Building Comprehensive Strategies for Obstetric Safety

The importance of simulation-based multi professional training in obstetric anesthesia: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Simulation-based training remains an integral component of medical education by providing a well tolerated, controlled, and replicable environment for healthcare professionals to enhance their skills and improve patient outcomes. Simulation technology applied to obstetric anesthesiology continues to evolve as a valuable tool for the training and assessment of the multidisciplinary obstetric care team.

RECENT FINDINGS

Simulation-based technology has continued to play a role in training and assessment, including recent work on interdisciplinary communication, recognition, and management of obstetric hemorrhage, and support in the low or strained resource setting. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the evolution of simulation-based training away from a reliance on in-situ or high-fidelity manikin-based approaches toward an increasing utilization of modalities that allow for remote or asynchronous training.

SUMMARY

The evolution of simulation for interdisciplinary training and assessment in obstetric anesthesia has accelerated, playing a greater role in aspects of communication, management of hemorrhage and supporting low or strained resource settings. Augmented reality, virtual reality and mixed reality have advanced dramatically, spurred on by the need for remote and asynchronous simulation-based training during the pandemic.

Simulation for diversity, equity and inclusion in emergency medicine residency training: A qualitative study

Background

The last few years have seen an increased focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives across organizations. Simulation has been used in varying degrees for teaching about DEI topics with emergency medicine; however, there are no established best practices or guidelines on this subject. To further examine the use of simulation for DEI teachings, the DEISIM work group was created as a collaboration between the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Simulation Academy and the Academy for Diversity and Inclusion in Emergency Medicine (ADIEM). This study represents their findings.

Method

This qualitative study was conducted using a three-pronged approach. Initial literature search was conducted followed by a call for submission of simulation curricula. These were then followed by five focus groups. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed by a professional transcription service, and then subjected to thematic analysis.

Results

Data were analyzed and organized into four broad categories including Learners, Facilitators, Organizational/Leadership, and Technical Issues. Challenges within each of these were identified, as were potential solutions. Select pertinent findings included focused faculty development, a carefully planned approach that utilized DEI content experts and the use of simulation for workplace microaggressions or discriminations.

Conclusions

There appears to be a clear role for simulation in DEI teachings. Such curricula, however, should be undertaken with careful planning and input from appropriate and representative parties. More research is needed on optimizing and standardizing simulation-based DEI curricula.

Consensus Statement No. 434: Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive and current overview of the evidence for the value of simulation for education, team training, patient safety, and quality improvement in obstetrics and gynaecology, to familiarize readers with principles to consider in developing a simulation program, and to provide tools and references for simulation advocates.

TARGET POPULATION

Providers working to improve health care for Canadian women and their families; patients and their families.

OUTCOMES

Simulation has been validated in the literature as contributing to positive outcomes in achieving learning objectives, maintaining individual and team competence, and enhancing patient safety. Simulation is a well-developed modality with established principles to maximize its utility and create a safe environment for simulation participants. Simulation is most effective when it involves interprofessional collaboration, institutional support, and regular repetition.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

This modality improves teamwork skills, patient outcomes, and health care spending. Upholding prescribed principles of psychological safety when implementing a simulation program minimizes harm to participants. However, simulation can be an expensive tool requiring human resources, equipment, and time.

EVIDENCE

Articles published between 2003 and 2022 were retrieved through searches of Medline and PubMed using the keywords "simulation" and "simulator." The search was limited to articles published in English and French. The articles were reviewed for their quality, relevance, and value by the SOGC Simulation Working Group. Expert opinion from relevant seminal books was also considered.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

All health care professionals working to improve Canadian women's health, and relevant stakeholders, including granting agencies, physician/nursing/midwifery colleges, accreditation bodies, academic centres, hospitals, and training programs.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Updates on Simulation in Obstetrical Anesthesiology Through the COVID-19 Pandemic

Simulation has played a critical role in medicine for decades as a pedagogical and assessment tool. The labor and delivery unit provides an ideal setting for the use of simulation technology. Prior reviews of this topic have focused on simulation for individual and team training and assessment. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided an opportunity for educators and leaders in obstetric anesthesiology to rapidly train health care providers and develop new protocols for patient care with simulation. This review surveys new developments in simulation for obstetric anesthesiology with an emphasis on simulation use during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Staying alive-training with anaesthetists

