may play only a minor role in normal CNS function or may have had its function compensated for by other inhibitory mechanisms. Additional studies with transgenic animals will help define the overall role of the K(2P) channels in normal neurophysiology and in volatile anesthetic mechanisms.

Correlating the clinical actions and molecular mechanisms of general anesthetics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent in-vitro and in-vivo research on molecular mechanisms of general anesthetics' actions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Classes of general anesthetics with distinct clinical profiles appear to induce amnesia, hypnosis, and immobility via different molecular targets. Propofol, etomidate, and barbiturates produce profound amnesia and hypnosis, but weak immobility, by enhancing the activity of specific gamma-aminobutyric acid typeA receptors. In contrast, nitrous oxide, xenon, and ketamine produce analgesia, but weak hypnosis and amnesia, by inhibiting glutamate and nicotinic receptors and activating potassium 'leak' channels such as TREK-1. Volatile halogenated anesthetics show little selectivity for molecular targets. They act on all the channels mentioned above, and other targets such as glycine receptors and mediators of neurotransmitter release.

SUMMARY

Several clinically distinct 'anesthetic states' are induced by different classes of drugs acting on neuronal circuits via different molecular targets. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic and toxic actions of general anesthetics helps us reframe the 'art' of anesthesia into more of a 'science'. These studies also enhance efforts to develop new drugs with improved clinical utility.