Ketamine attenuates sympathetic activity through mechanisms not mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the isolated spinal cord of neonatal rats

Effects of ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists on rat dural artery diameter in an intravital microscopy model

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

During migraine, trigeminal nerves may release calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), inducing cranial vasodilatation and central nociception; hence, trigeminal inhibition or blockade of craniovascular CGRP receptors may prevent this vasodilatation and abort migraine headache. Several preclinical studies have shown that glutamate receptor antagonists affect the pathophysiology of migraine. This study investigated whether antagonists of NMDA (ketamine and MK801), AMPA (GYKI52466) and kainate (LY466195) glutamate receptors affected dural vasodilatation induced by alpha-CGRP, capsaicin and periarterial electrical stimulation in rats, using intravital microscopy.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anaesthetized and the overlying bone was thinned to visualize the dural artery. Then, vasodilator responses to exogenous (i.v. alpha-CGRP) and endogenous (released by i.v. capsaicin and periarterial electrical stimulation) CGRP were elicited in the absence or presence of the above antagonists.

KEY RESULTS

alpha-CGRP, capsaicin and periarterial electrical stimulation increased dural artery diameter. Ketamine and MK801 inhibited the vasodilator responses to capsaicin and electrical stimulation, while only ketamine attenuated those to alpha-CGRP. In contrast, GYKI52466 only attenuated the vasodilatation to exogenous alpha-CGRP, while LY466195 did not affect the vasodilator responses to endogenous or exogenous CGRP.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Although GYKI52466 has not been tested clinically, our data suggest that it would not inhibit migraine via vascular mechanisms. Similarly, the antimigraine efficacy of LY466195 seems unrelated to vascular CGRP-mediated pathways and/or receptors. In contrast, the cranial vascular effects of ketamine and MK801 may represent a therapeutic mechanism, although the same mechanism might contribute, peripherally, to cardiovascular side effects.

Comparison of effects of propofol and midazolam at sedative concentrations on sympathetic tone generation in the isolated spinal cord of neonatal rats

BACKGROUND

Propofol and midazolam are common sedatives for critically ill patients. Little is known about the effects of propofol and midazolam on central sympathetic activity when drug concentrations in extracellular milieu are under precise control. Previous work using an in vitro neonatal rat splanchnic nerve-spinal cord preparation has demonstrated that tonic sympathetic activity is generated spontaneously in the thoracic spinal cord. The aim of this study was to investigate the concentration effects of propofol and midazolam on spinally generated sympathetic activity.

METHODS

Using an in vitro neonatal rat splanchnic nerve-spinal cord preparation that allows the precise control of drug concentrations, the central sympathetic effects elicited by the application of propofol (10-640 microM) and midazolam (10-640 microM) were compared.

RESULTS

There was a prompt decrease in sympathetic activity on application of propofol or midazolam in a concentration-dependent manner. A significant decrease in sympathetic activity was observed on application of propofol at 80-640 microM; however, the application of propofol at 10-40 microM caused only a slight alteration in activity. The sympathetic activity was not altered significantly by 10 microM of midazolam, but the application of midazolam at 20-640 microM caused a significant decrease in activity. Thus, in these experimental conditions, the minimum concentration of propofol causing a significant decrease in sympathetic activity was 80 microM and that of midazolam was 20 microM.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings suggest that the administration of 9-19 microM of propofol or 0.7-0.9 microM of midazolam, the clinically relevant concentrations for sedation, does not alter central sympathetic outflow at the spinal cord level. However, propofol at a concentration of 86 microM, which could be achieved by a single-bolus loading dose to induce sedation, depresses central sympathetic activity.