An effective working relationship between obstetricians and anaesthetists is crucial for patient safety in maternity care. Anaesthetists' skills and scope of clinical practice complement those of obstetricians, particularly during obstetric emergencies. Anaesthetists also bring expertise in resuscitation, critical care, and a training programme that is underpinned by non-technical as well as technical skills. Through training together, obstetricians and anaesthetists can help plug one another's knowledge gaps, identify each other's blind spots, aid mutual decision-making, and share relevant national guidance between specialties. Training also aids the development of a shared mental model, which contributes to improved teamwork. To be effective, this training should involve the whole team, be conducted in-house, be used to tackle local as well as national priorities, and be repeated regularly.

Association of Simulation Training With Rates of Medical Malpractice Claims Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists

OBJECTIVE

To compare malpractice claim rates before and after participation in simulation training, which focused on team training during a high-acuity clinical case.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis comparing the claim rates before and after simulation training among 292 obstetrician-gynecologists, all of whom were insured by the same malpractice insurer, who attended one or more simulation training sessions from 2002 to 2019. The insurer provided malpractice claims data involving study physicians, along with durations of coverage, which we used to calculate claim rates, expressed as claims per 100 physician coverage years. We used three different time periods in our presimulation and postsimulation training claim rates comparisons: the entire study period, 2 years presimulation and postsimulation training, and 1 year presimulation and postsimulation training. Secondary outcomes included indemnity payment amounts, percent of claims paid, and injury severity.

RESULTS

Compared with presimulation training, malpractice claim rates were significantly lower postsimulation training for the full study period (11.2 vs 5.7 claims per 100 physician coverage years; P<.001) and the 2 years presimulation and postsimulation training (9.2 vs 5.4 claims per 100 physician coverage years; P=.043). For the 1 year presimulation and postsimulation training comparison, the decrease in claim rates was nonsignificant (8.8 vs 5.3 claims per 100 physician coverage years; P=.162). Attending more than one simulation session was associated with a greater reduction in claim rates. Postsimulation claim rates for physicians who attended one, two, or three or more simulation sessions were 6.3, 2.1, and 1.3 claims per 100 physician coverage years, respectively (P<.001). Compared with presimulation training, there was no significant difference in the median or mean indemnity paid, percent of claims on which an indemnity payment was made, or median severity of injury after simulation training.

CONCLUSION

We observed a significant reduction in malpractice claim rates after simulation training. Wider use of simulation training within obstetrics and gynecology should be considered.

Single-center task analysis and user-centered assessment of physical space impacts on emergency Cesarean delivery

Cesarean delivery is the most common surgery performed in the United States, accounting for approximately 32% of all births. Emergency Cesarean deliveries are performed in the event of critical maternal or fetal distress and require effective collaboration and coordination of care by a multidisciplinary team with a high level of technical expertise. It is not well understood how the physical environment of the operating room (OR) impacts performance and how specialties work together in the space.

Cognitive Aids in Obstetric Units: Design, Implementation, and Use

Obstetrics has unique considerations for high stakes and dynamic clinical care of ≥2 patients. Obstetric crisis situations require efficient and coordinated responses from the entire multidisciplinary team. Actions that teams perform, or omit, can strongly impact peripartum and perinatal outcomes. Cognitive aids are tools that aim to improve patient safety, efficiency in health care management, and patient outcomes. However, they are intended to be combined with clinician judgment and training, not as absolute or exhaustive standards of care for patient management. There is simulation-based evidence showing efficacy of cognitive aids for enhancing appropriate team management during crises, especially with a reader role, with growing literature supporting use in obstetric and nonobstetric clinical settings when combined with local customization and implementation efforts. The purpose of this article is to summarize current understanding and available resources for cognitive aid design, implementation, and use in obstetrics and to highlight existing gaps that can stimulate further enhancement in this field.

Understanding the Heterogeneity of Labor and Delivery Units: Using Design Thinking Methodology to Assess Environmental Factors that Contribute to Safety in Childbirth

OBJECTIVE

There is limited research exploring the relationship between design and patient safety outcomes, especially in maternal and neonatal care. We employed design thinking methodology to understand how the design of labor and delivery units impacts safety and identified spaces and systems where improvements are needed.

