Influence of Mechanical Ventilation on the Incidence of Pneumothorax During Infraclavicular Subclavian Vein Catheterization: A Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Lung deflation while placing a subclavian vein catheter: Our experience in minimizing the risk of pneumothorax

PURPOSE

Lung deflation may reduce the risk of pneumothorax based on the assumption that the distance between the subclavian vein and the lung pleura would increase as well as the diameter of the vein. We aim to provide evidence to support the suggested desideratum of deflation in adults.

METHODS

A prospective database was created that included patients who underwent subclavian vein catheterization for monitoring and therapeutic reasons from January 2014 to January 2020. Measurements using ultrasonography of the diameter of the subclavian vein were taken while the patient's breathing was controlled by a ventilator and then repeated after disconnecting the mechanical ventilation and opening the pressure relief valve.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients were enrolled, with an average age of 41.9 years. The subclavian vein diameter was measured during controlled breathing with a mean average of 8.1 ± 0.6mm in males and 7.1 ± 0.5mm in females. The average increase after lung deflation with the pressure relief valve closed was 8.0± 5.1mm in males and 13.9 ± 5.4mm in females. An increase was noticed after opening a pressure valve, and the means were 5.5 ± 2.8mm in males and 5.1 ± 3.3mm in females. The catheter malposition rate was 0.8.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of interrupting mechanical ventilation and lung deflation lies within possibly avoiding pneumothorax as a complication of subclavian vein catheterization. These findings support the need for evidence regarding the curtailment of pneumothorax incidence in spontaneously breathing patients and the suggested increase in first-time punctures and success rates.

Quantitative Measurement of Pneumothorax Using Artificial Intelligence Management Model and Clinical Application

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be a solution for delayed or misdiagnosed pneumothorax. This study developed, a deep-learning-based AI model to estimate the pneumothorax amount on a chest radiograph and applied it to a treatment algorithm developed by experienced thoracic surgeons. U-net performed semantic segmentation and classification of pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax areas. The pneumothorax amount was measured using chest computed tomography (volume ratio, gold standard) and chest radiographs (area ratio, true label) and calculated using the AI model (area ratio, predicted label). Each value was compared and analyzed based on clinical outcomes. The study included 96 patients, of which 67 comprised the training set and the others the test set. The AI model showed an accuracy of 97.8%, sensitivity of 69.2%, a negative predictive value of 99.1%, and a dice similarity coefficient of 61.8%. In the test set, the average amount of pneumothorax was 15%, 16%, and 13% in the gold standard, predicted, and true labels, respectively. The predicted label was not significantly different from the gold standard (p = 0.11) but inferior to the true label (difference in MAE: 3.03%). The amount of pneumothorax in thoracostomy patients was 21.6% in predicted cases and 18.5% in true cases.

[Catheterization of the subclavian vein and the risk of pneumothorax : Mechanical ventilation increases the risk of pneumothorax during infraclavicular landmark-guided subclavian vein puncture: a prospective randomized study]

BACKGROUND

Infraclavicular subclavian vein (SCV) catheterization is a standard procedure in anesthesia and intensive care. There is a lack of evidence on how mechanical ventilation during venipuncture of the SCV influences pneumothorax rates.

OBJECTIVE

Primary hypothesis: non-inferiority of continuing vs. discontinuing mechanical ventilation during infraclavicular puncture of the SCV with respect to the pneumothorax rate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized and single-blinded study was approved by the local ethics committee. A total of 1021 eligible patients who underwent cranial neurosurgery in 2 different university hospitals were assessed between August 2014 and October 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups directly before induction of anesthesia. Intervention groups for venipuncture of the SCV were mechanical ventilation: tidal volume 7 ml/kg ideal body weight, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) ideal body weight/10, n = 535, or apnea: manual/spontaneous, APL valve 0 mbar, n = 486. Patients and the physicians who assessed pneumothorax rates were blinded to the intervention group. Venipuncture was carried out by both inexperienced and experienced physicians.

RESULTS

The pneumothorax rate was significantly higher in the mechanical ventilation group (2.2% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.012) with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.63 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.17-27.2; p = 0.031). A lower body mass index (BMI) was associated with a higher pneumothorax rate, OR 0.89 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

In this study landmark-guided infraclavicular SCV catheterization was associated with a significantly higher rate of pneumothorax when venipuncture was performed during mechanical ventilation and not in apnea. If a short phase of apnea is justifiable in the patient, mechanical ventilation should be discontinued during the venipuncture procedure.

Ultrasound- versus landmark-guided subclavian vein catheterization: a prospective observational study from a tertiary referral hospital

This was a single-center, observational, prospective study designed to compare the effectiveness of a real-time, ultrasound- with landmark-guided technique for subclavian vein cannulation. Two groups of 74 consecutive patients each underwent subclavian vein catheterization. One group included patients from intensive care unit, studied by using an ultrasound-guided technique. The other group included patients from surgery or emergency units, studied by using a landmark technique. The primary outcome for comparison between techniques was the success rate of catheterization. Secondary outcomes were the number of attempts, cannulation failure, and mechanical complications. Although there was no difference in total success rate between ultrasound-guided and landmark groups (71 vs. 68, p = 0.464), the ultrasound-guided technique was more frequently successful at first attempt (64 vs. 30, p < 0.001) and required less attempts (1 to 2 vs. 1 to 6, p < 0.001) than landmark technique. Moreover, the ultrasound-guided technique was associated with less complications (2 vs. 13, p < 0.001), interruptions of mechanical ventilation (1 vs. 57, p < 0.001), and post-procedure chest X-ray (43 vs. 62, p = 0.001). In comparison with landmark-guided technique, the use of an ultrasound-guided technique for subclavian catheterization offers advantages in terms of reduced number of attempts and complications.

An Uncommon Cause of Contralateral Brachial Plexus Injury Following Jugular Venous Cannulation

Patient: Female, 71

Final Diagnosis: Brachial plexus injury

Symptoms: Arm pain

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Syptoms released

Specialty: Urology

Brachial Plexus Injury Associated With Subclavian Vein Cannulation: A Case Report

We documented brachial plexus injury by electromyography and magnetic resonance imaging secondary to needle sticks for central line insertion. This type of complication is rare in the literature, as few case reports exist. Brachial plexus injury can happen because of anatomic variations. Nevertheless, multiple attempts or introducer needle rotations should be avoided during subclavian vein catheterization. Pain that emerges in the ipsilateral arm after subclavian catheter placement should be taken into serious consideration. It is important to identify the cause of pain as soon as possible so that the correct treatment can be efficiently provided. Use of an ultrasound-guided catheterization may be a better choice for preventing complications.