Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Does Not Improve Early Glomerular Filtration Rate in a Porcine Renal Transplantation Model

Loss of Endothelial Glycocalyx During Normothermic Machine Perfusion of Porcine Kidneys Irrespective of Pressure and Hematocrit

Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is a promising modality for marginal donor kidneys. However, little is known about the effects of NMP on causing endothelial glycocalyx (eGC) injury. This study aims to evaluate the effects of NMP on eGC injury in marginal donor kidneys and whether this is affected by perfusion pressures and hematocrits.

Methods

Porcine slaughterhouse kidneys (n = 6/group) underwent 35 min of warm ischemia. Thereafter, the kidneys were preserved with oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion for 3 h. Subsequently, 4 h of NMP was applied using pressure-controlled perfusion with an autologous blood-based solution containing either 12%, 24%, or 36% hematocrit. Pressures of 55, 75, and 95 mm Hg were applied in the 24% group. Perfusate, urine, and biopsy samples were collected to determine both injury and functional parameters.

Results

During NMP, hyaluronan levels in the perfusate increased significantly (P < 0.0001). In addition, the positivity of glyco-stained glycocalyx decreased significantly over time, both in the glomeruli (P = 0.024) and peritubular capillaries (P = 0.003). The number of endothelial cells did not change during NMP (P = 0.157), whereas glomerular endothelial expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 decreased significantly (P < 0.001). Microthrombi formation was significantly increased after NMP. The use of different pressures and hematocrits did not affect functional parameters during perfusion.

Conclusions

NMP is accompanied with eGC and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 loss, without significant loss of endothelial cells. eGC loss was not affected by the different pressures and hematocrits used. It remains unclear whether endothelial injury during NMP has harmful consequences for the transplanted kidney.

Anaesthetic Approach to Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Kidney Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are designed to reduce medical complications, the length of hospital stays (LoS), and healthcare costs. ERAS is considered safe and effective for kidney transplant (KTx) surgery. KTx recipients are often frail with multiple comorbidities. As these patients follow an extensive diagnostic pathway preoperatively, the ERAS protocol can ideally be implemented at this stage. Small singular changes in a long perioperative pathway can result in significant positive outcomes. We have investigated the current evidence for an ERAS pathway related to anaesthetic considerations in renal transplant surgery for adult recipients.

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Does Not Impact Renal Outcomes in an Enhanced Recovery Program

BACKGROUND

Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been proposed as a cornerstone for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs, particularly among high-risk patients undergoing high-risk surgery. However, due to the increased advocacy of euvolemia before surgery, the utility of GDFT in the context of ERAS is being questioned. Our primary objective was to determine whether GDFT has any impact on daily postoperative renal outcomes among high-risk patients undergoing thoracic surgery in an ERAS program.

METHODS

All patients included in this study were high-risk with a baseline GFR below 90 mL/min/1.73m² and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists status III/IV. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the intraoperative use of GDFT. Both groups were matched in a 1:1 fashion using propensity scores. Our renal outcomes included changes in daily glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) from post-anesthesia care unit through postoperative day 5.

RESULTS

In total 451 matched pairs were included in this analysis. Both groups had similar demographics and clinical characteristics. Patients treated with GDFT received more ephedrine (5mg [0-15] vs 0mg [0-15], P=0.03) and less volume of fluids (1163±484mL vs 1246±626mL, P=0.03) compared to those in the standard group. The incidence of AKI was similar in both groups (5.1% in the GDFT group vs 7.1% in non-GDFT group, P=0.57). Mixed effect analysis showed no significant differences in the trajectory of postoperative GFRs between both groups (P=0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

GDFT does not impact postoperative renal function compared to standard of care among high-risk patients in an ERAS program for thoracic pulmonary surgery.

Analysis on the application value of goal-directed fluid therapy in patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy with fast-track anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To explore the application value of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy with fast-track anesthesia.

METHODS

From December 2016 to December 2019, 74 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy under the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gastrointestinal Surgery department of Tongling People's Hospital were selected as research participants. They were divided into two groups: the routine group (patients were treated with conventional fluids) (n=37) and the GDFT group (patients were treated with GDFT) (n=37). In the two groups, patients were compared in terms of intraoperative fluid inflow and outflow, hemodynamic indexes before operation for 30 min (T0), after anesthesia induction for 30 min (T1), during operation for 0.5 h (T2) and 1.5 h (T3) and after operation (T4), postoperative complications, postoperative recovery, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores on the first day (d0) before operation and the first day (d1), the third day (d2) and the seventh day (d3) after operation, and inflammatory factor levels.

RESULTS

The amount of crystal input, colloid, blood loss, fluid replacement and urine volume in the GDFT group were significantly less than those in the routine group (P < 0.05). From T1 to T4, the values of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP) in the GDFT group were higher than those in the routine group (p < 0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the GDFT group was lower than that in the routine group (P < 0.05). Compared with those in the routine group, the postoperative anus exhaust time, the first time of starting to eat, the time of leaving bed, the duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit and the hospital stay were significantly shorter in the GDFT group (P < 0.05). From D1 to D3, the MMSE score in the GDFT group was higher than that in the routine group, while the levels of C-reactive protein (CPR), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and procalcitonin (PCT) were lower than those in the routine group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

GDFT has a better effect on the rapid rehabilitation of patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy during fast-track anesthesia, and it also has a positive effect on maintaining the stability of hemodynamics, reducing systemic inflammation and decreasing postoperative complications.

To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study

Background:

Optimal intra-operative fluid therapy in renal transplantation (RT) is essential to ensure adequate graft function while preventing fluid overload related complications. This RCT was to compare the intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based either on corrected flow time (CFT), measured by trans oesophageal Doppler (TED) or on the stroke volume variation (SVV), by FloTrac in patients undergoing living donor RT.

Methods:

This prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was done on 60 end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA) grade III–IV, age 18 to 65 years of either sex, scheduled for living donor RT under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups: TED group (n = 30) and FloTrac™ group (n = 30) and administered GDFT, based upon CFT (TED) and SVV (FloTrac™). The primary outcome was to compare the total fluid and number of fluid boluses administered intraoperatively, while the secondary outcomes were to compare any postoperative complications due to fluid overload and allograft function, assessed by serial serum creatinine levels up to 90 days postoperatively.

Results:

The mean total intra-operative fluid [3991.67 ± 856.32 vs. 3543.33 ± 1131.35, P = 0.089] and the amount of fluid administered per kg body weight per hour [13.32 ± 4.67 vs. 11.82 ± 4.76, P = 0.222] were lesser in the FloTrac compared to TED group, though not statistically significant. However, the postoperative incidence of allograft dysfunction, including rejection (P = 0.743) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (P = 0.999), and other complications (P = 0.643) were comparable.

Conclusions:

Both TED and FloTrac devices can be used effectively to guide GDFT in RT, However, lesser total fluid was required in the FloTrac group, which may lead to a lesser number of fluid-related postoperative complications.