A prospective observational study of ethnic and racial differences in neuraxial labor analgesia request and pain relief

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Peripartum Pain Assessment and Management

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine if there were racial/ethnic disparities in pain assessment and management from labor throughout the postpartum period.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all births from January 2019 to December 2021 in a single urban, quaternary care hospital, excluding patients with hysterectomy, ICU stay, transfusion of more than 3 units of packed red blood cells, general anesthesia, or evidence of a substance abuse disorder. We characterized and compared patterns of antepartum and postpartum pain assessments, epidural use, pain scores, and postpartum pain management by racial/ethnic group with bivariable analyses. Multivariable regression was performed to test for an association between race/ethnicity and amount of opioid pain medication in milligram equivalent units, stratified by delivery mode.

RESULTS

There were 18,085 births between 2019 and 2021 with available race/ethnicity data. Of these, 58.3% were white, 15.0% were Hispanic, 11.9% were Asian, 7.4% were Black, and the remaining 7.4% were classified as Other/Declined. There were no significant differences by race/ethnicity in the number of antepartum or postpartum pain assessments or the proportion of patients who received epidural analgesia. Black and Hispanic patients reported the highest maximum postpartum pain scores after vaginal and cesarean birth compared to white and Asian patients. However, Black and Hispanic patients received lower daily doses of opioid medications than white patients, regardless of delivery mode. After adjusting for patient factors and non-opioid medication dosages, all other racial/ethnic groups received less opioid medication than white patients.

CONCLUSION

Inequities were found in postpartum pain treatment, including among patients reporting the highest pain levels.

Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Health disparities continue to affect racial and ethnic marginalized obstetric patients disproportionally with increased risk of Cesarean delivery and pregnancy-related death. Yet, the literature on what influences such disparities in obstetric anesthesia service and its clinical outcomes is less well known. We set out to describe racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia during the peripartum period in the USA via a scoping review of the recent literature.

SOURCE

Using the Institute of Medicine's definition of disparities, we searched the National Library of Medicine's PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO, and Google Scholar for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2022 to identify literature on racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Out of 8,432 articles reviewed, 15 met our inclusion criteria. All but one study was observational. Seven studies were single-institutional while the remaining used multicentre data/databases. All studies compared two or more race and ethnicity classifications. Studies in this review described disparities in the use of labour epidural analgesia, labour epidural request timing, anesthesia for Cesarean deliveries, postpartum pain management, and epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headaches. Several studies reported disparities observed in the unadjusted models becoming no longer significant when adjusted for other covariates.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of the present scoping review on racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia, we present an evidence map identifying knowledge gaps and propose a future research agenda.

No pain management for labour: individual and organisational determinants: A secondary analysis of the 2016 French National Perinatal Survey

BACKGROUND

Disparities in access to pain management have been identified in several care settings, such as emergency departments and intensive care units, but with regard to labour analgesia, it remains poorly explored.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the proportion of women without pain management during labour and its individual and organisational determinants.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a nationwide cross-sectional population-based study, the 2016 French National Perinatal Survey.

SETTINGS

All maternity units in France.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten thousand and eleven women who attempted vaginal delivery with a labour duration at least 15 min.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Absence of pain management, defined as absence of any pharmacological or nonpharmacological analgesic method during labour.

RESULTS

Among the 10 011 women included, 542 (5.4%) had no labour pain management: 318 (3.7%) of the 8526 women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia and 222 (15.8%) of the 1402 who did not. Using generalised estimating equations stratified according to the maternal antenatal preference for neuraxial analgesia, the common determinants of no labour pain management in both groups were no attendance at childbirth education classes and admission to a delivery unit during the night. Among women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia, those who delivered in units with <1500 annual deliveries compared with units with 2000 to 3499 annual deliveries, were more likely to do without pain management [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39 to 2.78]; among those who did not prefer to use it, women born abroad were more likely to do without labour pain management (adjusted OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.40).

CONCLUSION

In France, 1 : 20 women had no labour pain management, and this proportion was three times higher among women who preferred not to use neuraxial analgesia. Enhancing maternal information on labour pain and its management, especially nonpharmacological methods, and rethinking care organisation, could improve access to analgesia of any kind.

Analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of epidural analgesia and its relationship with eutocic or dystocic delivery

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies have demonstrated the difference in the verbal rating scale with regard to obstructed labour and induced labour, so that obstructed labour and foetal macrosomia have been related to a greater sensation of pain during labour, particularly in the first stage. Even the epidural analgesia is linked to the need for instrumented or caesarean section due to foetal obstruction. The goal of the study is to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of epidural analgesia in normal versus obstructed labour.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty pregnant women were included in an observational, analytical, longitudinal and prospective study, that was performed in the Obstetrics Department of the Hospital Universitario Dexeus. All the nulliparous or multiparous over 36 weeks of pregnancy, after 3cm of cervical dilatation in spontaneous or induced labor were included. All the patients were given epidural analgesia according to protocol.

RESULTS

The basic descriptive methods were used for the univariate statistical analysis of the sample and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison of means between both groups. The correlations between variables were studied by means of the Spearman coefficient of correlation. The differences regarded as statistically significant are those whose P<.05.

CONCLUSION

In our population there were no statistically significant differences in the effectiveness of epidural analgesia in normal versus obstructed labour. Patients who got epidural analgesia and had obstructed labors have the same degree of verbal rating scale as patients that do not had obstructed labors (P>.05).

Factors associated with choice of delivery with or without epidural analgesia among laboring women: a cross-sectional survey at a tertiary care hospital of a developing country

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors responsible for epidural analgesia (EA) refusal among parturient patients.

METHODS

In this prospective cross-sectional study of six months, we included all consenting postpartum patients having a non-operative delivery in the obstetric unit of our hospital. Data were collected on a predesigned questionnaire and included information such as parity, education, reasons for delivering with or without EA, source of information and patient satisfaction. Knowledge regarding EA was assessed from patients delivering without EA.

RESULTS

From 933 patients enrolled, 730 (78.2%) delivered without EA, and 203 (21.7%) with EA. Only 11 (1.5%) patients refused EA for the reason of having natural birth process. Otherwise common reasons were misconceptions (65.9%) and lack of awareness about EA (20.5%); 70.5% had no knowledge of common side effects of EA. Among patients delivering with EA, 92.6% were offered EA by health care providers and had obstetricians and anesthesiologists as their sources of information.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in developing countries are laboring without EA, even in centers where there is a provision for it. The main reasons for not availing themselves of EA are lack of awareness and knowledge and misconceptions, rather than the desire to have un-medicated natural birth.