A new hypertonic saline assay for analgesic screening in mice: effects of animal strain, sex, and diurnal phase.
Can J Anaesth 2021;
68:672-682. [PMID:
33598887 DOI:
10.1007/s12630-021-01923-5]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE
There exists a pressing need for the identification of novel analgesics. We recently reported on a new preclinical assay for rapid analgesic screening based on intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of 10% hypertonic saline (HS) in female outbred (CD-1) mice. Herein, we characterized the HS assay's performance in inbred (C57BL/6) mice, sensitivity to sex differences, and effects of diurnal rhythm phase.
METHODS
In randomized, controlled, blinded in vivo animal experiments, we studied nociceptive responses induced by i.pl. HS in C57BL/6 (vs CD-1) mice of both sexes (n = 240) and determined diurnal rhythm phase effects in female animals. We established the HS assay's sensitivity to morphine by constructing dose-response curves and calculating half-maximal inhibitory doses (ID50s).
RESULTS
The injection of i.pl. HS produced nociceptive (licking and biting) responses in all C57BL/6 mice tested. In both C57BL/6 and CD-1 mice, the mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) response magnitudes were greater in females vs males (C57BL/6: 87 sec [64 to 110] vs 45 sec [29 to 61]; difference in means, 42 sec; 95% CI, 17 to 68; P < 0.001; n = 10/group; CD-1: 110 sec [95 to 126] vs 53 sec [32 to 74]; difference in means, 57 sec; 95% CI, 34 to 79; P < 0.001; n = 10/group). The mean (95% CI) nociceptive responses were greater at 24:00 hr than at 12:00 hr in C57BL/6 mice (64 sec [40 to 88] vs 37 sec [24 to 51]; difference in means, 27 sec; 95% CI, 7 to 47; P = 0.007; n = 10/group), but not in CD-1 mice (P = 0.97). Intravenous morphine dose-dependently attenuated nociceptive responses of both C57BL/6 and CD-1 mice (ID50, 0.6 and 2.5 mg·kg-1, respectively; P = 0.41).
CONCLUSION
These findings in inbred and outbred mice solidify the utility of the HS assay as an effective, rapid, robust, and versatile preclinical tool for analgesic screening.
Collapse