Proceedings From the Society for Advancement of Blood Management Annual Meeting 2017: Management Dilemmas of the Surgical Patient-When Blood Is Not an Option

Clinical Outcomes, Blood Utilization, and Ethical Considerations for Pediatric Patients in a Bloodless Medicine and Surgery Program

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients requesting bloodless care represent a challenging clinical situation, as parents cannot legally refuse lifesaving or optimal interventions for their children. Here, we report clinical outcomes for the largest series of pediatric inpatients requesting bloodless care and also discuss the ethical considerations.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective cohort study assessing 196 pediatric inpatients (<18 years of age) who requested bloodless care between June 2012 and June 2016. Patient characteristics, transfusion rates, and clinical outcomes were compared between pediatric patients receiving bloodless care and those receiving standard care (including transfusions if considered necessary by the clinical team) (n = 37,271). Families were informed that all available measures would be undertaken to avoid blood transfusions, although we were legally obligated to transfuse blood if the child's life was threatened. The primary outcome was composite morbidity or mortality. Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients transfused, individual morbid events, length of stay, total hospital charges, and total costs. Subgroup analyses were performed after stratification into medical and surgical patients.

RESULTS

Of the 196 pediatric patients that requested bloodless care, 6.1% (n = 12) received an allogeneic blood component, compared to 9.1% (n = 3392) for standard care patients ( P = .14). The most common indications for transfusion were perioperative bleeding and anemia of prematurity. None of the transfusions were administered under a court order. Overall, pediatric patients receiving bloodless care exhibited lower rates of composite morbidity compared to patients receiving standard care (2.6% vs 6.2%; P = .035). There were no deaths in the bloodless cohort. Individual morbid events, length of stay, and total hospital charges/costs were not significantly different between the 2 groups. After multivariable analysis, bloodless care was not associated with a significant difference in composite morbidity or mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-1.11; P = .077).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric patients receiving bloodless care exhibited similar clinical outcomes compared to patients receiving standard care, although larger studies with adequate power are needed to confirm this finding. There were no mortalities among the pediatric bloodless cohort. Although a subset of our pediatric bloodless patients received an allogeneic transfusion, no patients required a court order. When delivered in a collaborative and patient-centered manner, blood transfusions can be safely limited among pediatric patients.

Bloodless surgery in urologic oncology: A review of hematologic, anesthetic, and surgical considerations

The urologic oncology patient who refuses blood transfusion can present unique challenges in perioperative blood management. Since blood loss and associated transfusion can be expected in many complex urologic oncology surgeries, a multidisciplinary approach may be required for optimal outcomes. Through collaboration with the hematologist, anesthesiologist, and urologist, various techniques can be employed in the perioperative phases to minimize blood loss and the need for transfusion. We review the risks and benefits of these techniques and offer recommendations specific to the urologic oncology patient.

Hemodilution on microvascular oxygen delivery potential of the blood during coronary bypass surgery

PURPOSE

The hematocrit-to-whole blood viscosity ratio (Hct/WBV) reflects the blood O₂ delivery potential (O₂-DP). WBV is variable to the dynamic vascular shear rate (SR), 1-5/s at microcirculation and 300/s at larger vessels. To estimate the impact of hemodilution on the blood O₂-DP to the myocardium, we analyzed the hemodilution-induced change of Hct/WBV at SR 5/s (Hct/WBV₅) during off-pump coronary bypass (OPCAB) surgery.

METHODS

During OPCAB surgery (n = 21), 10% acute normovolemic hemodilution (HD 10%) was applied. Arterial blood samples were taken: one before and two after HD 10%. One of which after HD 10% underwent an additional 33% in vitro hemodilution (reaching 40% hemodilution in total, HD 40%). WBV of all blood samples was determined using a scan-capillary tube viscometer (Hemovister^™). The changes of Hct/WBV₅ were analyzed as a primary measure of the study and compared with those of Hct/WBV at SR 300/s (Hct/WBV₃₀₀).

RESULTS

Median[IQR] of Hct/WBV₅ [3.5 (2.8-4.2)%/cPoise] was significantly increased by HD 10 and HD 40% [3.6 (3.2-4.6)%/cPoise and 4.2 (3.3-5.2)%/cPoise, respectively, all P < 0.001], but the degrees of changes after HD 10 and HD 40% were not different. Median[IQR] of Hct/WBV₃₀₀ [10.3(8.6‒10.8)%/cPoise] was not changed by HD 10% [10.3(9.1-11.1)%/cPoise], but it was significantly decreased by HD 40% [8.4(7.4‒9.2)%/cPoise, P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

The increased Hct/WBV₅ suggests that 10-40% hemodilution improves the blood O₂-DP to the myocardium during OPCAB surgery. The SR-specific discrepancy in Hct/WBV changes advocates using microvascular WBV and Hct/WBV to evaluate the blood O₂-DP changes to the myocardium. Further study is warranted to assess the actual changes in myocardial O₂ delivery.

Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy in a Jehovah's Witness patient: strategies for minimizing blood loss and maximizing safety

BACKGROUND

The Watch Tower Society, the main governing organization of the Jehovah's Witness (JW) faith, introduced the doctrine to refuse blood in 1945 and has been enforcing it since 1961. A member can be expelled for accepting prohibited blood components. Many reconstructive surgeries place patients at an increased risk for blood loss. There have been attempts at reducing the rate of transfusions in craniofacial surgery, even in patients not opposed to it.

PRESENTATION

A 15-year-old female patient, who refused blood transfusion due to her faith, presented with a class III malocclusion, transverse maxillary constriction, and a lateral open bite. Surgery was deferred until the patient reached 18 years of age and had undergone preoperative orthodontics. A two-piece Le Fort I osteotomy was performed. Erythropoietin, oral iron, and tranexamic acid were used to minimize intraoperative blood loss.

CONCLUSION

Here we discuss preoperative and intraoperative management strategies to ensure a transfusion-free environment for patients with religious objections to blood transfusions undergoing operations with increased bleeding risk.

Blood transfusion and alternatives in Jehovah's Witness patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

More than 8.5 million people in the world observe the Jehovah's Witness faith, and require unique consideration for perioperative blood management as they generally refuse transfusion of blood and blood products. This review addresses a collaborative approach to each patient throughout the perioperative arena. The principles of this approach include optimization of hemoglobin levels preoperatively, attention to blood-salvaging methods intraoperatively, and minimization of blood draws postoperatively. In addition, we review the technologies currently in development as transfusion alternatives, including hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Progress has been made recently in the field of synthetic blood alternatives and hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers, which may lead to improved outcomes in this patient population.

SUMMARY

Utilization of multiple prevention and mitigation strategies to optimize oxygen supply and decrease oxygen demand will lead to decreased incidence of critical anemia and subsequent improved mortality in Jehovah's Witness patients.