Preoperative statin administration does not protect against early postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study

100 Years of Critical Care in the Pages of Anesthesia & Analgesia

The founding of Anesthesia & Analgesia (A&A) in 1922 was roughly contemporaneous with the creation of the first intensive care unit (ICU) in the United States at Johns Hopkins in 1923. Throughout the next 100 years, the pages of A&A have mirrored the development of critical care as its own distinct specialty. Although primarily a journal focused on intraoperative anesthesia, A&A has maintained a small but steady presence in critical care research. This review highlights the history and development of critical care publications in the pages of A&A from early observations on the physiology of critical illness (1922-1949) to the groundbreaking work of Peter Safar and others on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1950-1970), the growth of modern critical care (1970-2010), and the 2020 to 2022 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era.

Association Between Preoperative Statin Use and Respiratory Complications After Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Statins possess pleiotropic effects, which potentially benefit noncardiovascular conditions. Previous work suggests that statins reduce inflammation and prevent acute respiratory distress syndrome and infections. However, there is a paucity of data regarding potential benefits of statins on respiratory and infectious complications, particularly after noncardiac surgery. We therefore evaluated respiratory and other complications in noncardiac surgery patients taking or not taking statins preoperatively.

METHODS

We obtained data from the Cleveland Clinic Perioperative Health Documentation System and evaluated medical records of 92,139 inpatients who had noncardiac surgery. Among these, 31,719 patients took statins preoperatively. Statin patients were compared to nonstatin patients on incidence of intraoperative use of albuterol and postoperative respiratory complications for primary analysis. Infectious complications, cardiovascular complications, in-hospital mortality, and duration of hospitalization were compared for secondary analyses, using inverse probability of treatment weighting to control for potential confounding.

RESULTS

Statin use was associated with lower odds of intraoperative albuterol treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.97; P = .001; number needed to treat [NNT] = 216). Postoperative respiratory complications were also less common (OR = 0.82; 98.75% CI, 0.78-0.87; P < .001). Secondarily, statin use was associated with lower odds of infections, cardiovascular complications, in-hospital mortality, and shorter duration of hospitalization. The interaction between statin use and sex was significant (with significance criteria P < .10) for all primary and secondary outcomes except intraoperative use of albuterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative statin use in noncardiac surgical patients was associated with slightly reduced odds of postoperative respiratory, infectious, and cardiovascular complications. However, the NNTs were high. Thus, despite the fact that statins appeared to be associated with lower odds of various complications, especially cardiovascular complications, our results do not support using statins specifically to reduce noncardiovascular complications after noncardiac surgery.

Anti-inflammatory Effects of Statins in Lung Vascular Pathology: From Basic Science to Clinical Trials

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (or statins) are cholesterol-lowering drugs and are among the most widely prescribed medications in the United States. Statins exhibit pleiotropic effects that extend beyond cholesterol reduction including anti-atherosclerotic, antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory, and antithrombotic effects. Over the last 20 years, statins have been studied and examined in pulmonary vascular disorders, including both chronic pulmonary vascular disease such as pulmonary hypertension, and acute pulmonary vascular endothelial injury such as acute lung injury. In both research and clinical settings, statins have demonstrated promising vascular protection through modulation of the endothelium, attenuation of vascular leak, and promotion of endothelial repair following lung inflammation. This chapter provides a summary of the rapidly changing literature, summarizes the anti-inflammatory mechanism of statins on pulmonary vascular disorders, and explores clinical evidence for statins as a potential therapeutic approach to modulation of the endothelium as well as a means to broaden our understanding of pulmonary vasculopathy pathophysiology.

What factors predispose patients to acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Sepsis, pneumonia, and shock are the most common conditions predisposing to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and certain host genetic variants have been associated with the development of ARDS. Risk modifiers include abuse of alcohol and tobacco, malnutrition, and obesity. The Lung Injury Prediction Score (LIPS) and the simplified Early Acute Lung Injury Score predict ARDS based on clinical and investigational criteria. Hospital-acquired ARDS may result from a medley factors of which high tidal volume ventilation, high oxygen concentration, and plasma transfusion are most commonly implicated. The Checklist for Lung Injury Prevention (CLIP) has been developed to ensure compliance with evidence-based practice that may affect ARDS occurrence. To date, no pharmacologic intervention has been shown to prevent ARDS

Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Is Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome a Preventable Disease?

Despite significant advances in our understanding and management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the morbidity and mortality from ARDS remains high. Given the limited number of effective treatments for established ARDS, the strategic focus of ARDS research has shifted toward identifying patients with or at high risk of ARDS early in the course of the underlying illness, when strategies to reduce the development and progression of ARDS and associated organ failures can be systematically evaluated. In this review, we summarize the rationale, current evidence, and future directions in ARDS prevention.

Major publications in the critical care pharmacotherapy literature: January-December 2014

PURPOSE

Nine recently published articles and one guideline with important implications for critical care pharmacy practice are summarized.

SUMMARY

The Critical Care Pharmacotherapy Literature Update (CCPLU) group includes more than 40 experienced critical care pharmacists across the United States. Group members monitor 29 peer-reviewed journals on an ongoing basis to identify literature relevant to pharmacy practice in the critical care setting. After evaluation by CCPLU group members, selected articles are chosen for summarization and distribution to group members nationwide based on applicability to practice, relevance, and study design and strength. Hundreds of relevant articles were evaluated by the group in 2014, of which 114 were summarized and disseminated to CCPLU group members. From among those 114 publications, 10 deemed to be of particularly high utility to the critical care practitioner were selected for inclusion in this review for their potential to change practice or reinforce current evidence-based practice. One of the selected articles presents updated recommendations on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); the other 9 address topics such as albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis, use of enteral statins for acute respiratory distress syndrome, fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, the use of unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin for primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and early protocol-based care for septic shock.

CONCLUSION

There were many important additions to the critical care pharmacotherapy literature in 2014, including a joint guideline for the management of AF and reports of clinical trials.

Impact of statins on ALI/ARDS: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Statins may be beneficial in treating acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but their application remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis of published studies investigated their potential benefit in ALI/ARDS treatment.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched and all randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies with head-to-head comparison between statin and standard care were included.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and six cohort studies were included. Overall, statins treatment had no significant effect on mortality compared with placebo (RCTs: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.72, 1.37; cohorts: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.71, 1.37). In addition, ventilator-free days were comparable between the two groups (RCTs: SMD = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.03, 0.19; cohorts: SMD = 0.06, 95% CI = -0.17, 0.29). The one-way sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of results.

CONCLUSION

The results did not show that statins had effects on mortality and ventilator-free days among ALI/ARDS patients. However, this meta-analysis is limited by the number of RCTs included.

Anesthesia for esophagectomy

Esophagectomy is a high-risk operation with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. Attention to detail in many areas of perioperative management should lead to an aggregation of marginal gains and improvement in postoperative outcome. This review addresses preoperative assessment and patient selection, perioperative care (focusing on pulmonary prehabilitation, ventilation strategies, goal-directed fluid therapy, analgesia, and cardiovascular complications), minimally invasive surgery, and current evidence for enhanced recovery in esophagectomy.