Speckle Tracking Strain of the Right Ventricle

New developments in the understanding of right ventricular function in acute care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Right ventricular dysfunction has an important impact on the perioperative course of cardiac surgery patients. Recent advances in the detection and monitoring of perioperative right ventricular dysfunction will be reviewed here.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of right ventricular dysfunction in cardiac surgery has been associated with unfavorable outcomes. New evidence supports the use of a pulmonary artery catheter in cardiogenic shock. The possibility to directly measure right ventricular pressure by transducing the pacing port has expanded its use to track changes in right ventricular function and to detect right ventricular outflow tract obstruction. The potential role of myocardial deformation imaging has been raised to detect patients at risk of postoperative complications.

SUMMARY

Perioperative right ventricular function monitoring is based on echocardiographic and extra-cardiac flow evaluation. In addition to imaging modalities, hemodynamic evaluation using various types of pulmonary artery catheters can be achieved to track changes rapidly and quantitatively in right ventricular function perioperatively. These monitoring techniques can be applied during and after surgery to increase the detection rate of right ventricular dysfunction. All this to improve the treatment of patients presenting early signs of right ventricular dysfunction before systemic organ dysfunction ensue.

Tissue Doppler, speckling tracking and four-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in children with dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) function is frequently overlooked during dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) evaluation.

AIM

To evaluate RV function in children with idiopathic DCM using relatively recent echocardiographic modalities.

METHODS

We prospectively studied the cardiac function in 50 children with idiopathic DCM and 50 healthy children as a control group, using four-dimensional echocardiography (4-DE), Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI), and two-dimensional-speckles tracking echocardiography (2-D-STE). RV EF was measured by 4-DE.

RESULTS

The auto left (LV) ejection fractions (EF) measured by 2-D-STE were significantly lower in the patients' group than in the control. The sphericity index was also significantly lower in children with DCM than in the control. RV EF measured by 4-DE was significantly lower in the patient's group than the control. RV S wave, e´/a' ratio, myocardial performance index (MPI), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) were significantly impaired in children with DCM than in control. Both LV and RV global longitudinal strains (GLS) were significantly reduced in children with DCM than in control. RVGLS was significantly associated with the duration since diagnosis, tricuspid annulus S wave, RV MPI, and TAPSE, but not with the age of the patients, RV EF, or e´/a' ratio.

CONCLUSION

There was impairment of the RV LGS and other systolic and diastolic parameters in children with DCM. STE and TDI can help to detect the early decline of RV function.

Assessing Right Ventricular Function in the Perioperative Setting, Part I: Echo-Based Measurements

This article reviews transesophageal echocardiography-based assessment of perioperative right ventricular function and failure, including catheter-based methods, three-dimensional echocardiography, and their combination to make pressure-volume loops. It outlines right ventricular pathophysiology, multiple assessment methods, and their relationship to analogous transthoracic echocardiogram measurements. technologies used and developed for transthoracic or left ventricular assessment show significant limitations when applied to transesophageal assessment of the right ventricle. The article provides an overview of right ventricular assessment modalities that can be used in transesophageal echocardiography. Ultimately, clinicians must know limitations of measurements, synthesize information, and assess it in the clinical context.

A Comparison of Left- and Right-Sided Strain Software for the Assessment of Intraoperative Right Ventricular Function

OBJECTIVE

To compare intraoperative right ventricular (RV) strain measurements made with left ventricular (LV) strain software commonly found on the echocardiography machine (Philips QLAB chamber motion quantification, version 10.7, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), with offline analysis using the dedicated RV strain software (EchoInsight, version 2.2.6.2230, Epsilon Imaging, Ann Arbor, MI).

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, observational study.

SETTING

Single tertiary level, university-affiliated hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 48 patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography for cardiac or noncardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Two-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) images of the right ventricle were obtained. Intraoperative 2D images were analyzed in real time for RV free wall strain (FWS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) using QLAB chamber motion quantification (CMQ) LV strain software on the echocardiography machine. Two dimensional images were then analyzed offline to determine the RV FWS and GLS using EchoInsight RV-specific strain software. Three-dimensional images were then analyzed offline to detemine the 3D RV ejection fraction (3D RV EF) using TomTec 4D RV function (Unterschleissheim, Germany). Spearman's correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to characterize the relationship between RV strain measurements. Both types of strain measurements were compared to a reference standard of 3D RV EF.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Intraoperative RV strain measurements using LV-specific strain software correlated with offline RV strain measurements using the RV-specific strain software (FWS rho = 0.85; GLS rho = 0.81). The bias and limits of agreement were 0.75% (- 6.66 to 8.17) for FWS and -4.53% (-11.55 to 2.50) for GLS. The sensitivity and specificity for RV dysfunction for the intraoperative LV-specific software were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73-100) and 70% (95% CI 51-85), respectively, for RV FWS and 94% (95% CI 73-100) and 67% (95% CI 47-83), respectively, for RV GLS. The sensitivity and specificity for RV dysfunction for the offline RV-specific software were 89% (95% CI 65-99) and 73% (95% CI 54-88), respectively, for RV FWS and 94% (95% CI 73-100) and 30% (95% CI 15-49), respectively, for RV GLS.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative RV strain measurements using LV-specific strain software commonly available on the echocardiography machine (QLAB CMQ) correlate with offline RV strain measurements using RV-specific strain software (EchoInsight). The bias and limits of agreement for these left- and right-sided strain software suggest that these 2 measures of RV function cannot be used interchangeably. Both, however, were sensitive measures of RV dysfunction and therefore are likely clinically relevant.