SCAI/CCAS/SPA Expert Consensus Statement for Anesthesia and Sedation Practice

Usefulness of deep sedation with intravenous dexmedetomidine and midazolam in cardiac catheterization procedures for pediatric patients

Background

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective alpha 2 receptor agonist that has the advantage of causing less respiratory depression than other sedative agents. We evaluated the add-on effects of DEX on sedation among pediatric patients who received midazolam and pentazocine during cardiac catheterization.

Methods

120 cardiac catheterization procedures in 110 patients under deep sedation at Department of Pediatrics, Kanazawa University Hospital from January 2013 to August 2018: 63 procedures without DEX (i.e., non-DEX group) and 57 procedures with DEX (i.e., DEX group). Intravenous midazolam and pentazocine were used in both groups, and DEX without an initial loading dose (0.6 μg/kg/h) was used in the DEX group. We retrospectively investigated complications during catheterization, doses of sedative agents, and changes in vital signs.

Results

Hypoxemia requiring oxygen administration during catheterization tended to be higher in the non-DEX group than in the DEX group (4.8% vs. 0%). Additional dose of midazolam was significantly lower in the DEX group (median [IQR]: 0.05 mg/kg [0-0.11]) than in the non-DEX group [0.09 mg/kg (0-0.23), p = 0.0288]. The additional dose of midazolam in the non-DEX group with hypoxemia was significantly higher than the dose used in the non-DEX group without hypoxemia. No case of bradycardia below the criteria for bradycardia occurred and no serious complications occurred in the DEX group.

Conclusion

The use of intravenous DEX in combination with midazolam and pentazocine in pediatric cardiac catheterization may reduce the need for an additional dose of midazolam and may contribute to the prevention of airway complications associated with respiratory depression caused by sedative agents.

Reducing Adverse Events Associated with Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization: A Quality Improvement Project Focusing on Decreasing Catheterization-Associated Blood Transfusions

The objective of this study is to describe interventions and outcomes of a quality improvement (QI) project to reduce red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) within 72 h of pediatric cardiac catheterization. Using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology, we applied interventions including (1). Intraprocedural-to reduce hemodilution, blood loss, and excessive anticoagulation, (2). Standardization of institutional transfusion criteria, and (3). "Hard stop" requiring QI team consultation prior to elective post-catheterization RBCT. Primary outcome measures were frequency of RBCT from IMPACT quarterly reports and cases between transfusions (CBT). Length of stay (LOS) was the primary countermeasure. Characteristics of patients who did and did not receive RBCT were compared. 698 pediatric cardiac catheterizations occurred between 4/2017 and 8/2023. Intraprocedural interventions did not alter frequency of RBCT or CBT. Standardized transfusion guidelines followed by the "hard stop" decreased RBCT frequency from 10 to 1.9% and increased CBT without increasing LOS. Patients requiring RBCT were younger (medians 0.31 vs 2.4 years), smaller (5.2 vs 11.8 kg), and had longer procedures (2.24 vs 1.57 h) all p < 0.001. Single ventricle patients were more likely to have RBCT than simple biventricular patients (14.1% vs 3.1%; RR = 4.57, 95% CI 2.29-10.4; p < 0.001). Procedure type (diagnostic vs. intervention) and starting hemoglobin concentration were comparable between groups. Programmatic adherence to standardized peri-procedural transfusion guidelines successfully decreased RBCT without compromising patient care or increasing LOS. Younger age, lower weight, procedure length, and single ventricle physiology were all associated with RBCT risk.

Recommendations for Centers Performing Pediatric Heart Surgery in the United States

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

Recommendations for Centers Performing Pediatric Heart Surgery in the United States

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

Selected 2022 Highlights in Congenital Cardiac Anesthesia

This article is a review of the highlights of pertinent literature of interest to the congenital cardiac anesthesiologist, and was published in 2022. After a search of the United States National Library of Medicine PubMed database, several topics emerged in which significant contributions were made in 2022. The authors of this manuscript considered the following topics noteworthy to be included in this review-intensive care unit admission after congenital cardiac catheterization interventions, antifibrinolytics in pediatric cardiac surgery, the current status of the pediatric cardiac anesthesia workforce in the United States, and kidney injury and renal protection during congenital heart surgery.

Adverse Events in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Suite: Does Having Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesiologists Make a Difference?

INTRODUCTION

It has been suggested that anesthesiologists with subspecialty expertise in pediatric cardiac anesthesia are best qualified to care for patients with complex congenital cardiac anomalies and manage the complex physiology frequently encountered in the pediatric cardiac catheterization lab. We evaluated the incidence of adverse events in our pediatric cardiac catheterization lab, comparing care provided by cardiac and noncardiac pediatric attending anesthesiologists.