STUDY DESIGN

Site visits were conducted at 10 labor and delivery units in California. A multidisciplinary team collected data through observations, measurements, and clinician interviews. In parallel, research was conducted regarding current standards and codes for building new hospitals.

RESULTS

Designs of labor and delivery units are heterogeneous, lacking in consistency regarding environmental factors that may impact safety and outcomes. Building codes do not take into consideration workflow, human factors, and patient and clinician experience. Attitude of hospital staff may contribute to improving safety through design. Three areas in need of improvement and actionable through design emerged: (1) blood availability for hemorrhage management, (2) appropriate space for neonatal resuscitation, and (3) restocking and organization methods of equipment and supplies.

CONCLUSION

Design thinking could be implemented at various stages of health care facility building projects and during retrofits of existing units. Through this approach, we may be able to improve hospital systems and environmental factors.

Randomized Controlled Simulation Trial to Compare Transfer Procedures for Emergency Cesarean

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that capping intravenous and epidural lines would reduce time to transfer women in labor to the operating room and time to readiness for general anesthesia for emergency cesarean. The secondary purpose was to identify latent threats to patient safety.

DESIGN

Mixed methods analysis of a randomized, controlled, in situ simulation trial.

SETTING

Labor and delivery unit at high-risk referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen interprofessional teams that included labor and delivery nurses and anesthesiology residents.

METHODS

Immediately before simulation, we randomized bedside nurses and anesthesiology residents to one of two groups: usual transfer or the cap and run procedure. Simulation scenarios started with fetal heart rate decelerations that necessitated position changes followed by emergency cesarean. An embedded simulated obstetrician announced the decision for cesarean; completion of an OR checklist confirmed team readiness to induce general anesthesia. Postsimulation debriefing was focused on teamwork and opportunities to improve safety, and we used qualitative analysis to synthesize results.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant difference in the overall time from decision for cesarean to readiness for general anesthesia between the two groups (usual transfer median = 445 seconds [interquartile range, 425-465] vs. cap and run 390 seconds [interquartile range, 383-443], p = .12). The time in the operating room was less in the cap and run group than in the usual transfer group (median = 300 seconds vs. 250 seconds, p = .038). Qualitative analysis of the debriefing data indicated advantages of the capping procedure, including better bed maneuverability and fewer tangled lines.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of decreased overall time from decision for cesarean to readiness for general anesthesia based on whether the nurse capped the intravenous and epidural lines or pushed the intravenous pole alongside the bed. However, nurses perceived improved patient safety with the cap and run procedure.

Recent advances of simulation in obstetric anesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Simulation training in obstetric anesthesia has become widespread in recent years. Simulations are used to train staff and trainees, assess and improve team performance, and evaluate the work environment. This review summarizes current research in these categories.

RECENT FINDINGS

Simulation to improve individual technical skills has focused on induction of general anesthesia for emergent cesarean delivery, an infrequently encountered scenario by anesthesia trainees. Low- and high-fidelity simulation devices for the learning and practicing neuraxial and non-neuraxial procedures have been described, and both are equally effective. The use of checklists in obstetric emergencies has become common as and post-scenario debriefing techniques have improved. Although participant task performance improves, whether participants retain learned skills or whether simulation improves patient outcomes has not yet been established. Tools to assess teamwork during simulation have been developed, but none have been rigorously validated. In-situ vs. offsite simulations do not differ in effectiveness.

SUMMARY

Simulation allows for practice of tasks and teamwork in a controlled manner. There is little data whether simulation improves patient outcomes and metrics to predict the long-term retention of skills by simulation participants have not been developed.

Safety interventions on the labor and delivery unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review highlights recent advances in efforts to improve patient safety on labor and delivery units and well tolerated care for pregnant patients in general.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies in obstetric patient safety have a broad focus but repetitive themes for interdisciplinary training include: simulating critical events, having open multidisciplinary communication, frequent reviews of cases of maternal morbidity, and implementing maternal early warning systems. The National Partnership for Maternal Safety is also active in promoting care bundles across many topics on maternal safety.

SUMMARY

A culture of safety is the goal for all obstetric units. Achieving that ideal requires multidisciplinary collaboration, frequent reassessment for areas of improvement, and a culture of openness to change when improvement opportunities arise.