METHODS

Data were collected on each anesthetic in the pediatric cardiac catheterization lab from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019. A generalized linear mixed effect model was used to identify associations between pediatric cardiac and noncardiac anesthesiologists and the presence of adverse events adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, emergency status, and interventional versus diagnostic procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 3,761 procedures involving 1,729 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference between noncardiac and cardiac anesthesia attendings for overall adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.75 P=0.349). Specific respiratory adverse events (OR, 1.22; 95%, CI 0.73 to 2.03 P=0.443) or cardiac adverse events (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.64 to 2.48 P=0.502) were also not significantly different with respect to noncardiac compared with cardiac attending anesthesiologists.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis, the incidence of adverse events in the pediatric cardiac catheterization lab during the study period was not statistically different, whether anesthesia care was provided by a cardiac or a noncardiac anesthesiologist.

Severe Complications after General Anesthesia versus Sedation during Pediatric Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization for Ventricular Septal Defect

Pediatric cardiac catheterization requires unconsciousness and immobilization through general anesthesia or sedation. This study aimed to compare the occurrence of severe complications in pediatric diagnostic cardiac catheterization for ventricular septal defect between general anesthesia and sedation performed under similar institutional environments. Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we retrospectively identified pediatric patients (aged <2 years) who underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization for ventricular septal defect between July 2010 and March 2019. The composite outcome was the occurrence of severe complications, including catecholamine use and intensive care unit admission, within seven days after catheterization. Overlap weighting based on propensity scores was used to adjust for patient- and hospital-level confounding factors. We identified 3159 patients from 87 hospitals, including 930 under general anesthesia and 2229 under sedation. The patient- and hospital-level baseline characteristics differed between the groups. After adjustment, the proportion of patients with severe complications was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group than in the sedation group (2.4% vs. 0.6%; risk difference, 1.8% [95% confidence interval, 0.93−2.6%]). Severe complications occurred more frequently in the general anesthesia group than in the sedation group. Further research on anesthetic methods is necessary to assess the safety and accuracy of pediatric diagnostic cardiac catheterization.

Anesthesia in Children With Pulmonary Hypertension: Clinically Significant Serious Adverse Events Associated With Cardiac Catheterization and Noncardiac Procedures

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of clinically significant serious adverse events in a contemporary population of pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension who require anesthesia and identify factors associated with adverse outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A single-center quaternary-care freestanding children's hospital in the northeastern United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension based on hemodynamic criteria on cardiac catheterization during a 3-year period from 2015 to 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Anesthesia care for cardiac catheterization, noncardiac surgery, and diagnostic imaging.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred forty-nine children underwent 862 procedures, 592 for cardiac catheterization and 278 for noncardiac surgery and diagnostic imaging. The median age was 1.6 years, and the weight was 9.5 lbs. On index catheterization, median pulmonary artery pressure was 36 mmHg, and the pulmonary vascular resistance was 5.1 indexed Wood units. Ten percent of anesthetics were performed with a natural airway, and 80% used volatile anesthetics. Serious adverse events occurred in 26% of procedures (confidence interval [CI], 22%-30%). The rate of periprocedural cardiac arrest was 8 per 1,000 anesthetic administrations. In multivariate analysis, younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.4 per year; CI, 1.1-1.9; p = 0.01), location in the catheterization laboratory (aOR, 5.1; CI, 1.7-16; p = 0.004), and longer procedure duration (aOR, 1.3 per 30 minutes; CI, 1.1-1.4; p = 0.001) were associated with serious adverse events. Patients with a tracheostomy in place were less likely to experience an adverse event (aOR, 0.1; CI, 0.04-0.5; p = 0.001). The primary anesthetic technique was not associated with adverse events. Interventional cardiac catheterization was associated with an increased incidence of adverse events compared with diagnostic catheterization (42% v 21%; OR, 2.23; CI, 1.5-3.3; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serious adverse events were common in this cohort. Careful planning to minimize anesthesia time in young children with pulmonary hypertension should be undertaken, and these factors considered in designing risk mitigation strategies.

An update on pediatric sedation techniques in nonoperating room locations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review advancements in care for pediatric patients in nonoperating room settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in patient monitoring technology, utilization of Child Life specialists, and alternative staffing models are helping anesthesia providers meet the rising demand for coverage of pediatric nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) cases. The Wake Up Safe and Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium registries are exploring outcome measures regarding the safety of pediatric anesthesia in off-site locations and have reported an increased risk for severe respiratory and cardiac adverse events when compared to OR anesthesia sites. Additionally, malpractice claims for NORA have a higher proportion of claims for death than claims in operating rooms.

SUMMARY

Pediatric NORA requires thorough preparation, flexibility, and vigilance to provide safe anesthesia care to children in remote locations. Emerging techniques to reduce anesthetic exposure, improve monitoring, and alternative staffing models are expanding the boundaries of pediatric NORA to provide a safer, more satisfying experience for diagnostic and interventional procedures.

Anaesthesia for minimally invasive cardiac procedures in the catheterization lab

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The share of cardiac procedures performed in settings involving nonoperating room anaesthesia (NORA) continues to grow rapidly, and the number of publications related to anaesthetic techniques in cardiac catheterization laboratories is substantial. We aim to summarize the most recent evidence about outcomes related to type of anaesthetic in minimally invasive cardiac procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The latest studies, primarily focused on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr), demonstrate the need for reliable monitoring and appropriate training of the interdisciplinary teams involved in this high-risk NORA setting.

SUMMARY

Inappropriate sedation and concurrent inadequate oxygenation are main risk factors for claims involving NORA care. Current evidence deriving from TAVR shows that monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) is associated with shorter length of stay and lower mortality.

Comparison of Outcomes of Pediatric Catheter Ablation by Anesthesia Strategy: A Report From the NCDR IMPACT Registry

[Figure: see text].

Pediatric Anesthesia Outside the Operating Room: Safety and Systems

Anesthesia care performed outside the operating room is a growing area of pediatric anesthesia practice. The anesthesiology team expects to care for children in diverse locations, which include diagnostic and interventional radiology, gastroenterology and pulmonary endoscopy suites, radiation oncology sites, and the cardiac catheterization laboratory. To provide safe, high-quality care the anesthesiologist working in these environments must understand the unique environmental, logistical, and perioperative considerations and risks involved with each remote location. This 2-part review provides an overview of safety and system considerations in pediatric nonoperating room anesthesia before describing in more detail considerations for particular remote anesthetizing locations.

Pediatric Anesthesia Outside the Operating Room: Case Management

Anesthesiology teams care for children in diverse locations, including diagnostic and interventional radiology, gastroenterology and pulmonary endoscopy suites, radiation oncology units, and cardiac catheterization laboratories. To provide safe, high-quality care, anesthesiologists working in these environments must understand the unique environmental and perioperative considerations and risks involved with each remote location and patient population. Once these variables are addressed, anesthesia and procedural teams can coordinate to ensure that patients and families receive the same high-quality care that they have come to expect in the operating room. This article also describes some of the considerations for anesthetic care in outfield locations.

Practice horizons in pediatric nonoperating room anesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anesthesia outside the operating room is rapidly expanding for adult and pediatric patients. Anesthesia clinicians practicing in this area need a good understanding of the challenges of the NORA environment and the anesthetic risks and perioperative implications of practice so that they can deliver safe care to their patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent reports from large patient databases have afforded anesthesiologists a greater understanding of the risk of NORA when compared to anesthesia in the operating room. Descriptions of advances in team training with the use of simulation have allowed the development of organized procedural teams. With an emphasis on clear communication, an understanding of individual roles, and a patient-centered focus, these teams can reliably develop emergency response procedures, so that critical moments are not delayed in an environment remote from usual assistance.

SUMMARY

With appropriate attention to organizational concerns (i.e. team environment, safety protocols) and unrelenting focus on patient safety, anesthesiologists can assist in safely providing the benefit of cutting-edge technical advancements to pediatric patients in these challenging environments.

The 2017 Seventh World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery: week in review: congenital cardiac anaesthesia

The seventh meeting of the World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery was an opportunity for healthcare professionals from around the world to meet and discuss current issues affecting patients with acquired and CHD. A dedicated anaesthesia track facilitated the exchange of ideas and fostered many new friendships. This review highlights the congenital cardiac anaesthesia track and the involvement of the Congenital Cardiac Anesthesia Society in the congress.

Congenital heart diseases and anaesthesia

Patients with congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are at increased risk of developing complications during anaesthesia. Improvements in medical and surgical management in recent decades have resulted in significantly more children with CHD surviving to adulthood. The aim of this article is to focus on broad classification of CHD and to provide an updated review on the current perioperative anaesthetic management of CHD patients in different settings such as (a) interventional cardiac procedures that have dominated the field, (b) uncorrected patients for non-cardiac surgery and (c) corrected patients for non-cardiac surgery. The complexity of the defects along with a variety of non-cardiac surgery makes it impossible to have one single-anaesthesia technique. Search on Ovid, PubMed, Google Scholar and Medline were done with MeSH terms such as 'congenital heart disease', 'cardiac catheterisation', 'anaesthetic management' and 'non-cardiac surgery' mainly focusing on review articles and controlled studies for preparing the article.